| === stalcup is now known as vorian | ||
| bdrung | ari-tczew: "You can remove field XSBC-Original-Maintainer and move your person to Maintainer field as this package is not coming from Debian" - thats wrong (and dpkg-source will complain) | 01:48 |
|---|---|---|
| bdrung | ari-tczew: the maintainer needs to have a @ubuntu.com address in Ubuntu. | 01:48 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: why should we upgrade to debhelper 8? what benefit does it bring us over debhelper 7? | 01:49 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: ah right, @ubuntu.com address. | 01:50 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: btw, i was referring to http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch | 01:50 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: I know what are you reffering to. | 01:50 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: keeping up-to-dated QA standards | 01:50 |
| paissad | guys, i have debian/patches/ & debian/.pc directories, i use quilt in order to apply the patches, ... i only set debian/source/format to "3.0 (quilt)" | 02:15 |
| paissad | but except when i i manually copy (rsync) debian/.pc to sourceDir/.pc ... my build fails (debuild) | 02:16 |
| paissad | actually, the patches from debian/patches are not considered automatically | 02:16 |
| paissad | apart from have the patches in debian/patches & source/format, is there something i'm missing ? | 02:17 |
| Bachstelze | paissad: did you add the patches to debian/patches/series ? | 02:25 |
| paissad | Bachstelze, yes | 02:25 |
| paissad | Bachstelze, actually i think i know what is the problem, 2 sec please | 02:26 |
| paissad | actually, no i don't know what's the problem ^^ | 02:27 |
| Bachstelze | I'm not sure I understand either | 02:28 |
| Bachstelze | what do you mean by "not considered"? | 02:28 |
| paissad | Bachstelze, well, i have pms-linux-$VERSION/debian/patches/ | 02:39 |
| paissad | QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches | 02:39 |
| paissad | QUILT_REFRESH_ARGS="-p ab --no-timestamps | 02:39 |
| paissad | here is the tree of pms-linux-$VERSION/.pc -> http://dpaste.com/291751/ | 02:39 |
| paissad | here is the tree of debian/patches/ --> http://dpaste.com/291752/ | 02:40 |
| Bachstelze | paissad: one moment please, I'm in the middle of writing a Very Important™ email :) | 02:42 |
| paissad | don't bother mate ^^ | 02:42 |
| wolfric | as per https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693962 would this be a fair task for motu? Someone suggested i give packaging it myself a shot and from the brief read on the wiki, motu seems quite interesting and community friendly | 05:23 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 693962 in aircrack-ng (Ubuntu) "needs-packaging airdrop-ng not included in latest aircrack-ng" [Undecided,New] | 05:23 |
| wolfric | would this be a suitable candidate for me to try package? | 05:24 |
| micahg | wolfric: yes, it's probably just missing from the install file | 05:50 |
| wolfric | micahg: as in the aircrack deb install file? | 06:09 |
| micahg | wolfric: the .install file in teh debian dir if it exists | 06:09 |
| sagaci | wolfric: have you done much packaging | 06:42 |
| mase_wk | lo people. I am getting this error "debian/changelog(l5): found eof where expected first heading" from my debuild -S -uc -us | 06:50 |
| mase_wk | here is my changelog http://pastebin.ca/2032626 | 06:50 |
| mase_wk | i am unsure why it's complaining about the file, it looks very similiar to | 06:50 |
| mase_wk | http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog | 06:50 |
| micahg | mase_wk: you have no release name, source package shouldn't be capitalized | 06:51 |
| mase_wk | ok, what is the release name meant to reference ? | 06:51 |
| mase_wk | the release of the distro ? | 06:51 |
| micahg | mase_wk: yes | 06:51 |
| mase_wk | so Maverick Meerkat or just Maverick , do i use capitals for that ? | 06:52 |
| micahg | mase_wk: maverick, lower case, but only if this is for a local build or PPA, not REVU | 06:52 |
| mase_wk | i am unsure what REVU is. This isn't actually going into the distro, i would like it to go into an apt repository which i host somewhere | 06:53 |
| mase_wk | at least initially | 06:54 |
| micahg | mase_wk: ah, ok, maverick is fine then | 06:54 |
| micahg | mase_wk: to get the correct format, you can use dch --create | 06:55 |
| mase_wk | well i did use that initially but i didn't realise the case was important and i didn't know what release was referring to so i just removed it :) | 06:56 |
| mase_wk | so out of curiosity, what happens if debian people want to use this apt repo ? can they or do i need a debian install in order to create something that they can use ? | 06:57 |
| mase_wk | debian people = people who use debian :) | 06:57 |
| mase_wk | also i am getting a sh: gcc: not found, however this project is entirely PHP so why do i need gcc ? | 06:59 |
| micahg | mase_wk: part of build-essential? | 07:06 |
| === hanska is now known as dapal | ||
| shankao | hi! against which package should be filled "please sync..." reports? (i.e.: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/612518) | 10:49 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 612518 in Ubuntu "Please sync xen-4.0 from Debian to Maverick" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 10:50 |
| shankao | xen 3.3? should be left in the general "ubuntu" package? | 10:50 |
| shankao | found a dup (#378240) in xen-3.3, I will mark it as such | 10:59 |
| === apachelogger is now known as darthlogger | ||
| === darthlogger is now known as apachelogger | ||
| micahg | shankao: sync and merge bugs have a different workflow than regular bugs | 14:03 |
| shankao | so, should they be assigned to the general "ubuntu" package? | 14:08 |
| shankao | I mean, how do they get known to the proper people? | 14:11 |
| micahg | shankao: no, there are processes for them, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/#MOTU Processes, please don't touch them unless you understand the processes | 14:12 |
| shankao | ok, I see | 14:13 |
| shankao | thanks for the info | 14:13 |
| === Lutin is now known as Guest82309 | ||
| === Guest82309 is now known as Lutin | ||
| pulb | hi guys! bilal just suggested me to come here and ask for a package review. The package is called Basenji was uploaded here http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8714 some time ago .Its lintian clean and just needs a review. would be awesome if someone could do that :-) | 15:40 |
| ari-tczew | pulb: I'll have a look later. what did you do to get package in Debian? | 15:47 |
| pulb | ari-tczew: great! I didn't upload it to debian, just to revu. I'm using ubuntu and didnt find the time yet to check if it builds on debian | 15:49 |
| hugo_ | hello | 15:51 |
| hugo_ | Is it possible to migrate a package from getdeb.net to official debian repositories? | 15:52 |
| ari-tczew | yes, it is | 15:58 |
| === vorian is now known as bzip | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === bzip is now known as vorian | ||
| DktrKranz | bdrung: congrats! | 18:39 |
| highvoltage | moo | 18:40 |
| sebner | bdrung: congrats! :) | 18:42 |
| vorian | what'd he do DktrKranz? dd? | 18:42 |
| DktrKranz | vorian: exacly, just now | 18:42 |
| sebner | vorian: yeah | 18:42 |
| vorian | coolio, congrats bdrung | 18:42 |
| * maco claps | 18:44 | |
| hakermania | what happened to bdrung? | 19:03 |
| bdrung | DktrKranz, sebner, vorian: thanks. | 19:15 |
| bdrung | my irc client celebrates a highlighting festival. ;) | 19:16 |
| hakermania | bdrung: Congrats :) but for what? | 19:18 |
| bdrung | hakermania: DD - Debian Developer | 19:18 |
| bdrung | hakermania: now i have full upload rights to both worlds | 19:19 |
| hakermania | bdrung: Ouao. :) | 19:19 |
| bdrung | muhahaha | 19:21 |
| micahg | bdrung a DD now? very cool | 19:25 |
| bdrung | micahg: yes :) | 19:25 |
| DktrKranz | bdrung: go for Archive-Admin and FTP Team too, so you'll have full breakage rights too ;) | 19:32 |
| Laney | I just lost my almost-completed T&S reply | 19:35 |
| Laney | this makes me sad and angry | 19:35 |
| DktrKranz | I imagine... | 19:36 |
| * sebner hugs Laney :( | 19:36 | |
| Laney | unfortunately I was asked every single question too, so it was rather long | 19:36 |
| * DktrKranz printed the questions, and answered on-paper during lunchtime in office | 19:38 | |
| DktrKranz | quite old-style, but worked good :) | 19:38 |
| hakermania | Ey, how do I do that? ***hakermania had a coffe | 19:46 |
| * geser explains hakermania how to use /me | 19:57 | |
| * hakermania says | 20:02 | |
| hakermania | geser: cool, thx | 20:02 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: congrats :) (sorry missed your messages last night) | 20:05 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: thanks | 20:05 |
| tumbleweed | geser: any idea why ubuntutools.lp.lpapicache.Distribution('ubuntu') takes a lot longer than launchpadlib.launchpad.Launchpad.login_anonymously('testing', 'production').distributions['ubuntu'] (it seems to transfer a lot of data) | 20:06 |
| tumbleweed | geser: 10s vs 2s | 20:09 |
| geser | did you use anon-login also in the ubuntutools.lp.lpapicache case? | 20:10 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: why do we need ubuntutools.lp.lpapicache? | 20:10 |
| tumbleweed | it defaults to that, right? | 20:10 |
| geser | tumbleweed: no, default is normal login | 20:10 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: it caches results (but yes that was my first question too) | 20:10 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: and launchpadlib doesn't? | 20:11 |
| tumbleweed | geser: err yes that was it, sorry :( | 20:11 |
| geser | bdrung: before lpapicache the several functions from requestsync all refetched the object they needed through the LP API make the script unnessarily slow | 20:11 |
| geser | bdrung: no, unless you pass the fetched object around | 20:12 |
| bdrung | geser: can't we improve requestsync instead? | 20:12 |
| bdrung | geser: introducing object that store the launchpad objects? | 20:12 |
| geser | bdrung: that's what lpapicache does | 20:13 |
| geser | bdrung: lpapicache does it in a singleton style: doing Distribution('ubuntu') in one function and the same in a different function gives you the same object (fetched only once) | 20:20 |
| lifeless | bdrung: launchpadlib has to be conservative about caching; client code can be more aggressive where it has domain knowledge suggesting safety | 20:49 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| hakermania | ari-tczew: new package for wallch uploaded with one warning about the maintainer field (I was told by you to remove the XSBC-Original-Maintainer field at your comment. Please, if you have some time check it out. | 22:47 |
| hakermania | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch | 22:47 |
| mase_wk | what is the difference between the source formats quilt and native and what would make me choose one over the other ? | 22:57 |
| micahg | mase_wk: native has no upstream tarball | 22:59 |
| mase_wk | ok cool that is what i want then :) | 23:00 |
| mase_wk | do i still use debbuild -S -uc -us if my source format is native ? | 23:01 |
| mase_wk | nm it's created everything..just in the dir above | 23:01 |
| mase_wk | which i guess makes sense | 23:01 |
| bdrung | mase_wk: what do you package? | 23:12 |
| mase_wk | this is my first package. It's an application framework called timber | 23:13 |
| mase_wk | i have a file called build.xml, an ant compatible build tool called phing is used with timber | 23:14 |
| mase_wk | however it's complaining that it can't run ant clean | 23:15 |
| mase_wk | but i don't really want / need ant as a dependancy | 23:15 |
| mase_wk | how can i tell debbuild to ignore it ? | 23:16 |
| bdrung | mase_wk: this application is not Ubuntu specific? | 23:16 |
| mase_wk | no | 23:16 |
| mase_wk | the layout is ubuntu / debian specific | 23:16 |
| mase_wk | the fedora / RH use a different directory layout but that's about it | 23:17 |
| kklimonda | /b 10 | 23:17 |
| bdrung | mase_wk: then it shouldn't be a native package. | 23:17 |
| mase_wk | then it requires me to have an upstream tarball...which i don't have / want. I have a git repo which contains a branch which has only the debian dir in it | 23:18 |
| mase_wk | the idea being that i merge the debian branch and the master branch and run debuild and instapackage | 23:18 |
| bdrung | mase_wk: your upstream branch should be put into a tarball. you could add a "dist" target to build.xml to generate the tarball. | 23:19 |
| mase_wk | well a) build.xml isn't actually getting used at the moment | 23:20 |
| mase_wk | it's just there as a placeholder , but it will be in the future | 23:20 |
| mase_wk | although for unit tests and documentation | 23:20 |
| mase_wk | not as part of the install routine. | 23:20 |
| mase_wk | but if i do ever try and get this into debian i will do that. | 23:21 |
| oojah | mase_wk: You can/should create a tarball by making a get-orig-source target in debian/rules | 23:21 |
| oojah | (as I understand it) | 23:22 |
| oojah | There's an example in http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/maverick/sqlite3-pcre - download and extract the .debian.tar.gz file listed on the right. | 23:24 |
| mase_wk | oojah: ok, so then i just put the instructions for making my source tarball in there? | 23:24 |
| oojah | Bottom, not right. | 23:24 |
| oojah | mase_wk: It actually makes the source tarball. | 23:24 |
| mase_wk | sorry which of those files do i need the sqlite3-pcre_0~git20070120091816+4229ecc-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz one ? | 23:25 |
| oojah | mase_wk: Yep, then look at debian/rules | 23:26 |
| mase_wk | n/m not it | 23:26 |
| mase_wk | got it rather | 23:26 |
| mase_wk | kewl, thanks | 23:27 |
| oojah | It's just an example so might not apply to what you need to do exactly. | 23:27 |
| mase_wk | oojah: awesome that worked really well. so now my source format is correct. | 23:35 |
| mase_wk | does anyone have any idea how i can stop debbuild from trying to use my build.xml | 23:35 |
| EagleScreen | hello | 23:49 |
| mase_wk | hi EagleScreen | 23:53 |
| EagleScreen | can someone tell me what is wrong with this zenity code? <-- http://paste.debian.net/103446/ | 23:55 |
| EagleScreen | when the URL is clicked, nothing happens | 23:55 |
| EagleScreen | and terminal outputs this: http://paste.debian.net/103447/ | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!