/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/29/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

bcurtiswxkenvandine_, is my desktop not supposed to work at all with the GNOME3 PPA ?14:53
bcurtiswxI get top panel, and thats it14:53
bcurtiswxnautilus: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-3.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory14:54
bcurtiswxanyone know how i search for what package contains that file ?14:56
bcurtiswxapt-cache search ?14:56
micahgbcurtiswx: apt-file14:58
bcurtiswxmicahg, ty14:58
milanbvbcurtiswx: of course, this file comes from libgtk3.015:01
hyperairany dbus-glib gurus around?15:24
hyperairwhen a server allocates a crapload of memory to pass into dbus (e.g. client calls a method or something), who frees it?15:25
hyperairdbus?15:25
hyperairor the server application itself?15:25
bcurtiswxldd /usr/bin/nautilus | grep libgtk-x11-3.0.so.0  could someone using natty give me their output ?15:49
bcurtiswxmicahg, ^^15:53
bcurtiswxanyone know if there's a way for me to DL that file on its own to put where the computer thinks it should be ?15:59
bcurtiswxricotz, are you using the GNOME3 Team PPA currently ?16:05
ricotzbcurtiswx, currently not16:12
bcurtiswxricotz, OK, the libgtk3.0 files you have in the GNOME3 PPA somehow aren't installing libgtk-x11-3.0.so.016:13
bcurtiswxricotz, nautilus requires that file to run, so I can't do anything with nautilus16:13
bcurtiswxricotz, do you know how I might be able to download that .so file and put it where nautilus wants ?16:14
ricotzbcurtiswx, iirc, this x11 lib wont be built anymore, there will be only libgtk-3.0, so nautilus and its deps need a rebuild/update16:17
bcurtiswxricotz, i have a nautilus update available but it wants to remove ubuntu-desktop :( i wouldn't know how to fix it to make it install16:18
ricotzbcurtiswx, have you installed all the packages of the gnome3 ppa?16:19
bcurtiswxricotz, yup16:19
bcurtiswxricotz, thats the only one that wants to remove ubuntu-desktop16:20
bcurtiswxwait a second16:20
ricotzbcurtiswx, and a local rebuild of 2.91.6 against gtk+2.91.8~ doesnt work16:20
bcurtiswxno i did a apt-cache policy nautilus and it said it wasn't installed... but gosh if i remember any updates removing it... well hey.. problem solved i hope16:21
ricotzalso g-s-d migth have some problems16:22
bcurtiswxthat why i was assuming it was installed.. i make every effort on upgrades to not remove anything (i typically use apt-get update for that reason)16:22
bcurtiswxlol, ok check that,.. nvm16:22
bcurtiswxim on the wrong ssh16:22
bcurtiswxim battin 0.000 so far16:23
bcurtiswxricotz, Installed: 1:2.91.4-0ubuntu1~build1    Candidate: 1:2.91.4-0ubuntu1~build216:23
ricotzthat wont work ;)16:24
bcurtiswxricotz, :( no later version will either?16:24
ricotzi think 2.91.6 should work16:25
bcurtiswxricotz, is that in a PPA ?16:25
ricotzyou added the right ppa?16:25
ricotzyes it is16:25
ricotzppa:gnome3-team/gnome316:25
bcurtiswxricotz, yeah, thats the one i got16:27
ricotzoh this build failed16:27
bcurtiswxricotz, still.  i should get the one that it has which if 2.91.6.. right?16:28
ricotzyes16:28
bcurtiswxricotz, i have the PPA but its not getting the new packages... any idea on how to diagnose why ?16:28
ricotzas i said i just noticed the 2.91.6 built failed16:29
bcurtiswxricotz, oh, i was asking if the one previous to that was a 2.91.6 or 2.91.5 that i don't have16:29
ricotzyou need the 2.91.6 to work with gtk2.91.7+16:30
bcurtiswxricotz, the build in the PPA failed due to a missing dep, which according to apt-cache search doesn't exist and an apt-cache show says its virtual16:32
bcurtiswxgir1.0-pango-1.016:33
bcurtiswxricotz, maybe remove the dep ?16:33
bcurtiswxricotz, its not seeing package in the PPA.. im gonna retry that build16:34
bcurtiswxit should see them.16:34
ricotzbcurtiswx, i pushed an update16:40
bcurtiswxricotz, OK. i'll look for the changelog16:41
bcurtiswxricotz, FTBFS on that build.17:00
bcurtiswxricotz, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/61394207/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.nautilus_1%3A2.91.6-0ubuntu1~build2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz17:00
ricotzbcurtiswx, yeah, i see, i forgot to rename the nautilus gir package17:03
ricotzbcurtiswx, you are also a member of gnome3-team?17:05
bcurtiswxricotz, yes17:06
ricotzso you can fix it yourself ;)17:06
bcurtiswxricotz, yup, but i didn't know that the buil fail was due to a package rename.. im still learning that type of stuff :)17:06
ricotzi hope ~build3 will do17:07
bcurtiswxricotz, the package shouldn' be gir1.0-nautilus-2.0 but gir1.2-nautilus-2.0?17:08
ricotzactually gir1.2-nautilus-3.017:08
bcurtiswxricotz, the 3.0 is for the gtk version ?17:08
ricotzno, the nautilus version17:08
bcurtiswxricotz, 2.91.x is the 3.0 set.. yes.. sry :)17:09
ricotzright17:09
bcurtiswxanyone know how I would go about finding out how to see why nautilus wants to remove ubuntu-desktop.. aptitude why says ubuntu-desktop depends on nautilus, so why would it avoid an upgrade ?17:42
geser"sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop nautilus" and see where apt-get complains17:53
geseryou might need to repeat it with additional packages till you see the real conflict17:54
ricotzbcurtiswx, it is nautilus-sendto which needs to be remove and ubuntu-desktop depends on it17:58
ricotzso removing them will solve the problem17:58
bcurtiswxricotz, i don't have nautilus-sendto17:59
ricotztry to use aptitude which is quite comportable to use to figure these things out18:00
bcurtiswxricotz, ubuntu-desktop needs to not depend on nautilus-sendto, would it be appropriate to make a GNOME3 PPA build of ubuntu-desktop that doesn't depend on nautilus-sendto ?18:03
ricotzbcurtiswx, just remove it for testing purposes, ubuntu-desktop is only a meta-package to pull in all needed stuff18:04
GunnarHjgeser: Hi Michael, did my mail-reply yesterday make sense?18:11
geseryes18:12
geserGunnarHj: I have in the gdm login dialog "English (Ireland)" selected for a long time already. Don't if it matters in the upgrade, but I've also auto-login enabled. It was easier for me to edit .dmrc instead of figuring out which tool I need to use18:18
geserand I've "customized" my Ubuntu for my need so my installation and also usage isn't very typical18:20
GunnarHjgeser: I see. Sounds like I don't need to worry to much then.18:26
bcurtiswxricotz, do you have libgtk-x11-3.0.so.0 still in /usr/lib ?18:27
geserGunnarHj: as I wasn't sure if it's a problem for others too (a bug) or not, I mailed you instead of filing a bug18:27
GunnarHjgeser: Ok. Guess we'll get to know in the next few weeks.18:29
GunnarHjgeser: The ambition was to prevent undesired surprises as far as possible, but obviously we didn't catch all cases. ;-)18:30
bcurtiswxanyone here using natty have /usr/lib/gtk-x11-3.0.so.0 and /usr/lib/gdk-x11-3.0.so.0 ?18:43
bcurtiswxi would like to request that someone send them to me in e-mail so I can have them for the time being until other programs are built without them appropriately18:43
ricotzbcurtiswx, these file arent available anymore18:44
ricotzis nautilus still complaining about it18:44
ricotz?18:44
bcurtiswxricotz, yes18:44
ricotzis it nautilus or another dependency?18:45
bcurtiswxi type nautilus in the terminal and it doesn't like that those files aren't available18:45
ricotzldd /usr/bin/nautilus contains the gdk/gtk-x11 lib?18:47
bcurtiswxricotz, yes sir says its not found, but looks for it18:47
ricotzok :), i didnt installed it myself and i am a bit afraid to do so18:48
bcurtiswxricotz, as a workaround if i can get those files i can get things to work18:48
bcurtiswxi temp symlinked them to libgtk-3.0.so.0 and it causes some major warning and some breakage still18:49
bcurtiswxbut at least that got it to work, but it still doesn't on login18:49
bcurtiswxand only classic desktop18:49
ricotzsurely there is another dependency interfering18:50
bcurtiswxricotz, idk, is there a way i can find out ?18:50
coz_bcurtiswx,  out of curiosity..., this is a clean install of natty?  yes?18:52
bcurtiswxcoz_, it was originally a edit of the sources list to have natty, so to answer your question, no18:53
coz_bcurtiswx,  oh  mmm   have you already   sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade18:53
bcurtiswxcoz_, yes18:54
coz_bcurtiswx,   the last time I tried changeing the sources list to install natty if failed miserably18:54
coz_bcurtiswx,  i then downloaded and burned the daily  and installed that18:54
coz_bcurtiswx, of course there are always issues with alphas  but at least it was working as well as it could18:55
bcurtiswxcoz, it was just a find/replace in the sources.list from maverick to natty18:55
coz_bcurtiswx,  right...that didnt work for me18:55
bcurtiswxcoz_, hmm. OK18:55
coz_bcurtiswx,  unless you have a zillion files to back up ... I would just download the daily build...check md5sums and burn it at  1x if possible18:56
bcurtiswxcoz_, i may.  at this point im trying to learn about finding issues and possibly fixing them.. but it's all learn by myself.  I learn best that way thoug18:57
coz_bcurtiswx,  that 's great but  somehow I dont think starting with a broken leg is the best way to enter a race18:58
bcurtiswxcoz_, how would _you_ go about learning those type of things then?18:59
coz_bcurtiswx,   well there are plently of bugs in natty to work with :)18:59
coz_bcurtiswx,   and  right now you have issues with maverick turned into natty... although it may be worth ferreting through everything to find the issues to fix it... I think  reporting and attempting to fix  bugs  not caused by an upgrade may be more beneficial19:00
coz_bcurtiswx,  but that is strickly my own perspective on it19:01
coz_bcurtiswx,  please dont listen to me if it doesnt sit well with you :)19:01
bcurtiswxcoz_, with probably more than half of the ubuntu userbase upgrading and not fresh-installing.  I would think that upgrade bugs are fairly important :)19:01
coz_bcurtiswx,  i agree so I will back off from lecturing :)19:02
scott-workNg:  sorry to bother you, but you had addressed my rt ticket about ubuntustudio.org access but used an old gpg key22:25
scott-workNg:  i updated the ticket and just wanted to let you what happened22:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!