[00:27] <RoAkSoAx> correct me if I'm wrong, but when using grab-merge.sh it should not be applying patches in debian/patches, directly to the source right? Cause, when trying to debuild, it fails becuase it tries to apply a patch in debian/patches, but it has already been applied...
[00:28] <ari-tczew> RoAkSoAx: look in patches created by MoM, are there .pc files?
[00:32] <RoAkSoAx> ari-tczew: nope
[00:34] <ari-tczew> RoAkSoAx: I think that you should report a bug against MoM.
[00:34] <ari-tczew> RoAkSoAx: and try merge manually
[00:34] <RoAkSoAx> ari-tczew: yeah it is gonna be a PITA given that it'
[00:35] <RoAkSoAx> it's a big merge, and the changes forwarded to debian are still in the NEW queue :S
[00:35] <RoAkSoAx> hhehe
[00:35] <RoAkSoAx> anywayas, I'll work on that tomorrow
[00:35] <ari-tczew> RoAkSoAx: PITA?
[00:35] <ari-tczew> are you hungry?
[00:36] <RoAkSoAx> ari-tczew: I pm'd you with the  meaning
[00:36] <ari-tczew> aha, ok cenzored
[00:36] <RoAkSoAx> anyways, off for the day
[00:36] <RoAkSoAx> later
[00:36] <ari-tczew> cya
[01:48] <bdrung> tumbleweed: thanks for https://code.launchpad.net/~stefanor/ubuntu-sponsoring/footer-styling/+merge/45574
[01:49] <bdrung> tumbleweed: if you want to win a price: use for Statistics a three column layout (column1: Request types, column2: Target components, column3: Package Sets)
[03:53] <stalcup> how does one configure the new ppa to uploads
[03:53] <stalcup> does dput.cfg need edited?
[03:53]  * stalcup misses the old school way
[03:56] <hyperair> stalcup: you can still use the old school way, like i do.
[03:56] <stalcup> awesome
[03:56] <hyperair> stalcup: global dput.cf has an entry that allows the ppa: syntax
[03:57] <stalcup> hyperair: mind pasting your config?
[03:57] <ebroder> stalcup: http://pastebin.com/68mq6Ete is what you need
[03:57] <hyperair> http://paste.debian.net/104033/
[03:57] <stalcup> thanks ebroder and hyperair
[04:02] <hyperair> np
[07:58] <tumbleweed> bdrung: yeah, 3 column does look better
[08:43] <Wallch_Developer> Hi!! Can anyone tell me why package Wallch (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch) went from needs review to needs work without a comment to what we need to fix... ?
[10:20] <bdrung> tumbleweed: wow, that looks nice.
[10:23] <bdrung> can a motu swat team unsubscribe the team from bug #690173?
[10:25] <bdrung> tumbleweed: maybe adding colons to "Type column" would be good
[14:11] <lfaraone> tumbleweed: hi, I'll be your AM as you move through NM. a mail from me shortly will follow to get you started.
[14:15] <DktrKranz> lfaraone: oh, nice to see you act as AM :)
[14:15] <lfaraone> DktrKranz: I was tempted to say "good news: you've been reassigned an AM. bad news, you're my first applicant"
[14:16] <DktrKranz> heh
[16:17] <pmjdebruijn> hi
[16:17] <pmjdebruijn> I'm packaging a cmake app, and the basic stuff is automated by debhelper 7
[16:17] <pmjdebruijn> however, I do need to make a parameter to cmake
[16:17] <pmjdebruijn> how can I do that without manually creating an entire rules file
[16:17] <pmjdebruijn> are there any variables I can set/override
[16:27] <debfx> pmjdebruijn: you need to add a override_dh_auto_configure target to debian/rules
[16:27] <pmjdebruijn> thanks
[16:27] <pmjdebruijn> seems to work actually
[16:27] <pmjdebruijn> :)
[16:28] <pmjdebruijn> just found it online too
[16:28] <pmjdebruijn> debfx: thanks for your time
[16:29] <debfx> you're welcome :)
[18:44] <ari-tczew> ScottK: ping
[18:44] <ScottK> ari-tczew: Pong, but make it quick as I have to go in a minute.
[18:45] <ari-tczew> ScottK: about backports: for lucid I have to add one change. how can I do it? add a a patch to sponsor in backports?
[18:46] <ScottK> ari-tczew: If it's a package you have upload rights for, you can upload to lucid-backports and I can review it in the queue.  If not, you'll need to get it sponsored.  The approval process via a bug in lucid-backports is the same.
[18:46] <ScottK> Back later.
[18:46] <ari-tczew> ok thnx
[22:33] <kshadeslayer> hi, im trying to compile kdepim 4.5.94 in  natty and get this : http://paste.ubuntu.com/551950/
[22:34] <kshadeslayer> for some reason dpkg-buildpackage is trying to run make before CMake
[22:34] <kshadeslayer> any ideas?
[22:35] <ari-tczew> kshadeslayer: check debian/rules from clementine, it uses Cmake as well
[22:36] <kshadeslayer> ari-tczew: the point here being? .... ive seen alot of packages using CMake ... just never encountered dpkg-buildpackage jumping off to make before CMake
[22:52] <bdrung> ari-tczew: do you have plans for bringing clementine to debian?
[22:54] <ari-tczew> bdrung: This is good question. There is a clementine packed by another person, but not yet in Debian archive. why you ask?
[22:55] <bdrung> ari-tczew: because you referred to clementine. then i checked if it is in debian.
[22:57] <ari-tczew> bdrung: and this guy has troubles with getting clementine to archive.
[23:04] <ari-tczew> kshadeslayer: d/rules which you sent on pastebin is all?
[23:05] <ari-tczew> kshadeslayer: which debhelper do you use?
[23:10] <ari-tczew> udienz: you're crazy man
[23:10] <udienz> ari-tczew, :D
[23:10] <kshadeslayer> ari-tczew: yes ... and the debhelper which is in natty
[23:10] <kshadeslayer> ari-tczew: im going to sleep ... will continue tomorrow
[23:11] <udienz> ari-tczew, new record. one day 10 packages
[23:12] <kshadeslayer> 0.o
[23:12] <kshadeslayer> night all
[23:12] <udienz> kshadeslayer, night
[23:12] <ari-tczew> kshadeslayer: I asked which version
[23:12] <ari-tczew> 5 / 7 / 8 ?
[23:14] <bdrung> udienz: 10 packages? it's easy to upload 10 package in one day (do a big transition with many rebuilds). ;)
[23:15] <udienz> :D
[23:16] <ari-tczew> lucas__: is it possible to rebuild again natty to show FTBFS in udd.d.o? now should shows also FTBFS with python 2.7
[23:19] <geser> ari-tczew: dodo is doing an archive rebuild of main in LP currently
[23:20] <ari-tczew> geser: doko you mean?
[23:21] <geser> ari-tczew: sure, yes
[23:24] <geser> ari-tczew:  http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110107-natty.html
[23:25] <udienz> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110107
[23:30] <ari-tczew> geser: udd shows also output of FTBFS which is helpful
[23:31] <ari-tczew> geser: heh, would be nice to run rebuild on universe as well
[23:36] <psusi> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/natty/ubiquity/natty/revision/346 says it does a bunch of things, including merge from the maverick-redesign branch... but this does not appear to be a merge commit... what gives?
[23:40] <ebroder> psusi: look at the vcs-bzr for the package
[23:43] <psusi> ebroder, so this was a merge, that was not a merge?  i.e. they just applied the upstream diff and committed, instead of doing a bzr merge from it?
[23:43] <ebroder> psusi: the ~ubuntu-branches branches are auto-generated. if ev is maintaining ubiquity in a different branch, that's not necessarily reflected in ~ubuntu-branches
[23:44] <ebroder> did you look at the other branch to see if there was a merge there?
[23:44] <psusi> does it matter if there was a merge there?  my question is why the ubuntu branch does not show a merge
[23:45] <psusi> hrm.. auto generated eh?
[23:45] <ebroder> right
[23:45] <wgrant> ari-tczew: We'll be doing a universe rebuild later this week, probably.
[23:45] <wgrant> ari-tczew: We're just waiting on some more disk space to be installed.
[23:46] <ebroder> psusi: unless a developer takes explicit action to do otherwise, the lp:ubuntu/foo branches are created by basically fetching each uploaded revision of a package and checking it into bzr
[23:46] <psusi> ohh... so the auto generator isn't pulling from the real branch, but instead just auto commits each new source package upload?
[23:46] <ebroder> psusi: it's clever enough to deal with merges from debian, and new upstream revisions, but not that much else on its own
[23:46] <psusi> I see
[23:49] <ari-tczew> wgrant: could you fix headers in the table on the page http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/debcheck/debcheck.py?dist=natty&list=ALL ?
[23:52] <ari-tczew> wgrant: IMO use of udd script is good idea. in that way developers can easy find similiar FTBFS'
[23:55] <wgrant> ari-tczew: Sure, I might be able to set up the UDD script. But this was just what I did at 1am to get *something* up.