[10:38]  * ogra twiddles thumbs ... omap3 kernel still building
[10:52] <berco> Hi
[10:52] <berco> I was wondering why the OMAP3 kernel symbols are available in http://ddebs.ubuntu.com repo but not the package for OMAP4
[10:52] <berco> Is there a reason for this?
[10:53] <ogra> ask #ubuntu-kernel, they do the packaging
[10:53] <berco> ogra: thanks
[10:53] <ogra> theoretically omap4 should be there as well
[10:53] <ogra> if the ddebs are missing for it we should build them
[10:53] <berco> ogra: I only see linux-image-2.6.35-22-omap-dbgsym
[10:54] <ogra> yep
[10:55] <ogra> berco, hmm, i see omap4 now that i'm looking
[10:55] <ogra> http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux-ti-omap4/
[11:02] <berco> ogra: I only added "deb http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/ maverick main" to my sources.list and I don't see it
[11:02] <berco> ogra: what is the proper syntax for sources.list?
[11:02] <ogra> depends
[11:02] <ogra> are you using the kernel from proposed ?
[11:02] <ogra> or is there one in -updates you use
[11:03] <berco> if I want the one from 10.10
[11:03] <ogra> (and indeed, did you run apt-get update after changing sources.list)
[11:03] <berco> yep :)
[11:03] <berco> I did run update
[11:03] <ogra> well, there is definitely a kernel in maverick-updates
[11:03] <ogra> so you likely run that one
[11:04] <ogra> which needs to be reflected in your sources.list entry i think
[11:04] <ogra> dpkg -l|grep linux-image|grep omap4
[11:04] <ogra> see what version is installed
[11:05] <ogra> worst case just wget it and dpkg -i
[11:05] <berco> ogra: yeah, I wanted to answer a partner is trying to get our kernel symbols
[11:05] <ogra> (also note that the unstripped kernel is around 200M big)
[11:05] <berco> personnaly I run the kernel that we posted in omap-trunk public PPA
[11:05] <ogra> ah
[11:08] <berco> so that makes me think we should also push the kernel symbols for our trunk version, right?
[11:09] <berco> there's no process on launchpad to do this automatically?
[11:10] <ogra> i dont think so, it produces really huge packages ... you can just create a dbgsym package by default though
[11:10] <ogra> (dont ask me how, never did that)
[11:10] <berco> ok, when I add maverick-updates, I see the OMAP4 kernel.
[11:10] <ogra> right
[11:10] <ogra> thats what i thought
[11:11] <berco> ogra: thanks
[11:11] <ogra> http://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage
[11:12] <ogra> for your ppa kernel, you should be able to just change debian/control as described there
[11:25] <berco> ogra:  it sounds good. I'll discuss with sebj
[12:51] <alberto> i have downloaded ubuntu for beagleboard (mine is revision c4) and it works fine. The problem is that the usb hub does not power up. Does anyone know the solution for that?
[14:10]  * rsalveti lunch
[14:19] <davidm> G'day all
[14:19] <davidm> ogra, have you seen persia at all this week?
[14:19] <ogra> not at all
[14:19] <ogra> i was already wondering yesterday
[14:21] <davidm> I've been emailing  and calling with no response
[14:23] <ogra> damned
[14:23] <ogra> hopefully he is well
[14:39] <davidm> I hope so
[14:46] <rsalveti> yeah, since the last week of december
[14:46] <rsalveti> no news
[15:32] <janimo> ogra, managed to get iwconfig running eventually on the panda . The order of the arguments matters, and I did not know that
[15:33] <ogra> ah
[15:33] <janimo> so mode, channel and then essid
[15:33] <janimo> saw how nm does it via iwevent
[15:35] <rsalveti> interesting, didn't know that
[15:38] <ogra> lool, i was planning to upload a build from the debian git if you dont do it ... then we need the MIR for u-boot-tools approved and the package promoted
[15:38] <ogra> and only then i can change jasper to a new dep
[15:41] <ogra> (and then we have to pray for the archive to not be out of sync :) )
[15:41] <lool> ogra: There is no reason to push for it quicker in Debian; it wont make it to squeeze anyway, so I don't have any reason to request faster handling of it; I don't know how long it will take, but I would probably upload next week if I don't get feedback
[15:41] <lool> but Ubuntu shouldn't block on Debian; the package name is agreed upon, so shouldn't be a big issue
[15:43] <ogra> k
[15:44]  * ogra sighs having to deal with git then
[15:44] <ogra> i'll roll it tomorrow and upload an ubuntu0 package
[16:22] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: just upgraded my natty rootfs and it seems fine, can also confirm that firefox is ok
[16:22] <rsalveti> apparently no blocker bug
[16:22] <GrueMaster> I'm in the process of updating now.
[17:48] <GrueMaster> Ok.  Finally was able to pull down all the updates since yesterday.  Firefox is indeed working again (it was one of the updated packages).
[23:27] <topfs2> Quick question, is it normal that the netbook UI is rather slow on panda?
[23:44] <achiang> hm, i have an imx51 system (lucid) where ureadahead doesn't seem to be running during boot. i have an upstart job, not sure why it's not firing
[23:45] <achiang> ah, there we go, something in /var/log/boot.log -- terminated with status 5
[23:48] <GrueMaster> rsalveti: Any idea as to why the ti-ppa doesn't install on Natty?
[23:50] <GrueMaster> looks like a mime issue with gnome-open.