[00:16] Jack87: It's Sunday :) [00:16] :) === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [08:59] morning [09:30] hola === ogra is now known as Guest61426 === Guest61426 is now known as ogra_ === apw` is now known as apw === ogra_ is now known as ogra [12:34] hrmpf, archive is still out of sync [12:56] ogra: with 5 gig ram free, you can compile eclipse on tmpfs. [12:56] sure [12:56] (really, later :p ) [12:56] but first i would need to solder 4.5G onto the board ;) [12:57] persia: :) (thought I was already in this channel, apparently for some reason I wasn't ...) [12:58] heh [13:08] grrrr [13:36] ogra: you need more than 5 gig or do you want to swap everything else while compiling. ;) [13:37] i usually dont compile Qt, firefox, thunderbird or openoffice ... normal packages dont need these insane amounts of ram [14:32] bug #684951 [14:32] ogra: Bug 684951 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/684951 is private [15:28] rsalveti: quick question.. your new ppa seems to have same version # as what I was using from your old ppa.. how to I get 'apt-get install' to realize they are not the same and install from your new ppa? [15:29] robclark: actually it's not the same: 4.7.0-0ubuntu4.2ppa2 (new) 4.7.0-0ubuntu4.2ppa1 (old) [15:30] hmm.. sudo apt-get install libqt4-opengl tells me I already have latest version.. [15:58] Is libqt4-opengl for QWS or X11? [16:27] robclark: what oprofile version are you using atm? [16:27] How is resolv.conf handled in respect of dhclient on maverick? Is it updated automatically? [16:28] robclark: I remember I saw a but reported by GrueMaster [16:28] sveinse: yup, should be [16:28] rsalveti: whatever is in maverick.. although it is not working.. [16:28] sveinse, if you use ifup (/etc/network/interfaces) it is [16:28] but perf does seem to work, so that is what I'm using for now.. [16:28] sveinse, plain manual dhclient call wont update it [16:29] robclark: oh, got it, will try to check why oprofile is not working later [16:29] ogra: Ahh. So ifup is it then... [16:29] although you have to explicitly run perf_2.6.35-903 (the wrapper script isn't working) [16:29] rsalveti: btw, any ideas about: "Unable to load graphicssystem "opengl"" [16:29] ogra: Is ifup triggered by udev events (like eth cable insert)? [16:30] not sure [16:30] ogra: ok, thanks [16:30] robbiew: hm, weird, should work if you have the proper qt opengl packages installed [16:31] robbiew: sorry [16:31] robclark: ^ [16:31] it's possible I need to install something else.. I'm sort of newbie to qt so no idea where to start.. [16:32] just to sanity check.. the backend is still called "opengl" and not "opengles" or something like that? [16:33] robclark: afaik it should be still opengl [16:35] the build sounds correct: OpenGL support ......... yes (OpenGL ES 2.x) [16:36] rsalveti: short snippet from strace: http://pastebin.com/CBCgp3LP [16:37] my guess something is not getting packaged, which should be in that directory? [16:39] robclark: yup, could be the case [16:39] let me check the logs [16:39] k [16:48] robclark: it seems fine http://paste.ubuntu.com/555140/ [16:49] anyway, I'm starting my panda and will check [16:49] let me just get some food first, almost 3 pm already [16:50] rsalveti: /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/graphicssystems vs /usr/bin/graphicssystems [16:50] but even on my desktop it's using /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/graphicssystems/libqglgraphicssystem.so [16:51] hmm [16:51] * rsalveti brb, lunch [17:09] hi guys [17:15] I've been working on bug #704027 so I'd like to have chances to testbuild before uploading [17:15] Launchpad bug 704027 in gavl (Ubuntu) "gavl 1.2.0-1 FTBFS on armel (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/704027 [17:15] there is a way to make me happy? :) [17:17] Am I correct that there is no lsusb ported to armel? [17:18] quadrispro, attach a debdiff to the bug and someone for the team will get to it [17:18] s/for/of/ [17:18] sveinse, hmm ? [17:18] ogra@ac100:~$ which lsusb [17:18] /usr/sbin/lsusb [17:19] apt-get install lsusb [17:19] E: Unable to locate package lsusb [17:19] That's maverick [17:19] you want usbutils [17:20] aaahh.. go figure [17:21] what is the status of natty? We are using maverick (via rootstock) and it works pretty good. Is natty something to consider over maverick? [17:21] ogra, thanks [17:21] sveinse, natty will bring the new unity-2d UI for arm [17:22] Any major news for the platform itself, like new compile-settings etc? [17:22] newer toolchain [17:22] no changed default build options, no [17:23] i think until we switch to hardfloat there wont be massive changes anymore [17:23] and the hf port will still need time [17:24] Am I correct to assume that there is no problems with using hardfloat in custom applications, right? [17:25] it needs a complete recompile [17:25] its a completely different ABI [17:26] ok, so the application's external references (to libs & stuff) get garbled with the new ABI. So, basically, no then [17:27] Are any of you doing remote debugging against armel? The armel cross compiler is available, but I cannot find any gdb cross for armel... [17:28] i think lool just works on that [17:28] Would be nice to have something that matched the gdbserver in armel [17:28] nice! [17:30] What's the deal with --sysroot being removed from the cross toolchain? [17:30] sveinse: http://hudson.dooz.org/job/armel-gdb/ has a decently recent package [17:31] lool: Great! Thanks [17:31] I know that it conflicts with xdeb, but removing --sysroot is IMHO somwhat a drastic measure [17:32] I ruins our target cross buildsystem [17:32] rsalveti: The bug I filed in oprofile was because robclark pointed it out. I don't have much detail beyond what is in the bug report. [17:33] lool: I presume it's matched against the armel gdbserver, similar to the gnueabi cross toolchain, right? [17:53] sveinse: yes [18:25] ping? [18:38] argh, crap internet connection [18:38] GrueMaster: ok [19:06] hey this place is live for a change. [19:06] * Jack87 needs peeps who want to try ubuntu on nook color. [19:07] or help me try it and hope nook doesnt explode === Jack87 is now known as Jack87_Away