[00:00] <rww> what did he want :\
[00:00] <CarlFK> i was hoping to become less undecided ;/
[00:00] <elky> rww, to mock.
[00:00] <rww> ah
[00:01] <elky> he indignantly informed me he didn't harass jordan for asking him to change his nick. then got all grins when i mentioned to tm_t here.
[00:01] <elky> so yes, mocking.
[00:03] <elky> the amount of his understanding and level of reform from his reprimand is hence about, oh, zero.
[00:04] <CarlFK> yeah, but other than the administrative noise the damage to #u is also about 0.
[00:05] <elky> CarlFK, so? you seriously think that someone can abuse ops just because the users of #u don't notice? uh nuh
[00:06]  * rww ponders keeping an up to date note on the status of native 64-bit Flash in !flash
[00:07] <rww> ooo, !flash64. never mind.
[00:07] <CarlFK> elky: i am really not sure.  I would like to think if it is ignored it goes away.
[00:08] <elky> CarlFK, it didn't. he repeatedly came here to antagonise.
[00:09] <CarlFK> the few times I saw him in here it was to dispute his ban. which he did with the skill of a stereotypical IRC users.
[00:12] <CarlFK> can someone be banned from here but not #u?
[00:12] <CarlFK> seems whacky.  kinda wondering if it makes any sense.
[00:13] <elky> yes, but that's pretty counterproductive.
[00:13] <CarlFK> agreed
[00:34] <IdleOne> Pici: did you ever get that email I sent to you?
[00:34] <IdleOne> not sure if it got sent or not
[00:44] <IdleOne> guess threatening,harassing,abusing in PM has no bearing
[00:51] <rww> jussi: ubottu broke: 16:51:18 <ubottu> Please comment on the removal of ArtistAbbot in #ubuntu-offtopic, use: @comment None <comment>
[00:53] <rww> For anyone interested, ArtistAbbot 1) is Hoober/Prosper_/that dude who got kicked out of -ot, -women, and #ubuntu for linking obscene pictures, 2) is being rather problematic in PM.
[00:53] <rww> jussi: (also, it appears to have not put the removal and ban in BT)
[01:25] <r00t4rd3d> elky, I wasnt "reverting to any pattern". I was just letting you know you have been misinformed.
[01:30] <CarlFK> http://xkcd.com/386/  title="What do you want me to do?  LEAVE?  Then they'll keep being wrong!" alt="Duty Calls"
[01:38] <ArtistAbbot> just got banned. would like to be unbanned in the future
[01:41] <rww> ArtistAbbot: Telling people to reformat their computer when they're asking how to fix a permissions problem is not acceptable. You are well aware of this and our other channel guidelines from several previous encounters, including a ban in #ubuntu.
[01:42] <rww> Based on your persistant behavior in #ubuntu and other channels, I am not at all confident in your ability to exist peacefully in them. As a result, I do not plan to remove your ban at this time.
[01:46] <ArtistAbbot> SELinux
[01:47] <ArtistAbbot> we were in a #ubuntu-support
[01:47] <IdleOne> what does that have to do with telling someone to format?
[01:47] <IdleOne> if you don't know the answer to a question you are better off not saying anything.
[01:48] <ArtistAbbot> i have conflicting sources of information about the subject of his question
[01:49] <ArtistAbbot> i just read wikipedia and i am sure of it now. at the time i had no reason to doubt my answer as not a response to his question
[01:49] <IdleOne> ArtistAbbot: The ban is not going to be lifted tonight. Please part the channel.
[01:49] <ArtistAbbot> into how many?
[01:50] <IdleOne> r00t4rd3d: Unless you have a ban that needs to be resolved please do not idle in here
[04:26] <Tm_T> rww: mute?
[04:27] <rww> apparently he's scared of it, figured it works ;P
[04:27] <Tm_T> no, not really,but letting him to read the channel isn't an issue yet
[04:28] <rww> someone said we should use +q more. *shrugs*
[04:28] <Tm_T> ye, he's asking a ban in PM, so let's keep the +q (:
[04:29] <rww> hehe
[04:32] <rww> but yeah, technically, I guess +q is interchangeable with +b, unless they start PMing random people or join/part flooding
[04:33] <elky> I see alabd hasn't changed
[04:33] <rww> indeed
[04:33] <rww> at least he isn't asking us to ponder US export law this time
[06:19] <mneptok> humble.
[06:19] <rww> I think next time he wanders by, I'll call him "indie bundle" and see what happens.
[10:11] <elky> rww, erm, do i remember a troublesome user with a nick resembling "full metal alchemist" correctly?
[10:13] <rww> elky: not that I remember, for what it's worth
[10:17] <elky> who else just about choked on "cross platform" there?
[10:21] <rww> It's probably a bad sign that the current #ubuntu-offtopic topic is above-average sane.
[10:21] <elky> yeah
[10:45] <elky> things that should be illegal: stone fruit with cling stones :(
[10:46] <elky> hmm, that was meant for -ot
[11:33]  * elky looks at rww and tries to hold a straight face...
[11:36] <jussi> elky: everylabel.com.au if you need/want - printable in pretty much every printer, or he can print them for you :)
[11:43] <elky> rww i think he thinks the first hit for facebook at that google link is mine...
[11:43] <rww> ah. lol.
[11:45] <elky> ok, this is a tough one...
[11:46] <elky> offtopic /isn't/ the place for him. he's constantly toyed with for others amusement without any inkling of awareness of this...
[12:53] <MichealH> Hi
[12:53] <MichealH> Hi Ubuntu Ops, I noticed there was a Mass Inviter that had visited your channel and invited almost everyone to a new channel called #InteractiveArt. The founder, Agu10 was behind this. I am now mentoring him to the freenode rules by being an op of his channel and gave permissions to the staff too. I am officially apologising on behalf of Agu10 and I hope this will never happen again while I am mentoring him. Thanks!
[12:54] <MichealH> I hope you all understand
[12:55] <MichealH> See ya
[13:04] <Pici> IdleOne: No, I never recieved your email.
[17:20] <Myrtti> that kernel doesn't look like ubuntu
[18:13] <IdleOne> Why is ubottu asking me to review a ban that was lifted?
[18:45] <nhandler> My guess is that it might not have been around or failed to notice the ban removal for one reason or another.
[18:45] <nhandler> IdleOne: ^
[18:45] <IdleOne> nhandler: yup