| RoAkSoAx | correct me if I'm wrong, but when using grab-merge.sh it should not be applying patches in debian/patches, directly to the source right? Cause, when trying to debuild, it fails becuase it tries to apply a patch in debian/patches, but it has already been applied... | 00:27 |
|---|---|---|
| ari-tczew | RoAkSoAx: look in patches created by MoM, are there .pc files? | 00:28 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew: nope | 00:32 |
| ari-tczew | RoAkSoAx: I think that you should report a bug against MoM. | 00:34 |
| ari-tczew | RoAkSoAx: and try merge manually | 00:34 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew: yeah it is gonna be a PITA given that it' | 00:34 |
| RoAkSoAx | it's a big merge, and the changes forwarded to debian are still in the NEW queue :S | 00:35 |
| RoAkSoAx | hhehe | 00:35 |
| RoAkSoAx | anywayas, I'll work on that tomorrow | 00:35 |
| ari-tczew | RoAkSoAx: PITA? | 00:35 |
| ari-tczew | are you hungry? | 00:35 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew: I pm'd you with the meaning | 00:36 |
| ari-tczew | aha, ok cenzored | 00:36 |
| RoAkSoAx | anyways, off for the day | 00:36 |
| RoAkSoAx | later | 00:36 |
| ari-tczew | cya | 00:36 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: thanks for https://code.launchpad.net/~stefanor/ubuntu-sponsoring/footer-styling/+merge/45574 | 01:48 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: if you want to win a price: use for Statistics a three column layout (column1: Request types, column2: Target components, column3: Package Sets) | 01:49 |
| stalcup | how does one configure the new ppa to uploads | 03:53 |
| stalcup | does dput.cfg need edited? | 03:53 |
| * stalcup misses the old school way | 03:53 | |
| hyperair | stalcup: you can still use the old school way, like i do. | 03:56 |
| stalcup | awesome | 03:56 |
| hyperair | stalcup: global dput.cf has an entry that allows the ppa: syntax | 03:56 |
| stalcup | hyperair: mind pasting your config? | 03:57 |
| ebroder | stalcup: http://pastebin.com/68mq6Ete is what you need | 03:57 |
| hyperair | http://paste.debian.net/104033/ | 03:57 |
| stalcup | thanks ebroder and hyperair | 03:57 |
| hyperair | np | 04:02 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: yeah, 3 column does look better | 07:58 |
| Wallch_Developer | Hi!! Can anyone tell me why package Wallch (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch) went from needs review to needs work without a comment to what we need to fix... ? | 08:43 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: wow, that looks nice. | 10:20 |
| bdrung | can a motu swat team unsubscribe the team from bug #690173? | 10:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 690173 in VLC media player "Memory corruption in RealMedia parsing" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/690173 | 10:23 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: maybe adding colons to "Type column" would be good | 10:25 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === Lutin is now known as Guest42078 | ||
| === Lutin_ is now known as release | ||
| === release is now known as Luton | ||
| === Luton is now known as Lutin | ||
| lfaraone | tumbleweed: hi, I'll be your AM as you move through NM. a mail from me shortly will follow to get you started. | 14:11 |
| DktrKranz | lfaraone: oh, nice to see you act as AM :) | 14:15 |
| lfaraone | DktrKranz: I was tempted to say "good news: you've been reassigned an AM. bad news, you're my first applicant" | 14:15 |
| DktrKranz | heh | 14:16 |
| === shadeslayer is now known as kshadeslayer | ||
| === rbelem_ is now known as rbelem | ||
| pmjdebruijn | hi | 16:17 |
| pmjdebruijn | I'm packaging a cmake app, and the basic stuff is automated by debhelper 7 | 16:17 |
| pmjdebruijn | however, I do need to make a parameter to cmake | 16:17 |
| pmjdebruijn | how can I do that without manually creating an entire rules file | 16:17 |
| pmjdebruijn | are there any variables I can set/override | 16:17 |
| debfx | pmjdebruijn: you need to add a override_dh_auto_configure target to debian/rules | 16:27 |
| pmjdebruijn | thanks | 16:27 |
| pmjdebruijn | seems to work actually | 16:27 |
| pmjdebruijn | :) | 16:27 |
| pmjdebruijn | just found it online too | 16:28 |
| pmjdebruijn | debfx: thanks for your time | 16:28 |
| debfx | you're welcome :) | 16:29 |
| === stalcup is now known as kstalcup | ||
| === apachelogger is now known as kgnomelogger | ||
| === kshadeslayer is now known as kglibslayer | ||
| === kglibslayer is now known as kshadeslayer | ||
| ari-tczew | ScottK: ping | 18:44 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: Pong, but make it quick as I have to go in a minute. | 18:44 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: about backports: for lucid I have to add one change. how can I do it? add a a patch to sponsor in backports? | 18:45 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: If it's a package you have upload rights for, you can upload to lucid-backports and I can review it in the queue. If not, you'll need to get it sponsored. The approval process via a bug in lucid-backports is the same. | 18:46 |
| ScottK | Back later. | 18:46 |
| ari-tczew | ok thnx | 18:46 |
| === kstalcup is now known as stalcup | ||
| kshadeslayer | hi, im trying to compile kdepim 4.5.94 in natty and get this : http://paste.ubuntu.com/551950/ | 22:33 |
| kshadeslayer | for some reason dpkg-buildpackage is trying to run make before CMake | 22:34 |
| kshadeslayer | any ideas? | 22:34 |
| ari-tczew | kshadeslayer: check debian/rules from clementine, it uses Cmake as well | 22:35 |
| kshadeslayer | ari-tczew: the point here being? .... ive seen alot of packages using CMake ... just never encountered dpkg-buildpackage jumping off to make before CMake | 22:36 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: do you have plans for bringing clementine to debian? | 22:52 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: This is good question. There is a clementine packed by another person, but not yet in Debian archive. why you ask? | 22:54 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: because you referred to clementine. then i checked if it is in debian. | 22:55 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: and this guy has troubles with getting clementine to archive. | 22:57 |
| ari-tczew | kshadeslayer: d/rules which you sent on pastebin is all? | 23:04 |
| ari-tczew | kshadeslayer: which debhelper do you use? | 23:05 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: you're crazy man | 23:10 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, :D | 23:10 |
| kshadeslayer | ari-tczew: yes ... and the debhelper which is in natty | 23:10 |
| kshadeslayer | ari-tczew: im going to sleep ... will continue tomorrow | 23:10 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, new record. one day 10 packages | 23:11 |
| kshadeslayer | 0.o | 23:12 |
| kshadeslayer | night all | 23:12 |
| udienz | kshadeslayer, night | 23:12 |
| ari-tczew | kshadeslayer: I asked which version | 23:12 |
| ari-tczew | 5 / 7 / 8 ? | 23:12 |
| bdrung | udienz: 10 packages? it's easy to upload 10 package in one day (do a big transition with many rebuilds). ;) | 23:14 |
| udienz | :D | 23:15 |
| ari-tczew | lucas__: is it possible to rebuild again natty to show FTBFS in udd.d.o? now should shows also FTBFS with python 2.7 | 23:16 |
| geser | ari-tczew: dodo is doing an archive rebuild of main in LP currently | 23:19 |
| ari-tczew | geser: doko you mean? | 23:20 |
| geser | ari-tczew: sure, yes | 23:21 |
| geser | ari-tczew: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110107-natty.html | 23:24 |
| udienz | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110107 | 23:25 |
| ari-tczew | geser: udd shows also output of FTBFS which is helpful | 23:30 |
| ari-tczew | geser: heh, would be nice to run rebuild on universe as well | 23:31 |
| psusi | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/natty/ubiquity/natty/revision/346 says it does a bunch of things, including merge from the maverick-redesign branch... but this does not appear to be a merge commit... what gives? | 23:36 |
| ebroder | psusi: look at the vcs-bzr for the package | 23:40 |
| psusi | ebroder, so this was a merge, that was not a merge? i.e. they just applied the upstream diff and committed, instead of doing a bzr merge from it? | 23:43 |
| ebroder | psusi: the ~ubuntu-branches branches are auto-generated. if ev is maintaining ubiquity in a different branch, that's not necessarily reflected in ~ubuntu-branches | 23:43 |
| ebroder | did you look at the other branch to see if there was a merge there? | 23:44 |
| psusi | does it matter if there was a merge there? my question is why the ubuntu branch does not show a merge | 23:44 |
| psusi | hrm.. auto generated eh? | 23:45 |
| ebroder | right | 23:45 |
| wgrant | ari-tczew: We'll be doing a universe rebuild later this week, probably. | 23:45 |
| wgrant | ari-tczew: We're just waiting on some more disk space to be installed. | 23:45 |
| ebroder | psusi: unless a developer takes explicit action to do otherwise, the lp:ubuntu/foo branches are created by basically fetching each uploaded revision of a package and checking it into bzr | 23:46 |
| psusi | ohh... so the auto generator isn't pulling from the real branch, but instead just auto commits each new source package upload? | 23:46 |
| ebroder | psusi: it's clever enough to deal with merges from debian, and new upstream revisions, but not that much else on its own | 23:46 |
| psusi | I see | 23:46 |
| ari-tczew | wgrant: could you fix headers in the table on the page http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/debcheck/debcheck.py?dist=natty&list=ALL ? | 23:49 |
| ari-tczew | wgrant: IMO use of udd script is good idea. in that way developers can easy find similiar FTBFS' | 23:52 |
| wgrant | ari-tczew: Sure, I might be able to set up the UDD script. But this was just what I did at 1am to get *something* up. | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!