[00:50] <TrickyJ> Hi good morning friends :)
[00:51] <cjohnston> evenin'
[13:33] <cjohnston> could someone check out https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/loco-directory/705265 please
[13:34] <czajkowski> cjohnston: hi 
[13:35] <cjohnston> hey czajkowski 
[13:38] <cjohnston> mhall119: can owner be automatic, instead of being assigned?
[14:34] <mhall119> it can be,but it shouldn't be
[14:35] <Pendulum> mhall119: glad you have a coffee maker again :P
[14:38] <mhall119> me too :)
[14:39] <mhall119> cjohnston: pushing a rev with the date format fix
[14:40] <cjohnston> ok
[14:40] <cjohnston> i think maybe a tab for the indent?
[14:40] <cjohnston> seems a little close to me.. expecially with a description
[14:41] <cjohnston> it may just be me, i dunno
[14:43] <cjohnston> meeting is all utc.. i guess could specify utc
[14:46] <mhall119> cjohnston: like http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8016/agendah.png better?
[14:46] <mhall119> I think for consistency we should specity timezone, even when it's always gonna be UTC
[14:47] <cjohnston> i do like that better
[14:49] <mhall119> pushed
[14:50] <mhall119> I wonder if we'll be able to have this out by the 25th
[14:51] <cjohnston> whats the 25th?
[14:51] <mhall119> time for another florida team meeting
[14:51] <mhall119> we didn't have the last 2, due to the holidays
[14:52] <cjohnston> ic
[15:02] <mhall119> okay, one more push to my agenda branch
[15:02] <mhall119> this one adds meetings to the site search results
[15:04] <mhall119> man, we are way overdue for a release
[15:07] <mhall119> czajkowski: feeling better now?
[15:07] <czajkowski> aye 
[15:07] <czajkowski> a lot more human thanks
[15:11] <cjohnston> mhall119: what do you think about the mouseover
[15:12] <mhall119> what mouseover?
[15:13] <cjohnston> Can we have a mouseover on the agenda item link say something like "Update <agenda item>" (i.e. when you hover over "Agenda item 1" in: Agenda item 1 - Chris Johnston @ 2011-01-23 13:53    it would read "Update Agenda item 1"
[15:16] <mhall119> ok
[15:16] <cjohnston> give some sort of clue as to what the link is for
[15:19] <mhall119> How about "Update Agenda Item: {{item.title}}"
[15:20] <cjohnston> sure
[15:20] <mhall119> rev 371
[15:22] <cjohnston> just found a nice bonk
[15:22] <mhall119> um....
[15:22] <cjohnston> try to delete a parent item and see what happens
[15:23] <cjohnston> do you get an issue?
[15:23] <cjohnston> (parent item with a child item)
[15:23] <mhall119> nope
[15:23] <mhall119> it warns that children will be deletes
[15:23] <mhall119> deleted
[15:23] <mhall119> but it deletes it all okay
[15:23] <cjohnston> thats the difference between you and me
[15:23] <cjohnston> http://paste.ubuntu.com/557238/
[15:24] <mhall119> hmmm, must be because I made my account superuser
[15:27] <cjohnston> it looks like removing agenda items requires to be a contact or above
[15:27] <mhall119> okay, copy/paste fail, fixed it
[15:27] <mhall119> it should only require you be a member of the team or lc
[15:28] <cjohnston> question... do we want to allow non-members the ability to add agenda items
[15:28] <cjohnston> say you wanted to go talk to -us-ma about dev week
[15:28] <mhall119> hmmm...
[15:28] <cjohnston> should you be required to poke someone whos a team member to add the item for you
[15:28] <mhall119> that's kind of what I'm thinking
[15:29] <mhall119> czajkowski: what are your thoughts?
[15:29] <czajkowski> hmm
[15:29] <czajkowski> I'd say no
[15:29] <mhall119> you don't really want to barge into another team's meeting
[15:29] <czajkowski> as if they are adding stuff to an agenda they are active in some way 
[15:29] <mhall119> it's usually best to request that it be added
[15:30] <cjohnston> k
[15:30] <mhall119> we'll call it software enforced courtesy
[15:31] <cjohnston> lol
[15:31] <czajkowski> :)
[15:33] <cjohnston> mhall119: what do you think about trying to find some way to word that if they want to delete a parent, but not a child, to edit the child and remove the parent from it
[15:33] <cjohnston> just a thought
[15:34] <cjohnston> im not sure how much we want to explain
[15:34] <cjohnston> hehehehe
[15:34] <cjohnston> heres a fun one
[15:35] <cjohnston> make the parent a child of its child
[15:35] <cjohnston> i would think that should make the child the parent and the parent the child
[15:43] <mhall119> hmmm, that would break stuff, most likely
[15:44] <cjohnston> uh huh
[15:44] <cjohnston> http://paste.ubuntu.com/557242/
[15:44] <cjohnston> it was pretty cool.. the agenda items disappeared
[15:46] <mhall119> yeah, but it's likely to cause max recursion depth errors
[15:46] <mhall119> good catch
[15:46] <cjohnston> it should either show an error, or somehow be able to do it
[15:47] <cjohnston> have I just f'ed my db now to where i cant do much else with agenda items
[15:47] <cjohnston> ?
[15:51] <cjohnston> my stupid math thing keeps f'ing up with google chrome
[15:51] <cjohnston> i dont wanna have to go back to ff
[15:52] <mhall119> you'll have to manually undo the cyclic parent/child loop you created, yeah
[15:52] <czajkowski> mhall119: can you give wifey a mASSIVE hug from me please
[15:53] <cjohnston> ummmmmm
[15:54] <mhall119> czajkowski: sure
[15:56] <mhall119> cjohnston: okay, got a fix that will exclude all descendents of an agenda item from it's "parent" dropdown
[15:56] <cjohnston> so if changes are needed, it would require to make the child a parent and then make the originial parent a child
[15:57] <mhall119> yeah, you'd have to re-parent the child first
[15:58] <cjohnston> make a fix to fix my db too.. :-P
[16:03] <mhall119> you using sqlite?
[16:05] <cjohnston> ya
[16:05] <mhall119> just delete * from meetings_agendaitem; and start over if you need to
[16:06] <mhall119> or, if you know the one you changed, just remove it's parent value
[16:15] <mhall119> one more fix
[16:15] <mhall119> sheesh
[16:17] <mhall119> good that we're catching these bugs now though
[16:20] <cjohnston> +si
[16:20] <cjohnston> what did you find
[16:23] <mhall119> evidently before a model is saved, it's Manytomany will return all records for that model
[16:23] <mhall119> so, my exclude-descendents script was excluding all agenda items at the add agenda item form
[16:25] <mhall119> czajkowski: what's going on with the Irish government?
[16:26] <mhall119> didn't them PM just win a confidence vote last week or something?
[17:23] <czajkowski> mhall119: so the Taoiseach won the motion, much to many peoples susprise what has happened today was the other majority party in power has stepped down 
[17:24] <czajkowski> this forces the government to hold an election earlier
[17:24] <czajkowski> but also means there are issues surrounding passing a bill that is needed
[18:41] <nessomamon> buenas
[18:55] <cjohnston> mhall119: how does the order thing work... i made the first agenda item #4, it showed up as #1.. I added 4 more, and the one that I assigned to #4 is #5
[18:55] <cjohnston> even though it says order #4
[18:58] <cjohnston> and all the others have an order # of 1
[19:00] <cjohnston> hmm.. #2 shows up in the #3 spot, #3 shows up in the #4 spot, and #4 shows up in the #5 spo
[19:00] <cjohnston> t
[19:03] <cjohnston> i assume it is because two are listed as #1
[19:03] <cjohnston> so i would guess that somehow it needs to be smart enough to know that #1 already exists
[19:06] <Ronnie> evening all
[19:09] <mhall119> cjohnston: it just sorts by order....
[19:09] <mhall119> parent, order, created-date
[19:09] <mhall119> in that order
[19:09] <mhall119> I'll test it out and see what I can find
[19:11] <cjohnston> whats the point of the order then?
[19:13] <mhall119> to manually tweak the order if you don't want is simply sorted by created date
[19:14] <mhall119> if you have 1, 1, 1, 1, 4
[19:14] <mhall119> then 4 should be the last one
[19:14] <mhall119> those with order '1' will be sorted by created date in the first 4 slots
[19:15] <mhall119> or at least that's how it's supposed to work
[19:15] <mhall119> if it's not, then it's a bug somewhere
[19:17] <mhall119> hmmm, doesn't seem to be working :(
[19:17] <mhall119> it used to
[19:17] <mhall119> I wonder what I broke
[19:18] <mhall119> no wait, it is working
[19:19] <mhall119> yeah, it seems to be doing what it's supposed to
[19:20] <cjohnston> ok
[19:21] <cjohnston> i would think ordering it #4 would put it in the #4 spot i guess
[19:35]  * nigelb waves
[19:40] <mhall119> cjohnston: nope, it'll just put it lower than anything with a lower order number
[19:40] <mhall119> hiya nigelb 
[19:41] <nigelb> hey mhall119 :)
[19:41]  * nigelb just reached home
[19:42] <mhall119> how was the beach?
[19:49] <nigelb> mhall119: I have no words to describe it
[19:49] <nigelb> Total fun.  WEnt to bed everyday after 3
[20:33] <cjohnston> mhall119: I got the error again.. all i did was load the page.. i didnt click anything else 
[20:36] <cjohnston> mhall119: the log url doesnt seem to produce any results
[21:44] <markjones> Has anybody ever written a presentation on Ubuntu?
[21:44] <markjones> I need help
[21:45] <czajkowski> markjones: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Presentations quick google shows that 
[21:45] <markjones> ty czajkowski
[21:45] <czajkowski> np