[15:25] <charlie-tca> micahg: Lucid 10.04 docs are ready - bug 705734
[15:25] <micahg> charlie-tca: already grabbed them, it's a day late though, but I got a release ACK
[15:26] <charlie-tca> thank you
[15:26] <micahg> problem is codehosting is down at the moment
[15:26] <charlie-tca> yeah, I see bzr is down for at least an hour now
[15:40] <micahg> charlie-tca: why did you mark the devel task triaged on the docs bug?  I thought since it was targeted for lucid, that should be invalid
[15:44] <charlie-tca> lost my head
[15:44] <charlie-tca> So, I should mark it invalid?
[15:48] <charlie-tca> micahg: it looks like I missed your updates on the bug
[15:48] <charlie-tca> fixed it now, though
[15:48] <micahg> ok, thanks
[15:49] <charlie-tca> sorry, I should have refreshed it first, I guess,.
[15:49] <micahg> charlie-tca: no worries
[15:56] <Book_em_Dano> charlie-tca, how did you push xubuntu-docs for 10.04.2?
[15:56] <charlie-tca> micahg is doing it
[15:57] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: so, I'll be proposing a merge to your branch with the timestamp, pocket, and version changed, but otherwise I think it's ok, I have to do a test build still, but codehosting is down
[15:57] <charlie-tca> We were just waiting to make sure they were ready
[15:57] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: are there any updates for maverick and natty?
[15:59] <Book_em_Dano> yes, there are some other commits for both that I can submit today
[16:00] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: no rush, but how many updates do you intend for Maverick?
[16:02] <Book_em_Dano> I don't have an exact number but I have updated the changelog at lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick
[16:04] <Book_em_Dano> I was hoping to do all of the corrections and upload them all at once if possile
[16:04] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: yep, go ahead and wait for that
[16:05] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: I meant uploads, not individual changes :)
[16:08] <Book_em_Dano> micahg: I don't think I have permission to upload to ubuntu-branches, I would need someone to sponsor the upload; I imagine just one upload once I've finished the commits
[16:09] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: I'm happy to sponsor :)
[16:09] <charlie-tca> Book_em_Dano: Thank you very much for the hard work on the documentation. It will be great to have them updated!
[16:10] <Book_em_Dano> micahg: is the procedure to target a package for a milestone different than requesting a SRU for a package?
[16:11] <micahg> nope, usually you don't need a milestone unless it needs to get in, so for this, it's needed for 10.04.2
[16:12] <charlie-tca> Book_em_Dano: maverick has no milestones left, so it is just an update to it
[16:13] <micahg> charlie-tca: technically not true, there should be an -updates milestone
[16:14] <charlie-tca> Maybe my terminology is wrong then. There won't be another image published for it
[16:14] <micahg> right :)
[16:16] <Book_em_Dano> can anyone explain the difference between lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid and lp:ubuntu/lucid/xubuntu-docs?
[16:17] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: the lp:ubuntu branch was the release branch, lp:xubuntu-docs is an "upstream" devel branch
[16:25] <Book_em_Dano> can anyone explain how the version numbers for xubuntu-docs will be addressed? The version for the lucid version currently is 9.10.1, and with an update I assume the version would change to 9.10.2, but the version number is already utilized by the maverick version.
[16:25] <charlie-tca> Each release should have it's own version of docs
[16:25] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: no, I'm going to change it to 9.10.1.10.04.1
[16:25] <charlie-tca> maverick should be changed to 10.10.1
[16:26] <charlie-tca> natty should become 11.04.1
[16:27] <micahg> charlie-tca: err, I'd make maverick 9.10.2+really10.10
[16:27] <micahg> after natty is updated of course to 11.04
[16:27] <micahg> maybe I should make lucid 9.10.1+really10.04.1
[16:28] <charlie-tca> the numbers correspond to the release itself. 9.10 is there because we never got the docs updated after karmic
[16:28] <micahg> right, but we don't want to break upgrades
[16:28] <micahg> so if natty and maverick were already updated, I could bump lucid
[16:28] <charlie-tca> right
[16:29]  * charlie-tca goes to hide again. micahg and Book_em_Dano can decide how to do it, as long as the final versions are right.
[16:31] <Book_em_Dano> is it critical to change the version numbers in the changelogs?
[16:32] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: no, but it just confuses people when they see a version 9.10 for karmic and up
[16:33] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: did you get the 9.10.2 fixes in for lucid as well?
[16:37] <Book_em_Dano> I put the fixes for 9.10.2 (maverick version) in lp:xubuntu-docs/maverick, is that what you're asking?
[16:38] <micahg> no, are the appropriate ones in xubuntu-docs/lucid as well?
[16:40] <Book_em_Dano> All of the fixes pertinent to Xubuntu 10.04 are in lp:xubuntu-docs/lucid
[16:41] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: great, thanks
[16:41] <Book_em_Dano> but in terms of packaging, do the version numbers come from the changelogs or elsewhere?
[16:41] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: changelogs
[19:15] <micahg> Book_em_Dano: uploaded and merge proposed with changelog fixes