=== apw` is now known as apw
[21:26] <charlie-tca> anybody kicked the servers lately, no desktop images since January 12
[21:28] <cjwatson> you should have been getting failure mails
[21:28] <cjwatson> no point kicking servers when the distro's broken
[21:28] <cjwatson> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/natty/xubuntu/latest/livecd-20110117-i386.out
[21:28] <charlie-tca> Ubuntu too
[21:28] <cjwatson> yes
[21:28] <charlie-tca> Okay
[21:29] <cjwatson> I thought you might find a Xubuntu link more useful, that's al
[21:29] <cjwatson> l
[21:29] <charlie-tca> I knew xubuntu was broke for the libwebkitgtk upgrade
[21:29] <charlie-tca> thank you, cjwatson
[21:29] <cjwatson> Ubuntu has that plus libindicator breakage
[21:30] <charlie-tca> Thanks, back to waiting patiently, then
[21:30] <cjwatson> (why on earth does libindicator2 Breaks: libindicator1?)
[21:51] <highvoltage> hmm, I thought I tested an edubuntu daily build this morning
[21:51] <highvoltage> (maybe it was just an old livefs or something inside or I didn't check the date as properly as I thought I had)
[21:51] <highvoltage> or perhaps it's just unaffected
[21:53] <charlie-tca> daily-live is broken, daily have been coming out
[23:07] <cjwatson> looks like it stands a chance of being better tomorrow
[23:08] <cjwatson> alternate builds may have been being produced, but if the corresponding desktop build failed then chances are they'll fail to install, FWIW
[23:08] <cjwatson> so largely of interest to installer hackers
[23:19] <highvoltage> ah right, installation failed. the I wrongly assumed that charlie-tca meant that the build failed
[23:20] <charlie-tca> sorry. cjwatson said it the right way
[23:20] <cjwatson> he did - the livefs build failed