| kklimonda | hmm.. can I clone bzr repo without ssh key? | 02:03 |
|---|---|---|
| kklimonda | clone it from LP | 02:03 |
| kklimonda | ah, using http instead of lp worked | 02:04 |
| wgrant | kklimonda: lp: will resolve to http: if you haven't run bzr lp-login. | 02:16 |
| kklimonda | wgrant: I may have run lp-login at some point.. how can I check if I did (and restore the default behaviour)? | 02:24 |
| wgrant | kklimonda: Check ~/.bazaar/authentication.conf | 02:24 |
| wgrant | There will be a [Launchpad] section. | 02:24 |
| === Tak|Work is now known as Tak_ | ||
| === apachelogger is now known as darthlogger | ||
| === darthlogger is now known as apachelogger | ||
| Laibsch | where's the best place to ask about build problems in a PPA? I have something that at least starts to build in pbuilder but will not build in my PPA (build-time dependency issues) | 14:19 |
| Laibsch | PPA in question: https://launchpad.net/~r0lf/+archive/isdn/+packages | 14:20 |
| Laibsch | from the build log: | 14:22 |
| Laibsch | After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: libcapi20-dev(inst 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu6 ! << wanted 1:3.10) | 14:22 |
| Laibsch | I explicitly do not want to build against the Ubuntu package the (seemingly) older isdnutils package in that PPA | 14:23 |
| akoskm | hi! I requested a merge request from my trunk repo to the master. at the Code page it says that "1 branch proposed for merging into this one.". I already approved it, how to actually merge into the master? | 14:28 |
| micahg | Laibsch: build depends on libcapi20-dev (<< 1:3.10) is your issue, not the PPA | 14:34 |
| beuno | akoskm, you need to manually merge it into trunk | 14:34 |
| beuno | usually, you branch trunk locally, cd into it, merge ../other branch, commit, push | 14:35 |
| Laibsch | micahg: Thank you for having a look. If it wasn't clear, that "issue" is intentional, of course. I want to build against the package from the PPA not the seemingly newer package from ubuntu repos. | 14:40 |
| Laibsch | that dependency seems to be picked up fine with pbuilder, a local repo and the official repos | 14:40 |
| akoskm | beuno, thank you. I already merged it with trunk. Now I would merge trunk with master. | 14:41 |
| micahg | Laibsch: yeah, I don't know if you can do that in the PPA unless you reupload with a higher version than the archive one, and sorry, I read it twice and still got your intention wrong (my fault) | 14:42 |
| Laibsch | micahg: no problem, I'm sure it's a pretty unusual request to make | 14:53 |
| Laibsch | that isdnutils package has newer code in some parts but is mostly older than the ubuntu package | 14:54 |
| Laibsch | the capifax package needs the part where the code is newer and it needs the newest code | 14:54 |
| micahg | Laibsch: could you rebase those changes onto the Lucid package? You could also reupload with a slightly higher version number (1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu6.is.3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-9) | 14:58 |
| Laibsch | well, isdnutils already is a mess ;-) | 14:58 |
| Laibsch | I'm working on fixing that | 14:58 |
| Laibsch | less packages and versions meant less overhead | 14:59 |
| Laibsch | s/overhead/headache/ | 14:59 |
| Laibsch | but maybe you're right and rebasing the lucid package is the best way forward | 14:59 |
| Laibsch | that will actually be easy to do | 14:59 |
| damascene | Hi, | 16:53 |
| damascene | I'm the owner of https://launchpad.net/~arabic | 16:54 |
| damascene | and an administrator of ~lp-l10n-ar and ~ubuntu-l10n-ar | 16:55 |
| damascene | I would like to use a mail-list of one of them instead of creating separate mail lists | 16:56 |
| damascene | is it possible? | 16:56 |
| maxb | As a general rule, a Launchpad team used as a mailing list should be an Open team that is not used in any way to grant permissions to anything | 17:16 |
| damascene | what about using this https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-l10n-ara with all the teams? | 17:18 |
| damascene | or at least with ~arabic , it's open | 17:18 |
| maxb | Anything at lists.ubuntu.com is separate from Launchpad | 17:18 |
| damascene | I see. | 17:19 |
| damascene | I think I'll just order all new subscribers to any of these teams to join that mail-list. I think that would be easier. | 17:19 |
| maxb | That sounds like the right approach, if there already is a mailing list in existence for the purpose. | 17:20 |
| maxb | It would create confusion to have two lists for mostly the same topic | 17:20 |
| damascene | another question please. https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/108979 | 17:21 |
| damascene | Can we join the team as most of the owners agreed? | 17:22 |
| maxb | damascene: I think that will need to wait for official Launchpad people to be back after Christmas. But, given that all administrators of ~lp-l10n-ar and ~lp-l10n-ara have posted their consent on the question, it seems to me that it would be sensible to summarize that in the question | 17:32 |
| maxb | And explicitly ask for those two teams to be merged and the result appointed to the Launchpad translators group. | 17:33 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| maxb | Basically, summarize the current state so the official people with admin rights can see at a glance that the question is unblocked | 17:34 |
| damascene | OK, thanks for helping | 17:34 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| akoskm | hi! after accepting a merge request in the "trunk" how can I merge it with the "master"? | 19:02 |
| komputes | SPAM detected: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+question/139392 | 20:13 |
| crimsun | /sigh | 20:15 |
| micahg | komputes: looks like a hijacked account | 20:18 |
| komputes | micahg: either that or they found a way to automate questions (question does seem quite short) | 20:19 |
| komputes | micahg: + very new acct | 20:19 |
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| bdrung | why can't i access bug #690173? | 21:24 |
| ubot5 | Bug 690173 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/690173 is private | 21:24 |
| bdrung | i am ubuntu developer and maintainer for vlc. | 21:25 |
| cody-somerville | bdrung, Its probably a security bug. | 21:33 |
| bdrung | cody-somerville: it is, but why doesn't i have access to it? | 21:33 |
| cody-somerville | bdrung, because only the Ubuntu security team has access to unreviewed security bugs | 21:34 |
| bdrung | ok, then i'll fix a security bug that i can't see. | 21:34 |
| cody-somerville | bdrung, the security team will probably make it non-private if they deem it appropriate | 21:35 |
| cody-somerville | bdrung, Do you know who the reporter is? You can ask them to subscribe you directly to the bug. | 21:35 |
| bdrung | cody-somerville: i assume. | 21:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!