[03:18] <wick94> hey guys, i wanna join the bug squad :) r there n e requiremnts to it
[03:19] <charlie-tca> !r
[03:19] <ubot2> Factoid 'r' not found
[03:19] <charlie-tca> !n
[03:19] <ubot2> Factoid 'n' not found
[03:20] <drosenbe> !%x
[03:20] <ubot2> The X Window System is the part of your system that's responsible for graphical output. To restart your X, type « sudo /etc/init.d/?dm restart » in a console - To fix screen resolution or other X problems: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Config/Resolution
[03:20] <drosenbe> ha that didn't work
[03:30] <yofel> !u
[03:30] <ubot2> U is the 21st letter of the modern latin alphabet. Neither 'U' nor 'Ur' are words in the English language. Neither are 'R', 'Y', 'l8', 'Ne1' nor 'Bcuz'. Mangled English is hard for non-native English speakers. Please see http://geekosophical.net/random/abbreviations/ for more information.
[03:30] <yofel> good morning btw. ^^
[13:50] <hggdh> all: eeeBotu has misbehaved, and is down until I figure out the loop
=== zyga is now known as zyga-coffee
[13:50] <pedro_> thanks hggdh
[14:12] <vish> is bugzilla down?
[14:12] <vish> the gnome one..
[14:13] <vish> i keep getting error 500
[14:13] <pedro_> looks like it, i'm getting the same error here
[14:13] <vish> phew.. thx :)
[14:19] <hggdh> OK. I am still unsure where the problem is (pretty much boils down to a 'x not in X' returning True when x is in X), but made some changes to eeeBotu
[14:19] <hggdh> and brought back the beast
[14:19] <hggdh> please ping me if anything
[14:23] <vish> is this line right? "The *canonical* documentation for debbugs is http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting." from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs  second para
[14:24] <vish> says Canonical but points to Debian
[14:28] <charlie-tca> Depends on whether they are talking about the company Canonical or the company Debian docs.
[14:28] <charlie-tca> canonical is a word in english
[14:28] <Pici> Capitalization is important.
[14:30] <vish> oh boo.. not Canonical!
[14:30] <vish> nevermind then.. ;)
[14:36] <ElPasmo> Hi all, I think bug 687684 should set to Triaged with a Low importance. Can someone do it for me please?
[14:36] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 687684 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Authentication dialog does not receive focus when clicking the install button (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687684
[14:42] <charlie-tca> ElPasmo: nice job on that !
[14:43] <charlie-tca> elopio: triaged done
[14:43] <charlie-tca> tab fail
[14:43] <charlie-tca> ElPasmo: triaged done
[14:43] <ElPasmo> great! thanks charlie-tca :)
[14:44] <charlie-tca> You are welcome
[14:44] <ElPasmo> I have more :) I think bug 688857 should set to Triaged with a Medium importance. Can someone do it for me please?
[14:44] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 688857 in software-center (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Keyboard Shortcut for searchbar in the Software Center (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/688857
[14:47] <charlie-tca> ElPasmo: I have a problem with that one. The reporter is using 64bit, you can only confirm it using 32bit.
[14:48] <charlie-tca> You confirmed that 64bit did not have the issue?
[14:49] <ElPasmo> in 10.04 yes, but no in 10.10
[14:51] <ElPasmo> Ok Ill check 10.10 in 64 bits... I need a while though :) thanks for checking it charlie-tca :)
[15:01] <hggdh> ok, I think this time I got eeeBotu right...
[15:05] <ElPasmo> Meanwhile, I have another: I think bug 692637 should be set to Triaged with a Low importance. Can someone do it for me please?
[15:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692637 in eog (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Wrong scaling of svg (affects: 3) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692637
[15:09] <charlie-tca> ElPasmo: that one will need to be upstreamed to Gnome bugzilla
[15:09] <vish> ElPasmo: actually i think thats more of a librsvg issue than EOG
[15:09] <ElPasmo> I'm on it
[15:09] <ElPasmo> mmm w8, I'm not familiar with that...
[15:10] <charlie-tca> check the report, I added the information to it
[15:10] <ElPasmo> ok, thanks :)
[15:10] <vish> ElPasmo: the package is librsvg, there should probably be a bug for that already in GNOME.. it's a known issue..
[15:10] <ElPasmo> I'll check
[15:12] <vish> ElPasmo: notice the last line "This bug can also be seen in nautilus previews."  there has traditionally been a mismatch between svg and their previews.. it's just that librsvg is slow or something..
[15:12] <ElPasmo> lol, gnome bugzilla is down. I'll check tomorrow... Oh I see, thanks vish :)
[15:13] <vish> heh forgot about that!
[15:14] <ElPasmo> about what? :)
[15:16] <vish> bugzilla being down.. :)
[15:16] <charlie-tca> heh
[15:16] <ElPasmo> Oh ok...
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray
[18:09] <bdmurray> andersk: did you tag bug 689880 regression-potential?
[18:09] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 689880 in gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) "Clicking on a link hangs gnome-terminal until the server responds (affects: 1) (heat: 488)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689880
[18:11] <bdmurray> andersk: the right tag is regression-release
[18:12] <bdmurray> andersk: I ask because I'd like to make sure apport isn't adding the wrong tag.
[19:04] <hggdh> bdmurray: please have a look at https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server-bugs/2010-December/thread.html
[19:05] <hggdh> specifically, look at emails with subject (Ticket created)+
[19:05] <hggdh> bdmurray: is there a way for us to stop this unfortunate person?
[19:07] <bdmurray> wtf?
[19:08] <bdmurray> hggdh: they aren't showing up in the bug right?
[19:09] <hggdh> bdmurray: correct, nothing showing in the bug
[19:09] <bdmurray> hggdh: couldn't you just block their email on the mailing list - you are and admin right?
[19:09] <hggdh> bdmurray: I just "Contact this user"-ed, just in case
[19:09] <hggdh> bdmurray: the email is not from the user...
[19:09] <bdmurray> ?
[19:10] <hggdh> oh, it is :-)
[19:10] <hggdh> YES!
[19:10] <hggdh> helpdesk-felia bites the dust
[19:12] <hggdh> er
[19:13] <hggdh> bdmurray: actually, no, the submitter is LP
[19:14] <bdmurray> oh right
[19:14] <bdmurray> hggdh: is it a continuous loop? i.e. still happening now?
[19:15] <hggdh> I am still receiving them. It might be LP mail processing is delayed
[19:18] <kamusin> when is the qa meeting?
[19:18] <marjo> kamusin: it was supposed to be at 1800 UTC, but no-one showed up
[19:19] <marjo> kamusin: so cancelled; see you next year
[19:20] <kamusin> hehe have a nice christmas and a happy new year then :)
[19:20] <hggdh> ding-o-bell, kamusin
[19:22] <kamusin> hggdh,  ;)
[19:23] <andersk> bdmurray: I added the regression-potential tag.  I’ve only seen the bug in natty; I think it’s a GNOME 3 thing.
[19:26] <bdmurray> pedro_: didn't we just talk about a gnome 3 tag?
[19:27] <pedro_> oh yes on the last bugsquad meeting, if the reporter use the gnome 3 ppa it should be tagged as gnome3
[19:27] <pedro_> andersk, ^
[19:27] <andersk> I’m not using a PPA, I’m running stock packages from natty.
[19:28] <andersk> Now I see that the regression-potential tag isn’t being used anymore?  I must have missed that.
[19:31] <andersk> Changed to regression-release natty.
[19:31] <bdmurray> andersk: great, thanks
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:54] <trinikrono> hey guys does anyone know of a bug with autofs that wont allow the pc to go into hibernation
[20:54] <trinikrono> bug 625662
[20:54] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 625662 in ubuntu "autofs prevents suspend/hibernate (affects: 1) (heat: 34)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/625662
[21:06] <trinikrono> hey can some look at bug 382267 and see if it is ready to be set to triaged
[21:06] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 382267 in checkgmail (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "memory leak (affects: 6) (heat: 31)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/382267
[21:06] <trinikrono> a reporter ran valgrind so would that be enough to check the memory leak
[21:55] <jwatt_> who is fabiomarconi?
[21:55] <jwatt_> and does he more concerned with reducing the number of open bugs rather than addressing the issue reported?
[21:56] <micahg> jwatt_: he's njin and do you have a specific example?
[21:56] <jwatt_> njin?
[21:56] <jwatt_> micahg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/607643
[21:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 607643 in ubuntu "Maverick alpha 2 can't install or run on Macbook Pro (5.1 (late 2008 edition)) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid]
[21:57] <jwatt_> I've seen this problem reported in various places
[21:57] <jwatt_> so I went to a fair bit of trouble to investigate it
[21:57] <micahg> jwatt_: yeah, that doesn't seem right
[21:57] <jwatt_> and so I don't really appreciate his actions there
[21:58] <jwatt_> micahg: I'd like to open it again, but I don't really want to start an open-close-open-close war
[21:59] <micahg> jwatt_: that bug you referenced shows that the fix was released to maverick after you posted the information, is it still an issue?
[21:59] <charlie-tca> An issue there is that alpha2 is not a valid release. There are tons of changes between that and the final release
[22:00] <micahg> charlie-tca: right, but the issue here is that there was information provided and it seems the triager ignored it
[22:00] <jwatt_> charlie-tca: ah, I see
[22:00] <micahg> charlie-tca: so the triager should've asked the question I just asked
[22:00] <jwatt_> so I need to retest the final .dvd
[22:00] <charlie-tca> no, micahg look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/607643/comments/7
[22:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 607643 in ubuntu "Maverick alpha 2 can't install or run on Macbook Pro (5.1 (late 2008 edition)) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid]
[22:01] <micahg> charlie-tca: I'm referring to comments 5 and 6
[22:01] <jwatt_> micahg: yeah, it would have been nice if he'd politely pointed out I was confused about the version
[22:01] <charlie-tca> We do not know if it was fixed for release image or not, because the testing stopped at alpha2
[22:01] <jwatt_> I'll retest
[22:01] <micahg> jwatt_: please, it seems the bug should be fixed according to your research
[22:02] <charlie-tca> jwatt_: if it is still an issue, please change the status.
[22:02] <micahg> charlie-tca: right, but the triager should've acknowledged the research by saying that the referenced bug was fix for Maverick on XXXX-XX-XX, could you please retest with the latest image
[22:02] <charlie-tca> If you let us know, we can even note that the status will stay as long as needed to get it fixed
[22:03] <charlie-tca> He did ask to have it tested with the final release
[22:03] <micahg> charlie-tca: it just looks like he saw alpha 2 and posted a canned message instead of reading the bug
[22:03] <charlie-tca> but, yes, it could have been handled better
[22:04] <micahg> charlie-tca: also, closing after the response from jwatt_ is unwarrented as well
[22:04] <jwatt_> micahg: I'm a bit confused - so Andy Whitcroft's comment was on 2010-04-13 and refers to a fix for 10.04, whereas my testing was on 2010-08-07 and refers to a bug in 10.10
[22:04] <charlie-tca> If the response is it is present in Maverick alpha 2 and we are in Natty , it is
[22:04] <jwatt_> a2
[22:04] <jwatt_> if it was fixed for 10.04
[22:04] <hggdh> so, are we reopening the bug?
[22:05] <micahg> jwatt_: take a look at comment 132 in that bug, it contains a maverick changelog
[22:05] <jwatt_> then surely the fix has been lost
[22:05] <jwatt_> micahg: ah thanks
[22:05] <charlie-tca> jwatt_: What is needed is to have the final release image for maverick tested for the issue. It is possible the fix got left out
[22:05] <micahg> hggdh: well, at this point we should only reopen if it's an issue, but it should've been handled differently
[22:05] <micahg> hggdh: it appears to be a duplicate
[22:05] <hggdh> I agree it was mis-handled
[22:06] <hggdh> if it is a dup, let's link it
[22:07] <charlie-tca> looks like a regression, if it was fixed in 10.04 and broke again in 10.10
[22:07] <jwatt_> micahg: yeah, so that comment was from 2010-09-19, a month after my testing, cool
[22:08] <jwatt_> I also sent an email to Andy mentioning I thought it may have regressed, so maybe he merged it to 10.10 but forgot to go back and close my bug
[22:08] <jwatt_> dunno
[22:09] <jwatt_> anyways, I'm trying to pack for a flight home for christmas
[22:09] <jwatt_> I'll download and test the final .dvd in a few days once I'm home
[22:09] <jwatt_> thanks for the help sorting this out everyone!
[22:10] <micahg> jwatt_: you're welcome, I'm sorry for the trouble with the bug
[22:10] <jwatt_> no worries
[22:13] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: I'm inclined to set bug 692815 to Low.  Also did you recreate it in Natty?
[22:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 692815 in thunar (Ubuntu) "inconsistent labeling in Thunar (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692815
[22:14] <charlie-tca> No, it is not present in Natty. I agree with low. Probably lost my head that day. Want me to change it?
[22:14] <charlie-tca> I would like to see it fixed for 10.04.2, myself
[22:15] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: if you could and fix release it that'd be great
[22:15] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: okay, I'll approve a lucid nomination then
[22:15] <charlie-tca> Okay.
[22:16] <charlie-tca> done
[22:16] <charlie-tca> Thanks
=== JFo is now known as JFo-vacation
[22:21] <charlie-tca> I marked all the other docs bugs low, I am sure medium was a mistake
[23:34] <micahg> hggdh: BTW, what happened to EeeBotu last night?
[23:36] <hggdh> micahg: I had made a pretty big change to it (to support multiple channels, each with its own projects), and my tests did not uncover a er, rather small issue...
[23:36] <hggdh> micahg: so, eventually, this rather insignificant issue caused eeeBotu to loop
[23:37] <micahg> hggdh: ah, I wanted to kick the bot from the channel, but didn't have permissions
[23:37] <hggdh> micahg: I *think* I have it fixed. I have been monitoring both -bugs-announce and #ayatana-bugs, and seem to be OK
[23:37] <hggdh> micahg: eventually, someone did :-)
[23:37] <micahg> hggdh: seems a lot better today
[23:38] <hggdh> micahg: I do hope so :-)
[23:38] <hggdh> one day I will really get unhappy with it, and will recode from scratch