[00:18] hey [00:19] how do I get connected to wireless using this ubuntu system? [00:19] I just install it now [03:31] How do you folks like ubuntu one? === Cibortcin is now known as Cibort [11:37] Quick ? if anyone's around ... Any way to sync a specific _file_, rather than a whole folder? [11:38] Do I have to trick it by making a folder with a (hard?) link? [12:01] Trying again ... Any way to sync a specific _file_ rather than a whole folder? Do I have to make a hard link into a folder? [13:07] 'lo all [13:10] is ubuntu one available to non-desktop users? [13:10] ie. does it work in a terminal [13:13] tappi: as far as i know it is possible [13:15] tappi: I am not on my Ubuntu machine at the moment so I do not have my notes on the topic available [13:15] tappi: if you get serious about wanting to do it you might ask Chipaca about it [13:16] he is off today but you can usually catch him on weekdays about this time [13:19] i take it it's not doable out of the box+ [13:23] it just takes some configuring AFIK. === IAmNotThatGuy is now known as M0hi [14:33] Anybody around? Still trying to get this answered: Looking for a way to sync a specific _file_ rather than a whole folder. Only way I can see is to make a hard link into a folder which is being synced. [14:37] DiagonalArg: indeed. U1 doesn't have the option to sync partirular file, only folders. [14:37] *particular [14:37] I see. What's the logic of that, do you know? [14:37] Just curious. [14:38] DiagonalArg: From what I can tell, the logic is that the file sync system is highly not trivial. That's it. It'd be another layer of complexity if they where to introduce per-file sync. [14:38] *non trivial [14:38] Ok. Thanks a lot - [14:39] Hey, if you've got a min, I do have a bug issue on U1. [14:39] DiagonalArg: you are welcome. perhaps that functionality will come one day. [14:39] DiagonalArg: what's that? [14:39] It's this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bindwood/+bug/696194 [14:39] Launchpad bug 696194 in bindwood "Syncing Bookmarks (pulling from Server) in Ubuntu One Failing (affects: 1) (heat: 37)" [Undecided,New] [14:39] Any thoughts? [14:40] * karni checks [14:42] DiagonalArg: I'm not into Bindwood (never even used it), but indeed it looks like a replication issue. Unless someone takes care of your bug sooner, you might wanna drop in during workdays (i.e. starting Monday) and ask that question again :) [14:42] Ok, I'll try that. (What's a "replication issue"?) [14:45] Perhaps you meant it just couldn't copy, which indeed is the case. Ok, thanks for your help, karni.... [14:45] DiagonalArg: it means that couchDB (sort of Database) had problems either sending or receiving your bookmarks [14:45] right [14:45] np DiagonalArg , you might have more luck asking during workdays :) [14:45] Ok, Have a good week-end! [14:45] thanks, you too [15:46] beuno: I'm revising the wiki part about available settings. I haven't implemented speed limits, but as long as that's doable - should the limits be the same for WIFI and Mobile connections? Should we split it up and give more choice options depending on the connection type? [15:52] karni, I think that for now, the same speed limit is fine [15:52] beuno: ack. [15:53] beuno: how about the connection available for syncing? 1. none (turned off), 2. wifi, 3. mobile (which includes sync on wifi since it's free?) [15:55] maybe checkboxes for wifi and 3g? [15:55] so people can combine them as they wish? [15:55] aha. so whichever is available, we just check if they're fine with syncing with that. sure. [15:55] *on that (not with that) [15:56] * beuno nods [16:05] beuno: I have revised https://wiki.ubuntu.com/mkarnicki/u1f#Brainstorming - maybe I should be putting those as blueprints on lp? [16:06] yeah.. they're exactly for that purpose :) [16:21] karni, no, I think the wiki is fine [16:21] blueprints on launchpad have a lot of overhead [16:23] aha got it [16:46] beuno: ack on what I wrote on the wiki? :) (if you're off duty today, that's fine ; ) [16:48] let me look! [16:49] karni, looksgood [16:49] beuno: thank you [16:50] beuno: I'll update you with an apk asap I'm done with sync. today/tomorrow [16:50] karni, sounds great, looking forward to testing [16:50] beuno: ok! :) [18:15] verterok: Hi verterok. I think the OIOConnector::run() shouldn't catch IOException, perhaps even StorageProtocolError - instead of getting a (possibly re-thrown) failure in Ping deferred, I just get stack trace pinged and deferred still invokes callback instead of errback, although the "java.io.IOException: Write error: I/O error during system call, Broken pipe" [18:16] verterok: So I'd like to consult that with you. I have to get those Failure(s) to know when should I reconnect. [19:28] beuno: o oh.. that I kinda didn't expect. so when I edit myfavfile.txt on my PC, the next delta for the phone contains "myfavfile.txt is dead", and then "new myfavfile.txt is alive" -- that said, the first step removes the "this is my favourite!" from the items meta cached on the phone. I'll have to revise that :/ [19:29] so *that's* the thing very different from the PC - partial sync. only favourites. ok.. will come up with something. [19:33] ok, I have a solution. just another column in the db, and remove the dead files *after* the sync process. thus, fav file might only flip isLive: true -> false -> true, and not be deleted [21:20] verterok: What also interests me is - if I modify a file on my PC, I get four volumeNewGenerationCallback's with consecutive numbers: for example 79, 80, 81, 82 - where do so many changes come from? even if the server substitutes that modified file, it's just delete+receive, just two. [21:21] verterok: I'm asking so that I don't make unnecessary operations, if those callbacks are invoked so many times. i.e. generation number increases so fast. [21:46] karni: I'm not at home ATM, would you mind sending this by mail so I don't lose the questions? [21:46] verterok: I will, np! [21:49] karni: thx, now I'm back to non-work mode [21:49] later! [21:49] ^ ^ [21:49] verterok: bye! [22:09] beuno: I have mailed aquarius, guillermo, and you in Cc , with a question concerning nitty-gritty details of the U1 sync, which we could use to perform selective sync. It was a little suprize to me that a modified file changes it's nodeId (but at least a renamed folder doesn't).