[01:02] chrisccoulson: btw, my ati driver problem with FF 4.0 is "solved". [01:02] chrisccoulson: my graphic card died. now i am using the intel onboard graphics. [01:03] discrete graphic cards tend to die after 25 months. [01:05] Hm. I would get Nvidia anyway. I got frustrated with AMD killing closed fglrx support for my AMD integrated graphics on MoBo and killing 3D speed with Open support. [01:07] nikolam: i was happy with the free ati driver. i won't buy nvidia again, because i want a free (floss) driver with 3d support. [01:08] nikolam: four graphic cards (including mine) died last year, but this was not vendor specific. [01:09] all dedicated graphic cards die often [01:09] omg. bdmurray sorry to hear that. I might consider changing MoBoard or checking if Power supply is ok, too, since it seems to me a bit too much to kill 4 cards in a year [01:10] nikolam: four in different computers. mine, my parents, one friend, and one acquaintance [01:11] nikolam: all with different power supplies and they are located in three different house holds. [01:11] and they were from different vendors and series [01:19] bdrung, oh, that sounds scary. And they were all AMD? Were they connected to VGA or DVI-D monitors? What OS´es were they running on? [01:20] nikolam: amd and nvidia. three via dvi and one via vga. OS were ubuntu and windows. [01:22] bdrung, well, definitely something endemic about graphics card quality. Thanks for explaining. === asac_ is now known as asac [10:02] fta, great post on the PPA stats, very interesting [12:41] dpm, thanks [12:45] dpm, fyi: http://codereview.chromium.org/6040007/ [12:47] fta, thanks. I'm not familiar with the chromium development process. What do I see there? I understand it's a bug report to commit translations, but I thought the first batch had already been committed? [12:47] dpm, it's not a bug report, it's a patch review system. and it's the 2nd batch [12:47] ok, gotcha [12:48] still only 1 template though === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:26] chrisccoulson: I forgot there's a dynamic control file now :-/ [14:43] chrisccoulson: is there any reason to keep using DEB_BUILD_ARCH instead of DEB_HOST_ARCH? [15:51] chrisccoulson: you around? === gavin__ is now known as gavin [16:57] micahg - yeah, just got back from a shopping trip ;) [16:57] chrisccoulson: ah, sorry, was jumpy, but then realized another few hours won't hurt anything [16:59] well, my arm build didn't complete because the machine suspended, but it's passing the right -march now, so I figure it should work [17:00] cool, thanks [17:01] chrisccoulson: so, do you see any harm in switching from DEB_BUILD_ARCH to DEB_HOST_ARCH? lool said this should allow it to work when cross-compiling [17:02] hmmm, i thought it was the other way around [17:02] perhaps i'm confused [17:02] i thought DEB_BUILD_ARCH was the target arch, in which case, using that would be more correct wouldn't it? [17:02] * micahg thought so too, but DEB_HOST_ARCH seems to be suggested in the manpage for dpkg-architecture [17:03] oh, right, DEB_HOST_ARCH is the target then [17:03] right [17:03] in which case, some other parts in debian/rules are likely reversed ;) [17:04] i'd leave it for the time being, i will have a look at that in a bit [17:04] ok, the other suggestion was that armel won't match armhf [17:04] so maybe we should only match arm, but we can save that for later as well [17:05] ok, I'll upload then? [17:10] micahg - yeah, can do === Mook__ is now known as Mook === Mook_ is now known as Mook [19:12] was thunderbird and seamonkey dailies moved to a new PPA? it has been over 2 weeks without updates to either of them [19:17] latest tb i have is 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 and seamonkey is 2.0.11+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 [19:53] chrisccoulson: for xul2.0b8-ubuntu3 (FTBFS fix), what should I do since there's no tag for ubuntu2 [19:57] was tb and sm dailies moved to a new PPA? [19:58] gnomefreak: we never had sm dailies and I still haven't gotten the trunk builds working, will get that up next week [19:58] oh ok and you mean tb trunk builds? [19:58] gnomefreak: yeah, tb 3.1 dailies should be working [19:59] latest tb build is from 12/23/2010 [20:00] that would be bad :-/ [20:00] no change in that branch since [20:00] 3.1.8~hg20101223r5918+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 [20:00] ah, fta is right [20:01] ah ok [20:01] it's tracking http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.2/ [20:01] that may be why [20:02] http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/ is fresher [20:02] fta: right, I should have comm-central build ready next week, I need to take the changes that chrisccoulson made to the firefox branches and apply the appropriate ones to thunderbird [20:03] I was supposed to have more free time last month, but due to various reasons did not [20:05] is there a way to turn off the ff data submit process? [20:05] i dont recall the exact name of it [20:05] gnomefreak: just uncheck the box if it crashes, it's not required to submit [20:06] its not crashing [20:06] what data submit process then? [20:06] test pilot, probably [20:06] ah, I'm not familiar with that [20:06] just switch off the extension ;) [20:06] but it exists for a reason [20:06] not sure i was using ff it hink its b7 and it asks me to submit it [20:06] ah ok thanks [20:07] micahg - oh, did i not push the latest comments for xr-2.0? [20:07] chrisccoulson: idk, there's no tag, but you imported the changelog [20:08] micahg - oh, the tag is there, but it's in the branch i merged from ;) [20:08] chrisccoulson: ah, ok [20:08] chrisccoulson: that works then, I'll dig it out and upload later tonight [20:09] thanks [20:09] thanks [20:09] chrisccoulson: i dont have an extension for test pilot and i cant seem to find it in prefferences [20:10] gnomefreak, it's called "Feedback" in the addons manager [20:11] chrisccoulson: i only have greasemonkey, ubuntu mods, and prism in extensions from addon manager [20:12] wait a minute that was under b9 not b7 but b7 is the one i need [20:12] hmmm, not sure then. you'll need to describe what you're being asked to submit, I can't really guess that ;) [20:14] it pops up under feedback so i think you are correct. checking now [20:16] thats odd. with b7 greasemonkey, prism and ubuntu mods are not compatiable with b7 but with b9 they work fine [20:18] did you override the checks in the profile? [20:18] profile? you mean addon manager? [20:18] on the subject of testpilot, i really need to figure out why ubufox breaks it :/ [20:19] in addon manager i dont have an option to enable or override [20:22] nightly tester tool did not help it at all either [20:24] addon compatiblity checking is disabled and can not be enabled, maybe that is why? let me update all packages and see if it helps [22:25] evening === Mook_ is now known as Mook