=== jacob_ is now known as jacob
=== emma is now known as em
=== bcurtiswx_ is now known as bcurtiswx
[04:01] <drew2121> micahg: are there any known memory leak problems with FF 3.6?
[04:02] <drew2121> micahg: it's using 30% of 4gb with only 2 tabs, facebook and a new tab
[04:05]  * micahg pretends to not know what a memory leak is
[04:07] <drew2121> micahg: is that a yes?
[04:07] <micahg> drew2121: nah, Firefox doesn't have memory leaks ;-)
[04:08] <micahg> j/k
[04:09] <drew2121> lol... mine is pretty bad... i only had 6-8 tabs open in one, and i closed them, but no memory was freed up =X, i had to do a killall to fix it
[04:09] <drew2121> in the other window i had facebook and a new tab =P
[04:09] <micahg> drew2121: I've got 1.6GB of resident memory usage for FF4
[04:10] <drew2121> isn't that excessive?
[04:10] <micahg> yes
[04:10] <drew2121> memory leaks FTW
[04:11] <drew2121> micahg: are there any ways to go about debugging them?
[04:11] <micahg> drew2121: probably, I haven't had time to look into it yet
[04:12] <drew2121> i don't know of any specific debuggers that are good with it
[04:12] <drew2121> i haven't learned a whole lot of debuggers in school yet though...
[04:16] <drew2121> micahg: looks like the consensus is dmalloc for C languages...
[04:17] <micahg> drew2121: won't work, Firefox uses jemalloc
[04:19] <drew2121> micahg: i can't find any good documentation on jemalloc, i cant even find it in the repos =X
[04:36] <micahg> drew2121: did you see Chris's comment about apport and Firefox?
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[06:05] <awk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunistring/+bug/702317
[06:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 702317 in libunistring (Ubuntu) "Building of libunistring0 fails (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[06:06] <awk> When the hek will this get resolved? How do people build custom kernels ?
[06:11] <micahg> awk: I have it installed, so, wfm
[06:12] <micahg> awk: I suggest running apt-get update and trying again or trying a different mirror
[06:15] <awk> micahg: I have tried us/uk/za
[06:15] <awk> I have downloaded from archive.ubuntu
[06:15] <awk> and dpkg -i with the same result.
[06:16] <awk> never mind :P
[06:16] <awk> it's now working
[06:16] <micahg> awk: ah, good
[06:16] <awk> Can I close the bug?
[06:20] <micahg> awk: well, I already converted it to a question, so you can close that if you like
[06:21] <awk> micahg: what was the reason for it not working? bad rsync to repos?
[06:21] <micahg> awk: more likely a bad local cache
[06:22] <awk> ah, thanks.
[09:39] <wolfpack> I think the following is pretty OLD and need to be updated...."https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingHardwareDetection"
[09:41] <trinikrono> can someone set bug 382267 to triaged and set status to low for me please
[09:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 382267 in checkgmail (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "memory leak (affects: 6) (heat: 23)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/382267
[09:41] <trinikrono> or please advise lol
=== apw` is now known as apw
[13:49] <AbhiJit> ]/close
=== JoeSett is now known as JoeMaverickSett
[15:13] <drew2121> micahg: yeah, i didn't realize we changed that
=== emma_ is now known as em
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[18:25] <kamusin> hggdh, Eeebotu is gone :(
[18:27] <hggdh> kamusin: per chance I was at the computer -- restarted, thank you
[18:27] <kamusin> wohoo thanks to you ;)
[18:48]  * hggdh will dig out what happened to eeeBotu later
[19:56] <jschall> bug 384920 is almost 2 years old... it affects me, and I'm hoping to find a good workaround or to provide someone with the information necessary to fix it. It's causing my wireless to connect at 8 Mbit/s when it should be connecting at 54M.
[19:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 384920 in wireless-tools (Fedora) (and 1 other project) "iwconfig bitrate is not set properly (affects: 4) (heat: 25)" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/384920
[20:36] <drew2121> micahg: what is the process for when a new profile works for a user?
[20:37] <charlie-tca> good question, drew2121
[20:37]  * charlie-tca never ran into a user that succeeded with the new profile 
[20:37] <drew2121> charlie-tca: do you know? i mean, its not a bug, but how do i tell the user that =P
[20:37] <drew2121> check out bug 701217
[20:37] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 701217 in firefox (Ubuntu) "does not remember 'customer number' but says it has. (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/701217
[20:38] <charlie-tca> I don't know. I anxiously await micahg's response!
[20:38] <charlie-tca> My guess would be the bug is invalid because the user profile has something wrong
[20:40] <micahg> drew2121: disable all addons in the good profile and enable them one by one until the culprit is (hopefully) found
[20:41] <micahg> drew2121: actually, if that works, it won't be system installed, so convert to question at that point, and propose what I said before
[20:41]  * charlie-tca knew micahg would know the right answer
[20:42] <drew2121> he said with all addons disabled it doesn't work
[20:45] <drew2121> micahg: what do i do then?
=== PaoloRotolo_ is now known as PaoloRotolo
[20:52] <drew2121> and what are we doing about all the crash reports still in LP? are we still supposed to triage those?
[20:57] <micahg> drew2121: well, unless the crash report is usable, no, lucid and up can now report straight to Mozilla
[20:58] <drew2121> alrite...
[20:58] <drew2121> micahg: and about the new profile working, if he disables all addons it doesn't work, so convert to question and...?
[20:59] <micahg> drew2121: as for the bug, please ask the user which version worked, I'd like to know if it's a regression in -updates
[20:59] <drew2121> micahg: which version?
[21:00] <micahg> drew2121: user is up to date with 3.6.13
[21:00] <micahg> drew2121: maverick was released with 3.6.10
[21:01] <drew2121> yes... but all he did was create a new profile, that degrades your version
[21:06] <drew2121> micahg: nevermind, i understand what you meant now =P
[21:27] <drew2121> micahg: is bug 578069 normal behavior, so i could mark that as triaged/wishlist as the user is more looking to add a feature(the ability to choose between both)or should i mark triaged(low), as it is easily worked around.
[21:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 578069 in firefox (Ubuntu) "firefox adobe flash plugin no longer works (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/578069
[21:28] <micahg> drew2121: ubufox should allow you to switch
[21:28] <drew2121> alrite
[21:28] <micahg> drew2121: FYI, swfdec is broke in Lucid and gnash replaced it in maverick
[21:29] <micahg> err, not broke, just old
[21:29] <drew2121> micahg: where do you learn all this stuff? lol
[21:29] <drew2121> micahg: is there a daily digest?
[21:29] <micahg> drew2121: I did the initial merge of gnash 0.88 into ubuntu, so I saw what it replaced
[21:30] <micahg> I also filed the bug for the old swfdec-0.7 to be removed from maverick
[21:31] <drew2121> micahg: that would do it =P, so maybe ask the user to try a new profile? since ubufox should allow it?
[21:31] <micahg> err, swfdec0.7
[21:31] <micahg> drew2121: you can try
[21:33] <drew2121> if swfdec is broken shouldn't support be removed from lucid?
[21:33] <micahg> drew2121: it's not broke, it just won't render stuff like youtube
[21:33] <micahg> it's old
[21:34] <drew2121> micahg: thats broke to me =P
[21:34] <micahg> drew2121: we generally don't remove stuff from the stable release
[21:34] <micahg> I would like to maybe backport gnash, but I have to make sure it works
[23:46] <ether-boy> what way can i report/request a missing kernel module?
[23:52] <ether-boy> what way can i report/request a missing kernel module?