| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| === bjf__ is now known as bjf | ||
| ara | skaet, ping | 15:44 |
|---|---|---|
| skaet | ara, pong | 15:44 |
| ara | skaet, hey! | 15:44 |
| skaet | :) | 15:44 |
| ara | skaet, I have a couple of questions related to the 10.04.2 activity | 15:44 |
| skaet | ? | 15:44 |
| ara | skaet, are you going to send the notes from the meeting on Friday at some point (the one with all the dates) | 15:45 |
| skaet | ara, yup its on my todo list for today. | 15:45 |
| ara | skaet, OK, cool, so we agreed that we are going to try to have the candidate image for 10.04.2 on the 28th | 15:45 |
| skaet | that matches my memory, pitti ^^? | 15:46 |
| * skaet hmm, doesn't see pitti on channel. | 15:47 | |
| ara | skaet, yes, I think that was it | 15:47 |
| ara | skaet, another question :) | 15:47 |
| ara | skaet, as you know, the full cert is very time consuming, so, the automated testing on the really final image on the week of the 14th... is that really needed? | 15:48 |
| ara | I mean, we can try to do it if something changed that may affect HW, but that is very unlikely | 15:48 |
| ara | if only app things changed, that should be covered by QA and the ISO testing | 15:48 |
| ara | what are you expecting from that run' | 15:49 |
| ara | ? | 15:49 |
| ara | I mean, if | 15:49 |
| ara | I mean, we can run it, but if it is not going to catch any bugs, I don't see the point | 15:49 |
| skaet | I think we can reassess the week before, and look at what's changed and see if it is needed to do the automated tests again. | 15:50 |
| ara | skaet, sounds good | 15:51 |
| skaet | If nothing of substance has changed, there is not much point. However, until we know what happens over next couple of weeks, seems prudent to reserve the capability. | 15:51 |
| ara | skaet, it sounds like a plan. I mean, if no HW specific stuff has changed, there's no point in running the automated tests against all of our systems | 15:52 |
| ara | skaet, thanks for clarifying | 15:52 |
| skaet | ara, thanks for asking. :) | 15:53 |
| * cjwatson builds a lucid DVD so that he has something to work with to test the business of installing an LTS backport kernel | 15:54 | |
| cjwatson | gives me something to do while tediously rebasing 60-odd branches across an svn->git migration :-/ | 15:56 |
| Laney | d-i? | 15:57 |
| ara | skaet, we can put a topic in the release meeting of the 11th Feb about whether the automated testing is needed or not, based on what has changed | 15:57 |
| skaet | ara, sure. please remind me a little closer to the time if you don't see it on the actual agenda. | 15:59 |
| ara | skaet, will do | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | Laney: yeah | 16:01 |
| Laney | fun :-) | 16:02 |
| cjwatson | so far, I've completed a grand total of two | 16:02 |
| Laney | not quite as romantic as joeyh's blog post made it out, eh? | 16:03 |
| cjwatson | Laney: heh, it's more straightforward to do a single svn->git conversion than it is to rebase a set of long-lived branches on top of the results of that conversion, in general :) | 16:06 |
| cjwatson | 'bzr rebase-foreign' does most of it but I've had to hack it about a fair bit | 16:06 |
| ScottK | ara: Kernel is updated, so hardware specific stuff will have changed. | 16:23 |
| ara | ScottK, sorry? | 16:24 |
| ScottK | ara: You had a discussion with skaet a bit ago about if hardware specific things had changed for 10.04.2. Given the kernel changes since release, I think it's a given that hardware specific changes have been made. | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | I think they meant changed between the cert run on the 28th Jan or so, and the week of the 14th Feb | 16:26 |
| ara | ScottK, we are talking about other stuff | 16:26 |
| ScottK | ara: Oh. OK. Nevermind me then. | 16:26 |
| cjwatson | rather than changed between 10.04.1 and 10.04.2 | 16:26 |
| ara | :) | 16:26 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: Thanks. | 16:26 |
| ara | ScottK, no problem | 16:26 |
| ara | cjwatson, thanks | 16:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!