| charlie-tca | micahg: Lucid 10.04 docs are ready - bug 705734 | 15:25 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 705734 in xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Lucid) "Xubuntu-docs for lucid are out-dated" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/705734 | 15:25 |
| micahg | charlie-tca: already grabbed them, it's a day late though, but I got a release ACK | 15:25 |
| charlie-tca | thank you | 15:26 |
| micahg | problem is codehosting is down at the moment | 15:26 |
| charlie-tca | yeah, I see bzr is down for at least an hour now | 15:26 |
| micahg | charlie-tca: why did you mark the devel task triaged on the docs bug? I thought since it was targeted for lucid, that should be invalid | 15:40 |
| charlie-tca | lost my head | 15:44 |
| charlie-tca | So, I should mark it invalid? | 15:44 |
| charlie-tca | micahg: it looks like I missed your updates on the bug | 15:48 |
| charlie-tca | fixed it now, though | 15:48 |
| micahg | ok, thanks | 15:48 |
| charlie-tca | sorry, I should have refreshed it first, I guess,. | 15:49 |
| micahg | charlie-tca: no worries | 15:49 |
| Book_em_Dano | charlie-tca, how did you push xubuntu-docs for 10.04.2? | 15:56 |
| charlie-tca | micahg is doing it | 15:56 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: so, I'll be proposing a merge to your branch with the timestamp, pocket, and version changed, but otherwise I think it's ok, I have to do a test build still, but codehosting is down | 15:57 |
| charlie-tca | We were just waiting to make sure they were ready | 15:57 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: are there any updates for maverick and natty? | 15:57 |
| Book_em_Dano | yes, there are some other commits for both that I can submit today | 15:59 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: no rush, but how many updates do you intend for Maverick? | 16:00 |
| Book_em_Dano | I don't have an exact number but I have updated the changelog at lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick | 16:02 |
| Book_em_Dano | I was hoping to do all of the corrections and upload them all at once if possile | 16:04 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: yep, go ahead and wait for that | 16:04 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: I meant uploads, not individual changes :) | 16:05 |
| Book_em_Dano | micahg: I don't think I have permission to upload to ubuntu-branches, I would need someone to sponsor the upload; I imagine just one upload once I've finished the commits | 16:08 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: I'm happy to sponsor :) | 16:09 |
| charlie-tca | Book_em_Dano: Thank you very much for the hard work on the documentation. It will be great to have them updated! | 16:09 |
| Book_em_Dano | micahg: is the procedure to target a package for a milestone different than requesting a SRU for a package? | 16:10 |
| micahg | nope, usually you don't need a milestone unless it needs to get in, so for this, it's needed for 10.04.2 | 16:11 |
| charlie-tca | Book_em_Dano: maverick has no milestones left, so it is just an update to it | 16:12 |
| micahg | charlie-tca: technically not true, there should be an -updates milestone | 16:13 |
| charlie-tca | Maybe my terminology is wrong then. There won't be another image published for it | 16:14 |
| micahg | right :) | 16:14 |
| Book_em_Dano | can anyone explain the difference between lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid and lp:ubuntu/lucid/xubuntu-docs? | 16:16 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: the lp:ubuntu branch was the release branch, lp:xubuntu-docs is an "upstream" devel branch | 16:17 |
| Book_em_Dano | can anyone explain how the version numbers for xubuntu-docs will be addressed? The version for the lucid version currently is 9.10.1, and with an update I assume the version would change to 9.10.2, but the version number is already utilized by the maverick version. | 16:25 |
| charlie-tca | Each release should have it's own version of docs | 16:25 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: no, I'm going to change it to 9.10.1.10.04.1 | 16:25 |
| charlie-tca | maverick should be changed to 10.10.1 | 16:25 |
| charlie-tca | natty should become 11.04.1 | 16:26 |
| micahg | charlie-tca: err, I'd make maverick 9.10.2+really10.10 | 16:27 |
| micahg | after natty is updated of course to 11.04 | 16:27 |
| micahg | maybe I should make lucid 9.10.1+really10.04.1 | 16:27 |
| charlie-tca | the numbers correspond to the release itself. 9.10 is there because we never got the docs updated after karmic | 16:28 |
| micahg | right, but we don't want to break upgrades | 16:28 |
| micahg | so if natty and maverick were already updated, I could bump lucid | 16:28 |
| charlie-tca | right | 16:28 |
| * charlie-tca goes to hide again. micahg and Book_em_Dano can decide how to do it, as long as the final versions are right. | 16:29 | |
| Book_em_Dano | is it critical to change the version numbers in the changelogs? | 16:31 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: no, but it just confuses people when they see a version 9.10 for karmic and up | 16:32 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: did you get the 9.10.2 fixes in for lucid as well? | 16:33 |
| Book_em_Dano | I put the fixes for 9.10.2 (maverick version) in lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick, is that what you're asking? | 16:37 |
| micahg | no, are the appropriate ones in xubuntu-docs/lucid as well? | 16:38 |
| Book_em_Dano | All of the fixes pertinent to Xubuntu 10.04 are in lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid | 16:40 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: great, thanks | 16:41 |
| Book_em_Dano | but in terms of packaging, do the version numbers come from the changelogs or elsewhere? | 16:41 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: changelogs | 16:41 |
| micahg | Book_em_Dano: uploaded and merge proposed with changelog fixes | 19:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!