=== releaselogger is now known as apachelogger [00:42] hiya. Is there an easy way to move a package from one ppa to another (that I control) [00:42] I uploaded to the wrong one :/ [00:46] vex: you can copy packages from the "View Packages" page [00:48] hey cool! [00:48] look at that. [00:48] :D [00:48] thanks === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [07:09] Looks like the loggerhead /view/ changes are out now. Any numbers on performance improvements or load lessening? [07:09] mkanat: let me see if I can dig something up for you... [07:10] spm: Awesome. [07:10] Not sure when the change got rolled out. [07:10] probably last week with the full release [07:10] That would sound right. [07:11] It *feels* faster, at the least. [07:12] hand on heart, can't see anything that looks like a load/cpu lessoning. looks about the same. [07:12] Of course, right now is probably a relatively low-load time. [07:12] heh [07:12] spm: Okay. [07:13] spm: Do you have any stats on how many threads timeout? [07:13] Or how many threads run for longer than X seconds? [07:13] Run a single request for longer than X seconds, that is. [07:13] not that I'm aware of. it may be bruied in the logs; but we're not directly showing that anywhere. [07:13] Okay. [07:14] Yeah, I have a log analysis tool that does it, but I need the logs, of course. :-D [07:14] It's not important now, anyhow. [07:14] chicken, meet egg. ;-) [07:14] lol. [07:14] Okay, I'll work on oops reduction. [07:15] oki, always welcome! [07:15] spm: I heard there was some oops frequency analysis going on...are there any results from that yet? [07:16] errr. good question. I've heard of it, but don't know much beyond that. lifeless'd be a good starter to ask about that. [07:16] spm: Okay. [07:32] spm: How's stability been? [07:32] pretty good actually. [07:32] * spm pulls up the incident page [07:33] couple of fails at the end of December; only one since. the former were mainly memory abuse causing swappage necessitating kill/starts [07:42] spm: Wow, that's pretty great. [07:42] we may have to rename, from codebounce to codestable. :'-( [08:07] spm: Hahahahaha. :-D [08:12] spm: What about the one that wasn't a memory problem? [08:12] spm: Was it something like bug 617249? [08:12] Launchpad bug 617249 in Launchpad itself "codebrowse responding to debug requests; 500 erroring on everything else" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/617249 [08:34] wgrant: can you please look at the build logs of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ants/1.9+svn532-5/+buildjob/2004367 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clisp/1:2.48-3/+buildjob/2004687. They look like a mix of two different builds. [08:44] geser: I'm asleep, but that looks pretty serious. I will investigate in a few hours, but please ping me if you see anything else like it. [08:44] ok [08:56] It looks like the CSS being used by codebrowse is not correct. Is it being cached somewhere? === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [13:10] I've linked a branch to fix a packaging bug (http://launchpad.net/bugs/705389), what should I do next? Wait for someone on the Ubuntu side to notice? Ask this question in #ubuntu rather than #launchpad? [13:12] mgedmin: you have two ways: 1) subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to bug; 2) propose a merge your branch to lucid and set ubuntu-sponsors as reviewer [13:13] thanks [13:40] bah no mrevell! [13:53] czajkowski: He should be around in an hour or so. [13:54] ahh damn timezones [13:54] forgot he's in Dallas === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ [13:56] wgrant: you in Dallas? [14:11] does anyone know how I can change the assignee of a bug task? I've assigned one to the wrong team, and I'd like to correct it [14:12] no - sign beside them ? [14:14] not that I could see :( [14:14] ah, the little arrow on the far left lets me expand the task and reassign it, cool! [14:17] dpm: :) === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [14:55] czajkowski: I am. [14:56] wgrant: any sign of Mat? [14:57] czajkowski: He's on the other side of the room, with his laptop not out yet. [14:57] Although that may be changing. === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [14:57] wgrant: could you throw something at him please and tell him I'm looking for him... Laura is looking for him will do :) thanks [14:57] wont make people say my surname [14:58] It's not that hard... [14:58] I know this [14:59] others seem to argue with me :) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:29] mrevell: boo [15:29] Hi czajkowski, in a meeting just now so will be slow to reply. [15:29] mrevell: np can you look at your email, forwared on mails from loco contacts re issue with locked loco teams [15:29] please [15:30] czajkowski, Will do. [15:30] mrevell: cheers [15:31] :) [15:31] knew that bug was gonna become a pain in the ass === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [16:02] wgrant: there is now a bug for the buildlog issue: bug 705342 [16:02] Launchpad bug 705342 in Launchpad itself "buildlog contains a mix of two different builds" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/705342 [16:06] geser: Yeah, we are investigating. === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [16:09] geser: It's always that same builder. [16:09] And the builds that succeed seem to be fine. [16:10] wgrant: can you check what happened to the other builds of those intermixed buildlogs? [16:12] geser: I need the log from the slave, which won't be available for a while. [16:20] wgrant: I now looked closer on http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62494035/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-armel.clisp_1%3A2.48-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and the 2nd build seems to be for libcanberra 0.26-1ubuntu7 (armel; built on 2011-01-19) but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcanberra/0.26-1ubuntu7/+buildjob/2166905 tells it build successfully on 2011-01-12. why did it try it then on that build again? [16:20] geser: It was probably the libcanberra build from the copy archive. [16:20] It's building l* at the moment. [16:20] ah [16:24] wgrant: you are right: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110114-arm/+buildjob/2170420 === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [17:33] mrevell: can I ask you about a possible project name being appropriate or is there a better forum for that? [17:35] micahg, Yeah, please do. [17:35] mrevell: would the name ipfreely be inappropriate on launchpad? [17:35] micahg, Heh, no I don't think so. [17:35] mrevell: ok, thanks [17:36] even for a project which removes limitations (eg non-mobility of endpoints) from IP communication? [17:44] mrevell: good meeting === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [18:27] I am working under some HTTP proxy. When i try to branch through bazaar I get this error---"ssh: connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: Connection timed out bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist. "..Is there any way around to solve this?? [18:28] spiv: would you know? ^^ [18:33] I seriously doubt a HTTP proxy is causing that problem. [18:33] Is port 22 firewalled? [18:34] don't know .... i am in university [18:35] so may be they have port 22 firewalled [18:40] wolfpack: "Connection timed out" is the problem [18:40] wolfpack: as StevenK says you appear to be firewalled, or something like that. It's an issue with your network. [18:41] spiv: ok...so no solution for it ? [18:41] wolfpack: if you can't use port 22, and you don't need write access to the branch, you can probably work around it by using http:// URLs [18:42] If you need write access, then you must be able to connect to bazaar.launchpad.net port 22, there is no other option. [18:42] but i will not be able to contribute in devlopment work [18:42] ok [18:47] spiv: Is this way possible--I download the source for that branch using loggerhead and then work upon it while offline ......After that merge it using some other computer where port 22 is allowed [18:49] wolfpack: yes [18:49] Er, [18:49] But rather than download the source via loggerhead, just "bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/..." [18:50] You can *read* branches via http, and thus make your own local branches from an HTTP source [18:50] but I am not able to branch it [18:50] Have you tried a http://bazaar.launchpad.net/... URL when branching? [18:51] Hey czajkowski. Thanks for forwarding me those emails. I've sent a message to the loco-council list, which is awaiting moderation. [18:52] no [18:52] mrevell: loco council is me and 5 others [18:52] mrevell: the thread went on today on loco contacts [18:53] mrevell: mail approved now [18:53] czajkowski, Yeah, I wanted to email the loco council first. Thanks for approving it. [18:54] np [18:54] mrevell: you can follow the other thread on the contacts list [18:54] I did point out I'd gone and poke ye [19:11] spiv:U were telling about branching using http ....can u please tell me how to do that . === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === charlie-tca is now known as charlie-tca__ [19:49] Hello === charlie-tca__ is now known as charlie-tca [19:49] hello \o [19:49] Are you :D [19:50] I am trying to register my PGPKey [19:51] having any trouble? [19:52] Well, i don't know how to validate my Key on LaunchPad [19:52] so you have already created the key on your system? [19:53] A personal Key [19:54] ok, so what steps have you done so far? [19:56] Just register on LaunchPad create the key and now i am seeying the mail PGP [19:59] VarcMB: you need to upload the key to a keyserver, you can use the command "gpg --send-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com your_key_id" (replacing your_key_id with the ID of your key) [20:00] In the terminal right? [20:00] yeah [20:02] is not a valid key ID: omitted [20:03] you need to put your key ID in, you should be able to see it with "gpg --list-keys" [20:03] pub or sub? [20:04] pub [20:04] pub the answer is always pub [20:05] Get it but, say the same thing [20:05] true [20:06] try with "gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys your_key_id", I think gpg is a bit picky about what option comes last === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [20:08] Nothing [20:08] nothing? [20:08] I will try with Evolution mail [20:08] The problem si the key in the terminal i think [20:15] the GPG/PGP Key are the *******/****** Or the most long key? [20:15] mrevell: ping [20:17] VarcMB: the part after the '/'. if it shows "1024D/12345678" then "12345678" is the key ID [20:17] Ohhhh [20:18] Other error [20:19] My mistake, i do it whit the terminal [20:21] What i need now? [20:23] once you have uploaded the key, you need to tell launchpad about it [20:23] use "gpg --fingerprint" and look for the line with "Key fingerprint =" [20:24] I have the key [20:24] i need send this key from anywhere? [20:24] you need to paste that into https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editpgpkeys [20:24] and then click the Import Key button [20:25] Finish [20:26] you need to check your email now and decrypt the message with your key [20:26] Hi there czajkowski [20:27] you are killing me mister :P [20:27] Ok, i have Gamil and Evolution, Evolution is new for me so i will the to decrypt with the terminal [20:27] czajkowski, What do you mean? [20:27] mrevell: can you check your mail [20:27] VarcMB: that's fine, just type "gpg" in the terminal and copy+paste the email in [20:27] VarcMB: it should give you a link to follow [20:28] But this crypt [20:31] hi guys [20:31] hi guys, can somebody please review the account of klusumsky RE: [20:31] https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-nettool/+question/76378 [20:32] Hello, tsimpson i think can help you, please wait for him [20:36] VarcMB: you copy the encrypted message into gpg, it should then decrypt the message [20:38] The message need have a ' "" ' [20:39] just copy and paste directly from gmail should work [20:39] after typing "gpg" and pressing enter [20:40] i write in the terminal, "pgp MESSAGE (ONLY THE CODES)" and this don't work [20:42] did you paste everything from "-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----" to "-----END PGP MESSAGE-----"? [20:42] The BEGIN PGP MESSAGE & AND PGP MESSAGE no [20:44] just copy and paste the entire thing [20:46] Wait, i don't have installed the pgp [20:47] I will close the programs, i come back in few minutes [20:48] do the PPA builders not allow out-bound network connections? [20:48] mtaylor: no it's verboten [20:49] well, that sure does make building doc packages that use sphinx that use intersphinx inventories a little difficult :( [20:49] They have access to the PPA and primary archives, and that's about it. [20:49] I am back [20:50] * mtaylor goes off to make a patch for his ppa packaging branches. cries a little [20:50] oh - that's even just for the normal natty builder for the main archive [20:50] blast. [20:50] it's to enforce re-creatable build conditions [20:51] WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity. <----- say this [20:51] sure. makes sense - I'm just not sure what to do about making the generated docs for the -doc package be the same as the published ones. maybe I should just not care [20:54] I decrypt it :D but with a program [21:14] I can't finish it :( [21:17] Nevermind i finish it :D [21:26] bdmurray, ping [21:26] deryck: hey [21:27] how do I delete a ppa package that did not build? [21:27] bdmurray, so the bug reporting guidelines may be fixed now. How recently did you try this? [21:28] deryck: probably the week of the 3rd [21:28] bdmurray, can you try again (just changing to anything and set it back if needed)? assuming it works. [21:28] bdmurray, qastaging is available for this test, too. [21:29] deryck: *I* can't as we changed the owner of Ubuntu to a team I'm not a member of. However I seem to recall the same thing happening with the bug filing guidelines for Launchpad when gary tried to change them [21:29] vanguard: in the same was as you delete one that did build [21:30] s/was/way/ [21:30] deryck: I commented on the bug a bit today [21:30] bdmurray, right. I asked him, too. Just over-verifying. :-) Thanks, anyway! [21:32] deryck: if you let the bug supervisor set the bug reporting guidelines I'll be happy to verify it. ;-) [21:33] bdmurray, I don't follow. bug supervisor can't set that? Or you mean, you'll verify the actual text when it's set? :-) [21:33] deryck: bug supervisor can only set it for projects (I'm pretty sure) not for distros [21:36] bdmurray, I thought you fixed that? :-) [21:36] bigjools: I just uploaded one package, and that single one did not build [21:37] vanguard: what do you mean by "did not build" ? [21:37] failed to build? [21:38] yes [21:38] I had an error in the makefile [21:44] vanguard: you don't need to delete it, just upload a new version and the old one is superseded automatically [21:45] but I really haven't changed anything. [21:45] I renamed it from 0.3 to 0.3.1 then [21:45] vanguard: let me rephrase then - what is your intended outcome? [21:46] well, I did not build it with pbuilder before and did not notice that my makefile does not work. lp-build told me that a couple minutes later and I tried to upload a newer package, but it told me that it was alreay there [21:46] so I named it 0.3ubuntu1 [21:46] you can't re-use the same version [21:47] but it does not make too much sense because I am upstream, so 0.3-1 would be better [21:47] but I think lintian did not like that since it is an original package, now I have 0.3.1. But anyway, my ppa get's cluttered I think [21:47] no, it's not cluttered [21:47] the old version will be removed [21:48] because it failed or because it is superseeded? [21:49] when it's superseded === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away [22:06] bigjools: you are right, the two old versions are gone now [22:07] the last one built fine, and I can properly install it through my ppa. awesome! [22:07] glad to hear it [22:07] I'm right occasionally :) [22:23] what about deleted ppas, are they going to disappear at some point or will they always be in gray on my profile page? [22:29] is there any way to tell how many people are using some PPA that I maintain? [22:29] ie, i'm about to upload a change to a PPA that I think is only mostly used by me [22:29] kirkland: yes [22:29] bigjools: cool, how? [22:30] * bigjools digs up references [22:30] kirkland: http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/tracking-ppa-download-statistics [22:31] bigjools: cheers mate [22:31] kirkland: no worries [22:35] Hey guys, one ask [22:35] What mean or how can i know my: IRC Network [22:40] Varc: card.freenode.net (Washington, DC, USA) [22:41] is last.fm down for you too? [22:41] What happend if i ut it and i am not from USA [22:42] Varc: You mean what happens if you are not from the USA and still on an US-Server? [22:42] Well, that is the internet, does not matter [22:42] it is a distributed chat here, so all servers talk to each other [22:43] Ok, i wanna join from the Ubuntu bugs squad and i was need know it thanks you very much [22:43] you can join any channel on any server, IRC does the job afaik [22:44] I see, that is cool and the "wiki" I need have a Wiki is it free or what? [22:46] Varc: A wiki is a type of documentation system, everybody can alter and add text, just like on wikipedia [22:46] Varc: What wiki are you referring to? [22:47] On LaunchPad [22:47] In my profile [22:48] can you give me the URL? [22:48] I can't is in my profile [22:48] No Wiki names registered. [22:48] Say Wiki [22:48] And No Wiki names registered. [22:49] "Example: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/" [22:49] ah [22:49] well, if you write on a wiki, you can register the name you use [22:49] so that everybody who visits your profile can see what you wrote in the wiki [22:50] you can leave that blank [22:50] But for a Mentor request this is needed and i don't wrote in any wike [22:51] okay, I guess you would have to register in the ubuntu wiki with some name and enter that name into your profile then [22:52] And the Ubuntu host right? [22:52] I think so [22:53] Thanks for your help, you work for Ubuntu or someting like it? [22:57] not really [22:57] Just a Linux lover? [22:57] Varc: I am just a regular launchpad user, linux lover and devel [22:58] Software design? [22:58] devel is short for developer [22:58] so, yeah [22:58] although I think that most of what I do is not really great in design [22:58] it just works ... somehow :D [22:59] Cool, in Windows i Design a super small program because i have 16 years old and i don't know a lot about the design but i wanna work in that and without a friend we will work on aMSN for do someting more special