[00:50] Hi good morning friends :) [00:51] evenin' === nhandler is now known as Guest18627 === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [13:33] could someone check out https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/loco-directory/705265 please [13:34] cjohnston: hi [13:35] hey czajkowski [13:38] mhall119: can owner be automatic, instead of being assigned? [14:34] it can be,but it shouldn't be [14:35] mhall119: glad you have a coffee maker again :P [14:38] me too :) [14:39] cjohnston: pushing a rev with the date format fix [14:40] ok [14:40] i think maybe a tab for the indent? [14:40] seems a little close to me.. expecially with a description [14:41] it may just be me, i dunno [14:43] meeting is all utc.. i guess could specify utc [14:46] cjohnston: like http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8016/agendah.png better? [14:46] I think for consistency we should specity timezone, even when it's always gonna be UTC [14:47] i do like that better [14:49] pushed [14:50] I wonder if we'll be able to have this out by the 25th [14:51] whats the 25th? [14:51] time for another florida team meeting [14:51] we didn't have the last 2, due to the holidays [14:52] ic [15:02] okay, one more push to my agenda branch [15:02] this one adds meetings to the site search results [15:04] man, we are way overdue for a release [15:07] czajkowski: feeling better now? [15:07] aye [15:07] a lot more human thanks [15:11] mhall119: what do you think about the mouseover [15:12] what mouseover? [15:13] Can we have a mouseover on the agenda item link say something like "Update " (i.e. when you hover over "Agenda item 1" in: Agenda item 1 - Chris Johnston @ 2011-01-23 13:53 it would read "Update Agenda item 1" [15:16] ok [15:16] give some sort of clue as to what the link is for [15:19] How about "Update Agenda Item: {{item.title}}" [15:20] sure [15:20] rev 371 [15:22] just found a nice bonk [15:22] um.... [15:22] try to delete a parent item and see what happens [15:23] do you get an issue? [15:23] (parent item with a child item) [15:23] nope [15:23] it warns that children will be deletes [15:23] deleted [15:23] but it deletes it all okay [15:23] thats the difference between you and me [15:23] http://paste.ubuntu.com/557238/ [15:24] hmmm, must be because I made my account superuser [15:27] it looks like removing agenda items requires to be a contact or above [15:27] okay, copy/paste fail, fixed it [15:27] it should only require you be a member of the team or lc [15:28] question... do we want to allow non-members the ability to add agenda items [15:28] say you wanted to go talk to -us-ma about dev week [15:28] hmmm... [15:28] should you be required to poke someone whos a team member to add the item for you [15:28] that's kind of what I'm thinking [15:29] czajkowski: what are your thoughts? [15:29] hmm [15:29] I'd say no [15:29] you don't really want to barge into another team's meeting [15:29] as if they are adding stuff to an agenda they are active in some way [15:29] it's usually best to request that it be added [15:30] k [15:30] we'll call it software enforced courtesy [15:31] lol [15:31] :) [15:33] mhall119: what do you think about trying to find some way to word that if they want to delete a parent, but not a child, to edit the child and remove the parent from it [15:33] just a thought [15:34] im not sure how much we want to explain [15:34] hehehehe [15:34] heres a fun one [15:35] make the parent a child of its child [15:35] i would think that should make the child the parent and the parent the child [15:43] hmmm, that would break stuff, most likely [15:44] uh huh [15:44] http://paste.ubuntu.com/557242/ [15:44] it was pretty cool.. the agenda items disappeared [15:46] yeah, but it's likely to cause max recursion depth errors [15:46] good catch [15:46] it should either show an error, or somehow be able to do it [15:47] have I just f'ed my db now to where i cant do much else with agenda items [15:47] ? [15:51] my stupid math thing keeps f'ing up with google chrome [15:51] i dont wanna have to go back to ff [15:52] you'll have to manually undo the cyclic parent/child loop you created, yeah [15:52] mhall119: can you give wifey a mASSIVE hug from me please [15:53] ummmmmm [15:54] czajkowski: sure [15:56] cjohnston: okay, got a fix that will exclude all descendents of an agenda item from it's "parent" dropdown [15:56] so if changes are needed, it would require to make the child a parent and then make the originial parent a child [15:57] yeah, you'd have to re-parent the child first [15:58] make a fix to fix my db too.. :-P [16:03] you using sqlite? [16:05] ya [16:05] just delete * from meetings_agendaitem; and start over if you need to [16:06] or, if you know the one you changed, just remove it's parent value [16:15] one more fix [16:15] sheesh [16:17] good that we're catching these bugs now though [16:20] +si [16:20] what did you find [16:23] evidently before a model is saved, it's Manytomany will return all records for that model [16:23] so, my exclude-descendents script was excluding all agenda items at the add agenda item form [16:25] czajkowski: what's going on with the Irish government? [16:26] didn't them PM just win a confidence vote last week or something? [17:23] mhall119: so the Taoiseach won the motion, much to many peoples susprise what has happened today was the other majority party in power has stepped down [17:24] this forces the government to hold an election earlier [17:24] but also means there are issues surrounding passing a bill that is needed [18:41] buenas [18:55] mhall119: how does the order thing work... i made the first agenda item #4, it showed up as #1.. I added 4 more, and the one that I assigned to #4 is #5 [18:55] even though it says order #4 [18:58] and all the others have an order # of 1 [19:00] hmm.. #2 shows up in the #3 spot, #3 shows up in the #4 spot, and #4 shows up in the #5 spo [19:00] t [19:03] i assume it is because two are listed as #1 [19:03] so i would guess that somehow it needs to be smart enough to know that #1 already exists [19:06] evening all [19:09] cjohnston: it just sorts by order.... [19:09] parent, order, created-date [19:09] in that order [19:09] I'll test it out and see what I can find [19:11] whats the point of the order then? [19:13] to manually tweak the order if you don't want is simply sorted by created date [19:14] if you have 1, 1, 1, 1, 4 [19:14] then 4 should be the last one [19:14] those with order '1' will be sorted by created date in the first 4 slots [19:15] or at least that's how it's supposed to work [19:15] if it's not, then it's a bug somewhere [19:17] hmmm, doesn't seem to be working :( [19:17] it used to [19:17] I wonder what I broke [19:18] no wait, it is working [19:19] yeah, it seems to be doing what it's supposed to [19:20] ok [19:21] i would think ordering it #4 would put it in the #4 spot i guess [19:35] * nigelb waves [19:40] cjohnston: nope, it'll just put it lower than anything with a lower order number [19:40] hiya nigelb [19:41] hey mhall119 :) [19:41] * nigelb just reached home [19:42] how was the beach? [19:49] mhall119: I have no words to describe it [19:49] Total fun. WEnt to bed everyday after 3 [20:33] mhall119: I got the error again.. all i did was load the page.. i didnt click anything else [20:36] mhall119: the log url doesnt seem to produce any results [21:44] Has anybody ever written a presentation on Ubuntu? [21:44] I need help [21:45] markjones: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Presentations quick google shows that [21:45] ty czajkowski [21:45] np