bdrung | kklimonda: but i can make it 4 % faster by using float instead of double | 00:13 |
---|---|---|
bdrung | :) | 00:13 |
=== anoteng_ is now known as anoteng | ||
ari-tczew | bdrung: could you check wrap-and-sort on wallch package? Indeed, doesn't do anything. | 02:10 |
slooksterpsv | Hi, I have a simple question, what does MOTU stand for or mean? (Acronym-wise) | 02:17 |
Nafallo | Masters of the Universe | 02:19 |
slooksterpsv | oh ok, thank you | 02:20 |
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth | ||
ebroder | brung: worrying about a 1.3% performance overhead seems kind of silly to me | 03:30 |
ebroder | at the very least, i'd make sure that things blow up if you don't call kibi_init, instead of working but being wrong | 03:30 |
ebroder | there's a lot of value to failing spectacularly when things are used out of spec | 03:31 |
ebroder | otherwise people won't notice they're doing something wrong | 03:31 |
s1aden | reliable >= faster | 03:34 |
=== s1aden is now known as sladen | ||
lifeless | sladen: its not always that simple :) | 05:11 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
=== hanska is now known as dapal | ||
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
ari-tczew | randomaction: nice to see you again involved! | 13:05 |
randomaction | hello | 13:06 |
randomaction | finally got some time for Ubuntu | 13:06 |
ari-tczew | :) | 13:06 |
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
bdrung | ari-tczew: running wrap-and-sort a second time doesn't change anything. wrap-and-sort worked as expected (read the man page). | 14:34 |
bdrung | ebroder: it's significant faster than the glib function. i can live with the performance overhead. kibi_init is gone. :) | 14:36 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: I still don't understand. | 14:36 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: wrap-and-sort is idempontent | 14:38 |
bdrung | :) | 14:38 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: and your script never change this package? | 14:40 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: it did. run "wrap-and-sort -v" to see which files are touched | 14:40 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: you should read the man page. quote: "By default the lists will only split into multiple lines if the entries are longer than 80 characters." | 14:41 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: why only longer than 80 chars? | 14:42 |
sebner | bdrung: is requestsync b0rken atm? http://pastebin.com/kwHxEEXf | 14:47 |
tumbleweed | sebner: that looks like a gpg configuration issue? | 14:51 |
tumbleweed | sebner: also, --lp :) | 14:51 |
sebner | ah true | 14:51 |
sebner | tumbleweed: worked, thx :) | 14:52 |
=== sresu_ is now known as sresu | ||
bdrung | ari-tczew: 80 chars are a common line maximum | 14:55 |
bdrung | sebner: file a bug. it shouldn't give you an assertion error | 14:56 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: IMO there should be an option to wrap anyway, even if it's less than 80 chars | 14:56 |
sebner | bdrung: aye aye | 14:56 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: there is. read the man page! | 14:56 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: but the default is what i prefer :P | 14:57 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: I did it, don't yell. I'm blind. | 14:57 |
ari-tczew | -a, --wrap-always wrap lists even if they fit into one 80 character long | 14:57 |
bdrung | *applaus* you found it | 14:58 |
ari-tczew | bdrung: why default is 80? IMO | 14:58 |
ari-tczew | always should wrap | 14:58 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: because that's a sensible length limit | 14:58 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: it's a matter of personal preference | 14:58 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: I added the -s option because I don't like the wrapping bdrung does :) | 14:58 |
ari-tczew | tumbleweed: aha. I like the case as bdrung does. :P | 14:59 |
bdrung | ari-tczew: e.g. http://richarddingwall.name/2008/05/31/is-the-80-character-line-limit-still-relevant/ | 14:59 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
* ari-tczew has noticed that day is visibly longer! | 15:02 | |
=== sk0rv is now known as skorv | ||
=== yofel is now known as sheytyl | ||
=== sheytyl is now known as yofel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!