[03:30] <jschall> bug 384920 is almost 2 years old... it affects me, and I'm hoping to find a good workaround or to provide someone with the information necessary to fix it. It's causing my wireless to connect at 8M when it should be connecting at 54M. I have a broadcom bcm4313
[03:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 384920 in wireless-tools (Fedora) (and 1 other project) "iwconfig bitrate is not set properly (affects: 4) (heat: 25)" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/384920
[03:31] <jschall> bug 1 sucks too
[03:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1 in tilix (and 20 other projects) "Microsoft has a majority market share (affects: 614) (heat: 2979)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[03:35] <drew2121> jschall: looking into it, but i cant promise anything
[03:36] <jschall> drew2121: thanks, willing to offer any information necessary
[03:37] <drew2121> jschall: have you tried the fixes in the description?
[03:38] <jschall> drew2121: look like temporary fixes
[03:38] <drew2121> jschall: that worked?
[03:38] <jschall> drew2121: well, i can set it to 54M
[03:39] <drew2121> iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M fixed is a nother config you may wayt to set
[03:39] <jschall> drew2121: but won't it revert if it reconnects?
[03:39] <jschall> or if the computer is suspended or shut down or whatever?
[03:39] <jschall> i'll try it for sure
[03:40] <drew2121> jschall: yes, thats why you either need to change your /etc/rc.local or run that command
[03:40] <jschall> drew2121: set rate 54m fixed, rebooting to see what it comes up as
[03:41] <drew2121> jschall: see you in a few =)
[03:41] <jschall> drew2121: it's a laptop :)
[03:41] <jschall> drew2121: and this is a desktop
[03:41] <drew2121> jschall: ahh, well let me know what happens
[03:41] <jschall> drew finished booting just now, waiting for it to connect
[03:42] <jschall> drew2121: back to 8M
[03:42] <drew2121> hrm...
[03:43] <jschall> drew2121: adding the lines to rc.local will run it when the machine boots, but not when i change SSIDs or suspend. i'll try it here, though.
[03:44] <jschall> drew2121: restarting again
[03:44] <drew2121> jschall: true, i don't debug wireless but i can still help, and maybe get the status to triaged
[03:45] <jschall> drew2121: came up as 54M
[03:45] <drew2121> jschall: how about after a sleep?
[03:46] <jschall> drew2121: 54M after reconnect
[03:46] <drew2121> jschall: all working now then?
[03:47] <jschall> drew2121: 54M after resume
[03:47] <drew2121> jschall: nice
[03:47] <jschall> drew2121: i guess that workaround fixes it
[03:47] <jschall> drew2121: isn't wifi supposed to automatically scale based on how bad a signal it has though?
[03:48] <drew2121> jschall: i'm not sure... i'm not a wireless expert =P
[03:48] <jschall> drew2121: anyway, now it'd be nice if i could get 300M... that's the next step
[03:48] <jschall> drew2121: apparently 802.11n doesn't work with these drivers
[03:48] <jschall> drew2121: hate broadcom.
[03:48] <drew2121> jschall: what drivers are you using? proprietary?
[03:48] <jschall> drew2121: yeah
[03:49] <drew2121> jschall:  broadcom FTL
[03:49] <jschall> drew2121: i don't really NEED 300M, but the netbook doesn't have gigabit on it so it'd be nice to get more speed than the 100Mbps ethernet can provide.
[03:49] <jschall> drew2121: on data transfers
[03:50] <drew2121> jschall: yeah
[03:51] <jschall> drew2121: also soon i'll likely have 50mbps cable, and i don't trust 54mbps wifi to provide that properly.
[03:51] <jschall> drew2121: i guess i don't need it to on my netbook though.
[03:52] <drew2121> i'm pretty sure ethernet has always been faster for me than wireless
[03:52] <drew2121> jschall: i'm not sure if i have gigabit or not though
[03:53] <jschall> drew2121: i just moved out of my parents' house into an apartment and bought gigabit everything.
[03:53] <drew2121> and im running G
[03:53] <jschall> drew2121: it's nice.
[03:54] <jschall> drew2121: transfer files between computers at hard drive's speed
[03:54] <drew2121> jschall: i'm pretty comfy with the setup i have now, once i get a job i'll probably buy better stuff...
[03:55] <drew2121> jschall: yeah, that would fantastic... i've transfered stuff that took me an hour or two to get across
[08:31] <rusivi> Regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/344588 please reinstate wine (ubuntu) back to triage as this has been worked on upstream. As well, I have & will continue to refrain from toggling the status of triaged bugs.
[08:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 344588 in wine (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Wine doesn't support 5.1 and 7.1 sound (affects: 1) (heat: 11)" [Low,Incomplete]
[09:52] <rusivi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hddtemp/+bug/160621 Looks like either a Wishlist for more granular options, Won't Fix as it's supposed to check the HDD temp, or Invalid b/c the reporters/those marked affected may be using HDD as swap
[09:52] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 160621 in sensors-applet (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "running hddtemp causes unnecessary disk activity (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 29)" [Undecided,Invalid]
[09:53] <rusivi> on pkg hddtemp (Ubuntu)
[10:56] <tykjepelken> Hello
[10:57] <tykjepelken> Could any one answer a question regarding translation bugs in launchpad?
[11:17] <rork> !anyone tykjepelken
[11:17] <ubot2> rork: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[11:17] <rork> !anybody
[11:17] <ubot2> A large amount of the first questions asked in this channel start with "Does anyone/anybody..."  Why not ask your next question (the real one) and find out?
=== zyga_ is now known as zyga-vaio
[11:20] <tykjepelken> Of course
[11:27] <tykjepelken> An error showed up in a file during import of language packs of Firefox, creating a bug report. This bug was a typo in a translation in a file, easily fixed. Do I now need to make a diff or anything describing the changes, or will a simple upload of the fixed file do?
[11:27] <tykjepelken> ... Marking it as a patch?
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[13:56] <trinikrono> hello bugsquad
[14:12] <hggdh> good morning, trinikrono
[14:12] <trinikrono> :D
[14:15] <trinikrono> hey  hggdh can look at bug 3882267 i would like to believe it can be set to triaged and status set to low, can you verify or tell me what is needed again?
[14:15] <ubot2> trinikrono: Error: Bug #3882267 not found.
[14:15] <trinikrono> erm * bug 382267
[14:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 382267 in checkgmail (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "memory leak (affects: 6) (heat: 23)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/382267
=== bcurtiswx_ is now known as bcurtiswx
[18:28] <trinikrono> hey can someone please look at bug 382267 i would like it triaged and status set to low
[18:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 382267 in checkgmail (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "memory leak (affects: 6) (heat: 23)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/382267
[18:29] <Pici> 4/22
[18:29] <Pici> oops.
[18:31] <charlie-tca> trinikrono: done, thanks for sending that one upstream
[18:31] <trinikrono> charlie-tca: you wonderful human being you
[18:32] <charlie-tca> You are welcome
[18:32] <trinikrono> i have been trying to get it triaged a whilen ow
[18:32] <charlie-tca> Seems that it is still valid, too
[18:32] <trinikrono> charlie-tca: yes it gets really bad after 2 days
[18:33] <trinikrono> charlie-tca: can you stick around while i try to finish my 5 a day
[18:34] <yofel> he's not the only one around so have fun ;)
[18:34] <trinikrono> :D
[18:35] <charlie-tca> There are many of us here. If I don't catch them, some one will. Besides, if you comment and change the status to confirmed, you get credit even if it doesn't get to triaged today
[19:27] <trinikrono> micahg: so just check the package in rmadison
[19:27] <micahg> trinikrono: there's already a WNPP bug
[19:27] <micahg> also, just verify that it says is needed on wiki is present in the description
[19:28] <micahg> and yes, you can check to see if it's in Ubuntu with rmadison
[19:29] <trinikrono> so this bug  is ready to be triaged?
[19:29] <trinikrono> bug 622185
[19:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 622185 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] bsnes (affects: 2) (heat: 24)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/622185
[19:29] <micahg> trinikrono: no, you didn't link the wnpp bug
[19:30] <trinikrono> i am looking!
[19:30] <trinikrono> lol
[19:30] <trinikrono> ohwow
[19:30] <trinikrono> i found it :d
[19:31] <trinikrono> so thats theimportant step?
[19:31] <trinikrono> the upstream
[19:31] <micahg> trinikrono: nope, just one of them :)
[19:38] <trinikrono> erm
[19:38] <trinikrono> micahg: when to put in the bug reportt
[19:38] <trinikrono> it says bsnes isnt in launchpad
[19:38] <trinikrono> maybe i am just confusing myself
[19:38] <micahg> trinikrono: also affect Debian w/o a package
[19:39] <trinikrono> so affects distro?
[19:39] <micahg> trinikrono: yep
[19:41] <trinikrono> micahg: okie so it is good to go now?
[19:42] <micahg> trinikrono: I don't think it's the same person that filed the ITP and the LP bug
[19:43] <trinikrono> thats true
[19:43] <micahg> trinikrono: done
[19:45] <trinikrono> great :D
[19:45] <trinikrono> i have about 7 i was subscribed too
[19:45] <micahg> trinikrono: thanks
[19:45] <trinikrono> now that i know what to do
[19:53] <trinikrono> micahg: so if i dont findit in debian what should i do?
[19:54] <micahg> trinikrono: make sure the rest of the info is there
[19:55] <trinikrono> the liscense agreement you mean?
[19:55] <micahg> trinikrono: license agreement, URL, anything else worth mentioning
[19:56] <trinikrono> this bug 601778
[19:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 601778 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] 3Proxy - tiny free cross-platform proxy server (affects: 1) (heat: 16)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/601778
[19:56] <trinikrono> it has all of these things in the description
[19:56] <trinikrono> but in the wiki it says to add a rfp ignore that?
[19:57] <micahg> trinikrono: well, I was told they're ignored for the most part
[19:57] <trinikrono> so you are happy that it can be set to triaged?
[19:57] <trinikrono> so make a rfp anyways
[19:57] <trinikrono> or
[19:58] <micahg> I'm happy without it
[19:59] <trinikrono> well once you are happy you will set it too triaged then?
[20:21] <trinikrono> can someone set bug 601778 to triaged for me please
[20:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 601778 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] 3Proxy - tiny free cross-platform proxy server (affects: 1) (heat: 16)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/601778
[20:22] <charlie-tca> trinikrono: packaging bug?  Note 2: Never set these bugs to 'Confirmed', unless you are working with a package maintainer, and have been asked to do so.
[20:23] <trinikrono> its not confirmed
[20:23] <trinikrono> charlie-tca: ?
[20:23] <charlie-tca> triaged means confirmed. Please have the maintainer/developer you are working with on it set it
[20:25] <trinikrono> right before thenotes
[20:25] <trinikrono> it says to set to triaged and put need-packaging tag
[20:25] <trinikrono> and micahg just triaged the other one
[20:26] <trinikrono> bug 622185
[20:26] <charlie-tca> micahg is a developer
[20:26] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 622185 in debian (and 1 other project) "[needs-packaging] bsnes (affects: 2) (heat: 16)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/622185
[20:26] <micahg> charlie-tca: no, I added a section, where something can be 'Triaged' for a needs packaging bug, it means that all the information needed is present
[20:26] <micahg> confirmed is a problem since that means ready for upload
[20:27] <charlie-tca> Okay. I still don't know enough about them to do it
[20:27] <trinikrono> o.o
[20:27] <yofel> can't we use a tag for 'ready-to-upload' ?
[20:28] <micahg> yofel: no, it's workflow
[20:28] <yofel> :S
[20:29] <trinikrono> micahg: so can i get my bug triaged :D
[20:30] <micahg> trinikrono: I actually asked some people what we should do about the RFPs, if I'm right, we need to update the wiki, if I'm wrong, you need to file one :)
[20:30] <trinikrono> lol
[20:30] <trinikrono> ill go find another packaging bug then
[20:36]  * micahg wants to hug pidgin
[20:42] <charlie-tca> thursday, micahg
[20:42] <charlie-tca> start early, if you want to...
[20:42] <micahg> charlie-tca: yep, just saw itr
[20:42] <micahg> *it
[20:46] <charlie-tca> hm, my email client went nuts! I don't know how bad I spammed the bugday message now.
[20:48] <micahg> charlie-tca: I only got 2 so far
[20:48] <yofel> I got 2 too
[20:48] <charlie-tca> I will keep my fingers crossed; I showed about 8, but some seem to have failed to go out
[20:53]  * charlie-tca trusts micahg fully on packaging bugs, he just doesn't know packaging very good himself.
[21:42] <trinikrono> hey if a reporter wants a package updated
[21:42] <trinikrono> should he file a report against the package he wants updated
[21:43] <trinikrono> or what?
[21:43] <micahg> trinikrono: yes, and tag it upgrade
[21:43] <trinikrono> :D
[21:43] <trinikrono> can you put that in the wiki somewhere
[21:43] <micahg> trinikrono: if the version's already in Debian, a sync can be requested
[21:43] <micahg> !tags | trinikrono
[21:43] <ubot2> trinikrono: We use some common tags for tracking bugs on Launchpad.net See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags for common usage.
[21:44] <trinikrono> i meant the procedure
[21:44] <trinikrono> but if its not in debian
[21:44] <micahg> trinikrono: feel free to add something
[21:46] <trinikrono> did they say if too file in debian?
[21:47] <micahg> trinikrono: I've done it in the past, generally, take a look at the PTS and see if the version's listed, if it is, I don't think you need to file a bug, the problem is, only some DDs are uploading now since Debian's in deep freeze
[21:48] <trinikrono> aha
[21:49] <trinikrono> can you look at bug 699788 i just closed it because it asked for a upgrade of the package and i want to makesure i am doing the right thing
[21:49] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 699788 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] QMidiArp (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/699788
[21:50] <micahg> trinikrono: no, don't close, reassign and make sure it's still needed
[21:51] <trinikrono> ok
[21:52] <trinikrono> but if it is tagged upgrgade should the status be wishlist
[21:52] <trinikrono> or low?
[21:52] <micahg> trinikrono: wishlist unless something is broke
[21:53] <trinikrono> but the status should be triaged or new?
[21:53] <micahg> trinikrono: new
[21:53] <trinikrono> :D
[21:53] <micahg> err, doesn't matter, it's just a request
[21:56] <trinikrono> right
[21:56] <trinikrono> so does it look good now?
[21:56] <yofel> note: wishlist is an importance, not a status
[21:57] <trinikrono> yes
[21:58] <yofel> ok, I just saw a lot of misunderstandings in the past from mixing that
[21:59] <trinikrono> icant set importance anyways :D
[22:01] <trinikrono> so i can leave this bug alone now, i assinged to the package and set it too new and changed the name
[22:01] <trinikrono> and put the upgrade tag
[22:05] <yofel> micahg: that can be set triaged, can it? - or do update requests also fall under developer process bugs?
[22:05] <micahg> yofel: I think developer process and there's no point in marking it triaged
[22:06] <trinikrono> this needs to go in the wiki
[22:06] <trinikrono> :D
[22:10] <trinikrono> http://paste.ubuntu.com/555565/ what do you guys  think
[22:14] <micahg> trinikrono: I would say title should be 'Please update foo to version bar', also idk about other info
[22:15] <trinikrono> lol
[22:15] <trinikrono> maybe this is a motu thing
[22:19]  * micahg is a MOTU :)
[22:19] <trinikrono> lol
[22:20] <trinikrono> what about the other ones
[22:20] <trinikrono> if the package is not in debian
[22:20] <trinikrono> does it need the rtp
[22:21] <micahg> rfp?
[22:21] <trinikrono> yes that
[22:21] <trinikrono> this is all very new to me
[22:22] <micahg> trinikrono: idk, I'll try to get an answer
[22:33] <bencahill> is it ok to discuss a possible bug in here?
[22:35] <yofel> bencahill: fire away
[22:35] <bencahill> yofel: ok, great :) I'm waiting on someone in #u to confirm, but I'm pretty sure it's not something specific to me. see below:
[22:35] <bencahill> so you start with no windows open...then open two (let's say terminal) windows...then click the 'show desktop' button (or press mod4 + d), they both minimize. Then if you restore one window by click on it on the bottom panel, and click 'show desktop' or mod4+d, the other window re-appears. I do not believe this is the intended behavior. I would think that whenever there are any windows open, the show desktop function should show the desktop
[22:36] <bencahill> confirmed by nothingspecial in #u
[22:42] <yofel> hm, I don't use gnome myself so I'm not sure how they want it, I wouldn't expect that behaviour either though
[22:44] <yofel> does anyone know what package that would be?
[22:52] <trinikrono> micahg: check you later!
[22:52] <trinikrono> later guys o/
[22:53] <bencahill> yofel: perhaps gnome-desktop-environment ?
[22:55] <yofel> nope, that's a meta package, I thought gnome-applets for a moment, but that doesn't seem to be it
[22:55] <yofel> someone else will have to help you there
[23:34] <bencahill> yofel: yeah, because it is not just with the applets, but with the mod4 + d shortcut, so whatever function (or whatever) that calls...
[23:35] <yofel> maybe metacity or compiz - I don't know how show desktop works in gnome