=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [01:31] lastlog ipv6 [01:31] across many channels [01:33] looks like they forgot the / [01:33] I see === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [06:40] oh goody gumdrops [06:40] Actually, I have some gumdrops right here - yay Christmas! [06:41] i have two lemon chocolate lindt things left in a box of chocolates but i can't bear them [06:41] ...lemon? [06:45] yes, they're like supposed to be chocolate replicas of lemon curd pie or something [10:44] Didn't someone talk to rocket16 in the past about quit messages involving "Victory to the Aryans!" and such? [10:44] cannot remember [13:55] i am here to know what in the world is going on [13:56] with? [13:56] if your question relates to #ubuntu-uk then you're in the wrong place, loco channels are dealt with in #ubuntu-irc [13:56] popey, oh ok [15:47] * Tm_T is testing metaclient [16:19] Good day all , Does this mean that all materials on ubuntu.com can be copied for non-commercial use ? http://www.ubuntu.com/legal > You are welcome to display on your computer, download and print pages from this website provided the content is only used for personal, educational and non-commercial use [16:23] alabd: why are you asking us? [16:23] alabd: we shouldn't answer that kind of question. we are not experts and likely will give you incorrect info that could cause real problems for you. [16:24] Who should answer ? don't know where to ask [16:24] we are not lawyers [16:25] tsimpson: yes i-humble know you are not lawyer but that site s ubuntu.com [16:25] since it's ubuntu.com what? we are not responsible for the website, only the IRC channels [16:25] you could always email canonical if you are concerned you may be violating copyright [16:25] ok thanks a lot [16:25] bye [16:26] client went nuts, what was the question? [16:26] he was asking if he can use parts of the ubuntu.com website for non-commercial purposes [16:26] probably not. [16:26] IdleOne: alabd: Good day all , Does this mean that all materials on ubuntu.com can be copied for non-commercial use ? http://www.ubuntu.com/legal > You are welcome to display... [16:26] he already had http://www.ubuntu.com/legal [16:26] but not my place to say [16:27] it does something about non-commercial use, but I'm not about to give out legal advice ;) [16:27] me either [16:27] contact a lawyer and ask them to figure it out [16:30] look at the AND [16:30] it is not OR [16:30] "provided the content is only used for personal, educational and non-commercial use" [16:31] the use has to be personal AND educational AND non-commercial [16:31] so as soon as you copy web content, then post it anywhere publicly, you are afoul of the trademark policy [16:31] legal documents are teh fun-times [16:42] Lecarsi: can I help you? [16:42] No. [16:42] aka iLinux === bilalakh1ar_ is now known as cdbs [17:04] Happy New Year, ops! [17:05] Thank you cdbs, same to you === LjL is now known as Guest82017 [20:39] In #ubuntu-server, RoyK said: ubottu: no, webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system [20:39] In #ubuntu-server, RoyK said: ubottu: no, webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system, see ebox [20:39] In ubottu, RoyK said: no, no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system [20:39] In #ubuntu-server, RoyK said: ubottu: no, webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system, see ebox [20:50] Hi phuzion, how can we help you today? [20:52] Flannel: I'm just running supybot's encyclopedia channel, and it said that something was forwarded to this channel, so I was checking to see if my bot joined this channel. === CarlFK1 is now known as CarlFK [22:12] It's be nice if when you did an /abr, ubottu only asked for ONE comment instead of two, and just applied it to both the remove and the ban. [22:14] I don't comment on the remove [22:15] when followed by a ban [22:22] Same here. [22:22] So, given that this is a common workflow, the bots should match the reality :) [22:22] (In before "but you should be verbosely commenting on everything!") [22:28] the difficulty is in that the bot does no see a "kick-ban", but a kick and a ban [22:28] the bot is not smart, as it reminds you when you talk to it ;) [22:29] tsimpson: but bot programmers are smart, right? [22:30] Should be easy enough to introduce a 2-second lag between the event and bugging you to comment on it, and note what else happens in that time frame. [22:31] that would require adding a queue and a periodic event and other things that I'd rather not do without redesigning the plugin anyway [22:32] Excuses excuses :P === Guest82017 is now known as LjL === LjL is now known as Guest19421 === Guest19421 is now known as LjL [23:04] i think tonyyarusso just volunteered to help, tsimpson [23:04] mor coderz plz [23:15] also, im pretty sure the bot is definitive; reality is frequently inaccurate.