[00:13] kklimonda: but i can make it 4 % faster by using float instead of double [00:13] :) === anoteng_ is now known as anoteng [02:10] bdrung: could you check wrap-and-sort on wallch package? Indeed, doesn't do anything. [02:17] Hi, I have a simple question, what does MOTU stand for or mean? (Acronym-wise) [02:19] Masters of the Universe [02:20] oh ok, thank you === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [03:30] brung: worrying about a 1.3% performance overhead seems kind of silly to me [03:30] at the very least, i'd make sure that things blow up if you don't call kibi_init, instead of working but being wrong [03:31] there's a lot of value to failing spectacularly when things are used out of spec [03:31] otherwise people won't notice they're doing something wrong [03:34] reliable >= faster === s1aden is now known as sladen [05:11] sladen: its not always that simple :) === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === hanska is now known as dapal === menesis1 is now known as menesis [13:05] randomaction: nice to see you again involved! [13:06] hello [13:06] finally got some time for Ubuntu [13:06] :) === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs [14:34] ari-tczew: running wrap-and-sort a second time doesn't change anything. wrap-and-sort worked as expected (read the man page). [14:36] ebroder: it's significant faster than the glib function. i can live with the performance overhead. kibi_init is gone. :) [14:36] bdrung: I still don't understand. [14:38] ari-tczew: wrap-and-sort is idempontent [14:38] :) [14:40] bdrung: and your script never change this package? [14:40] ari-tczew: it did. run "wrap-and-sort -v" to see which files are touched [14:41] ari-tczew: you should read the man page. quote: "By default the lists will only split into multiple lines if the entries are longer than 80 characters." [14:42] bdrung: why only longer than 80 chars? [14:47] bdrung: is requestsync b0rken atm? http://pastebin.com/kwHxEEXf [14:51] sebner: that looks like a gpg configuration issue? [14:51] sebner: also, --lp :) [14:51] ah true [14:52] tumbleweed: worked, thx :) === sresu_ is now known as sresu [14:55] ari-tczew: 80 chars are a common line maximum [14:56] sebner: file a bug. it shouldn't give you an assertion error [14:56] bdrung: IMO there should be an option to wrap anyway, even if it's less than 80 chars [14:56] bdrung: aye aye [14:56] ari-tczew: there is. read the man page! [14:57] ari-tczew: but the default is what i prefer :P [14:57] bdrung: I did it, don't yell. I'm blind. [14:57] -a, --wrap-always wrap lists even if they fit into one 80 character long [14:58] *applaus* you found it [14:58] bdrung: why default is 80? IMO [14:58] always should wrap [14:58] ari-tczew: because that's a sensible length limit [14:58] ari-tczew: it's a matter of personal preference [14:58] ari-tczew: I added the -s option because I don't like the wrapping bdrung does :) [14:59] tumbleweed: aha. I like the case as bdrung does. :P [14:59] ari-tczew: e.g. http://richarddingwall.name/2008/05/31/is-the-80-character-line-limit-still-relevant/ === JanC_ is now known as JanC [15:02] * ari-tczew has noticed that day is visibly longer! === sk0rv is now known as skorv === yofel is now known as sheytyl === sheytyl is now known as yofel