 lastlog ipv6
[01:31] <charlie-tca> across many channels
[01:33] <IdleOne> looks like they forgot the /
[01:33] <charlie-tca> I see
[06:40] <elky> oh goody gumdrops
[06:40] <tonyyarusso> Actually, I have some gumdrops right here - yay Christmas!
[06:41] <elky> i have two lemon chocolate lindt things left in a box of chocolates but i can't bear them
[06:41] <tonyyarusso> ...lemon?
[06:45] <elky> yes, they're like supposed to be chocolate replicas of lemon curd pie or something
[10:44] <rww> Didn't someone talk to rocket16 in the past about quit messages involving "Victory to the Aryans!" and such?
[10:44] <Tm_T> cannot remember
[13:55] <Phineas> i am here to know what in the world is going on
[13:56] <IdleOne> with?
[13:56] <popey> if your question relates to #ubuntu-uk then you're in the wrong place, loco channels are dealt with in #ubuntu-irc
[13:56] <Phineas> popey,  oh ok
[15:47]  * Tm_T is testing metaclient
[16:19] <alabd> Good day all ,  Does this mean that all materials on ubuntu.com can be copied for non-commercial use ? http://www.ubuntu.com/legal > You are welcome to display on your computer, download and print pages from this website provided the content is only used for personal, educational and non-commercial use
[16:23] <tsimpson> alabd: why are you asking us?
[16:23] <CarlFK> alabd: we shouldn't answer that kind of question.  we are not experts and likely will give you incorrect info that could cause real problems for you.
[16:24] <alabd> Who should answer ? don't know where to ask
[16:24] <tsimpson> we are not lawyers
[16:25] <alabd> tsimpson: yes i-humble know you are not lawyer but that site s ubuntu.com
[16:25] <tsimpson> since it's ubuntu.com what? we are not responsible for the website, only the IRC channels
[16:25] <tsimpson> you could always email canonical if you are concerned you may be violating copyright
[16:25] <alabd> ok thanks a lot
[16:25] <alabd> bye
[16:26] <IdleOne> client went nuts, what was the question?
[16:26] <tsimpson> he was asking if he can use parts of the ubuntu.com website for non-commercial purposes
[16:26] <IdleOne> probably not.
[16:26] <CarlFK> IdleOne: alabd: Good day all ,  Does this mean that all materials on ubuntu.com can be copied for non-commercial use ? http://www.ubuntu.com/legal > You are welcome to display...
[16:26] <tsimpson> he already had http://www.ubuntu.com/legal
[16:26] <IdleOne> but not my place to say
[16:27] <tsimpson> it does something about non-commercial use, but I'm not about to give out legal advice ;)
[16:27] <IdleOne> me either
[16:27] <IdleOne> contact a lawyer and ask them to figure it out
[16:30] <mneptok> look at the AND
[16:30] <mneptok> it is not OR
[16:30] <mneptok> "provided the content is only used for personal, educational and non-commercial use"
[16:31] <mneptok> the use has to be personal AND educational AND non-commercial
[16:31] <mneptok> so as soon as you copy web content, then post it anywhere publicly, you are afoul of the trademark policy
[16:31] <tsimpson> legal documents are teh fun-times
[16:42] <IdleOne> Lecarsi: can I help you?
[16:42] <Lecarsi> No.
[16:42] <IdleOne> aka iLinux
[17:04] <cdbs> Happy New Year, ops!
[17:05] <IdleOne> Thank you cdbs, same to you
[20:50] <Flannel> Hi phuzion, how can we help you today?
[20:52] <phuzion> Flannel: I'm just running supybot's encyclopedia channel, and it said that something was forwarded to this channel, so I was checking to see if my bot joined this channel.
[22:12] <tonyyarusso> It's be nice if when you did an /abr, ubottu only asked for ONE comment instead of two, and just applied it to both the remove and the ban.
[22:14] <IdleOne> I don't comment on the remove
[22:15] <IdleOne> when followed by a ban
[22:22] <tonyyarusso> Same here.
[22:22] <tonyyarusso> So, given that this is a common workflow, the bots should match the reality :)
[22:22] <tonyyarusso> (In before "but you should be verbosely commenting on everything!")
[22:28] <tsimpson> the difficulty is in that the bot does no see a "kick-ban", but a kick and a ban
[22:28] <tsimpson> the bot is not smart, as it reminds you when you talk to it ;)
[22:29] <tonyyarusso> tsimpson: but bot programmers are smart, right?
[22:30] <tonyyarusso> Should be easy enough to introduce a 2-second lag between the event and bugging you to comment on it, and note what else happens in that time frame.
[22:31] <tsimpson> that would require adding a queue and a periodic event and other things that I'd rather not do without redesigning the plugin anyway
[22:32] <tonyyarusso> Excuses excuses :P
[23:04] <elky> i think tonyyarusso just volunteered to help, tsimpson
[23:04] <tsimpson> mor coderz plz
[23:15] <elky> also, im pretty sure the bot is definitive; reality is frequently inaccurate.