[01:18] <CIA-39> [muon] jmthomas * 1209138 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/muon/ (10 files in 2 dirs) Not all sizes of the application-x-deb mimetype icon in KDE 4.6+ are appropriate for an application icon. To remedy this, take the other sizes from KDE 4.5 and install them in hicolor as muon.png
[01:19] <CIA-39> [muon] jmthomas * 1209139 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/muon/muon.desktop Use the new "muon" icon we install to hicolor
[03:32] <CIA-39> [muon] jmthomas * 1209143 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/installer/CategoryView/CategoryDrawer.cpp Play it safe and use the QModelIndex's data() function
[04:04] <CIA-39> [muon] jmthomas * 1209144 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/muon/config/GeneralSettingsPage.cpp This layout is as good as I can get it, but at least simplify the code by using a QFormLayout
[08:23] <_Groo_> hi/2 all
[08:23] <_Groo_> kubuntu-experimental is missing akonadi 1.4.90, and is breaking kdepim for maverick, akonadi cant start because of old akonadi-server
[08:23] <_Groo_> ence, kmail doesnt start for ex
[08:39] <_Groo_> also, beta ppa is missing kdenetwork 4.5.90, it still has 4.5.85a
[12:14] <droidslayer> \o
[12:15] <yofel> hey droidslayer
[12:17] <droidslayer> yofel: oh hai :-)
[12:47] <yofel> droidslayer: can you change the default encoding used by rekonq?
[12:53] <ari-tczew> hmm... I found a bug on natty - nvidia-settings is crashing if started from system menu
[12:53] <ari-tczew> from console works fine
[12:53] <ari-tczew> output of error: (nvidia-settings:2342): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_set_size_request: assertion `width >= -1' failed
[12:55] <yofel> doesn't crash here - natty
[12:55] <yofel> broken theme?
[12:56] <ari-tczew> yofel: my theme works fine and this is default kubuntu theme - I didn't change it since install kubuntu-desktop
[12:57] <yofel> well, I'm using oxygen-molecule as gtk theme here and nvidia settings works fine when started from the menu or krunner
[12:57] <ari-tczew> yofel: open kickoff (menu) -> look for nvidia-settings -> open it -> choice 'X Server Display Configuration'
[12:57] <ari-tczew> after click on a this second option, nvidia is crahsing
[12:58] <yofel> nope, doesn't crash
[12:59] <ari-tczew> yofel: on your system
[13:45] <droidslayer> maco: valorie  around ?
[13:45] <droidslayer> Any ideas if zareason ship to India?
[14:00] <Quintasan> \o
[14:01] <ari-tczew> o/
[14:01] <droidslayer> 'lo
[14:02] <maco> droidslayer: they ship anywhere in the world, afaik
[14:03] <droidslayer> Yeah I just read that :-P
[14:03] <droidslayer> Might be buying a Terra hd
[16:52] <freinhard> hi!
[17:12] <freinhard> 4.6rc1 breaks kaddressbooks?
[17:30] <skfin> KDE PIM is delayed, thats all I know
[17:31] <skfin> I dont know does that cause any conflicts
[17:46] <yofel> freinhard: breaks in what way?
[18:27] <skfin> yofel: As far as I remember there were a problem on upgrading with aptitude, want's to remove kaddressbook or holds everything
[18:27] <skfin> Or something
[18:31] <skfin> And apt-get holds
[18:32] <skfin> Because KDE PIM
[18:32] <skfin> On maverick, i mean
[18:43] <freinhard> right, aptitude can't handle the upgrade
[18:44] <freinhard> and kaddressbook is broken afterwards anyways, so neither of them is better ;)
[18:47] <skfin> Nah, they havent packaged everything yet so it doesnt want to upgrade just yet
[18:47] <skfin> Give some time to packagers
[18:48] <skfin> Hmm
[18:49] <skfin> Actually, it works now for me
[18:49] <skfin> Yesterday(or was it on 23th) it didnt work
[18:50] <skfin> But now it works
[18:51] <arpan> yeah, i am running kde 4.6 rc1 on maverick, upgraded yesterday and it works well except my login screen background is dark
[18:52] <arpan> and k3b say it can't find any optical drive as hal deamon is not running but hal is installed
[18:57] <shadeslayer> so ... plasma crash : http://paste.ubuntu.com/547570/
[18:57] <shadeslayer> more of a QGS crash tho
[19:00] <skfin> What is the name of the metapackage that contains devel tools for kde
[19:01] <skfin> It was kde-devel once but cant find it anymore
[19:02] <shadeslayer> skfin: kde-sc-devel
[19:02] <shadeslayer> but .. theres no kde-devel anymore
[19:02] <skfin> Thanks :P
[19:02] <skfin> Hmm
[19:02] <skfin> shadeslayer: Oh?
[19:02] <shadeslayer> apparently im supposed to bring it back ... but im too lazy ^_^
[19:03] <skfin> :S
[19:04] <skfin> Blah, and I dont remember what all should I have
[19:04] <shadeslayer> well
[19:05] <shadeslayer> use apt-get build-dep  ^_^
[19:05] <skfin> Lol
[19:05] <skfin> For wha
[19:05] <skfin> t
[19:06] <skfin> I want to do c++, qt and kdelibs
[19:06] <skfin> Like, code using them
[19:06] <shadeslayer> ah
[19:06] <shadeslayer> skfin: kdelibs5-dev libqt4-dev and build-essential
[19:06] <shadeslayer> install those packages
[19:07] <shadeslayer> skfin: also a IDE like KDevelop or QtCreator ...
[19:07] <skfin> Lol
[19:08] <skfin> I had kdelibs5-dev, libqt4-dev and build-essential already :P
[19:08] <skfin> I perfer KDevelop
[19:09] <shadeslayer> right .. your all set then :D
[19:09] <skfin> Yeah
[19:10] <skfin> And yes I had KDevelop already
[19:10] <skfin> Lol I had everything already
[19:10] <shadeslayer> kewl
[19:10] <skfin> Hmm
[19:10] <skfin> Seems like KDevelop has a way less templates than before
[19:12] <skfin> Or it is just me
[19:12] <shadeslayer> skfin: tried the one from the PPA
[19:13] <skfin> Nope, what PPA is it?
[19:14] <skfin> Actually, I dont even have much time
[19:14] <skfin> Need to work whole christmas, gci :P
[19:14] <skfin> And amarok insider
[19:14] <skfin> And interview of a developer
[19:15] <shadeslayer> skfin: http://www.kubuntu.org/news/kdevelop-4.2-beta
[19:15] <shadeslayer> you'll just have to upgrade
[19:16] <skfin> Hmm
[19:16] <skfin> How I can add that to sources without kpackagekit?
[19:16] <skfin> Kpackagekit is not working very well atm
[19:16] <shadeslayer> skfin: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:foo
[19:16] <skfin> Oh yes, forgot that
[19:17] <skfin> Hmm I had that already
[19:18] <skfin> Is KDevelop 4.2 beta's version number 4.1.80?
[19:18] <shadeslayer> should be
[19:18] <skfin> Okay, then I have it
[19:18] <skfin> But still, only few templates
[19:19] <skfin> There are four templates
[19:20] <skfin> Is it for everybody else too?
[19:21] <skfin> Anyway, thanks a lot shadeslayer, I'll have to start working on my gci task
[19:21] <shadeslayer> sure no problem
[19:22] <shadeslayer> skfin: maybe they were split into a new package
[19:22] <skfin> I cant find any
[19:23] <skfin> Only kdevelop-php but I dont need that one :P
[19:23] <skfin> Well actually I need but not in this case
[19:24] <skfin> Haha: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8211975&postcount=3
[19:27] <skfin> Well, i dont need a template and there is a cmake command line application(hello world) which can be used for everything
[19:27] <shadeslayer> lol
[19:27] <shadeslayer> skfin: go complain in #kdevelop :P
[19:27] <skfin> Nah, I dont want
[19:28] <skfin> And as I said, I dont currently have time for that
[20:01]  * apachelogger has cold feet
[20:01] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: likewise
[20:03] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://i.imgur.com/IT2oK.png
[20:03] <apachelogger> is it p0rn?
[20:04] <shadeslayer> yes .... no .... maybe ... you need to decode the Data Matrix first :P
[20:04] <apachelogger> dont want to
[20:05] <apachelogger> cannt you give me decoded stuff?
[20:05] <apachelogger> omg
[20:05] <apachelogger> xmas day
[20:05] <apachelogger> that means
[20:05] <shadeslayer> no ... i feel g33ky today
[20:05] <apachelogger> doctor who
[20:05] <apachelogger> does it not
[20:05] <apachelogger> omg omg omg
[20:05] <ulysses> oh, tomorrow Doctor Who \o/
[20:06] <shadeslayer> bah ... encoding is all messed up in KDE 4.5.90
[20:07] <sheytan> Hey :D
[20:07] <sheytan> a christmass idea for kubuntu
[20:07] <sheytan> do not put the release version (11.04) next to kubuntu logo in plymouth
[20:07] <sheytan> just leave "Kubuntu" :)
[20:08] <shadeslayer> now ... someone go comment on bug 694344
[20:08] <shadeslayer> iirc ulysses you had the same issue right?
[20:09] <ulysses> shadeslayer: yes
[20:09] <apachelogger> no background has the advantage of faster kdm startup!
[20:09] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: no .. its slow as hell
[20:09] <apachelogger> sheytan: we do have the version next to it?
[20:09] <shadeslayer> even slower than KDE 4.5.4
[20:09] <apachelogger> oh
[20:10] <apachelogger> so they ported it to plasma?
[20:10] <apachelogger> :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
[20:10] <shadeslayer> i think so
[20:10] <shadeslayer> not sure
[20:10] <sheytan> apachelogger: in the "text mode" yes
[20:10] <sheytan> not sure about the normal mode
[20:11] <apachelogger> oh
[20:11]  * apachelogger does not care about the text mode since it only is used on systems with shit drivers and with shit drivers exerpience will suck anyway
[20:12] <sheytan> it's the KMS thing that doesn't work with nvidia, right?
[20:12] <apachelogger> sheytan: I think you should file a bug report about this against plymout (since that is a change that ought to be done in all versions of ubuntu, not just kubuntu)
[20:12] <apachelogger> not sure
[20:12] <apachelogger> it might just be that it does not support enough colors in KMS
[20:12] <apachelogger> some driver foobar anyway
[20:12] <ulysses> KMS sucks
[20:13] <apachelogger> no it does not
[20:13] <ulysses> due to kms my screen flashed in Lucid
[20:13] <shadeslayer> i have nvidia and for some reason on natty i have awesome res on my TTY
[20:13] <apachelogger> no
[20:13] <apachelogger> due to shit drivers & X it flashed
[20:14] <sheytan> will gstreamer be default for natty?
[20:15] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: plasma kdm hasnt been merged yet ... so no .. its not plasma based :P
[20:16] <sheytan> shadeslayer is there somewhere a plasma-kdm based demo?
[20:16] <sheytan> or screenshots
[20:16] <shadeslayer> sheytan: you'll have to ask sreich
[20:17] <sheytan> will do
[20:17] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: encoding in KDE based web browsers are all messed up with KDE 4.5.90 .. any ideas? 
[20:17] <shadeslayer> i.e konqueror and rekonq
[21:07] <apachelogger> did they drink too much eggnog?
[21:14] <whilo> can somebody help me and point out why building ktorrent trunk in my ppa does not resolve the dependeny to libktorrent in that ppa?
[21:14] <whilo> https://launchpad.net/~christian-weilbach/+archive/magneticlove/+build/2112385
[21:20] <apachelogger> maverick does not contain libktorrent-dev >=1.1*
[21:46] <whilo> apachelogger: but my ppa does and it says in the launchpad docs that it automatically pulls the dependency from the ppa when it is necessary
[21:47] <apachelogger> from the ppa itself
[21:47] <apachelogger> for that it needs to be in the ppa though ;)
[21:47] <apachelogger> ah
[21:47] <apachelogger> whilo: https://launchpad.net/~christian-weilbach/+archive/magneticlove/+packages
[21:47] <apachelogger> see the green cogwheels
[21:47] <apachelogger> those mean that the packages are not published yet
[21:48] <apachelogger> i.e. built but not available
[21:48] <apachelogger> usually takes between a second and 30 minutes I believe
[21:51] <Quintasan> or three days
[21:51] <Quintasan> LP magic
[21:52] <whilo> apachelogger: ok, i have disbled publishing since these packages are not really released yet and i am just testing the setup for the release
[21:53] <yofel> that will obviously not work since you need them published (LP magic strikes again)
[21:59] <apachelogger> whilo: that wont work
[21:59] <apachelogger> although
[21:59] <apachelogger> one can deactivate publishing?
[22:00] <Quintasan> Riddell: vHanda said he will attach a patch to the bug report (nepomuk crashes in RC1), which package it will go to? kdelibs?
[22:00] <whilo> apachelogger: yep, i didn't knew that this won't work so i am retrying now
[22:00] <apachelogger> whilo: btw, ~prebeta is actuall > ~beta :)
[22:00] <apachelogger> p>b
[22:00] <whilo> apachelogger: ok i thought that already, what should i use? git + date?
[22:01] <whilo> +git20101225 ?
[22:01] <apachelogger> +>~
[22:01] <apachelogger> whilo: ~beta0 for example
[22:01] <apachelogger> or previousversion+git$DATE
[22:02] <whilo> apachelogger:  the beta is not released yet
[22:02] <apachelogger> whilo: yeah, but beta0 < beta1 ;)
[22:02] <whilo> apachelogger: ok, but it breaks binary compatibility as it is a major release
[22:02] <apachelogger> usually for snapshots we just use the previousversion+git
[22:03] <whilo> apachelogger: ok
[22:03] <apachelogger> whilo: the package version has no impact on ABI
[22:03] <apachelogger> that is why the binary library package reflects the soname
[22:04] <whilo> ok
[22:04] <apachelogger> if the soversion gets bumped, the package name changes (that is if the soversion gets bumped at all which is usually not the case for snapshots, so that is a bit of a tricky thing to begin wiht ;))
[22:08] <apachelogger> doctor who \o/
[22:27] <Riddell> thanks Quintasan 
[22:28] <Quintasan> Riddell: No probs, I will test the patch with out packaging tomorrow.\
[22:47] <whilo> apachelogger: if i am pushing now ~beta0, launchpad does not seem to build the uploaded packages. do i have to remove the old ones first?
[22:47] <apachelogger> yes
[22:48] <apachelogger> as p>b lp will not accept ~beta0
[22:48] <ari-tczew> after last updates to *.90, gtk apps looks like windows 95
[22:50] <whilo> apachelogger: dput tells me that the file has already been uploaded, is this ok? or do i have to force it somehow?
[22:50] <apachelogger> -f
[22:51] <yofel> ari-tczew: KDE is resetting my gtk style configuration on logout here too
[22:52] <yofel> hm, do we have oxygen-gtk in the repository?
[22:53] <whilo> apachelogger: ha, kubuntu will get 0day support for magnet:/ urls :-)
[22:54] <whilo> if only phonon would work, than you could use bangarang with streamloaded webvideos. this would definetly rock in a screencast
[22:54] <whilo> i could even load some rss feed, but i hope i can do that later
[22:55] <whilo> amarok sadly also drops remote urls and temporary loads them first :-(
[23:01] <whilo> apachelogger: is ~beta0~0ubuntu0~magneticlove~maverick1 a good candidate?
[23:19] <apachelogger> whilo: sounds good enough
[23:19] <apachelogger> whilo: btw, sandsmark suggested that he stumbled upon code in dragon that is ugly enough to cause problems
[23:20] <apachelogger> so it might not be a problem in phonon afterall
[23:20] <apachelogger> who knows
[23:58] <ScottK> apachelogger: Would you please have a glance at http://pastebin.com/tQ2HzPV3 and see if it seems sensible to you?  It builds on armel, which the current one doesn't.
[23:59] <apachelogger> looks good to me
[23:59] <ScottK> Thanks.
[23:59] <apachelogger> ScottK: what was the build failure?