[12:20] when looking for a video card does "Standard Memory Config" refer to my system memory? [12:21] * gnomefreak having a hard time looking for a nvidia in the 7series or above cant use pci express card :( [12:25] i can even do 6 series above the 6200 and i cant find specs for the 6800 [16:00] chrisccoulson: good morning, are you handling the FF4.0 daily patch refresh? [16:01] micahg - i will do today if you don't get around to it first ;) [16:01] chrisccoulson: ok, I can do it now [16:02] thanks [16:02] brb, session restart [16:04] fta: do you have any interest in merging python-pysnmp4 from Debian? [16:05] micahg, no time atm [16:05] fta: np, I'll take care of it [16:05] thanks [16:06] i planed to use this package for one of my project, but i went nowhere with it, i still prefer my own SNMP stack [17:02] hi chrisccoulson [17:02] NSS 3.12.9 has been tagged [17:03] micahg - yeah, i saw that. i'll do it later [17:03] i guess it's only small changes === evilvish is now known as vish === vish is now known as evilvish [17:51] fta: have you ever tried to build chrome os? [17:51] asac, no, not yet [17:52] fta: kk [17:52] fta: i have folks around me that say that chromeos build system is a mess and that for ARM it doesnt build most of the days ... which i find a suspicious statement given how decent they do the browser [17:53] asac, arm is one of their primary targets [17:53] asac, but they cross build (afaik) [17:53] fta: right ... [17:54] as i said i find this suspicious [17:54] cross build shouldt be a problem in general [17:56] asac, http://build.chromium.org/p/chromiumos/waterfall [17:56] arm is green [17:58] fta: is piman a good guy to talk to ? and is he working on arm/chromeos? or just browser? [17:59] he was, not sure if he still is [17:59] fta: thanks [18:00] asac, oh, he's sheriff today so i'd say he is still a good poc [18:00] awesome [18:05] fta: oh ... depot_tools ... thats packaged, right=? [18:05] * asac checks apt-cache [18:05] asac, nope [18:06] * micahg thought someone was working on that [18:06] it's just a pile of files [18:06] it has been discussed in -motu once [18:07] kk ... [18:09] asac, the problem is that different projects have different expectations for it, and it's a moving target. imho, not worth it [18:56] bug 689849 [18:56] Launchpad bug 689849 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "8.0.552.215~r67652 -> 8.0.552.224~r68599 security update (affects: 1) (heat: 269)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689849 [18:57] fta: ? [18:57] nothing, i just needed the url ;) [18:57] ah, ok [18:57] preparing the new upgrade [19:00] bug 702542 [19:00] Launchpad bug 702542 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "8.0.552.224~r68599 -> 8.0.552.237~r70801 security update (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702542 [20:57] jdstrand, bug 702542 + http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/8.0.552.237~r70801/ [20:57] Launchpad bug 702542 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "8.0.552.224~r68599 -> 8.0.552.237~r70801 security update (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702542 [21:00] fta: ack [21:03] fta: thanks for the packages. I am pulling it down now and will upload after review [21:04] jdstrand, thanks. there are only 2 tiny translations changes, zero risk. The 1st was a missing template from the previous upgrade, the 2nd is 2 more langs. [21:05] jdstrand, both have been tested before [21:08] fta: cool. thanks for the heads up [22:59] o/ [23:38] fta: now I have a new sound notification [23:39] BUGabundo, a reboot fixed mine this morning [23:39] mine is still working