[16:18] <highvoltage> hey everyone
[16:18] <mhall119> morning
[16:24] <highvoltage> hey mhall119 I was wondering if you were around
[16:25] <mhall119> I am
[16:26] <highvoltage> indeed :)
[16:26] <highvoltage> I wasn't particularly looking for you, but I thought that if *someone* would be around at this time it would be you
[16:27] <mhall119> any progress on debmower?
[16:28] <highvoltage> no, I suck. I spent pretty much the last week just watching TV and vegging out
[16:28] <highvoltage> the next week should be somewhat better :)
[16:28] <mhall119> no worries, I did pretty much the same
[16:29] <mhall119> that's the true meaning of christmas, after all
[16:29] <mhall119> I'm still torn about what to do with xdg-launcher
[16:34] <highvoltage> yeah, stuffing yourself and lying around is indeed the TrueMeaning™ of christmas :)
[16:35] <highvoltage> I don't have an idea for xdg-launcher, if you feel strongly that that is what it should be called you can always just fight for it
[16:35] <highvoltage> but I guess it probably is more appropriate to call it something else out of the xdg namespace
[16:36] <mhall119> yeah, but it seems like a silly think to fight over
[16:36] <highvoltage> *nod*
[16:36] <mhall119> I may just call it qimo-launcher for 11.04, then work on a more generic one for 11.10
[16:39] <highvoltage> that sounds sensible, although going with something more generic from the start will save you the trouble of dealing with transitional packages due to name changes
[16:41] <mhall119> true
[16:42] <mhall119> then again, I can always call it qimo-launcher but still make it generic enough for non-qimo use
[16:48] <highvoltage> indeed
[18:01] <mhall119> http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-nashville/come-0n-nashville-let-s-qimo
[18:01] <mhall119> Edubuntu gets a plug there too
[18:02] <mhall119> though, I'm not quite sure what "let's Qimo" means....
[18:15] <highvoltage> cool! interesting, I haven't made the direct link in my head from 'qimo' to 'eskimo' yet
[18:15] <mhall119> really?
[18:15] <mhall119> I try to advertise that pretty heavily
[18:15] <mhall119> it helps people pronoune it right
[18:15] <highvoltage> yes. maybe I did on some level but I didn't direclty think it. then again I might not have read that many qimo stuff before then (oops)
[18:16] <mhall119> probably the latter, I didn't start heavily advertising it until version 2, so you'd probably already read most everything before then
[18:17] <highvoltage> ah cool, they mention weblive too
[18:21] <mhall119> yeah
[19:44] <mhall119> highvoltage: that page seems to be a tad bit biased, so I'd question even if the images are real
[19:44] <mhall119> but, even if they are, they're for the software freedom law center, not the free software foundation
[19:47] <highvoltage> mhall119: bkuhn said they are real, I don't have a problem with the salaries per se
[19:47] <highvoltage> (weird how people jump to that conclusion though)
[19:48] <mhall119> yeah, I guess there wasn't a reason to assume that you did
[19:49] <mhall119> I was more struck that the guy who posted it seems to think that the FSF is paying those salaries
[19:50] <highvoltage> yeah he seems to have some kind of weird agenda
[19:51] <highvoltage> oh right, he seems to want everyone to use BSD licensed systems
[19:51] <highvoltage> (read that on one of his other pages)
[19:55] <mhall119> yeah, I saw that
[19:59] <mhall119> he also mentions GPL4
[19:59] <mhall119> not sure what that is