| ari-tczew | +1 micahg | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | ari-tczew: we have the same issue when people run firefox with sudo | 00:00 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: file a bug if it happen again | 00:00 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: lol why firefox with sudo? Someone must be pretty boted. | 00:00 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: happen what? | 00:01 |
| ari-tczew | s/boted/bored | 00:01 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: some people think you need to run everything with sudo | 00:01 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: if pbuilder-dist fails due to file permissions | 00:01 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: the same sentence I heard from kadu upstream developers. | 00:01 |
| bdrung | micahg: the new pbuilder-dist should even work with sudo (and then use /root/pbuilder) | 00:02 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: well, I think that I can file a bug right now because I'm not planning again reintroduce natty chroot. | 00:02 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: your bug could be triggered by and older version of pbuilder called with sudo (which should be fixed now). | 00:03 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: IMO everyone who is upgrading from old pbuilder is affected by this bug | 00:04 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: really? | 00:04 |
| * micahg doesn't use the current pbuider-dist w/sudo but is prompted for password | 00:04 | |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: I use pbuilder-dist since lucid. | 00:04 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: but did you run pbuilder-dist with sudo? | 00:05 |
| ari-tczew | now sudo has been changed and you adjusted pbuilder-dist. everyone will have to change permissions | 00:05 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: already not. but before run pbuilder-dist I had to do: $ sudo chown ari -R ~/pbuilder | 00:06 |
| * micahg thought one of the benefits of pbuilder-dist was not having to run w/sudo | 00:06 | |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: i am not a pbuilder-dist user, but it looks like it was never meant to run with sudo | 00:06 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: and store files in friendly ~/ directory, where you can write access ;) | 00:07 |
| ari-tczew | s/can/have | 00:07 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: you can file a bug if you can provide steps to reproduce the problem | 00:07 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: ok, but how do you want to fix this case? add a warning about incorrect permissions? | 00:08 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: wasn't the error message clear enough? if not, then file a bug requesting a better error message. | 00:11 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: could be added 'Please set permissions for you correctly. Root is already an owner of ~/pbuilder." | 00:12 |
| bdrung | "Root is already an owner of ~/pbuilder."? | 00:13 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: that's the reason of use chown | 00:13 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: yes, but ~/pbuilder could be owned by someone else | 00:14 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: or ~/pbuilder could be mounted read only | 00:14 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: then pbuilder-dist created it r-o. I'm the only user of Ubuntu, so who can be an owner of ~/pbuilder? root :) | 00:16 |
| ari-tczew | and chown fixed problem | 00:16 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: yes, that's your case, but the error can be trigger by other reasons like mentioned above | 00:17 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: what's the conclusion? file a bug or not... | 00:18 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: file a bug or talk to tumbleweed | 00:19 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: around? | 00:20 |
| blueyed | I wonder why this build fails: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/61691370/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.php5_5.3.5~snap201101060130-0~blueyedppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 03:37 |
| blueyed | error seems to be: Zend/zend_stream.c:239: error: 'PROT_READ' undeclared (first use in this function) | 03:37 |
| micahg | blueyed: missing a library or header? | 03:40 |
| blueyed | micahg: maybe, but that's in there unpatched and used in other places. Probably some patch breaks it.. I am basically using a mashup from Debian/Ubuntu and the PHP snapshot. | 03:46 |
| micahg | you can try asking on #ubuntu-server as they might be more familiar with the code | 03:47 |
| blueyed | PROT_READ gets defined in bits/mman.h, which gets included by sys/mman.h - without the latter, mmap would not be available, too, would it? | 03:54 |
| blueyed | the include is protected by "if HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H" in Zend/zend_stream.c | 03:55 |
| blueyed | ..and I cannot find where this would get defined. | 03:57 |
| blueyed | There is one "checking for sys/mman.h... no" (and all others "yes"). How can this be? The "no" one also seems to come from the same configure?! (or is this mangled output from parallel builds?) | 04:02 |
| blueyed | Why does it look like there are two configures running in parallel? Search for "sys/mman" in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/61691370/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.php5_5.3.5~snap201101060130-0~blueyedppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 04:14 |
| === sresu is now known as sre-su | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 06:30 |
| sagaci | afternoon | 06:32 |
| sagaci | dholbach: are you going to do more ustream tutes | 06:32 |
| dholbach | sagaci, yes, not this week, but definitely some time after that | 06:33 |
| udienz | micahg, about bug 694413. sorry for delay. i have tested now | 08:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 694413 in firestarter (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package firestarter 1.0.3-8ubuntu1 in natty" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/694413 | 08:21 |
| dholbach | could anyone imagine giving a dev training session at either 13th Jan, 12:00 UTC or 20th Jan, 18:00 UTC or 27th Jan, 0:00 UTC ? | 09:07 |
| dholbach | (if you'd like to move the time, that'd be fine too) | 09:07 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| benste | hi, iirc you're the team who care about packaging ? | 11:01 |
| benste | found a bug - namely a missing dependency of a package | 11:01 |
| benste | should i simply use groundcontrol to download and add it ? | 11:02 |
| benste | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeedu/+bug/698056 | 11:05 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 698056 in kdeedu (Ubuntu) "parley 2scripts could not be executed - missing dep" [Undecided,New] | 11:05 |
| benste | ? | 11:05 |
| benste | someone here ? | 11:07 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === sre-su is now known as sresu | ||
| === sresu is now known as sre-su | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| benste | dholbach: is there an easy way fixing a dependency issue ? | 12:55 |
| benste | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeedu/+bug/698056 | 12:56 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 698056 in kdeedu (Ubuntu) "parley 2scripts could not be executed - missing dep" [Undecided,New] | 12:56 |
| dholbach | benste, yes, get the source of the package, edit debian/control and add the dependency | 12:57 |
| benste | with groundcontrol ? | 12:58 |
| benste | will give it a try | 12:58 |
| benste | dholbach: ist das normal, das groundcontorl wenn ich fix bug sage - einfach nur meine nautilus navigations sachen disabled ? - oder läd der dann die ganzen source runter ? | 13:01 |
| dholbach | benste, I have no idea about groundcontrol, sorry | 13:04 |
| benste | :-) kk | 13:04 |
| benste | dholbach: but do you know how big the package source might be ? - looks like it's downloading kdeedu - isntead of parley | 13:04 |
| dholbach | I'd just run bzr branch lp:ubuntu/kdeedu or apt-get source kdeedu in the terminal | 13:04 |
| dholbach | it might be pretty big | 13:05 |
| dholbach | a lot of packages in the kde world are "bundled" together in one source package | 13:05 |
| dholbach | http://paste.ubuntu.com/551060/ | 13:05 |
| benste | dholbach: groundcontrol does use bzr :-) --- is working on 2nd atempt - downloading more than 120 MB till now | 13:10 |
| benste | more than 320 MB now -- how should someone e.g. in India fix a bug in the package -- the download would take weeks if I wouldn't have VDSL 20 ?? | 13:14 |
| dholbach | it indeed is a problem - there are huge source packages and it's made worse by getting history of commits to the source package | 13:16 |
| dholbach | AFAIK the bazaar team has "checkouts with shallow history" on their agenda | 13:16 |
| geser | benste: which branch are you exactly downloading? | 13:23 |
| benste | geser: kdeedu - finished with more than 400 MB | 13:23 |
| benste | maybe the branch is also named | 13:23 |
| benste | bugfix-lp-698056 | 13:23 |
| geser | benste: I guess you got the "upstream" branch instead of the "packaging" one | 13:24 |
| benste | and this is ok or bad ? | 13:24 |
| benste | i just told groundcontrol to fix the bug id .... | 13:25 |
| geser | I don't know how groundcontrol works | 13:25 |
| benste | btw. there is no src/debian - rememeber it from dholbach s training session, but it's not there | 13:25 |
| geser | yes, because you probably got the upstream source (without the debian/ directory) | 13:26 |
| benste | :-) ok will have to delete it and try it the other way | 13:26 |
| geser | you need to branch https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu to get the debian/ directory for kdeedu | 13:26 |
| benste | not bzr branch lp:ubuntu/kdeedu as dholbach said ? | 13:27 |
| geser | but I've little expierence with those kind of branches, so I don't know who to use them properly | 13:27 |
| geser | that should work in theory (if kdeedu would have a such a branch) | 13:28 |
| geser | but when you look at https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeedu you see that there is none | 13:28 |
| benste | ok use "fetch branch" now and got redirected to the code one you set -- let's hope the new download is not the same size | 13:29 |
| geser | dholbach: do you have expierence with working with "only debian/" kind of branches? | 13:29 |
| Laney | I believe bzr builddeb supports them | 13:29 |
| Laney | "merge upstream mode" or something | 13:29 |
| benste | -- there is only a deb dir in there is this correct ? | 13:29 |
| geser | if "deb" == "debian" then yes | 13:29 |
| benste | dholbach: the package which i wanted to add as dependency is already in there | 13:30 |
| benste | python-qt4 | 13:30 |
| benste | ?? | 13:30 |
| benste | geser: dholbach that's kinda strange -- how can i check the deps of the package which i installed ? - maybe it was already updated ? | 13:33 |
| geser | apt-cache show parley | 13:33 |
| geser | benste: you sure you looked at Depends for parley in debian/control and not Build-Depends? | 13:33 |
| benste | the package which i needed on install is in debian /control/build-deps | 13:34 |
| benste | does i have to add it in the depends section too ?? | 13:34 |
| benste | argh -- there are multiple packages in this file | 13:35 |
| benste | kdeedu build-depends on python-qt4 | 13:35 |
| geser | Build-Depends are packages which need to be installed during package building, Depends (for each package stance) are package that need to be installed before that (build) package can get installed | 13:35 |
| benste | geser: http://paste.ubuntu.com/551065/ | 13:36 |
| benste | should i simply add python-qt5? | 13:37 |
| benste | 4 | 13:37 |
| benste | in line 4 with , ? | 13:37 |
| benste | geser: or better in line 3 ? | 13:38 |
| benste | geser: dholbach and what does i have to do next when I've added ",python-qt4" in line 3 ? | 13:39 |
| dholbach | benste, line 3 sounds wrong | 13:40 |
| geser | line 3 and 4 are logically one line (split into two to keep it readable) | 13:40 |
| dholbach | not Build-Depends | 13:40 |
| dholbach | but Depends | 13:40 |
| dholbach | Build-Depends are the packages that need to be installed to build/compile the package | 13:40 |
| benste | line 3 is Depends | 13:40 |
| geser | dholbach: line 3 in his paste and not debian/control | 13:40 |
| dholbach | ok | 13:40 |
| benste | :-) | 13:40 |
| benste | ok saved but how can i commit it ? | 13:40 |
| benste | to the bug report ? | 13:40 |
| geser | first you need to write a fresh changelog entry for it | 13:41 |
| geser | debian/changelog entry (with dch -i) | 13:41 |
| dholbach | run: dch -i (devscripts package), document what you changed, run debcommit, bzr push lp:~<yourlpid>/ubuntu/kdeedu/bugfix-lp-698056, run bzr lp-open (and click on 'propose merge') | 13:42 |
| Laney | test it? | 13:43 |
| benste | dholbach: got an error | 13:44 |
| geser | dholbach: does debcommit also the linking to the bug? (bzr commit --fixes lp:698056) | 13:44 |
| benste | http://paste.ubuntu.com/551071/ | 13:44 |
| dholbach | geser, if you add "LP: #234567" in the changelog, yes | 13:44 |
| benste | geser: was in the wrong dir - ignore my pastebin | 13:45 |
| benste | may i edit the changelog manually ? | 13:45 |
| benste | and my e-mail adress is wrong in there | 13:46 |
| geser | dholbach: and shouldn't the push go to: lp:~<yourlpid>/kdeedu/ubuntu/bugfix-lp-698056 in this specific case (it's not the autoimported packaging branch) | 13:46 |
| geser | benste: better use dch to not break the format of debian/changelog | 13:47 |
| dholbach | not the autoimported packaging branch? | 13:48 |
| geser | no, kdeedu has no autoimported packaging branch (lp:ubuntu/kdeedu) | 13:48 |
| geser | he uses the lp:~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu branch (contains only the debian/ directory) | 13:49 |
| dholbach | oh ok | 13:49 |
| benste | dholbach: dch settings were explained in your packaging session - right ? - they're in the packaging guide ? | 13:50 |
| dholbach | yes | 13:50 |
| benste | need to change the e-mail adrees - thought it's using the one of my ssh key doesn't it ? | 13:50 |
| benste | dholbach: i can't use dh_make -e mymailadress for that - as i don't have a whole package - how can i change the adress used by dch ? | 13:51 |
| benste | DEBFULLNAME is set, this will be used for the maintainer full | 13:52 |
| benste | name; if not, then NAME will be checked. If the environment variable | 13:52 |
| benste | DEBEMAIL | 13:52 |
| dholbach | don't use dh_make if there's a packaging (/debian/ directory) in place already | 13:52 |
| dholbach | please check out the packaging guide | 13:52 |
| geser | export DEBFULLNAME="Your name"; export DEBEMAIL="your@email" | 13:53 |
| dholbach | (^ put that into .bashrc and 'source .bashrc' or restart your terminal session) | 13:53 |
| dholbach | benste, you don't neeed to ping me for every question - as you noticed there's a bunch of knowledgable folks in here :) | 13:54 |
| benste | sorry :-) | 13:54 |
| dholbach | don't worry :) | 13:54 |
| benste | got an error on debcommit : http://paste.ubuntu.com/551074/ | 14:01 |
| geser | did you tell bzr who you are (your lp login) before branching? | 14:04 |
| dholbach | $ sudo apt-get install bzr bzr-builddeb | 14:04 |
| dholbach | $ bzr whoami "James Westby <james.westby@ubuntu.com>" | 14:04 |
| dholbach | $ bzr launchpad-login james-w | 14:04 |
| benste | dholbach: usually groundcontrol should have done this, but let try it | 14:07 |
| benste | btw | 14:07 |
| dholbach | as I said - I don't know about groundcontrol | 14:07 |
| benste | on https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu they say You cannot upload to this branch. Members of Kubuntu Members can upload to this branch. | 14:07 |
| dholbach | it might be worth talking to doctormo about this | 14:07 |
| benste | already took a look whether he's only but he's not atm :-) | 14:07 |
| dholbach | then push to ~benste/kdeedu/fix-698056 | 14:08 |
| benste | bzr-builddeb libxdelta2 pbzip2 pristine-tar xdelta | 14:08 |
| benste | where not yet installed | 14:08 |
| geser | benste: that's not a problem as you will push into your "namespace" (lp:~benste) and propose a merge later to get into the ~kubuntu-members branch | 14:09 |
| benste | argh, after installation debcommit works | 14:09 |
| geser | benste: the next fix will be easier as you have the tools already installed then :) | 14:10 |
| benste | at least until it gets to transport - but i'll try commit and push withouht debcommit | 14:11 |
| benste | same issue as with debcommit ?? - http://paste.ubuntu.com/551077/ | 14:12 |
| dholbach | something still seems to have a lock on your branch | 14:13 |
| dholbach | I don't know what groundcontrol does tbh | 14:13 |
| geser | I guess you should either convice bzr that it can write now too or (probably easier) refetch the branch | 14:13 |
| dholbach | or no... hm | 14:13 |
| dholbach | ahhhhh | 14:13 |
| dholbach | I guess groundcontrol did a "bzr checkout ..." | 14:13 |
| benste | maybe :-) | 14:14 |
| dholbach | in the directory run: bzr unbind; debcommit | 14:14 |
| dholbach | "checkout" gives you a bound branch where a commit will always be in sync with the remote branch, "unbind" should allow you to do local commits (which you need to push somewhere 'manually' afterwards) | 14:15 |
| benste | bzr: ERROR: To use this feature you must upgrade your branch at bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu/. | 14:16 |
| dholbach | urgh | 14:17 |
| benste | guess it will be easiest to delete this directory and start all new again ? | 14:17 |
| benste | my change was only one line - so never mind | 14:17 |
| geser | rename it so you don't lose your changes | 14:17 |
| dholbach | copy the debian directory some other place and use "bzr branch ..." | 14:17 |
| hakermania | Is it allowed to make a right-click menu for your program? E.g. to add a option to the AVIs right click menu that says Convert to-> and have a submenu with WMV, MKV etc.... Is it allowed? | 14:25 |
| benste | geser: debdif worked now but have a new error on pushing http://paste.ubuntu.com/551086/ | 14:26 |
| dholbach | benste, lp:~benste/kdeedu/bugfix-lp-698056 | 14:36 |
| benste | dholbach: may i add you as reviewer ? | 14:40 |
| dholbach | usually just proposing the merge should be good enough | 14:41 |
| benste | sorry already suggested the merge with you as reviewer :-) | 14:42 |
| dholbach | I'm not even member of ~kubuntu-members | 14:43 |
| benste | :-) | 14:43 |
| benste | but i remember you | 14:43 |
| benste | thank you and geser for your help - took a long time but i've fixed my first easy bug now :-) | 14:43 |
| benste | -- when it's accepted - the bug report will be auto updated to fix released ? | 14:43 |
| dholbach | hum, it doesn't look right | 14:44 |
| dholbach | === added directory 'debian' | 14:44 |
| dholbach | === added directory '.bzr-builddeb' | 14:44 |
| dholbach | it seems like you copied in the directory | 14:45 |
| benste | i didn't :-( | 14:45 |
| dholbach | and not modified the files that are available there | 14:45 |
| benste | ok let's try it a 3rd time :-) | 14:46 |
| benste | renaming the dir first again ? | 14:46 |
| dholbach | request a review from kubuntu-dev instead of me | 14:47 |
| benste | I'll do | 14:47 |
| benste | but doesn't i have to fix this xxxx new lines issue first ? | 14:47 |
| benste | I've only change one line :-) | 14:47 |
| dholbach | I'm happy to have a look at it, but they're in a much better position to make the final judgement | 14:47 |
| benste | - should i do it again or wait for their feedback ? | 14:48 |
| dholbach | it looks like you copied those directories in | 14:48 |
| dholbach | instead of just modifiying the changelog and control files | 14:48 |
| benste | I've used cd .. | 14:49 |
| benste | and debcommit later - may this be the reason | 14:49 |
| benste | debcommit is to be used in /ubuntu or in /debian ? | 14:50 |
| dholbach | I don't know - it probably expects debian/changelog to be there | 14:51 |
| dholbach | ... brb | 14:52 |
| benste | i rebranched it now | 14:52 |
| benste | now commit told me 2 files changed-- that seems to be correct | 14:54 |
| benste | may i push to the same branch ? | 14:54 |
| benste | These branches have diverged | 14:54 |
| benste | got this errro message | 14:54 |
| Laney | bzr push --force I believe | 14:55 |
| Laney | or make a new branch | 14:55 |
| benste | laney thanks created a new one | 14:58 |
| benste | dholbach: I don't know what I doing wrong - same result on the 2nd try - branched - changed - added changelog - debcommit - push but more than 1000 lines changed ?? | 15:04 |
| benste | https://code.launchpad.net/~benste/kdeedu/bugfix-lp-698056_b/+merge/45388 | 15:04 |
| dholbach | can you pastebin the contents of the directory? | 15:05 |
| dholbach | just run "ls" in ubuntu/ | 15:05 |
| benste | debian | 15:05 |
| benste | http://paste.ubuntu.com/551101/ | 15:05 |
| dholbach | very weird | 15:06 |
| dholbach | ahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 15:07 |
| benste | ?? | 15:07 |
| dholbach | this is because the way ~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu is used confuses launchpad | 15:08 |
| dholbach | ~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu just contains packaging | 15:08 |
| dholbach | lp:kdeedu is an upstream code import | 15:08 |
| dholbach | benste, explicitly propose the merge into ~kubuntu-members/kdeedu/ubuntu | 15:08 |
| benste | weird thing :-) | 15:08 |
| benste | dholbach: changed https://code.launchpad.net/~benste/kdeedu/bugfix-lp-698056_b/+merge/45390 - the diff will be shown in a few minutes or ? | 15:10 |
| dholbach | reload the page | 15:10 |
| dholbach | it looks much better now | 15:10 |
| benste | :-) thanks for your help | 15:10 |
| dholbach | I'd change a few small things: | 15:10 |
| benste | hope parley will stay the only kde app that I have to use :-) | 15:11 |
| benste | -- which things ? | 15:11 |
| dholbach | - change "control - fix lp:698056" to "debian/control: add python-qt4 dependency for parley (LP: 698056)" | 15:11 |
| dholbach | - change "maverick" to "natty" | 15:11 |
| benste | do you do it ? | 15:11 |
| dholbach | - change "benste" to your real name | 15:11 |
| dholbach | apart from that: good work | 15:12 |
| dholbach | I don't know about the kubuntu team's plans with it regarding the version number, so just leave it as it is | 15:12 |
| benste | maverick → natty - in the bug report ??? | 15:13 |
| benste | and name in bashrc ? | 15:13 |
| dholbach | in debian/changelog | 15:14 |
| dholbach | and in .bashrc too | 15:14 |
| benste | if i change the changelog i have to commit again and create a new branch again ? | 15:14 |
| dholbach | not a new branch | 15:15 |
| dholbach | just change debian/changelog, commit using something like: bzr commit -m "fix changelog entry" | 15:15 |
| dholbach | then push it to the same branch | 15:15 |
| dholbach | and hit "resubmit" on its webpage | 15:15 |
| benste | dholbach: changes are upstream now - but i got a mail that my mail for the kubuntu dev mailing list was rejected -- it was the automated LP mail asking for review -- could you review it again :-) | 15:23 |
| dholbach | "(LP:698056)" → "(LP: #698056)" | 15:23 |
| dholbach | please let somebody else review it | 15:23 |
| benste | in changelog ? :-) | 15:25 |
| dholbach | yes | 15:25 |
| benste | where can i find all theses rules if i do something similar again in future ?? | 15:26 |
| dholbach | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix is a bit outdated but should mention the most important bits (or link to them) | 15:27 |
| benste | dholbach: have a nice afteroon - changed it, and hope they'll see it even if it's not forwarded to their mailing list | 15:31 |
| dholbach | ^ Riddell, ScottK: any idea why merge proposals are rejected from the mailing list? | 15:32 |
| benste | dholbach: "its a bit different in kubuntu branches, unreleased packages have UNRELEASED till they are put into the archives" | 15:41 |
| benste | instead of natty :-) | 15:41 |
| dholbach | ok, that's something some teams or developers do a bit different than others | 15:42 |
| dholbach | as I said: I'm not part of the kubuntu development team, so I don't know how things are done there | 15:43 |
| Riddell | benste: I got them thanks, will do them shortly | 15:57 |
| Riddell | dholbach: because the mailing list is set to reject non-subscribers | 15:58 |
| benste | Riddell: already got two other people who told me that I'll have to use Unreleased instead of natty :-) | 15:58 |
| benste | Riddell: you might follow kubuntu-bugs - for the rest of the discussion too :-) | 15:59 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| hakermania | Is it allowed to make a right-click menu for your program? E.g. to add a option to the AVIs right click menu that says Convert to-> and have a submenu with WMV, MKV etc.... Is it allowed? | 17:01 |
| Ayrton | I'm trying to package a software and I'm getting "running debsign failed" on debuild... | 18:12 |
| Ayrton | debuild ask for my key password | 18:12 |
| Ayrton | and my pass is correct | 18:12 |
| Ayrton | but I'm getting this error | 18:12 |
| Ayrton | whats happening? | 18:13 |
| Bachstelze | Ayrton: you should have other messages | 18:16 |
| Ayrton | Bachstelze, one sec, I will get the output in xchat | 18:17 |
| Bachstelze | Ayrton: !pastebin it | 18:17 |
| Ayrton | yes, I'm doing it | 18:17 |
| Ayrton | Bachstelze, http://paste.ubuntu.com/551187/ | 18:19 |
| Ayrton | in the end, the gpg ask my pass | 18:19 |
| Ayrton | in brazilian portuguese | 18:19 |
| Bachstelze | Ayrton: looks loke there's a problem with gpg-agent; are you using it? | 18:22 |
| Ayrton | Bachstelze, yes | 18:23 |
| Ayrton | Bachstelze, the strange is some other things that I use works fine, showing the same error "gpg: problemas com o agente - desabilitando o uso do agente" | 18:24 |
| Ayrton | I can use gpg --decrypt, for exemple | 18:24 |
| Ayrton | I will think for 30 minutes and back again | 18:27 |
| Ayrton | Bachstelze, the other strange thing is debbuild is generating the package | 18:28 |
| batronix | I'm currently porting a application (http://www.progshop.com/shop/software/prog-express/download.html) to linux. How do I get an application to the ubuntu repositories when its finished? | 18:47 |
| Bachstelze | batronix: since it would be a new package, the best way would be to get it into Debian, and then let it be synced to Ubuntu | 18:50 |
| batronix | thx for the reply. How do i start to get into debian? | 18:53 |
| evaluate | batronix, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages and http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ should give you all of the info you need | 18:54 |
| evaluate | (or at least most of it :-) | 18:54 |
| batronix | thx | 18:55 |
| lifeless | there is also the appstore route | 19:00 |
| lifeless | I don't recall the link for it ofhand | 19:00 |
| jcfp | is popcon broken? seems all packages' scores haven't changed at all in weeks? | 19:45 |
| bcurtiswx | im not even hungry and i read that as popcorn.. :( | 19:46 |
| jcfp | so does google :/ | 19:54 |
| ari-tczew | kklimonda: do you need a sponsor for bug 654397 ? | 20:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 654397 in hamster-applet (Ubuntu Maverick) "Reports lack totals" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/654397 | 20:01 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: http://overbenny.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/libkibi-ready-for-testing/ | 20:08 |
| kklimonda | ari-tczew: well, it would be great to get it moving - I haven't subscribed -sponsors as I was waiting for -sru ack, but you can probably upload it and let them find it in the queue. | 20:08 |
| ebroder | kklimonda: you know that ubuntu-sru changed their minds on that policy a while back, right? | 20:09 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: is there something to do after a MOTU-SWAT ACK (re vlc)? | 20:10 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: security sponsors should upload this one. I pinged sbeattie tomorrow. | 20:10 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: sorry, yesterday | 20:10 |
| bdrung | ok, i will wait | 20:11 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: changed their minds on what? on uploading packages to the queue before getting an ack? | 20:11 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: if so I obviously have missed that memo :) | 20:11 |
| ari-tczew | kklimonda: now ubuntu-sponsors handle SRUs | 20:12 |
| ebroder | kklimonda: yeah, when the main and motu sru teams merged, they decided that you sponsor first, and sru ack second | 20:13 |
| sbeattie | bdrung: I'll release vlc in a little bit, just want to do a bit of smoke checking the built packages. | 20:13 |
| ebroder | it's somewhere on the SRU wiki page | 20:13 |
| ari-tczew | If I'm not incorrent, ubuntu-sponsors handle almost all, beside backports | 20:13 |
| ari-tczew | sbeattie: it build fine | 20:13 |
| kklimonda | !sru | 20:14 |
| ubottu | Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 20:14 |
| kklimonda | google is getting worse and worse, I couldn't find the direct link there :/ | 20:14 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: the procedure looks like "[...]then subscribe ubuntu-sru. | 20:15 |
| kklimonda | 4. Upload the fixed package to release-proposed[...]" | 20:15 |
| ebroder | kklimonda: right, but "wait for an ACK from ubuntu-sru" is not in there | 20:16 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: I do vaguely remember someone wanting an ack from sru before uploading it (after the procedure has been changed) | 20:16 |
| ari-tczew | ebroder, kklimonda: so this wiki sentence should be changed | 20:17 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: I can only assume that it was simply a case of miscommunication, just after teams merging. And I've decided to play it on the safe side since then :) | 20:17 |
| kklimonda | ebroder: so, in the new world of ubuntu-sru, I should subscribe both ubuntu-sru and ubuntu-sponsors, or should I just subscribe ubuntu-sponsors who are going to subscribe ubuntu-sru when they do the upload? | 20:18 |
| ebroder | kklimonda: i'd say both, but i'm not entirely sure | 20:18 |
| ari-tczew | ebroder: both | 20:19 |
| kklimonda | ok, thanks | 20:19 |
| ari-tczew | kklimonda, ebroder: who is free to change the wiki? ;) | 20:19 |
| ari-tczew | change => update | 20:20 |
| micahg | I don't think both is appropriate, it seems like subscribing -archive and -sponsors at the same time which is wrong | 20:20 |
| kklimonda | ebroder, ari-tczew: it's there, at the end of 4th point actually: "If you need a sponsored upload, attach a debdiff to the bug and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors, as usual. There is no need to wait before uploading." | 20:20 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: archive? | 20:21 |
| micahg | ubuntu-archive | 20:21 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: I don't understand. where do you see archive? | 20:21 |
| ebroder | micahg: not really. because the new process doesn't force a strict ordering between the SRU ACK and the sponsored upload | 20:22 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: not thing case, speaking in general | 20:22 |
| micahg | ebroder: well, they want to approve in queue, so it's being inserted into their workflow before it's actionable | 20:22 |
| kklimonda | it has been added some time after new procedure has been written - I guess I should subscribe to the page to be up to date | 20:22 |
| ebroder | micahg: i thought the wiki talked about sometimes getting an sru ack early in the process | 20:23 |
| micahg | ebroder: yes, if it's a risky SRU, before the work is done | 20:23 |
| * micahg can't find what he said anywhere :-/ | 20:24 | |
| micahg | ah, it's there 2.3 | 20:25 |
| Bachstelze | I think it said to do it if the SRU will require a lot of work | 20:25 |
| Bachstelze | so you don't do all the work for nothing if it gets rejected | 20:25 |
| === ximion1 is now known as ximion | ||
| ari-tczew | how can I fix this FTBFS? http://paste.ubuntu.com/551224/ | 20:51 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: check the .install file for that file and see if the name changed and needs an updatey | 20:52 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: there are several ,install files ; | 20:56 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: dh_install tells you which one | 20:57 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: ok, got it. debian/tmp/sbin/ocfs2_controld.cman usr/sbin/ | 20:58 |
| ari-tczew | sbin? huh, is it corrent? | 20:58 |
| micahg | can be, depends on what it is | 20:58 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: ok, do you can read what is wrong? | 20:58 |
| ari-tczew | can you* | 20:58 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: I don't have time to look at it, you need to see if the file has been renamed in the build, check the debian/tmp/ dir that's appropriate | 20:59 |
| micahg | or if it's not being installed to the tmp dir for some reason | 20:59 |
| ari-tczew | :( | 21:03 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| bdrung | tumbleweed: around? | 21:18 |
| === DrKranz is now known as DktrKranz | ||
| === apachelogger is now known as gnomelogger | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!