[00:20] <smallfoot-> put 2.6.37 in maverick!!!
[09:41] <janimo> where is the latest omap3 kernel deb? I am confused by the different packages all having omap in their names
[09:42] <janimo> I looked on ports.* and archive.*
[09:43] <apw> janimo, it was built out of the linux package, so it would be in the launchpad librarian.  i believe arm is put on ports though
[09:43] <janimo> apw, I see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux-image-omap_2.6.37.12.14_armel.deb on LP
[09:44] <janimo> but it is small (not multiMb)
[09:44] <apw> yeah thats the meta package
[09:45] <apw> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/armel/linux-image-2.6.37-12-omap/2.6.37-12.26
[09:46] <janimo> apw, thanks, so this should end up in the archives as well if not there already
[09:46] <janimo> ?
[09:49] <janimo> ah, found it, under linux/ (I wa expecting that to be before linux-atm in the directory listing)
[09:51] <janimo> is omap4 not built from the same source to reduce build times?
[10:08] <ogra> janimo, omap4 has its own source, there are about 1200 patches that arent upstream yet
[10:09] <ogra> janimo, also, you would extend build times by adding another armel arch 
[10:13] <janimo> maybe later when versatile is dropped and omap4 patches are a bit more upstream it can be put in the same source
[10:16] <ogra> thats the plan but first TI has to upstream their patches
[10:16] <ogra> until then we will build from their sourcetree
[10:16] <stefanlsd> hi kernel team!  does anyone know if DMAR will be included by default soon / a kernel exists i can use - or i need to build my own for now if i want it...
[10:16] <stefanlsd> specifically looking at bug #639712
[10:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 639712 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "PCI Pass Through via libvirt cannot remap IRQ's (affects: 3) (heat: 41)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/639712
[14:07] <cnd> cking, a friend of mine filed this odd bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/697959
[14:07] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 697959 in linux (Ubuntu) "Brightness hotkeys only work after suspending/resuming system. (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[14:07] <cnd> I was wondering if you have seen anything like it before?
[14:14] <cking> cnd, I've observed the converse, they work until one does S3
[14:14] <cnd> heh
[14:14] <cnd> is it a bios bug?
[14:15] <cking> possibly
[14:15] <cking> it's a tosh
[14:15] <cking> so likely
[14:15] <cnd> heh
[14:15] <cnd> thanks!
[14:15] <cking> could try the latest natty kernel to see if any upstream fixes may address it
[14:16] <tgardner> cnd, http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ppa/ubuntu has the current kernel built for Lucid
[14:17] <cnd> tgardner, ok, I'll point him at it
[14:30] <84XABIUT3> hello all.. does someone know when this workaround will be used? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/604122 i need to put some files on my sd-card..
[14:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 604122 in linux (Ubuntu) "mmc0: Got command interrupt 0x00030000 even though no command operation was in progress. (affects: 7) (heat: 44)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[14:31] <84XABIUT3> isn't that possible yet? why isn't it workarounded by CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC=n ?!?
[14:32] <84XABIUT3> i don't think it's good for the look of *buntu if so simple things won't work.. and i'm sorry, i'm a bit in a hurry, i have to break up in 30 minutes and just liked to move these files to work... :s
[14:32] <84XABIUT3> but i couldn't do anything without that...
[14:34] <84XABIUT3> is there no solution for now?
[14:35] <84XABIUT3> ping
[14:36] <84XABIUT3> no one of 123 users is active yet? all sleeping? 
[14:38] <84XABIUT3> i don't like to stress, but so simple things like these should be able to going, not?
[14:38] <84XABIUT3> it isn't possible in any **** way?
[14:39] <84XABIUT3> hello all.. does someone know when this workaround will be used? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/604122 i need to put some files on my sd-card..
[14:39] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 604122 in linux (Ubuntu) "mmc0: Got command interrupt 0x00030000 even though no command operation was in progress. (affects: 7) (heat: 44)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[14:41] <84XABIUT3> ping
[14:48] <apw_> without knowing why that module param was enabled it is hard to just turn it off
[14:54] <apw__> tgardner: moin, do you remember us enabling ricoh MMC driver support ... it rings a bell but i cannot recall the specifics
[14:55] <tgardner> apw: no memory
[15:03] <apw> 84XABIUT3, there are many little niggles and not all are trivially fixable.  we'd need to figure out why it was turned on to work out the downside
[15:22] <tgardner> apw, #define pm_qos_add_request(_req, _class, _value) do {                   \
[15:22] <tgardner>         (_req)->request = pm_qos_add_request((_class), (_value));       \
[15:22] <tgardner>     } while (0)
[15:24] <apw> #define FOO FOO
[15:29] <smoser> i have a quick git question i'm sure someone here can answer
[15:30] <smoser> i did: git clone --bare git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/linux-2.6 linux-2.6.git
[15:30] <smoser> then 
[15:30] <smoser> git clone --bare --reference linux-2.6.git git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-${rel};
[15:30] <smoser> then, later, i can 'git fetch' inside the linux-2.6.git directory to update it
[15:30] <smoser> but if i try in ubuntu-lucid.git, i get: $ git fetch
[15:30] <smoser> fatal: Where do you want to fetch from today?
[15:31] <tgardner> smoser, try 'git fetch origin'
[15:33] <smoser> hm.. it must have been user error, i dont know that i told the truth completely above. 
[15:33] <smoser> i added a config stanza to 'config' like:
[15:33] <smoser> [remote "origin"]
[15:33] <smoser>         fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[15:33] <smoser>         url = git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
[15:33] <smoser> then it worked.
[15:34] <tgardner> smoser, hmm, I think its because you cloned as a '--bare' repository.
[15:35] <smoser> i would have thoguht it would still record that... i think i also might have lost the '--reference'  bit . at least there is nothing in config suggesting that it should do reference.
[15:36] <tgardner> I think --reference makes soft links down in your object tree
[15:37] <smoser> i thoguht htey were hard links... but either way, it would have to "remember" that to continue getting benefit across subsequent fetchs. or maybe i'm missing something.
[15:38] <apw> smoser, the cross linking is via .git/object/info/alternates file
[15:38] <tgardner> smoser, well, they are some kind of link. if you move linux-2.6.git, then ubuntu-lucid.git becomes unuseable
[15:39] <smoser> apw, thanks: $ cat objects/info/alternates 
[15:39] <smoser>  /media/archive/linux/linux-2.6.git/objects
[15:39] <smoser> so, it is recorded there.
[15:40] <smoser> tgardner, thanks for your help.
[17:33] <jdstrand> sbeattie: since jj is away, you are getting my question :)
[17:33] <jdstrand> sbeattie: I got this running the apparmor kernel regression tests:
[17:33] <sbeattie> jdstrand: ruh-roh
[17:33] <jdstrand> cc  -lapparmor -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes    changeprofile.c   -o changeprofile
[17:33] <jdstrand> /tmp/ccrZP2V9.o: In function `main':
[17:33] <jdstrand> changeprofile.c:(.text+0x2aa): undefined reference to `aa_change_profile'
[17:33] <jdstrand> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
[17:33] <jdstrand> make: *** [changeprofile] Error 1
[17:33] <jdstrand> sbeattie: that is kinda an important function for libvirt
[17:34] <jdstrand> sbeattie: are you familiar with what is going on?
[17:34] <jdstrand> $ cat /proc/version_signature 
[17:34] <jdstrand> Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-server 2.6.37
[17:34] <sbeattie> no libapparmor1 available?
[17:34] <jdstrand> sbeattie: notice the -12.26
[17:34] <jdstrand> ii  libapparmor1                    2.6~devel+bzr1616-0ubuntu1         changehat AppArmor library
[17:35] <jdstrand> sbeattie: I am testing a new 1616
[17:35] <jdstrand> sbeattie: oh, could this be related to your r1616 commit?
[17:35] <jdstrand> sbeattie: probably: 'dynamically link in libapparmor library in libapparmor's testsuite'
[17:36] <jdstrand> (I do have libapparmor-dev installed too)
[17:36] <jdstrand> sbeattie: we can take this to #apparmor. I misread the error
[17:37] <sbeattie> jdstrand: hrm, 1616 is internal in the libapparmor testsuite.
[17:37] <jdstrand> sbeattie: this is running qrt which runs the kernel regression testsuite in apparmor
[17:37] <sbeattie> jdstrand: sure, we can head to #apparmor
[18:36] <pr0ph3t> hi all
[18:37] <pr0ph3t> I have git and the kernel sources, but I am not sure how to apply a specific patch to my kernel before recompiling it, the patch is at this address http://dev.iksaif.net/issues/108. Help please !
[18:43]  * tgardner --> lunch
[18:54]  * cking calls it a day
[19:57]  * JFo goes to make coffee
[20:39] <Kano> hi apw 
[20:40] <Kano> did you notice that rt2800usb and rt2870sta share the same usb ids?
[20:41] <Kano> just that the rt2800usb driver does not really work correctly..
[20:49] <pr0ph3t> hi all
[20:50] <pr0ph3t>  how can I point out politely that a driver should be merged with mainline? I can't recompile everytime I want to update kernel!
[20:53] <pr0ph3t> the driver is already in mainline but it is bugged and a patch has been created, but I have to recompile the kernel everytime and I only have a laptop with ULV CPU
[21:25] <bguthro> pr0ph3t: Submit the patch to lkml. The developers here don't control what is merged into mainline
[22:03] <hallyn> anyone here been closely following bkl removal patchsets?