[10:47] <layn> hi
[12:00] <nobuto> Hi, I want to get Bug #664514 SRUed. I wrote a statement and a test case, attached debdiff, and subscribed ubuntu-sru and ubuntu-sponsors.
[12:00] <nobuto> But I couldn't find "Nominate for release" button described here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
[12:00] <nobuto> Could someone who have that rights nominate for Maverick?
[12:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 664514 in python-apt (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10 (affects: 21) (heat: 122)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/664514
[12:09] <nobuto> And I think importance of this bug is High, because it has "a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users"(unattended-upgrade is unusable). Could someone triage it? Thanks in advance.
[12:10] <vish> nobuto:  "Nominate for release" button is below the python-apt(debian) yellow line
[12:10] <vish> it's a link rather, not a button..
[12:11] <vish> s/debian/ubuntu
[12:12] <nobuto> hmm.. I only see "Also affects project" and "Also affects distribution" link.
[12:12] <vish> nobuto: next to that, dont you see a third link?
[12:12] <nobuto> vish: I see only 2 link.
[12:13] <vish> what is wrong with lp and dates!! nobuto attached the debdiff on comment 10 on 2010-12-18 and how can the bug descriptionbe updated the next day! 2010-12-17
[12:13] <vish> nobuto: hmm, must be one of the privileges thing..
[12:21] <vish> nobuto: and i just set the importance to low because, it has a workaround..
[12:22] <nobuto> vish: workaround means just upgrading system manually?
[12:22] <vish> nobuto: yea..
[12:23] <nobuto> vish: OK. I understand. thank you.
[12:23] <vish> nobuto: you're welcome..
[16:11] <bdmurray> mvo: I've seen a few dpkgterminal logs with lzma Encoder error messages in them.  What do those indicate?
[16:42] <ElPasmo> Hi all, I want to participate in the 5 a day idea... but I think I'm doing something wrong because I'm never shown in the statistics.
[16:43] <nisshh> ElPasmo, i think you need to be on a team or something
[16:43] <micahg> ElPasmo: you need a public e-mail address on launchpad
[16:43] <ElPasmo> I'm in the team
[16:43] <ElPasmo> and I think I set it to public :)
[16:43] <ElPasmo> www.launchpad.net/~elpasmo
[16:44] <nisshh> ElPasmo, you might have to wait a while before the list is updated
[16:44] <nisshh> especially if you just made your email public a minute ago
[16:44] <ElPasmo> I did it yesterday :)
[16:45] <ElPasmo> But ok, I'll wait... thanks a lot micahg and nisshh :)
[16:46] <nisshh> ElPasmo, thats just what i think, i may be wrong :)
[16:47] <ElPasmo> Yes, but seems reasonable... :)
[16:47] <nisshh> yeah
[16:52] <ElPasmo> I think bug 692189  should be set to triaged with a Low importance. May someone do it for me?
[16:52] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692189 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "rhythmbox is not given focus when re-opened from sound applet menu (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692189
[16:56] <hggdh> ElPasmo: done, thank you
[16:57] <ElPasmo> Thanks hggdh
[16:59] <mvo> bdmurray: hello! I don't know (yet), do you have a example report?
[16:59] <bdmurray> mvo: bug 691985
[17:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 691985 in udev (Ubuntu) "package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/691985
[17:03] <ElPasmo> I think bug 687684 should be set to triaged with a Low importance. May someone do it for me? I have a doubt, should this bug go to one hundred paper cuts?
[17:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 687684 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Authentication dialog does not receive focus when clicking the install button (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687684
[17:06] <mvo> bdmurray: thanks, my gut feeling is fs corruption, but I'm not really sure without further digging into the code
[17:07] <mvo> it seems to be consistent (the error number) at least
[17:09] <bdmurray> mvo: did you look at dmesg.txt? WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.35/ubuntu/aufs/plink.c:332 au_plink_append+0x274/0x2e0 [aufs]()
[17:12] <mvo> oh
[17:12] <mvo> I didn't, that is a good clue
[17:17] <bdmurray> mvo: I've also seen a lot of package upgrade bugs with empty DpkgTerminalLogs
[17:17] <bdmurray> mvo: generally on live media
[17:35] <ElPasmo> I think bug 692589 is a question but I'm pretty new and I'm not sure. May anyone confirm I'm right or not?
[17:35] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692589 in openssl (Ubuntu) "Bug in libssl-dev package, pem.h (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692589
[17:39] <micahg> ElPasmo: I think that's a valid bug
[17:40] <ElPasmo> Ok micahg, can you explain me why? or will it take too long? :P
[17:40] <ElPasmo> I want to learn, only that :)
[17:41] <micahg> ElPasmo: it's saying that there's an issue with the development headers provided, well I should clarify, upstream may or may not think it's valid, but it's a bug vs question
[17:41] <ElPasmo> Ok I see, thanks a lot micahg  :)
[17:44] <dnivra> hello. i am trying to report an issue with resume on hibernate/suspend. maco suggested i come here and ask how to proceed. the problem is that when i suspend/hibernate, my system does suspend/hibernate i think cos the behaviour is right-blinking light on power switch. but instead of resuming, my system restarts.
[17:44] <dnivra> i would like to know which package to report against and where can i find more info to understand if it is actually a bug?
[17:45] <devildante> dnivra: report against linux
[17:45] <devildante> dnivra: and run "ubuntu-bug linux" to get system info for your bug ;)
[17:46] <dnivra> devildante, well that just gets the system info right? any logs/messages etc that could shine more light?
[17:46] <dnivra> devildante, and how to reproduce the bug of course. i just can say "hibernate/suspend and resume it restarts" can I :D?
[17:46] <devildante> dnivra: for certain special packages, ubuntu-bug retrieves more info
[17:47] <dnivra> devildante, oh! okay then. i'll give it a shot. anything else you'd recommend be done for this issue?
[17:47] <devildante> dnivra: does it happen every time? and how do you resume from suspend? by opening the lid or pressing the power button...?
[17:48] <devildante> (include it in the bug ;))
[17:48] <devildante> dnivra: also the name of the machine would be useful info in the bug title
[17:48] <dnivra> devildante, every time; i can reproduce it surely. and yes i open the lid and press the power button. sure will include it. let me ensure it does happen one last time.
[17:48] <devildante> dnivra: kay :)
[17:49] <dnivra> sure company and model name. thanks a lot!
[18:13] <dnivra> devildante, http://paste.ubuntu.com/546038/ is the error i got when i was hibernating. ever seen it before?
[18:14] <devildante> dnivra: no, I'm not expert on kernel bugs... but it looks like your computer will explode :p
[18:15] <devildante> dnivra: just let the kernel experts handle it
[18:15] <devildante> dnivra: by filing a bug ;)
[18:15] <dnivra> devildante, oh it is a kernel bug eh? okay. i'm no expert on bugs :). sure will do; thought i shouldn't report a duplicate if it is one :)
[18:16] <devildante> dnivra: no, report it even if it's a duplicate
[18:16] <dnivra> oh! okay. sure!
[18:16] <devildante> dnivra: you may think it's a duplicate, but maybe a little change in hardware could invalidate the bug
[18:16] <devildante> dnivra: that's the policy of the kernel team
[18:17] <dnivra> oh! okay. guess it's worth the while then.
[18:17] <devildante> :)
[18:17] <dnivra> devildante, there are two options - hibernate/resume and suspend/resume. file a separate bug for each?
[18:17] <devildante> dnivra: hmm, no, just resume from suspend
[18:18] <dnivra> devildante, the error i just pasted was resume from hibernate. to that then?
[18:19] <devildante> dnivra: you said the bug occurs for both suspend and hibernate
[18:19] <devildante> dnivra: so it's not relevant which option you choose ;)
[18:19] <dnivra> devildante, suspend doesn't show any errors-it shows nothing in fact. straight off and very quick. :)
[18:19] <devildante> dnivra: hmm
[18:19] <dnivra> devildante, alright then. will do it against hibernate.
[18:20] <devildante> dnivra: please specify though in the description that the hibernate error doesn't occur on suspend ;)
[18:20] <dnivra> devildante, will do :).
[18:21] <jcastro> hey hggdh
[18:21] <dnivra> that's the first time apport has asked for the password :)
[18:21] <jcastro> hggdh: I would like a bug bot for unity/compiz/ayatana, how can I get one?
[18:22] <devildante> dnivra: yeah, it's because it retrieves info from places only accessible by root
[18:23] <dnivra> devildante, this is what you meant by apport collects different information for different packages :).
[18:23] <devildante> dnivra: yes ;)
[18:24] <dnivra> devildante, good to know :). thanks!
[18:24] <devildante> dnivra: np ;)
[18:25] <devildante> dnivra: btw, if you need more info about the bug reporting process, this wiki page should help you: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
[18:25] <dnivra> thanks a lot devildante i'm half way through. will check out if there's anything special for kernel bugs.
[18:25] <devildante> dnivra: np ;)
[18:28] <ElPasmo> Hi people, can you take a look of bug 692559 and tell me if setting it to Invalid is the right thing to do?
[18:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692559 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "package nscd 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.6 failed to install/upgrade: underprocess installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 1 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692559
[18:30] <charlie-tca> Yes, you can mark that invalid based on the reporters comments
[18:30] <ElPasmo> thanks charlie-tca  :)
[18:31] <charlie-tca> thanks for helping
[18:38] <dnivra> LP #692683
[18:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692683 in linux (Ubuntu) "System restarts after hibernate/suspend instead of resume (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692683
[18:38] <dnivra> that's the bug devildante . thought I'd just let you know :)
[19:41] <bdmurray> whoa what happened to my right click menu in firefox?
[19:43] <bdmurray> well no I can't recreate it
[19:43] <bdmurray> s/no/now
[20:23] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, about your right click menu in firefox - it probably pops up behind the desktop
[20:23] <chrisccoulson> (bug 692265)
[20:23] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692265 in unity (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Indicator menus appear behind applications (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692265
[20:23] <chrisccoulson> a few people have mentioned that recently
[20:36] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: mine was like a page or two long