[01:02] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: btw, my ati driver problem with FF 4.0 is "solved".
[01:02] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: my graphic card died. now i am using the intel onboard graphics.
[01:03] <bdrung> discrete graphic cards tend to die after 25 months.
[01:05] <nikolam> Hm. I would get Nvidia anyway. I got frustrated with AMD killing closed fglrx support for my AMD integrated graphics on MoBo and killing 3D speed with Open support.
[01:07] <bdrung> nikolam: i was happy with the free ati driver. i won't buy nvidia again, because i want a free (floss) driver with 3d support.
[01:08] <bdrung> nikolam: four graphic cards (including mine) died last year, but this was not vendor specific.
[01:09] <bdrung> all dedicated graphic cards die often
[01:09] <nikolam> omg. bdmurray sorry to hear that. I might consider changing MoBoard or checking if Power supply is ok, too, since it seems to me a bit too much to kill 4 cards in a year
[01:10] <bdrung> nikolam: four in different computers. mine, my parents, one friend, and one acquaintance
[01:11] <bdrung> nikolam: all with different power supplies and they are located in three different house holds.
[01:11] <bdrung> and they were from different vendors and series
[01:19] <nikolam> bdrung, oh, that sounds scary. And they were all AMD? Were they connected to VGA or DVI-D monitors? What OS´es were they running on?
[01:20] <bdrung> nikolam: amd and nvidia. three via dvi and one via vga. OS were ubuntu and windows.
[01:22] <nikolam> bdrung, well, definitely something endemic about graphics card quality. Thanks for explaining.
[10:02] <dpm> fta, great post on the PPA stats, very interesting
[12:41] <fta> dpm, thanks
[12:45] <fta> dpm, fyi: http://codereview.chromium.org/6040007/
[12:47] <dpm> fta, thanks. I'm not familiar with the chromium development process. What do I see there? I understand it's a bug report to commit translations, but I thought the first batch had already been committed?
[12:47] <fta> dpm, it's not a bug report, it's a patch review system. and it's the 2nd batch
[12:47] <dpm> ok, gotcha
[12:48] <fta> still only 1 template though
[14:26] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I forgot there's a dynamic control file now :-/
[14:43] <micahg> chrisccoulson: is there any reason to keep using DEB_BUILD_ARCH instead of DEB_HOST_ARCH?
[15:51] <micahg> chrisccoulson: you around?
[16:57] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, just got back from a shopping trip ;)
[16:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ah, sorry, was jumpy, but then realized another few hours won't hurt anything
[16:59] <micahg> well, my arm build didn't complete because the machine suspended, but it's passing the right -march now, so I figure it should work
[17:00] <chrisccoulson> cool, thanks
[17:01] <micahg> chrisccoulson: so, do you see any harm in switching from DEB_BUILD_ARCH to DEB_HOST_ARCH? lool said this should allow it to work when cross-compiling
[17:02] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, i thought it was the other way around
[17:02] <chrisccoulson> perhaps i'm confused
[17:02] <chrisccoulson> i thought DEB_BUILD_ARCH was the target arch, in which case, using that would be more correct wouldn't it?
[17:02]  * micahg thought so too, but DEB_HOST_ARCH seems to be suggested in the manpage for dpkg-architecture
[17:03] <chrisccoulson> oh, right, DEB_HOST_ARCH is the target then
[17:03] <micahg> right
[17:03] <chrisccoulson> in which case, some other parts in debian/rules are likely reversed ;)
[17:04] <chrisccoulson> i'd leave it for the time being, i will have a look at that in a bit
[17:04] <micahg> ok, the other suggestion was that armel won't match armhf
[17:04] <micahg> so maybe we should only match arm, but we can save that for later as well
[17:05] <micahg> ok, I'll upload then?
[17:10] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, can do
[19:12] <gnomefreak> was thunderbird and seamonkey dailies moved to a new PPA? it has been over 2 weeks without updates to either of them
[19:17] <gnomefreak> latest tb i have is 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1  and seamonkey is 2.0.11+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
[19:53] <micahg> chrisccoulson: for xul2.0b8-ubuntu3 (FTBFS fix), what should I do since there's no tag for ubuntu2
[19:57] <gnomefreak> was tb and sm dailies moved to a new PPA?
[19:58] <micahg> gnomefreak: we never had sm dailies and I still haven't gotten the trunk builds working, will get that up next week
[19:58] <gnomefreak> oh ok and you mean tb trunk builds?
[19:58] <micahg> gnomefreak: yeah, tb 3.1 dailies should be working
[19:59] <gnomefreak> latest tb build is from 12/23/2010
[20:00] <micahg> that would be bad :-/
[20:00] <fta> no change in that branch since
[20:00] <gnomefreak> 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1
[20:00] <micahg> ah, fta is right
[20:01] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[20:01] <fta> it's tracking http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.2/
[20:01] <fta> that may be why
[20:02] <fta> http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/ is fresher
[20:02] <micahg> fta: right, I should have comm-central build ready next week, I need to take the changes that chrisccoulson made to the firefox branches and apply the appropriate ones to thunderbird
[20:03] <micahg> I was supposed to have more free time last month, but due to various reasons did not
[20:05] <gnomefreak> is there a way to turn off the ff data submit process?
[20:05] <gnomefreak> i dont recall the exact name of it
[20:05] <micahg> gnomefreak: just uncheck the box if it crashes, it's not required to submit
[20:06] <gnomefreak> its not crashing
[20:06] <micahg> what data submit process then?
[20:06] <chrisccoulson> test pilot, probably
[20:06] <micahg> ah, I'm not familiar with that
[20:06] <chrisccoulson> just switch off the extension ;)
[20:06] <chrisccoulson> but it exists for a reason
[20:06] <gnomefreak> not sure i was using ff it hink its b7 and it asks me to submit it
[20:06] <gnomefreak> ah ok thanks
[20:07] <chrisccoulson> micahg - oh, did i not push the latest comments for xr-2.0?
[20:07] <micahg> chrisccoulson: idk, there's no tag, but you imported the changelog
[20:08] <chrisccoulson> micahg - oh, the tag is there, but it's in the branch i merged from ;)
[20:08] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ah, ok
[20:08] <micahg> chrisccoulson: that works then, I'll dig it out and upload later tonight
[20:09] <micahg> thanks
[20:09] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[20:09] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: i dont have an extension for test pilot and i cant seem to find it in prefferences
[20:10] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak, it's called "Feedback" in the addons manager
[20:11] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: i only have greasemonkey, ubuntu mods, and prism in extensions from addon manager
[20:12] <gnomefreak> wait a minute that was under b9 not b7 but b7 is the one i need
[20:12] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, not sure then. you'll need to describe what you're being asked to submit, I can't really guess that ;)
[20:14] <gnomefreak> it pops up under feedback so i think you are correct. checking now
[20:16] <gnomefreak> thats odd. with b7 greasemonkey, prism and ubuntu mods are not compatiable with b7 but with b9 they work fine
[20:18] <micahg> did you override the checks in the profile?
[20:18] <gnomefreak> profile? you mean addon manager?
[20:18] <chrisccoulson> on the subject of testpilot, i really need to figure out why ubufox breaks it :/
[20:19] <gnomefreak> in addon manager i dont have an option to enable or override
[20:22] <gnomefreak> nightly tester tool did not help it at all either
[20:24] <gnomefreak> addon compatiblity checking is disabled and can not be enabled, maybe that is why? let me update all packages and see if it helps
[22:25] <BUGabundo> evening