[00:41] <karni> I get 503, is it maintanance?
[00:41] <karni> see http://goo.gl/7qKU1
[00:46] <maxb> losa ping: codebrowse is offline
[00:46] <maxb> Not that there's likely to be anyone around who can fix it right now :-/
[00:46] <karni> :) It's fine. Normal people don't code late night during Xmas I guess xD
[00:48] <karni> maxb: interestingly, one file loaded, the other not. but I don't think is a load issue. anyway, thanks.
[04:00] <damascene> Hi, where should I go for this?
[04:00] <damascene> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/108979
[04:01] <damascene> it's about joining translation teams in one team
[04:37] <nigelb> damascene: This is the right place, but I'm not sure if anyone is around due to the vacations
[04:52] <damascene> ok
[05:08] <ovnicraft> hi guys, how i can search bugs reported by me?
[07:56] <achew22> Is launchpad having issues? I can't seem to browse source
[10:42] <TheMusicGuy> Hi. I just begun the process of recovering from a really bad commit to a big solo project I've been working on and I just finished reading the BlueprintOverview. I figured I can use the commit log from the bad commit as a basis for a future/todo/tasks list, since I currently don't have much in the way of a written checklist and I am in need of one. Where should I go from here?
[13:14] <zyga> can anyone please confirm that date picker is broken on firefox 3.x ?
[13:48] <fde-openerp> hello! I get this error when trying to push a branch
[13:48] <fde-openerp> bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(lp-78826448:///~openerp/openobject-server/trunk/.bzr/branchlock): Transport operation not possible: readonly transport
[13:48] <fde-openerp> command is:
[13:48] <fde-openerp> bzr push --remember bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp/openobject-server/trunk/
[13:51] <zyga> fde-openerp, are you bzr lp-login ?
[13:51] <fde-openerp> yes
[13:51] <wgrant> fde-openerp: Are you in https://launchpad.net/~openerp? It doesn't look like it.
[13:54] <fde-openerp> ok that was it, tkans (I thought I was)
[13:54] <fde-openerp> thanks
[14:34] <leoquant> error ID OOPS-1822B1140 i
[18:43] <jolson> Launchpad reject my bug report for lack of REFERE header. I'm just using an ordinary Firefox. Is this the expected behaviour or is there something wrong at the moment?
[18:50] <lifeless> jolson: its expected; you've disabled the referer header which launchpad uses as part of its xss protection
[18:52] <jolson> lifeless: Thanks for the response. I haven't actively disabled the header, as far as I know. I thought it had to do with that HTTPS was in use. Doesn't that mean that everyone with Firefox would be unable to submit bugs?
[18:53] <elmo> jolson: firefox defaults to sending the referrer header
[18:53] <elmo> jolson: you (or someone else) has configured your firefox to not send it
[18:53] <elmo> jolson: you might want to look at the 'refcontrol' firefox extension, it allows you to control referrer sending on a per-site basis, and you can e.g. whitelist launchpad
[18:54] <elmo> + but still not send them by default
[18:55] <jolson> elmo: Really! I wasn't aware I was using anything other than the defaults. Where is the place I can reset this setting to the default? I don't want to whitelist only Launchpad.
[18:56] <elmo> jolson: open 'about:config' in a new tab/window in firefox
[18:56] <jolson> I found network.http.sendRefererHeader there. Is that it?
[18:56] <elmo> that and sendSecureXSiteReferrer
[18:57] <jolson> elmo: Alright. Both of them at default now. Need I restart Firefox? (I hope not, it takes forever to restore all tabs!)
[18:58] <elmo> jolson: I don't believe you have to restart firefox, it should take effect immediately
[18:59] <jolson> elmo: I'll try again now. Too bad my carefully crafted bug report got lost.
[19:05] <jolson> elmo: Gah. Something keeps changing the header setting to 0 all the time. I guess it's some add-on, though I don't know which one. Any usual suspects?
[19:06] <elmo> jolson: refcontrol?
[19:06] <elmo> jolson: beyond that, I don't know, sorry
[19:07] <lifeless> what addons do you have installed?
[19:10] <jolson> lifeless: Adblock Plus; BugMeNot; Element Hiding Helper for Adblock Plus; Firebug; Firepicker; FlashMath; Greasemonkey; Illimitux; Linkification; Live HTTP headers; Screengrab; Ubuntu Firefox Modifications; UnPlug; User Agent Switcher; wmlbrowser
[19:15] <lifeless> I'd try turning adblock plus off; there are a bunch of hits for 'adblock plus referer' in google
[19:15] <lifeless> if that works, then consult its docs for how to enable referer on one website only.
[19:16] <lifeless> They have a fair argument that referer isn't reliable as protection, and we're going to do something more robust in the future, but for now, referer is what we use.
[19:18] <jolson> lifeless and elmo: Thank you. I'll look into what Adblock Plus is up to when I get the time. No bug reporting today, though.
[20:26] <ari-tczew> jelmer: what about release new bzr in sid or experimental?
[20:26] <ari-tczew> dunno whether wait or upload bugfix to bzr in Ubuntu
[21:03] <vagrantc> i'm trying to add a new ssh key to launchpad, and the text box window line-wraps and thus the key is invalid ... is there any other way to import a key? i'm using https://launchpad.net/~vagrantc/+editsshkeys
[21:06] <beuno> vagrantc, it shouldn't be saving it warpped
[21:06] <beuno> *wrapped
[21:07] <vagrantc> well, something is broken
[21:07] <vagrantc> i get a very useful error message "Invalid public key"
[21:08] <vagrantc> it's not like i don't use that key
[21:09] <vagrantc> ah!
[21:09] <vagrantc> it required a comment
[21:12] <vagrantc> i may be a bit dense here, but how do you report bugs in launchpad ... there's no obvious interface at https://bugs.launchpad.net ... ?
[21:15] <beuno> vagrantc, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad
[21:17] <vagrantc> thanks
[21:20] <elmo> vagrantc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/60601
[21:21] <elmo> vagrantc: including a comment from you ;-)
[21:21] <vagrantc> hah.
[21:27] <vagrantc> maybe i'll make another comment in two years the next time it breaks... *sigh*
[21:30] <jelmer> ari-tczew: I'm having trouble building it locally at the moment (the testsuite fails)
[21:30] <ari-tczew> jelmer: do you need a help?
[21:30] <jelmer> ari-tczew: Can you successfully build http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-bazaar/bzr/unstable at the moment?
[21:32] <ari-tczew> jelmer: your link shows empty ftp :) do you mean https://code.launchpad.net/~debian-bazaar/bzr/unstable ?
[21:33] <jelmer> ari-tczew: that location contains a bzr branch (the web server hides .bzr directories though)
[21:34] <ari-tczew> jelmer: I really want to help you and try to build bzr locally. However, I'm affected by bug and I can't branch :)
[21:34] <ari-tczew> jelmer: if you can pack it into tarball and send to any ftp...
[21:40] <jelmer> ari-tczew: you should be able to just comment out that problematic bit manually
[21:41] <ari-tczew> jelmer: do you mean download all files changed manually?
[21:43] <vagrantc> thanks for the help, folks ...
[21:50] <micahg> ari-tczew: branch in a VM :)
[21:51] <ari-tczew> micahg: I don't have VM.
[22:00] <jelmer> ari-tczew: I mean just add the size= argument in bzrlib/transport/http/_urllib_wrappers2.py
[22:05] <ari-tczew> jelmer: I'll try this one in a couple of minutes. could you pastebin your error?
[22:13] <ari-tczew> jelmer: what about changes in debian/{control,rules}? should do I apply them as well?
[22:17] <jelmer> ari-tczew: I don't have it here - it was in one of the locale tests
[22:30] <ari-tczew> jelmer: I'm patching source but there is no wrappers2.py
[22:30] <ari-tczew> only wrappers.py
[22:36] <ari-tczew> jelmer: bzr is building. I have concern about log r3891: you wrote about python-configobj but in result there is more change in debian/control
[23:21] <jelmer> ari-tczew: I also mention a switch to python-support
[23:21] <jelmer> however, neither of those should affect the test suite
[23:27] <ari-tczew> jelmer: also FTBFS on my side. http://paste.ubuntu.com/548088/
[23:27] <ari-tczew> jelmer: is it related to change in source or due to change in /debian/ directory?
[23:33] <jelmer> ari-tczew: You're not building on Debian?
[23:33] <ari-tczew> jelmer: nope, on natty
[23:33] <ari-tczew> Ubuntu
[23:34] <jelmer> ari-tczew: Those are known issues when running the test suiteg with python2.7.
[23:35] <jelmer> ari-tczew: except for the first one fixes have landed
[23:35] <ari-tczew> developers will be suprised after back from holidays
[23:35] <ari-tczew> jelmer: did you have build fine on Debian?
[23:36] <jelmer> ari-tczew: no, that's where I get the FTBFS
[23:36] <jelmer> ari-tczew: Debian doesn't have 2.7
[23:36] <ari-tczew> jelmer: I know