[00:00] what did he want :\ [00:00] i was hoping to become less undecided ;/ [00:00] rww, to mock. [00:00] ah [00:01] he indignantly informed me he didn't harass jordan for asking him to change his nick. then got all grins when i mentioned to tm_t here. [00:01] so yes, mocking. [00:03] the amount of his understanding and level of reform from his reprimand is hence about, oh, zero. [00:04] yeah, but other than the administrative noise the damage to #u is also about 0. [00:05] CarlFK, so? you seriously think that someone can abuse ops just because the users of #u don't notice? uh nuh [00:06] * rww ponders keeping an up to date note on the status of native 64-bit Flash in !flash [00:07] ooo, !flash64. never mind. [00:07] elky: i am really not sure. I would like to think if it is ignored it goes away. [00:08] CarlFK, it didn't. he repeatedly came here to antagonise. [00:09] the few times I saw him in here it was to dispute his ban. which he did with the skill of a stereotypical IRC users. [00:12] can someone be banned from here but not #u? [00:12] seems whacky. kinda wondering if it makes any sense. [00:13] yes, but that's pretty counterproductive. [00:13] agreed [00:34] Pici: did you ever get that email I sent to you? [00:34] not sure if it got sent or not [00:44] guess threatening,harassing,abusing in PM has no bearing [00:51] jussi: ubottu broke: 16:51:18 Please comment on the removal of ArtistAbbot in #ubuntu-offtopic, use: @comment None [00:53] For anyone interested, ArtistAbbot 1) is Hoober/Prosper_/that dude who got kicked out of -ot, -women, and #ubuntu for linking obscene pictures, 2) is being rather problematic in PM. [00:53] jussi: (also, it appears to have not put the removal and ban in BT) [01:25] elky, I wasnt "reverting to any pattern". I was just letting you know you have been misinformed. [01:30] http://xkcd.com/386/ title="What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!" alt="Duty Calls" [01:38] just got banned. would like to be unbanned in the future [01:41] ArtistAbbot: Telling people to reformat their computer when they're asking how to fix a permissions problem is not acceptable. You are well aware of this and our other channel guidelines from several previous encounters, including a ban in #ubuntu. [01:42] Based on your persistant behavior in #ubuntu and other channels, I am not at all confident in your ability to exist peacefully in them. As a result, I do not plan to remove your ban at this time. [01:46] SELinux [01:47] we were in a #ubuntu-support [01:47] what does that have to do with telling someone to format? [01:47] if you don't know the answer to a question you are better off not saying anything. [01:48] i have conflicting sources of information about the subject of his question [01:49] i just read wikipedia and i am sure of it now. at the time i had no reason to doubt my answer as not a response to his question [01:49] ArtistAbbot: The ban is not going to be lifted tonight. Please part the channel. [01:49] into how many? [01:50] r00t4rd3d: Unless you have a ban that needs to be resolved please do not idle in here === Mamarok_ is now known as Mamarok [03:04] In #ubuntu, Rawr0192 said: !smw where is that? [04:26] rww: mute? [04:27] apparently he's scared of it, figured it works ;P [04:27] no, not really,but letting him to read the channel isn't an issue yet [04:28] someone said we should use +q more. *shrugs* [04:28] ye, he's asking a ban in PM, so let's keep the +q (: [04:29] hehe [04:32] but yeah, technically, I guess +q is interchangeable with +b, unless they start PMing random people or join/part flooding [04:33] I see alabd hasn't changed [04:33] indeed [04:33] at least he isn't asking us to ponder US export law this time [06:19] humble. [06:19] I think next time he wanders by, I'll call him "indie bundle" and see what happens. [10:11] rww, erm, do i remember a troublesome user with a nick resembling "full metal alchemist" correctly? [10:13] elky: not that I remember, for what it's worth [10:17] who else just about choked on "cross platform" there? [10:21] It's probably a bad sign that the current #ubuntu-offtopic topic is above-average sane. [10:21] yeah [10:45] things that should be illegal: stone fruit with cling stones :( [10:46] hmm, that was meant for -ot [11:33] * elky looks at rww and tries to hold a straight face... [11:36] elky: everylabel.com.au if you need/want - printable in pretty much every printer, or he can print them for you :) [11:43] rww i think he thinks the first hit for facebook at that google link is mine... [11:43] ah. lol. [11:45] ok, this is a tough one... [11:46] offtopic /isn't/ the place for him. he's constantly toyed with for others amusement without any inkling of awareness of this... [12:53] Hi [12:53] Hi Ubuntu Ops, I noticed there was a Mass Inviter that had visited your channel and invited almost everyone to a new channel called #InteractiveArt. The founder, Agu10 was behind this. I am now mentoring him to the freenode rules by being an op of his channel and gave permissions to the staff too. I am officially apologising on behalf of Agu10 and I hope this will never happen again while I am mentoring him. Thanks! [12:54] I hope you all understand [12:55] See ya [13:04] IdleOne: No, I never recieved your email. [13:21] FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (flood (16)) [16:11] In ubottu, MuzerAway said: MuzerAway is currently away, try again later [17:20] that kernel doesn't look like ubuntu [18:13] Why is ubottu asking me to review a ban that was lifted? [18:45] My guess is that it might not have been around or failed to notice the ban removal for one reason or another. [18:45] IdleOne: ^ [18:45] nhandler: yup [20:20] soreau called the ops in #ubuntu (dagni)