[15:25] micahg: Lucid 10.04 docs are ready - bug 705734 [15:25] Launchpad bug 705734 in xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Lucid) "Xubuntu-docs for lucid are out-dated" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/705734 [15:25] charlie-tca: already grabbed them, it's a day late though, but I got a release ACK [15:26] thank you [15:26] problem is codehosting is down at the moment [15:26] yeah, I see bzr is down for at least an hour now [15:40] charlie-tca: why did you mark the devel task triaged on the docs bug? I thought since it was targeted for lucid, that should be invalid [15:44] lost my head [15:44] So, I should mark it invalid? [15:48] micahg: it looks like I missed your updates on the bug [15:48] fixed it now, though [15:48] ok, thanks [15:49] sorry, I should have refreshed it first, I guess,. [15:49] charlie-tca: no worries [15:56] charlie-tca, how did you push xubuntu-docs for 10.04.2? [15:56] micahg is doing it [15:57] Book_em_Dano: so, I'll be proposing a merge to your branch with the timestamp, pocket, and version changed, but otherwise I think it's ok, I have to do a test build still, but codehosting is down [15:57] We were just waiting to make sure they were ready [15:57] Book_em_Dano: are there any updates for maverick and natty? [15:59] yes, there are some other commits for both that I can submit today [16:00] Book_em_Dano: no rush, but how many updates do you intend for Maverick? [16:02] I don't have an exact number but I have updated the changelog at lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick [16:04] I was hoping to do all of the corrections and upload them all at once if possile [16:04] Book_em_Dano: yep, go ahead and wait for that [16:05] Book_em_Dano: I meant uploads, not individual changes :) [16:08] micahg: I don't think I have permission to upload to ubuntu-branches, I would need someone to sponsor the upload; I imagine just one upload once I've finished the commits [16:09] Book_em_Dano: I'm happy to sponsor :) [16:09] Book_em_Dano: Thank you very much for the hard work on the documentation. It will be great to have them updated! [16:10] micahg: is the procedure to target a package for a milestone different than requesting a SRU for a package? [16:11] nope, usually you don't need a milestone unless it needs to get in, so for this, it's needed for 10.04.2 [16:12] Book_em_Dano: maverick has no milestones left, so it is just an update to it [16:13] charlie-tca: technically not true, there should be an -updates milestone [16:14] Maybe my terminology is wrong then. There won't be another image published for it [16:14] right :) [16:16] can anyone explain the difference between lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid and lp:ubuntu/lucid/xubuntu-docs? [16:17] Book_em_Dano: the lp:ubuntu branch was the release branch, lp:xubuntu-docs is an "upstream" devel branch [16:25] can anyone explain how the version numbers for xubuntu-docs will be addressed? The version for the lucid version currently is 9.10.1, and with an update I assume the version would change to 9.10.2, but the version number is already utilized by the maverick version. [16:25] Each release should have it's own version of docs [16:25] Book_em_Dano: no, I'm going to change it to 9.10.1.10.04.1 [16:25] maverick should be changed to 10.10.1 [16:26] natty should become 11.04.1 [16:27] charlie-tca: err, I'd make maverick 9.10.2+really10.10 [16:27] after natty is updated of course to 11.04 [16:27] maybe I should make lucid 9.10.1+really10.04.1 [16:28] the numbers correspond to the release itself. 9.10 is there because we never got the docs updated after karmic [16:28] right, but we don't want to break upgrades [16:28] so if natty and maverick were already updated, I could bump lucid [16:28] right [16:29] * charlie-tca goes to hide again. micahg and Book_em_Dano can decide how to do it, as long as the final versions are right. [16:31] is it critical to change the version numbers in the changelogs? [16:32] Book_em_Dano: no, but it just confuses people when they see a version 9.10 for karmic and up [16:33] Book_em_Dano: did you get the 9.10.2 fixes in for lucid as well? [16:37] I put the fixes for 9.10.2 (maverick version) in lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick, is that what you're asking? [16:38] no, are the appropriate ones in xubuntu-docs/lucid as well? [16:40] All of the fixes pertinent to Xubuntu 10.04 are in lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid [16:41] Book_em_Dano: great, thanks [16:41] but in terms of packaging, do the version numbers come from the changelogs or elsewhere? [16:41] Book_em_Dano: changelogs [19:15] Book_em_Dano: uploaded and merge proposed with changelog fixes