bdrung | chrisccoulson: btw, my ati driver problem with FF 4.0 is "solved". | 01:02 |
---|---|---|
bdrung | chrisccoulson: my graphic card died. now i am using the intel onboard graphics. | 01:02 |
bdrung | discrete graphic cards tend to die after 25 months. | 01:03 |
nikolam | Hm. I would get Nvidia anyway. I got frustrated with AMD killing closed fglrx support for my AMD integrated graphics on MoBo and killing 3D speed with Open support. | 01:05 |
bdrung | nikolam: i was happy with the free ati driver. i won't buy nvidia again, because i want a free (floss) driver with 3d support. | 01:07 |
bdrung | nikolam: four graphic cards (including mine) died last year, but this was not vendor specific. | 01:08 |
bdrung | all dedicated graphic cards die often | 01:09 |
nikolam | omg. bdmurray sorry to hear that. I might consider changing MoBoard or checking if Power supply is ok, too, since it seems to me a bit too much to kill 4 cards in a year | 01:09 |
bdrung | nikolam: four in different computers. mine, my parents, one friend, and one acquaintance | 01:10 |
bdrung | nikolam: all with different power supplies and they are located in three different house holds. | 01:11 |
bdrung | and they were from different vendors and series | 01:11 |
nikolam | bdrung, oh, that sounds scary. And they were all AMD? Were they connected to VGA or DVI-D monitors? What OSĀ“es were they running on? | 01:19 |
bdrung | nikolam: amd and nvidia. three via dvi and one via vga. OS were ubuntu and windows. | 01:20 |
nikolam | bdrung, well, definitely something endemic about graphics card quality. Thanks for explaining. | 01:22 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
dpm | fta, great post on the PPA stats, very interesting | 10:02 |
fta | dpm, thanks | 12:41 |
fta | dpm, fyi: http://codereview.chromium.org/6040007/ | 12:45 |
dpm | fta, thanks. I'm not familiar with the chromium development process. What do I see there? I understand it's a bug report to commit translations, but I thought the first batch had already been committed? | 12:47 |
fta | dpm, it's not a bug report, it's a patch review system. and it's the 2nd batch | 12:47 |
dpm | ok, gotcha | 12:47 |
fta | still only 1 template though | 12:48 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
micahg | chrisccoulson: I forgot there's a dynamic control file now :-/ | 14:26 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: is there any reason to keep using DEB_BUILD_ARCH instead of DEB_HOST_ARCH? | 14:43 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: you around? | 15:51 |
=== gavin__ is now known as gavin | ||
chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, just got back from a shopping trip ;) | 16:57 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: ah, sorry, was jumpy, but then realized another few hours won't hurt anything | 16:57 |
micahg | well, my arm build didn't complete because the machine suspended, but it's passing the right -march now, so I figure it should work | 16:59 |
chrisccoulson | cool, thanks | 17:00 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: so, do you see any harm in switching from DEB_BUILD_ARCH to DEB_HOST_ARCH? lool said this should allow it to work when cross-compiling | 17:01 |
chrisccoulson | hmmm, i thought it was the other way around | 17:02 |
chrisccoulson | perhaps i'm confused | 17:02 |
chrisccoulson | i thought DEB_BUILD_ARCH was the target arch, in which case, using that would be more correct wouldn't it? | 17:02 |
* micahg thought so too, but DEB_HOST_ARCH seems to be suggested in the manpage for dpkg-architecture | 17:02 | |
chrisccoulson | oh, right, DEB_HOST_ARCH is the target then | 17:03 |
micahg | right | 17:03 |
chrisccoulson | in which case, some other parts in debian/rules are likely reversed ;) | 17:03 |
chrisccoulson | i'd leave it for the time being, i will have a look at that in a bit | 17:04 |
micahg | ok, the other suggestion was that armel won't match armhf | 17:04 |
micahg | so maybe we should only match arm, but we can save that for later as well | 17:04 |
micahg | ok, I'll upload then? | 17:05 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, can do | 17:10 |
=== Mook__ is now known as Mook | ||
=== Mook_ is now known as Mook | ||
gnomefreak | was thunderbird and seamonkey dailies moved to a new PPA? it has been over 2 weeks without updates to either of them | 19:12 |
gnomefreak | latest tb i have is 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 and seamonkey is 2.0.11+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 | 19:17 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: for xul2.0b8-ubuntu3 (FTBFS fix), what should I do since there's no tag for ubuntu2 | 19:53 |
gnomefreak | was tb and sm dailies moved to a new PPA? | 19:57 |
micahg | gnomefreak: we never had sm dailies and I still haven't gotten the trunk builds working, will get that up next week | 19:58 |
gnomefreak | oh ok and you mean tb trunk builds? | 19:58 |
micahg | gnomefreak: yeah, tb 3.1 dailies should be working | 19:58 |
gnomefreak | latest tb build is from 12/23/2010 | 19:59 |
micahg | that would be bad :-/ | 20:00 |
fta | no change in that branch since | 20:00 |
gnomefreak | 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 | 20:00 |
micahg | ah, fta is right | 20:00 |
gnomefreak | ah ok | 20:01 |
fta | it's tracking http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.2/ | 20:01 |
fta | that may be why | 20:01 |
fta | http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/ is fresher | 20:02 |
micahg | fta: right, I should have comm-central build ready next week, I need to take the changes that chrisccoulson made to the firefox branches and apply the appropriate ones to thunderbird | 20:02 |
micahg | I was supposed to have more free time last month, but due to various reasons did not | 20:03 |
gnomefreak | is there a way to turn off the ff data submit process? | 20:05 |
gnomefreak | i dont recall the exact name of it | 20:05 |
micahg | gnomefreak: just uncheck the box if it crashes, it's not required to submit | 20:05 |
gnomefreak | its not crashing | 20:06 |
micahg | what data submit process then? | 20:06 |
chrisccoulson | test pilot, probably | 20:06 |
micahg | ah, I'm not familiar with that | 20:06 |
chrisccoulson | just switch off the extension ;) | 20:06 |
chrisccoulson | but it exists for a reason | 20:06 |
gnomefreak | not sure i was using ff it hink its b7 and it asks me to submit it | 20:06 |
gnomefreak | ah ok thanks | 20:06 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - oh, did i not push the latest comments for xr-2.0? | 20:07 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: idk, there's no tag, but you imported the changelog | 20:07 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - oh, the tag is there, but it's in the branch i merged from ;) | 20:08 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: ah, ok | 20:08 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: that works then, I'll dig it out and upload later tonight | 20:08 |
micahg | thanks | 20:09 |
chrisccoulson | thanks | 20:09 |
gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: i dont have an extension for test pilot and i cant seem to find it in prefferences | 20:09 |
chrisccoulson | gnomefreak, it's called "Feedback" in the addons manager | 20:10 |
gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: i only have greasemonkey, ubuntu mods, and prism in extensions from addon manager | 20:11 |
gnomefreak | wait a minute that was under b9 not b7 but b7 is the one i need | 20:12 |
chrisccoulson | hmmm, not sure then. you'll need to describe what you're being asked to submit, I can't really guess that ;) | 20:12 |
gnomefreak | it pops up under feedback so i think you are correct. checking now | 20:14 |
gnomefreak | thats odd. with b7 greasemonkey, prism and ubuntu mods are not compatiable with b7 but with b9 they work fine | 20:16 |
micahg | did you override the checks in the profile? | 20:18 |
gnomefreak | profile? you mean addon manager? | 20:18 |
chrisccoulson | on the subject of testpilot, i really need to figure out why ubufox breaks it :/ | 20:18 |
gnomefreak | in addon manager i dont have an option to enable or override | 20:19 |
gnomefreak | nightly tester tool did not help it at all either | 20:22 |
gnomefreak | addon compatiblity checking is disabled and can not be enabled, maybe that is why? let me update all packages and see if it helps | 20:24 |
BUGabundo | evening | 22:25 |
=== Mook_ is now known as Mook |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!