[04:39] hola [04:40] alguien en la sala??? [04:41] !es | locodir-user [04:41] locodir-user: En la mayoría de canales de Ubuntu se habla sólo en inglés. Si busca ayuda en español o charlar entra en el canal #ubuntu-es. Escribe "/join #ubuntu-es" (sin comillas) y dale a enter. === IdleOne is now known as gpc [06:39] good morning [06:54] good morning === daker_ is now known as daker [12:00] hello all [12:00] hey effie-jayx === head_v is now known as head_victim === head_victim is now known as head_victim_lapy === head_victim_lapy is now known as head_victim === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [18:15] mhall119: should we do something about web dev for developer week? does that fall too far out of the scope? [18:19] you mean do a class on web development? [18:19] I think we should have a web dev class, yes [18:19] getting involved in the ubuntu type of web development [18:20] I think one of the times I taught django ws for developer week [18:20] like how to start hacking on foundations/hof/ld [18:20] I think a 'getting started on loco-directory' would be good, yes [18:21] I'm not sure foundations of hof will be in a good enough state to really be encouraging to new contributors [18:21] but ld or summit would [18:21] or the cloud portal [18:22] actually the cloud portal is just a wordpress theme ツ [18:23] oh [18:23] maybe awstrial then [18:23] yes [18:23] if that's going to be someting that sticks around [18:23] you'd have to ask DavidLevin [18:23] gah, Daviey [18:25] I think LD is the ideal candidate webapp though [18:25] o/ [18:25] holy crap Daviey is alive! [18:25] sadly :P [18:25] it has the most exposure, it most open to community direction, and has the most defined development model/cycle [18:25] hey Daviey! [18:25] awstrial is here to stay fwiw [18:26] cjohnston, he is a walking dead :p [18:26] we're talking about django apps we can use to teach a developer week class [18:26] awstrial currently needs lots of love. :) [18:27] but how open is it to community direction? [18:27] will new features have to be approved by someone at Canonical? [18:29] mhall119, hmm [18:29] tricky question [18:29] yeah [18:29] i guess it depends what a 'feature' is. [18:29] i mean, this differs from some other projects - in so far that it actually costs some money per visitor [18:30] yeah [18:30] and also it's directly used by Canonical to market a product [18:30] so having the person paying, canonical, does make sense for them to ack a feature.. i think [18:30] hmm [18:30] product or project? [18:30] product, it's being used to sell Ubuntu on the cloud [18:31] hmm [18:31] I don't think it's that straight forward... [18:31] Amazon make money out of that, i can't see how Canonical do. [18:31] it's a promotion [18:31] advertising if you will [18:32] hmm [18:32] * Pendulum hugs Daviey [18:32] Canonical will want more control over what is said/claimed/offered on 10.cloud.ubuntu.com that on loco.ubuntu.com [18:32] yeah, that is true [18:33] keep in mind that iirc LD idea came from Canonical, didn't it? [18:33] i thought that was nixternal [18:34] He was the first contributor... didn'tthink it was his idea [18:34] We discussed it at Mountain view [18:34] o [18:35] wherever it came from, we've been given quite a bit of freedom in choosing it's direction and features [18:42] oh aye. [18:44] if we're going to bring in several new contributors, we're going to need to be flexible with new ideas and features [18:44] the last thing we want to do is to have to reject features [18:46] as long as they are valid and worthwile [18:46] not that we wouldn't have to reject features to LD, but we (community contributors) would have more discretion === dscassel_ is now known as dscassel