| TrickyJ | Hi good morning friends :) | 00:50 |
|---|---|---|
| cjohnston | evenin' | 00:51 |
| === nhandler is now known as Guest18627 | ||
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| cjohnston | could someone check out https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/loco-directory/705265 please | 13:33 |
| czajkowski | cjohnston: hi | 13:34 |
| cjohnston | hey czajkowski | 13:35 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: can owner be automatic, instead of being assigned? | 13:38 |
| mhall119 | it can be,but it shouldn't be | 14:34 |
| Pendulum | mhall119: glad you have a coffee maker again :P | 14:35 |
| mhall119 | me too :) | 14:38 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: pushing a rev with the date format fix | 14:39 |
| cjohnston | ok | 14:40 |
| cjohnston | i think maybe a tab for the indent? | 14:40 |
| cjohnston | seems a little close to me.. expecially with a description | 14:40 |
| cjohnston | it may just be me, i dunno | 14:41 |
| cjohnston | meeting is all utc.. i guess could specify utc | 14:43 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: like http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8016/agendah.png better? | 14:46 |
| mhall119 | I think for consistency we should specity timezone, even when it's always gonna be UTC | 14:46 |
| cjohnston | i do like that better | 14:47 |
| mhall119 | pushed | 14:49 |
| mhall119 | I wonder if we'll be able to have this out by the 25th | 14:50 |
| cjohnston | whats the 25th? | 14:51 |
| mhall119 | time for another florida team meeting | 14:51 |
| mhall119 | we didn't have the last 2, due to the holidays | 14:51 |
| cjohnston | ic | 14:52 |
| mhall119 | okay, one more push to my agenda branch | 15:02 |
| mhall119 | this one adds meetings to the site search results | 15:02 |
| mhall119 | man, we are way overdue for a release | 15:04 |
| mhall119 | czajkowski: feeling better now? | 15:07 |
| czajkowski | aye | 15:07 |
| czajkowski | a lot more human thanks | 15:07 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: what do you think about the mouseover | 15:11 |
| mhall119 | what mouseover? | 15:12 |
| cjohnston | Can we have a mouseover on the agenda item link say something like "Update <agenda item>" (i.e. when you hover over "Agenda item 1" in: Agenda item 1 - Chris Johnston @ 2011-01-23 13:53 it would read "Update Agenda item 1" | 15:13 |
| mhall119 | ok | 15:16 |
| cjohnston | give some sort of clue as to what the link is for | 15:16 |
| mhall119 | How about "Update Agenda Item: {{item.title}}" | 15:19 |
| cjohnston | sure | 15:20 |
| mhall119 | rev 371 | 15:20 |
| cjohnston | just found a nice bonk | 15:22 |
| mhall119 | um.... | 15:22 |
| cjohnston | try to delete a parent item and see what happens | 15:22 |
| cjohnston | do you get an issue? | 15:23 |
| cjohnston | (parent item with a child item) | 15:23 |
| mhall119 | nope | 15:23 |
| mhall119 | it warns that children will be deletes | 15:23 |
| mhall119 | deleted | 15:23 |
| mhall119 | but it deletes it all okay | 15:23 |
| cjohnston | thats the difference between you and me | 15:23 |
| cjohnston | http://paste.ubuntu.com/557238/ | 15:23 |
| mhall119 | hmmm, must be because I made my account superuser | 15:24 |
| cjohnston | it looks like removing agenda items requires to be a contact or above | 15:27 |
| mhall119 | okay, copy/paste fail, fixed it | 15:27 |
| mhall119 | it should only require you be a member of the team or lc | 15:27 |
| cjohnston | question... do we want to allow non-members the ability to add agenda items | 15:28 |
| cjohnston | say you wanted to go talk to -us-ma about dev week | 15:28 |
| mhall119 | hmmm... | 15:28 |
| cjohnston | should you be required to poke someone whos a team member to add the item for you | 15:28 |
| mhall119 | that's kind of what I'm thinking | 15:28 |
| mhall119 | czajkowski: what are your thoughts? | 15:29 |
| czajkowski | hmm | 15:29 |
| czajkowski | I'd say no | 15:29 |
| mhall119 | you don't really want to barge into another team's meeting | 15:29 |
| czajkowski | as if they are adding stuff to an agenda they are active in some way | 15:29 |
| mhall119 | it's usually best to request that it be added | 15:29 |
| cjohnston | k | 15:30 |
| mhall119 | we'll call it software enforced courtesy | 15:30 |
| cjohnston | lol | 15:31 |
| czajkowski | :) | 15:31 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: what do you think about trying to find some way to word that if they want to delete a parent, but not a child, to edit the child and remove the parent from it | 15:33 |
| cjohnston | just a thought | 15:33 |
| cjohnston | im not sure how much we want to explain | 15:34 |
| cjohnston | hehehehe | 15:34 |
| cjohnston | heres a fun one | 15:34 |
| cjohnston | make the parent a child of its child | 15:35 |
| cjohnston | i would think that should make the child the parent and the parent the child | 15:35 |
| mhall119 | hmmm, that would break stuff, most likely | 15:43 |
| cjohnston | uh huh | 15:44 |
| cjohnston | http://paste.ubuntu.com/557242/ | 15:44 |
| cjohnston | it was pretty cool.. the agenda items disappeared | 15:44 |
| mhall119 | yeah, but it's likely to cause max recursion depth errors | 15:46 |
| mhall119 | good catch | 15:46 |
| cjohnston | it should either show an error, or somehow be able to do it | 15:46 |
| cjohnston | have I just f'ed my db now to where i cant do much else with agenda items | 15:47 |
| cjohnston | ? | 15:47 |
| cjohnston | my stupid math thing keeps f'ing up with google chrome | 15:51 |
| cjohnston | i dont wanna have to go back to ff | 15:51 |
| mhall119 | you'll have to manually undo the cyclic parent/child loop you created, yeah | 15:52 |
| czajkowski | mhall119: can you give wifey a mASSIVE hug from me please | 15:52 |
| cjohnston | ummmmmm | 15:53 |
| mhall119 | czajkowski: sure | 15:54 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: okay, got a fix that will exclude all descendents of an agenda item from it's "parent" dropdown | 15:56 |
| cjohnston | so if changes are needed, it would require to make the child a parent and then make the originial parent a child | 15:56 |
| mhall119 | yeah, you'd have to re-parent the child first | 15:57 |
| cjohnston | make a fix to fix my db too.. :-P | 15:58 |
| mhall119 | you using sqlite? | 16:03 |
| cjohnston | ya | 16:05 |
| mhall119 | just delete * from meetings_agendaitem; and start over if you need to | 16:05 |
| mhall119 | or, if you know the one you changed, just remove it's parent value | 16:06 |
| mhall119 | one more fix | 16:15 |
| mhall119 | sheesh | 16:15 |
| mhall119 | good that we're catching these bugs now though | 16:17 |
| cjohnston | +si | 16:20 |
| cjohnston | what did you find | 16:20 |
| mhall119 | evidently before a model is saved, it's Manytomany will return all records for that model | 16:23 |
| mhall119 | so, my exclude-descendents script was excluding all agenda items at the add agenda item form | 16:23 |
| mhall119 | czajkowski: what's going on with the Irish government? | 16:25 |
| mhall119 | didn't them PM just win a confidence vote last week or something? | 16:26 |
| czajkowski | mhall119: so the Taoiseach won the motion, much to many peoples susprise what has happened today was the other majority party in power has stepped down | 17:23 |
| czajkowski | this forces the government to hold an election earlier | 17:24 |
| czajkowski | but also means there are issues surrounding passing a bill that is needed | 17:24 |
| nessomamon | buenas | 18:41 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: how does the order thing work... i made the first agenda item #4, it showed up as #1.. I added 4 more, and the one that I assigned to #4 is #5 | 18:55 |
| cjohnston | even though it says order #4 | 18:55 |
| cjohnston | and all the others have an order # of 1 | 18:58 |
| cjohnston | hmm.. #2 shows up in the #3 spot, #3 shows up in the #4 spot, and #4 shows up in the #5 spo | 19:00 |
| cjohnston | t | 19:00 |
| cjohnston | i assume it is because two are listed as #1 | 19:03 |
| cjohnston | so i would guess that somehow it needs to be smart enough to know that #1 already exists | 19:03 |
| Ronnie | evening all | 19:06 |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: it just sorts by order.... | 19:09 |
| mhall119 | parent, order, created-date | 19:09 |
| mhall119 | in that order | 19:09 |
| mhall119 | I'll test it out and see what I can find | 19:09 |
| cjohnston | whats the point of the order then? | 19:11 |
| mhall119 | to manually tweak the order if you don't want is simply sorted by created date | 19:13 |
| mhall119 | if you have 1, 1, 1, 1, 4 | 19:14 |
| mhall119 | then 4 should be the last one | 19:14 |
| mhall119 | those with order '1' will be sorted by created date in the first 4 slots | 19:14 |
| mhall119 | or at least that's how it's supposed to work | 19:15 |
| mhall119 | if it's not, then it's a bug somewhere | 19:15 |
| mhall119 | hmmm, doesn't seem to be working :( | 19:17 |
| mhall119 | it used to | 19:17 |
| mhall119 | I wonder what I broke | 19:17 |
| mhall119 | no wait, it is working | 19:18 |
| mhall119 | yeah, it seems to be doing what it's supposed to | 19:19 |
| cjohnston | ok | 19:20 |
| cjohnston | i would think ordering it #4 would put it in the #4 spot i guess | 19:21 |
| * nigelb waves | 19:35 | |
| mhall119 | cjohnston: nope, it'll just put it lower than anything with a lower order number | 19:40 |
| mhall119 | hiya nigelb | 19:40 |
| nigelb | hey mhall119 :) | 19:41 |
| * nigelb just reached home | 19:41 | |
| mhall119 | how was the beach? | 19:42 |
| nigelb | mhall119: I have no words to describe it | 19:49 |
| nigelb | Total fun. WEnt to bed everyday after 3 | 19:49 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: I got the error again.. all i did was load the page.. i didnt click anything else | 20:33 |
| cjohnston | mhall119: the log url doesnt seem to produce any results | 20:36 |
| markjones | Has anybody ever written a presentation on Ubuntu? | 21:44 |
| markjones | I need help | 21:44 |
| czajkowski | markjones: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Presentations quick google shows that | 21:45 |
| markjones | ty czajkowski | 21:45 |
| czajkowski | np | 21:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
