| highvoltage | u/join #weirdos | 04:54 |
|---|---|---|
| ebroder | Somebody's been reading the blogs :-P | 04:55 |
| stalcup | what's a blog? | 05:12 |
| === Zic_ is now known as Zic | ||
| === almaisan` is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| ari-tczew | bdrung: interesting case. update-maintainer from daily u-d-t couldn't work: update-maintainer: Error: No Maintainer field found in ./debian/control. | 14:16 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: get source of seahorse-plugins from Debian unstable and check it | 14:16 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: if you want to help, file a bug report and distillate a testcase (ubuntutools/test/test_update_maintainer.py) | 14:18 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: how can I run it? | 14:19 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: bug confirmed | 14:19 |
| ari-tczew | (sorry for my lack of knowledge) | 14:19 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: build the package and see what is done. | 14:20 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: which package? | 14:21 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: ubuntu-dev-tools | 14:22 |
| bdrung | the test are run on build | 14:22 |
| bdrung | s/test/tests/ | 14:22 |
| * bdrung is currently very busy. | 14:22 | |
| ari-tczew | still confused | 14:23 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: do you need reported bug? | 14:23 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: either file a bug or propose a bzr branch merge that add a testcase which tests this issue | 14:25 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: I'll report a bug | 14:25 |
| dholbach | good morning | 14:41 |
| ari-tczew | hello dholbach | 14:42 |
| ari-tczew | maco: should we forward your patch to Debian? bug 345727 | 14:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 345727 in seahorse-plugins "Seahorse-agent writes an empty ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf on first run, breaking email signing in KDE" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/345727 | 14:59 |
| nigelb | Laney_: people seem to walk into that channel and then leave :p | 15:00 |
| nigelb | Laney_: (you know the one where you entered and said ':O' and left :p) | 15:00 |
| Bachstelze | #ubuntu ? | 15:00 |
| ari-tczew | maybe he was excited of number of developers in one place | 15:01 |
| Bachstelze | that's what I feel like saying every time I go there | 15:01 |
| Laney | nigelb: :P just wanted to see if it still existed | 15:05 |
| nigelb | Laney: hehe | 15:16 |
| nigelb | Laney: me and jonathan are trying to make it cool to hang out there ;) | 15:17 |
| === Dr_Who is now known as tgall_foo | ||
| evaluate | dapal, ping? | 15:34 |
| dapal | evaluate: pong, will look at the package later tonight :) | 15:34 |
| evaluate | dapal, just wanted to let you know that I just had a look at the installation again, and it throws me a bunch of errors right now... | 15:35 |
| dapal | ah :) | 15:35 |
| evaluate | not sure why though, the first time it worked really fine... | 15:35 |
| dapal | take your time to fix/look at it then, there's no hurry :p | 15:35 |
| dapal | (and I'm a bit busy too) | 15:35 |
| evaluate | ok, I will let you know if/when I find the issue | 15:36 |
| Laney | look! a hanska! | 15:36 |
| dapal | eeeek! | 15:36 |
| evaluate | dapal, hmm, it seems that the script also uses some custom smarty stuff, so I guess I can't use the shared smarty library after all... | 15:51 |
| dapal | uhm :/ | 15:52 |
| evaluate | so I'd either have to use the smarty lib they supply or create some patches so that it works with the shared one (if this is even possible -- I will have to look at it), but I think the first one would be much better IMO | 15:53 |
| dapal | I agree | 15:54 |
| dapal | if you can, make a diff between the customised smarty and the system one, just to understand what's different | 15:54 |
| dapal | maybe the system one could be patched | 15:54 |
| evaluate | dapal, thing is that they don't use the current smarty version that is in debian. they use 2.6.25 and debian has 2.6.26 | 15:55 |
| dapal | ah | 15:55 |
| dapal | if the difference is only in the version, maybe you could try to patch CMS | 15:55 |
| dapal | for simplicity, you could just leave the code there though | 15:55 |
| evaluate | dapal, well, from what I can tell, they expect different function names from smarty. let me paste you something real quick | 15:56 |
| evaluate | dapal, http://paste.debian.net/104313/ | 16:00 |
| Bachstelze | is there a standard procedure to request a sync? bug 694387 is fixed in a newer Debian version | 16:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 694387 in wvdial (Ubuntu) "FTBFS in Natty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/694387 | 16:00 |
| Laney | !sync | 16:01 |
| geser | Bachstelze: requestsync from ubuntu-dev-tools | 16:01 |
| ubottu | Helpful information for filing a sync request can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 16:01 |
| evaluate | dapal, also, it seems that the file that contains the different code gets loaded directly from the smarty core file, so I can't actually tell the shared smarty librari from debian to load my custom file, because it loads the default one automatically. | 16:03 |
| dapal | evaluate: ok ok, keep the embedded one | 16:03 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| evaluate | dapal, btw, setting the permissions in the rules file doesn't seem to work... | 16:36 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| evaluate | dapal, finished and uploaded the new package. Whenever you've got time :-) | 18:18 |
| === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde | ||
| hrw | hi guys | 18:41 |
| ari-tczew | hi hrw | 18:50 |
| === jdstrand is now known as jdstrand_ | ||
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| kklimonda | ugs, update-maintainer takes 7 seconds to replace two lines.. | 20:25 |
| kklimonda | heh.. it runs rmadison underneath.. | 20:26 |
| kklimonda | bdrung: does it really make sense to make update-maintainer handle all cases under the sun? runnig rmadison twice makes it really slow, and the reason for that is apparently preventing developers from shooting themselves into feet | 20:32 |
| ari-tczew | kklimonda: which u-d-t do you use? from archive or daily? | 20:50 |
| kklimonda | ari-tczew: from archive | 20:53 |
| bdrung | kklimonda: 7 seconds? it runs rmadison? | 21:09 |
| udienz | Hello, dep5 have rev 155 can i used it now for new packages for Ubuntu? | 21:09 |
| kklimonda | bdrung: the version for natty does | 21:10 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: sure | 21:13 |
| bdrung | kklimonda: natty still have the pre-rewritten u-m. please use https://launchpad.net/~udt-developers/+archive/daily until the next release of udt | 21:13 |
| bdrung | real0m0.048s | 21:14 |
| kklimonda | bdrung: will do | 21:14 |
| micahg | txwikinger: ping | 21:19 |
| txwikinger | micahg: pong | 21:19 |
| micahg | txwikinger: could you please look at bug 684510 re ichthux-meta | 21:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 684510 in sword-language-packs (Ubuntu) "Remove sword-language-packs(BS) and ichthux-live(B) from Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/684510 | 21:20 |
| txwikinger | micahg: ok.. I do | 21:20 |
| micahg | txwikinger: thanks | 21:21 |
| txwikinger | micahg: Yes.. I think the package should be dropped.. it is not needed | 21:21 |
| txwikinger | You want me to write a comment into the bug report? | 21:21 |
| micahg | txwikinger: the meta package or the binary? | 21:22 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, when we must send a patch wih 'submittodebian'? if a patch apllied in debian packages or whan a patch has works well? | 21:22 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: if it's non ubuntu specific, then forward. | 21:23 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: btw. submittodebian is no only way | 21:23 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: I'll comment your application tomorrow | 21:24 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: or later if deadline is not tomorrow | 21:24 |
| txwikinger | micahg: which meta package? | 21:24 |
| micahg | txwikinger: ichthux | 21:25 |
| txwikinger | no. ichthux should stay | 21:25 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, i don't know it's a patch is ubuntu spesific or not. i mean a patch works if used debian experimental | 21:25 |
| txwikinger | I will modify it to take out the sword language packages | 21:25 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, aha thanks... feel free to comments when you free | 21:25 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: "used debian experimental" - can't gotcha | 21:26 |
| ari-tczew | what does it mean? | 21:26 |
| micahg | txwikinger: great, thanks, let me know if you need a sponsor | 21:26 |
| txwikinger | ok.. thanks micahg | 21:26 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, i mean in debian ustable a packages works well by "dpkg-buildpackage" but not in debian-experimental | 21:26 |
| udienz | i use gcc-4.5 and binutils-gold | 21:27 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: how do you testing packages to get build? | 21:27 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, yes, always. minimum 3 times, building via dpkg-buildpackage, pbuildr and ppa | 21:28 |
| udienz | *pbuilder | 21:28 |
| udienz | just make sure this package have bug | 21:28 |
| lfaraone | tumbleweed: sent off your report to the front desk, they'll check it and send it along to DAM, who will say "yes", and tell DSA to create you an account. | 21:28 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: if you're working of fix ftbfs with binutils-gold/gcc4.5 you don't need to sending every package to PPA. pbuilder natty is enough. | 21:29 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: and one time is enough. | 21:29 |
| ari-tczew | another case if you do: build package -> update pbuilder -> build package once again - that's fine then | 21:30 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: do you want to become uploader of u-d-t once you are DD? | 21:35 |
| udienz | fixed bug 701476 | 22:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 701476 in stardict (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] Source stardict 3.0.1-7 in natty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/701476 | 22:10 |
| tumbleweed | lfaraone: that was amazingly quick, thanks | 22:22 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: sure, I imagine I'll be involved in it for a while to come | 22:23 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: your merge proposals are still on my todo list. | 22:24 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: good good, I still have some stuff to do for the builders. been busy with NM and other things | 22:25 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: we should do at least one u-d-t release this month | 22:26 |
| tumbleweed | yeah, sounds good, otherwise there's way too much untested code | 22:26 |
| lfaraone | tumbleweed: hehe, 3 days is unheard of, you're right. but don't worry, they'll have you in the DAM queue for a week at least. | 22:27 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: my NM process took nearly a year. ;) | 22:28 |
| lfaraone | bdrung: I was in it for 6 months. | 22:28 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: btw, we should try to create a testcase for every bug that is reported. | 22:28 |
| lfaraone | to tumbleweed 's credit, he did apply in October. | 22:29 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: yeah, that's always a good idea (sorry timed out there, dodgy DSL line) | 22:32 |
| DktrKranz | bdrung: I think you can even upload u-d-t to unstable this time | 22:32 |
| bdrung | DktrKranz: then why did we upload it to experimental? | 22:33 |
| DktrKranz | in case we need to fix things before squeeze, but I don't think it'll be the case anymore | 22:33 |
| DktrKranz | anyway, it's fine to have it in experimental for another upload too | 22:34 |
| ari-tczew | DktrKranz: so, people forgot that Debian isn't yet released? | 22:47 |
| lfaraone | ari-tczew: no… people *can* upload to unstable if they want. | 22:50 |
| ari-tczew | aha | 22:50 |
| Laney | I imagine Debian will release quite soon, so no need | 22:57 |
| DktrKranz | ari-tczew: basically, we didn't upload to unstable to be given the chance to upload fixes straight to unstable instead of targeting t-p-u, now that we're close to release, and there weren't lots of bugs reported, uploading to unstable could be an option | 22:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!