[01:07] Hi I have question about kernel dynamic modules [01:08] if I execute modinfo parport_serial | grep 9835 [01:08] I get somethink like this: [01:08] alias: pci:v00009710d00009835sv*sd*bc*sc*i* [01:08] is any option to add my own alias to parport_serial module? === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [05:11] ScottK: pacakgekit is baffling, same build on maverick builds fine, it seems like the mozilla plugin isn't being built for some reason on natty [05:47] ScottK: packagekit solved (bug 692854 if you want to sponsor) [05:47] Launchpad bug 692854 in packagekit (Ubuntu) "packagekit FTBFS on natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692854 === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [07:17] good morning! [07:31] Riddell: I fixed the packagekit FTBFS if you want to sponsor it (bug 692854) [07:31] Launchpad bug 692854 in packagekit (Ubuntu) "packagekit FTBFS on natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692854 === axp2_ is now known as axp2 === akshatj is now known as troll === troll is now known as akshatj [08:36] in case binary new requests are to be brought up here: lightspark{,-common,-dbg} and browser-plugin-lightspark on armel were just recently introduced. thanks [08:44] @pilot in === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for dapper -> maverick | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | Current Friendly Patch Pilots: dholbach [09:02] Laney: hello, have you had the chance to look at the new way ghc6 fails on armel? === hunger_ is now known as hunger === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [10:37] Hello, is this http://launchpadlibrarian.net/61007900/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.git-buildpackage_0.5.12_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz , actually a problem of pychecker with python2.7 ? [10:39] doko__: ^ [10:46] james_w, why can't I reject https://code.launchpad.net/~stefan-bader-canonical/ubuntu/natty/e2fsprogs/branch/+merge/43541? [10:46] there's just "WIP", "Merged" and "Needs Review" [10:51] AnAnt: likely pychecker, we had issues getting it updated to 2.6 too ... === evilvish is now known as group === group is now known as evilvish === evilvish is now known as whois === whois is now known as vish [12:05] * Keybuk must stop winding Lennart up on lkml [12:06] but it's such fun! [12:10] Public service announcement: we're down to 20 items on http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ - YES! [12:10] dholbach: I'm looking forwards to having to get all my uploads sponsored ;-) [12:11] Keybuk, because you'll lose your upload privileges? why? [12:11] you're de-core-dev-ing like crimsun did? [12:11] because of a Launchpad bug [12:11] I can't transfer my GPG key to my new LP account [12:12] Keybuk, seems like LP is not set up for schizophrenic personas :-P [12:12] indeed [12:12] I'm going to nag them about that once they've fixed the gaping hole in LP's brain where all my bzr branches used to be [12:13] but you know how it is, Ticket in RT, Out of Mind [12:19] Daviey, do you know if bug 687971 is still blocked on bug 688522? [12:19] Launchpad bug 687971 in eucalyptus-commons-ext (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus-commons-ext' (0.5.0-0ubuntu2) failed to build on natty" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687971 [12:19] Launchpad bug 688522 in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] Eucalyptus doesn't build on maverick, with -security pocket enabled " [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/688522 [12:19] * dholbach attempts a test build [12:21] janimo: a bit, not so much though [12:27] dholbach, I don't know if the openjdk fix has landed in natty yet.. [12:27] * Daviey checks [12:27] dholbach, looks like it's still blocked in natty awaiting the openjdk fix (either dropping of two patches, or a proper fix from upstream) [12:28] Daviey, shall we get the bug out of the queue for now then? [12:29] dholbach, Hmm.. can do; i'd like to hear doko's thoughts on porting the fix to openjdk from maverick to natty for the interim to get things moving [12:29] hum, to me it looks like it's building alright in natty? [12:29] that would unblock and allow us to close those bugs. [12:30] dholbach, Interesting.... openjdk hasn't been touched since the 26th Nov... so it *should* fail. [12:30] http://paste.ubuntu.com/546240/ [12:30] Daviey, ^ [12:31] hmm [12:32] dholbach, lemme rebuild here [12:32] Daviey, that was with James' branch [12:36] * Daviey regrets reinstalling natty... loosing his devel env. [12:36] losing* [12:39] Daviey, the old version still builds too === diwic is now known as diwic_afk [12:39] (but with the wrong paths, I guess) [12:40] dholbach, trying to re-digest https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus-commons-ext/+bug/687971/comments/8 [12:40] Ubuntu bug 687971 in eucalyptus-commons-ext (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus-commons-ext' (0.5.0-0ubuntu2) failed to build on natty" [High,In progress] [12:41] Daviey, to me it looks like geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec should be uploaded, so eucalyptus-commons-ext can build again, then something done with openjdk, so libhibernate3-java can build [12:41] That is my understanding. :) [12:41] Daviey, if that's the case, I'd upload the geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec change now [12:42] Daviey, go? :) === akshatj is now known as akshatj|study === diwic_afk is now known as diwic [12:45] dholbach, It sounds sensible, and i'm not too concerned if it has fall out TBH... :) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:46] haha [12:46] ok [12:46] I'm sure James will be in touch with me if it fails :) [12:47] dholbach, No. i really think it will be ok [12:47] and James probably won't be around until NEXT YEAR :) [12:47] so you have a year to run, and hide. :) === jelmer__ is now known as jelmer [12:47] ha! [12:49] dholbach, Can you give me a ping when it's uploaded please? :) [12:50] Daviey, [12:50] ____ ___ _ _ ____ _ [12:50] | _ \_ _| \ | |/ ___| | [12:50] | |_) | || \| | | _| | [12:50] | __/| || |\ | |_| |_| [12:50] |_| |___|_| \_|\____(_) [12:50] [12:50] @pilot out === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for dapper -> maverick | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | Current Friendly Patch Pilots: [12:54] dholbach, thanks! :) === jussi01 is now known as jussi [12:59] dholbach: your ping was very small. it could easily overlooked. :P [12:59] dholbach: and thanks for getting the main queue down to 15 [13:00] 15? I thought 19 [13:00] dholbach: _main_ [13:00] aha, yes :) [13:00] next step: get the 2000+ bugs with patches fixed :-P [13:01] dholbach: you were involved in edit-patch, weren't you? [13:01] bdrung, mvo was [13:01] I was part of the discussion when the idea was born - but that's as much credit as I'd be willing to take :) [13:02] dholbach: this tool needs some love and needs an non-interactive mode for making sponsor-patch a useful tool for the 2000+ bugs with patches [13:02] bdrung, I agree [13:03] dholbach: why are you listed as author in edit-patch? [13:03] * bdrung tries to make you more responsible. :P [13:03] bdrung, I don't know [13:04] I started writing it in python and mvo took it from there and rewrote it in much better shell [13:04] dholbach: having it in python would be nice - then sponsor-patch could use it without running a command [13:05] the idea was to get it into devscripts at some stage [13:05] dholbach: ok, valid point [13:05] alrightie... I'll take the dog for a walk in the snow now - see you in a bit :) [13:05] but devscripts doesn't seem to be well maintained [13:06] dholbach: and i will build an iglu :) [13:06] ha, excellent :) [13:06] enjoy! :) [13:08] micahg: Thank you. I'll take it if no one else has. [13:10] Using distribution natty [13:10] bzr: ERROR: Unknown target distribution: natty [13:10] -- [13:10] argh! [13:14] bdrung: yeah, I saw that there are a few open bugs on it, should be straightforward to add a non-interactive mode === akshatj|study is now known as akshatj [13:14] mvo: it would be nice if you could add it. [13:16] bdrung: ok, I have a look next === apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger [13:32] Keybuk: That is fixed in latest upload to maverick [13:32] s/maverick/natty [13:33] Keybuk: and I am waiting for someone to test an SRU upload. Its already in maverick-proposed [13:34] cdbs: yeah, it's just annoying that it checks at all [13:34] since it doesn't actually put it anywhere [13:38] Keybuk: I guess you are using bzr bd or something related to its plugins? [13:38] yup [13:38] bzr merge-upstream in this case [13:41] hmm, and now pbuilder isn't co-operating [13:42] If it's not finding your pbuilderrc it's because sudo changed it's handling of the environment in Natty and it's looking in /root. [13:42] Keybuk: Would be awesome if you tested that SRU upload [13:42] g2g [13:42] no, it seems to be not installing one of the Build-Dependeices [13:42] so failing the build because the dep isn't satisfied [13:42] upload of package bzr-builddeb [13:42] dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libselinux1-dev [13:42] dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting. [13:42] That's on odd one then. [13:43] yeah [13:43] it looks like it's not parsing the libselinux1-dev [linux-any] properly [13:43] Ah. [13:44] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363193 [13:47] jhunt: did we get a useful bash-completion file in the end? [13:50] Keybuk: yes - in your inbox now. [13:51] who should be listed as the author? [13:51] Keybuk: me [13:52] ok [13:52] Keybuk: thx. [13:54] Keybuk: it closes bug 672067. [13:54] Launchpad bug 672067 in upstart (Ubuntu) "There is no bash-completion for the commands in upstart" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/672067 [13:55] ok, committed and pushed [13:55] you'll need to do some packaging changes - but we can do those on thursday together if london works out [13:56] Keybuk: s/works out/defrosts/ ? [13:56] jhunt: if you wanted to have a go beforehand, you'd need to bzr merge -c 1258 lp:upstart to cherry pick the add, and then modify debian/upstart.install [13:56] (man dh_install is the appropriate manpage) [13:58] walters: howdy [13:59] hi Keybuk [13:59] how goes it? [13:59] good! just getting back from doing some volunteer math tutoring at the local high school, it's fun actually =) [14:00] how's sf treating you? [14:00] SF isn't yet treating me [14:00] I'm still in the USCIS queue === doko__ is now known as doko [14:01] ah hah, i had to look that up [14:01] how many years is that expected to take? [14:01] though i should know it since my girlfriend just became an American 2 months ago =) [14:01] I'm supposed to find out sometime between Dec 24 and Dec 28 [14:01] depending how you interpret their "days" [14:01] and whether or not they miss the promised date and just do it later [14:01] our days are 24.1 feet [14:02] dholbach, can you upload the package? [14:02] did they just give some number of days and then youre supposed to subtract out weekends and holidays? [14:02] james_w, I'm core-dev, so I'd expect so, yes [14:02] dholbach, yeah [14:03] dholbach, it's bug filing time I think [14:03] james_w, is it lp.net/launchpad already? [14:03] yeah, I think so [14:03] alrightie [14:04] maco: that's the depending on their intepretation bit ;-) [14:05] james_w, bug 692998 [14:05] Launchpad bug 692998 in Launchpad itself "Can't set status of merge proposal to anything other than "merged", "WIP" and "needs review"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692998 [14:05] thanks [14:05] de rien [14:06] Keybuk: remember, we dont have boxing day [14:08] Keybuk: thx! === beuno_ is now known as beuno === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter === plars_ is now known as plars [15:01] cjwatson, hi, regarding my installer crash yesterday, could you please look at http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/546280/ ? === ]reed[ is now known as [reed] [15:01] I will file a bug it if it's unknown or unlikely to be fixed on a newer daily [15:02] kees: AYT? [15:02] joaopinto: please file a bug with the full logs attached [15:02] ok [15:02] I don't debug from partial logs [15:03] I assume you've already verified it on the current daily build [15:03] shouldn't the installer crash handler allow me to open the report bug directly and upload the required files ? [15:03] (if that had been a full log I wouldn't have needed to ask) [15:03] not yet, I will need to refresh the iso [15:04] you should get an apport crash thingy if the installer crashes [15:04] if you don't, use 'ubuntu-bug ubiquity' [15:05] running ubuntu-bug ubiquity from my current installed system failed :P [15:05] I assume it's expected to be run from a livecd session [15:05] of course! [15:05] I will do the manual link bug reporting and attach the logs, otherwise I would need to reinstall & fail again [15:05] fine === zyga is now known as zyga-food [15:10] done, bug 693027 [15:10] Launchpad bug 693027 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Failed to install using Ubuntu desktop 11.04 i386 daily image from 18th Dec" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/693027 [15:11] which package should be used for the bug about the global menu not responding after the failure dialog ? [15:17] about refreshing to a newer daily, can I just dd the usb partition into an iso, update it and just dump it into the usb partition ? [15:18] I doubt it [15:19] ok, so I will only be able to test it after retunring from holidays :( [15:21] ev is looking at it now === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [15:30] the booting ubuntu logo looks bad, that is something being worked right ? [15:31] "bad" as in, the letters are not round, look "corrupted" on the edges [15:33] known, I'll work on it in the new year if nobody's dealt with it before then [15:56] cjwatson: unfortunately adding python2.7 to "minimal" didn't work :-/ [15:57] I rebuilt alternates, still there (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/20101221.1/natty-alternate-i386.list) [15:59] alternates are a bad example [15:59] you need to ask me for those :) [15:59] how long ago did you add it? [15:59] cjwatson: oh, I do? what changed? === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [16:00] wait, maybe I'm misdiagnosing this [16:00] cjwatson: ubuntu-meta published 3 hours ago [16:00] it does have the right priority set === zyga-food is now known as zyga [16:00] cjwatson: and I rebuilt the alternates about a hour ago [16:00] give me a minute to investigate, then. [16:01] cjwatson: it's not that urgent, no need to drop your brain state [16:01] too late [16:01] argh, sorry about that [16:04] kenvandine: could you have a look at the libgda4 build failure? more gir transition stuff [16:04] sure [16:05] cjwatson, doko: OTOH it's just 16 packages to rebuild for getting everything to python2.7 | python2.6; I can do just that, ok for you? [16:05] wait please, this might be a genuine germinate bug and I'd like the opportunity to diagnose it [16:05] *nod* [16:07] it should definitely be using python2.7 already in minimal rather than pulling another package into standard [16:10] only python2.7-minimal is in minimal, not python2.7 [16:11] no, python2.7 is in minimal now as a workaround by pitti [16:11] that should have worked [16:11] ahh [16:29] pitti: (still working on it, germinate slows down really dramatically under pdb :-/) [16:36] pitti: the short-term solution is going to be to rebuild those packages anyway, though - I'm not going to be able to get a new germinate deployed on archive and cdimage before I finish for the year === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen [16:36] cjwatson: fine with me, I should be able to get this done today [16:37] cjwatson: is there a way how you can reproduce this situation with all packages fixed? [16:37] I can probably fake something up [16:37] hopefully I can fix it before the archive changes though :) [16:37] cjwatson: also, I'm only going to rebuild the packages which are on the CD for now [16:37] there are a few more in main [16:38] which we could then temporarily seed for testing [16:38] I can always just keep this debug directory - due to another bug, it won't refresh its local copies of the Packages/Sources files [16:38] so it should be fine [16:38] ah, good [16:40] ah, maybe it's not a germinate bug after all [16:40] Package: python-apt [16:40] Depends: python2.6 | python2.7, python (>= 2.6.5-11~), libapt-inst1.2, libapt-pkg4.10, libc6 (>= 2.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0), python-apt-common [16:40] Recommends: lsb-release, iso-codes, python2.6 [16:40] argh [16:40] why that Recommends? [16:40] mvo: ^ could have been a temporary workaround for something? [16:42] fix that and python2.6 drops off the alternate CD [16:42] cool, will coordinate with mvo and do that [16:42] thank you! [16:42] pitti: uh, no idea, let me fix and upload [16:42] thanks cjwatson [16:42] according to germinate anyway [16:42] mvo: ah, you want to? ok, great [16:42] and bzr blame to figure out what is going on [16:43] pitti: yes, thats fine, I will merge the latest debian stuff along the way [16:44] mvo: danke [16:46] it's the only reverse-recommends in main, anyway [16:46] and in all other components, too [16:54] kees, mterry: MIR ping (689766 and 692955), just to resolve component mismatches [16:54] doko, hiyo [16:55] doko, I can take the first, libasyncns === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [16:56] mterry: the second too, please. I did submit these, can't review [16:56] doko, OK [17:00] cjwatson: Hey, would you be able to ack and/or promote python-fixtures as per LP #692955? [17:00] Launchpad bug 692955 in python-fixtures (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-fixtures, needed as a b-d for python-testtools" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692955 [17:00] (I need a fix in a package which is dep-wait on python-fixtures) [17:01] I can't ack it, I'm not in ubuntu-mir [17:02] my understanding is that I only get to promote source packages that are either (a) trivially obvious (split-out, renamed, etc.) or (b) set to Fix Committed by an ubuntu-mir member [17:05] lool, I'm about to look at that MIR === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [17:11] mterry: thanks [17:12] cjwatson, james_w: Yeah, I thought you guys were historical ~ubuntu-mir members [17:12] how does one find out _why_ a package has been rejected? [17:13] lool: nope, never me [17:13] tgardner: the archive admin who rejects iti is supposed to mail you [17:13] *it [17:13] if they didn't then they need a slap :) [17:13] cjwatson, huh. and how do I find out who rejected it? [17:14] the email says 'Rejected by archive administrator.' [17:14] unfortunately there isn't an easy way. https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/31750 [17:14] Ubuntu bug 31750 in Launchpad itself "rejects should allow (and require) reasons" [Low,Triaged] [17:14] tgardner: what package name? [17:15] cjwatson, linux-meta_2.6.35.24.29 [17:15] I lookedin both of the bugs mentioned in the changelog, but there were no comments [17:17] irritatingly I can't find a record even on the archive master [17:17] stable processing is usually pitti, but I see he's left IRC [17:17] it may have been an accident [17:17] cjwatson, well, this isn't an ABI bumper so it can wait. [17:18] I can resurrect it [17:18] cjwatson, that would be fine with me. [17:19] marjo: do you have any update on the upgrade failures? [17:21] doko: it looks like its not python releated, it appears there is a problem with the intel driver on the i945 chipset [17:21] lool, python-fixtures FTBFS due to test case issues. If you're an interested party, maybe you can look at it? [17:21] doko: I added code to the release-upgrader to autopatch pycomile now [17:22] tgardner: resurrected and accepted. if whoever it was didn't want me to reverse their decision then they should have mailed you a reason. :-) [17:22] mvo: \o/ is this release-upgrader in maverick-updates too? [17:22] cjwatson, :) thanks for your help [17:24] doko: everybody upgrading will get it, regardless of -update or not (its the default upgrade app, its always fetched from the distro that you upgrade to) [17:24] doko: diff -ed ftw ;) [17:25] cjwatson: new python-apt uploaded, took a bit longer as I fixed another debfile releated bug along the way [17:25] ta === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [17:31] marjo, sure [17:31] apw: here [17:31] marjo, can we get the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file for the 'black boot' on the bug please [17:32] fyi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/693093 [17:32] Ubuntu bug 693093 in linux (Ubuntu) "Blank screen with latest natty on intel atom GPU" [Undecided,New] [17:36] apw: done [17:37] cdbs: about your liboauth upload. if your change is the only Ubuntu change, please don't make such changes. it increases the delta for no extra worth [17:39] marjo, and you are unable to switch to VT1 ? or you can now? [17:42] marjo, can you login to the machine and do the following [17:43] DISPLAY=:0.0 xwd -root >OUT [17:43] and put the result somewhere i can look at it [17:43] marjo, also can you confirm whether the backlight is on (a dark place can herlp here) [17:45] apw: still unable to switch to VT1 [17:47] marjo, actualy you may need to login to do the xwd thing, so when you hear the drums i think you need to hit return, then password, and see if you get the login sound [17:47] then try it [17:49] doko: okay, it was actually recommended by the upstream author. Moreover, I am the debian maintainer of liboauth, so I can manage delta effectively [17:49] and I will drop the patch in Debian once gcc-4.5 becomes default there for wheezy [17:50] apw: didn't work [17:50] cdbs: it is unlikely that debian will make --as-needed the default [17:50] apw: any other way to try? [17:51] doko: hmm, will see then. will sync when I get the next upstream version uploaded [17:51] apw: no login sound heard [17:52] apw: backlight is on === tlyu_ is now known as tlyu === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [18:10] doko: Is it intentional that the python2.7 testsuite got disabled in 2.7.1-1ubuntu1? [18:11] lool: yes, quick upload, no changes, will enable it again with the next upload === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger === Guest43017 is now known as Lutin [19:17] hello === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === jelmer__ is now known as jelmer [20:22] @pilot in === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for dapper -> maverick | #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | Current Friendly Patch Pilots: ari-tczew [20:31] cyphermox: have you got tested your patch for cnetworkmanager? [20:34] ari-tczew, it was, though I didn't re-test it recently since uploading a new NM [20:34] cyphermox: could you do it again? [20:34] of course [20:35] cool! [20:35] sorry for harassing you about it, it's just pretty much the only way to use NM on the command-line, although I frankly don't touch it much [20:36] ari-tczew: Hey, I noticed you've had the pinot merge assigned to you for a while now. Are you still working on it? [20:36] ebroder: yes, I'll do it after sponsorship for cyphermox [20:36] ebroder: I'm doing cnetworkmanager 1st as cyphermox is waiting since 8th Dec :) [20:36] ari-tczew: Ok, just making sure you hadn't forgotten about it. I was going to look at it last night, but didn't want to yoink it from you [20:37] ebroder: I'm pretty sure that you won't be out of work for Ubuntu :) [20:39] ari-tczew, still looks good to me. [20:46] ari-tczew: Did you see clementine is out of binary New in maverick-backports? [20:46] Should be all set now. [20:47] ScottK: I see that clementine is still New :> [20:48] ari-tczew: Sorry. My mistake. [20:48] kk [20:48] * ScottK was looking at a different package and didn't realize it. [20:52] cyphermox: what do you think about forwarding your patch to debian/upstream? [20:54] yes, upstream [20:54] I should send it again, actually [20:56] cyphermox: ok, uploading [21:04] * ari-tczew loves review patches by Bazaar, but hates sponsorship it! (very hard) [21:05] ari-tczew: sponsor-patch :) [21:05] bzr bd -S ? [21:05] tumbleweed: does it support Bazaar? [21:05] ari-tczew: yes [21:06] Laney: there are not only build source. now I have to set tags, set merge and 100 other commands... [21:06] ari-tczew: bzr mark-uploaded && bzr push :parent (or sponsor-patch :P) [21:07] tumbleweed: could you drive through sponsor-patch way? [21:07] ari-tczew: sponsor-patch -u $bugnumber [21:07] err -s [21:08] ari-tczew: you could read the man page of sponsor-patch. it explains it very good. [21:10] tumbleweed: okay, I have test built done, it's ready to upload. does sponsor-patch sets all tags and other data necessary for bzr sponsorship policy? (I'm just making sure) [21:10] yes it does [21:11] ari-tczew: you can run it with "-v" to see which commands are called [21:11] only issue I can think of is that you can't push back when uploading SRUs because there is no $release-proposed branch yet, but that's not really sponsor-patch's problem. [21:12] tumbleweed: I'm doing for natty. [21:17] which package includes 'bd' command? [21:17] ari-tczew: bzr-builddeb [21:18] ari-tczew: does sponsor-patch fail? [21:18] bdrung: that should probably go in reccomends [21:18] bdrung: yes [21:19] ari-tczew: show me the crash log [21:19] * bdrung nods to tumbleweed. === hanska is now known as dapal [21:29] bdrung: http://paste.ubuntu.com/546400/ [21:33] tumbleweed: does this work: "login(self, service=service)"? [21:34] bdrung: that service comes from the default value in ubuntutools.lp [21:38] bdrung, tumbleweed: failed :/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/546403/ [21:38] tumbleweed: shouldn't you mention which env variables are still supported, but deprecated [21:39] ari-tczew: i'll fix it. which u-d-t version do you use? [21:41] bdrung: ok [21:41] bdrung: Zainstalowana: 0.107 [21:41] ups, I have to update :/ [21:43] bdrung: there's also the option of warning about deprecated configuration [21:43] tumbleweed: ok, i prefer that. [21:43] tumbleweed: then we don't need to document them [21:43] oh, even better, yes :) [21:44] cyphermox: sorry for my late, I'm testing sponsor-patch on your case :) [21:44] but don't worry, it will be uploaded soon [21:44] ari-tczew: your bug is still in trunk [21:45] bdrung: could you qualify the time of fix? I have to know whether wait for fix or play with sponsorship another way. [21:45] ari-tczew: gimme 5 mins. [21:45] okay [21:48] mterry: you merged bluez with Debian! wow you're my lord! [21:48] ari-tczew, :) we hadn't done that in a long time [21:48] mterry: I tried to do this 3 times but always I failed :P [21:49] ari-tczew, I only did half of it. Rob Ancell started it, I just finished it. Maybe that was the missing piece -- only do a small chunk. :) [21:50] mterry: mhm. I'm working with Robert on some merges. Your sentence makes me sure that it will be a success :) [21:50] ari-tczew: pushed fix to trunk [21:50] ari-tczew, ah, no worries, I'm fighting a unity bug ;) [21:50] ari-tczew: you can build it with "bzr bd" [21:52] s/a/an unity bug - english typo ;) [21:52] cyphermox: ^^ [21:52] indeed. thanks ;) [21:52] You're welcome. [21:54] tumbleweed: should i call ubu_email() in sponsor-patch? [21:55] ari-tczew: actually, "a unity bug" is correct - it's the initial sound that matters, not the initial letter, and "unity" starts with a /y/ sound [21:57] cjwatson: in Poland teach to write 'an' before vowels :> [21:57] ari-tczew: "teach"? [21:57] It's not a *bad* herustic :) [21:57] that's a reasonable rule of thumb but it fails in cases where the initial sound is consonantal anyway, like this [21:57] bdrung: teachers say to write... [21:58] RAOF: heuristic? [21:58] bdrung: Fancy rule of thumb! [21:59]