[00:42] <rsalveti> cjwatson: I prefer to move uboot-mkimage back and fix the u-boot package later
[00:43] <rsalveti> because currently even for u-boot, we're using the linaro one, and not the one at universe
[12:02] <rsalveti> cjwatson: bdrung: lool is trying to fix the u-boot package so we can just live without the old one
[12:02] <cjwatson> ok
[12:02] <rsalveti> the new build just failed for i386
[12:02] <rsalveti> and he changed jasper already
[12:02] <rsalveti> cjwatson: so it seems that we now just need to move it to main
[12:03] <lool> rsalveti: It's ok, I don't think we need the i386 build
[12:03] <lool> I did discuss a proposed fix for the i386 build on the u-boot mailing-list earlier this morning, waiting for feedback
[12:04] <lool> (we should eventually fix it on i386, but that's only relevant for the cdimage host which probably has uboot-mkimage from a stable release installed)
[12:04] <lool> hmm actually I'm thinking this might break linaro builds, maybe I ought to push an i386 fix soon  :)
[12:26] <bdrung> great to hear that
[12:28] <cjwatson> lool: I can't just promote it directly - it's a much larger source package
[12:29] <cjwatson> lool: can you please put it through the MIR process?
[14:20] <lool> rsalveti: Did you file a MIR bug?  shall I?
[14:20] <lool> Sorry, I'm losing power from time to time; I guess the grid is under pressure
[15:02] <rsalveti> lool: please fill a MIR bug, if possible
[15:03] <rsalveti> as you're the one fixing the u-boot package
[16:18] <lool> cjwatson: LP #692613
[16:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 692613 in u-boot (Ubuntu) "[MIR] u-boot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692613