[02:03] <kklimonda> hmm.. can I clone bzr repo without ssh key?
[02:03] <kklimonda> clone it from LP
[02:04] <kklimonda> ah, using http instead of lp worked
[02:16] <wgrant> kklimonda: lp: will resolve to http: if you haven't run bzr lp-login.
[02:24] <kklimonda> wgrant: I may have run lp-login at some point.. how can I check if I did (and restore the default behaviour)?
[02:24] <wgrant> kklimonda: Check ~/.bazaar/authentication.conf
[02:24] <wgrant> There will be a [Launchpad] section.
[14:19] <Laibsch> where's the best place to ask about build problems in a PPA?  I have something that at least starts to build in pbuilder but will not build in my PPA (build-time dependency issues)
[14:20] <Laibsch> PPA in question: https://launchpad.net/~r0lf/+archive/isdn/+packages
[14:22] <Laibsch> from the build log:
[14:22] <Laibsch> After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: libcapi20-dev(inst 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu6 ! << wanted 1:3.10)
[14:23] <Laibsch> I explicitly do not want to build against the Ubuntu package the (seemingly) older isdnutils package in that PPA
[14:28] <akoskm> hi! I requested a merge request from my trunk repo to the master. at the Code page it says that "1 branch proposed for merging into this one.". I already approved it, how to actually merge into the master?
[14:34] <micahg> Laibsch: build depends on libcapi20-dev (<< 1:3.10) is your issue, not the PPA
[14:34] <beuno> akoskm, you need to manually merge it into trunk
[14:35] <beuno> usually, you branch trunk locally, cd into it, merge ../other branch, commit, push
[14:40] <Laibsch> micahg: Thank you for having a look.  If it wasn't clear, that "issue" is intentional, of course.  I want to build against the package from the PPA not the seemingly newer package from ubuntu repos.
[14:40] <Laibsch> that dependency seems to be picked up fine with pbuilder, a local repo and the official repos
[14:41] <akoskm> beuno, thank you. I already merged it with trunk. Now I would merge trunk with master.
[14:42] <micahg> Laibsch: yeah, I don't know if you can do that in the PPA unless you reupload with a higher version than the archive one, and sorry, I read it twice and still got your intention wrong (my fault)
[14:53] <Laibsch> micahg: no problem, I'm sure it's a pretty unusual request to make
[14:54] <Laibsch> that isdnutils package has newer code in some parts but is mostly older than the ubuntu package
[14:54] <Laibsch> the capifax package needs the part where the code is newer and it needs the newest code
[14:58] <micahg> Laibsch: could you rebase those changes onto the Lucid package?  You could also reupload with a slightly higher version number (1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu6.is.3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-9)
[14:58] <Laibsch> well, isdnutils already is a mess ;-)
[14:58] <Laibsch> I'm working on fixing that
[14:59] <Laibsch> less packages and versions meant less overhead
[14:59] <Laibsch> s/overhead/headache/
[14:59] <Laibsch> but maybe you're right and rebasing the lucid package is the best way forward
[14:59] <Laibsch> that will actually be easy to do
[16:53] <damascene> Hi,
[16:54] <damascene> I'm the owner of https://launchpad.net/~arabic
[16:55] <damascene> and an administrator of ~lp-l10n-ar and ~ubuntu-l10n-ar
[16:56] <damascene> I would like to use a mail-list of one of them instead of creating separate mail lists
[16:56] <damascene> is it possible?
[17:16] <maxb> As a general rule, a Launchpad team used as a mailing list should be an Open team that is not used in any way to grant permissions to anything
[17:18] <damascene> what about using this https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-l10n-ara with all the teams?
[17:18] <damascene> or at least with ~arabic , it's open
[17:18] <maxb> Anything at lists.ubuntu.com is separate from Launchpad
[17:19] <damascene> I see.
[17:19] <damascene> I think I'll just order all new subscribers to any of these teams to join that mail-list. I think that would be easier.
[17:20] <maxb> That sounds like the right approach, if there already is a mailing list in existence for the purpose.
[17:20] <maxb> It would create confusion to have two lists for mostly the same topic
[17:21] <damascene> another question please. https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/108979
[17:22] <damascene> Can we join the team as most of the owners agreed?
[17:32] <maxb> damascene: I think that will need to wait for official Launchpad people to be back after Christmas. But, given that all administrators of ~lp-l10n-ar and ~lp-l10n-ara have posted their consent on the question, it seems to me that it would be sensible to summarize that in the question
[17:33] <maxb> And explicitly ask for those two teams to be merged and the result appointed to the Launchpad translators group.
[17:34] <maxb> Basically, summarize the current state so the official people with admin rights can see at a glance that the question is unblocked
[17:34] <damascene> OK, thanks for helping
[19:02] <akoskm> hi! after accepting a merge request in the "trunk" how can I merge it with the "master"?
[20:13] <komputes> SPAM detected: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+question/139392
[20:15] <crimsun> /sigh
[20:18] <micahg> komputes: looks like a hijacked account
[20:19] <komputes> micahg: either that or they found a way to automate questions (question does seem quite short)
[20:19] <komputes> micahg: + very new acct
[21:24] <bdrung> why can't i access bug #690173?
[21:25] <bdrung> i am ubuntu developer and maintainer for vlc.
[21:33] <cody-somerville> bdrung, Its probably a security bug.
[21:33] <bdrung> cody-somerville: it is, but why doesn't i have access to it?
[21:34] <cody-somerville> bdrung, because only the Ubuntu security team has access to unreviewed security bugs
[21:34] <bdrung> ok, then i'll fix a security bug that i can't see.
[21:35] <cody-somerville> bdrung, the security team will probably make it non-private if they deem it appropriate
[21:35] <cody-somerville> bdrung, Do you know who the reporter is? You can ask them to subscribe you directly to the bug.
[21:37] <bdrung> cody-somerville: i assume.