[00:59] <jj-afk> back on later
[01:11] <lifeless> whats the difference in a -server image?
[01:13] <jj-afk> the -server image is configured a little different
[01:13] <jj-afk> Hz = 100, and things like that
[01:16] <lifeless> cool, thanks
[02:34] <alex_mayorga> Hello all and thanks for your work on Ubuntu
[02:34] <alex_mayorga> I keep getting kernel panics as described on bug 693828
[02:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 693828 in linux (Ubuntu) "Fatal exception in interrupt: Kernel panic on 2.6.37-10-generic and 2.6.37-11-generic (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/693828
[02:35] <alex_mayorga> can someone help me to pinpoint the problem?
[09:08]  * apw loooks
[14:56] <cnd> sconklin, bjf[afk], if I remember right you two are handling stable kernels now?
[14:57] <cnd> there's a patch queued up for .36 stable that should be applied to lucid and maverick to fix load avg calculations
[14:57] <cnd> will that automatically be applied, or should I forward the patch to the list?
[14:57] <tgardner> cnd, email it on the list?
[14:57] <cnd> ok
[14:57] <tgardner> cnd, it'll happen automagically if its in stable (eventually)
[14:58] <cnd> ok, I'll forward the notification just to be safe
[14:58] <tgardner> cnd, has it bubbled down to .32 and .35 stable?
[14:59] <cnd> tgardner, I don't know, I just got an email stating that it's queued up for .36
[14:59] <cnd> I'll try to check git.kernel.org
[14:59] <tgardner> cnd, I thought we were carrying some form of that patch as a SAUCE patch in older kernels
[14:59] <cnd> tgardner, one of the two patches
[15:00] <cnd> this one is the second
[15:00] <tgardner> ah
[15:00] <cnd> it took a long time for the second one to be fixed
[15:00] <cnd> apparently it was pretty hairy
[15:00] <tgardner> maybe its not suitable for stable
[15:01] <cnd> well, load avg is severely broken without it :)
[15:01] <cnd> on some systems
[15:01] <cnd> it fixes the issue jj found
[15:01] <cnd> on ec2 systems
[15:02] <cnd> hmmm... I can't find where the .35 and .32 patch queues are found
[15:02] <tgardner> cnd, thats right, we dropped your patch on xen flavours because it caused regressions, right?
[15:02] <cnd> I don't know how it all works now with the stable process change
[15:02] <cnd> yeah
[15:02] <cnd> this fixes that regression
[15:02] <tgardner> cnd, yeah, we're a bit confused about where stable kernels are ending up as well
[15:03] <cnd> tgardner, I'll just forward the new patch to the list to be sure, with an explanation of what's going on
[15:28] <bjf> test
[15:28] <tgardner> bjf, test for echo
[15:28] <bjf> test succeeded :-)
[19:19]  * jjohansen -> dr. apt
[19:27]  * tgardner --> lunch
[20:04] <cking> yawn
[20:04] <JFo> yep
[20:14] <cking> beer
[20:16] <JFo> :(
[23:12] <smallfoot-> why isnt Linux kernel 2.6.37 available for Maverick 10.10 in the kernel ppa?
[23:19] <smallfoot-> why isnt Linux kernel 2.6.37 available for Maverick 10.10 in the kernel ppa?
[23:46] <apw> smallfoot-, the kernel-ppa only contains builds for lucid, as that is the only place we are targetting backports
[23:47] <smallfoot-> what?
[23:47] <smallfoot-> but im not using lucid
[23:47] <smallfoot-> im using maverick
[23:48] <smallfoot-> and i want 2.6.37