| apw | mjg59, i have wondered why we don't have synthetic ones for cpu types | 09:02 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | smb, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+patches | 09:28 |
| ilmari | the drm-intel-next kernel packages havent been built since the 13th | 09:45 |
| cking | apw, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/S3 | 09:52 |
| apw | ilmari, oddness | 10:00 |
| apw | ilmari, hrrm something very odd there, just triggered it now and it is building | 10:02 |
| ilmari | apw: thanks | 10:03 |
| * ilmari needs to test a recent change for LP#680748 | 10:05 | |
| apw | bug #680748 | 10:05 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 680748 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "[arrandale] flicker on LVDS laptop display with stripy patterns" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/680748 | 10:05 |
| ilmari | apw: how long does the build usually take? | 11:32 |
| apw | 2-3 hours, but i think it was queued second | 11:35 |
| apw | Bisecting: 1999 revisions left to test after this (roughly 11 steps) | 11:35 |
| apw | Bisecting: 1999 revisions left to test after this (roughly 11 steps) | 11:35 |
| apw | sigh | 11:35 |
| amitk | lol | 11:39 |
| * apw blames amitk .... its suspend that is bust after all | 11:39 | |
| * amitk doesn't care about suspend or hibernate... | 11:40 | |
| amitk | ... yet! | 11:40 |
| amitk | apw: blame manjo | 11:40 |
| ilmari | apw: okay, I'll check the directory this afternoon (GMT) | 11:42 |
| apw | ilmari, yep, its still building the mainline tip of the day, drm-intel-next is next | 11:42 |
| apw | amitk, always :) | 11:42 |
| mjg59 | apw: Because system devices can't have modaliases | 12:13 |
| mjg59 | apw: Limitation of the driver core - someone's meant to be fixing it | 12:13 |
| apw | mjg59, fair enough | 12:15 |
| * apw struggles on with bisecting an amd64/i915 suspend hang ... 11 more to go | 12:16 | |
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| === sforshee is now known as sforshee-afk | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| * apw lunches | 15:02 | |
| === sforshee-afk is now known as sforshee | ||
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| ara | hey guys! | 15:41 |
| ara | how are you doing? | 15:41 |
| ara | do we know when we are getting the new maverick -proposed kernel in the -proposed archive? | 15:41 |
| tgardner | sconklin, ^^ | 15:50 |
| sconklin | ara: pitti just copied it moments ago. The version you want is 2.6.35-25.44 | 15:51 |
| tgardner | cking, AceLan_: bouncing tangerine for security update soon. | 15:57 |
| ara | sconklin, yes, I saw that, thanks! | 15:59 |
| cking | tgardner, ok | 16:02 |
| apw | sconklin, how did you not go mad doing bisects | 16:08 |
| JFo | need coffee, brb | 16:08 |
| sconklin | apw it's not bad at all when you have fast builds on tangerine, and a couple of testers who get you results in 10 mins or less. I did 7 or 8 build/test cycles in a day and got a final result! | 16:08 |
| tgardner | apw, Linus' tip has the doc build failure fixed. | 16:09 |
| apw | sconklin, mine started about 'about 12' | 16:10 |
| apw | tgardner, excellent will suck it up shortly | 16:10 |
| tgardner | apw, we'll need it to procude an -rc2 based kernel | 16:11 |
| tgardner | produce* | 16:11 |
| sconklin | ugh. Mine started at about 8. I could have probably cut two off of that my guessing at a range of commits, but it wasn't worth the uncertainty | 16:11 |
| apw | tgardner, yep | 16:13 |
| apw | tgardner, is tangerine bouncing now ? | 16:14 |
| tgardner | apw, yep, it takes a bit | 16:14 |
| apw | tgardner, didn't want to start bisect 6 without waiting for the bounce | 16:14 |
| tgardner | apw, I didn't realize you were in the middle of something. I could have waited. | 16:15 |
| apw | tgardner, nope not at all, it'll take all day at an hour a spin | 16:15 |
| apw | just wanted to make sure you'd done it before i started a build | 16:15 |
| tgardner | apw, besides some security updates, the armel chroot was hung and I couldn't get it to bail out. | 16:16 |
| tgardner | apw, tangerine is back | 16:16 |
| apw | tgardner, yep, utterly reasonable to bounce it ... didn't want to interfere | 16:17 |
| apw | has held me up by exactly 25s | 16:17 |
| apw | i think i can live with that | 16:17 |
| cking | really? | 16:17 |
| tgardner | apw, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2011-January/014095.html | 16:29 |
| ilmari | apw++ # new drm-intel-next build | 16:37 |
| apw | ilmari, cool | 16:39 |
| bjf | https://spreadsheets0.google.com/a/canonical.com/ccc?hl=en&key=tOvtWlTi17QL1bZm-0dCKEg&hl=en#gid=0 | 16:47 |
| bjf | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/FixingCVEs | 16:48 |
| === cking is now known as cking-afk | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| apw | bjf, can you point me at the brad arsenal classes branch, i've lost my mind and it | 17:34 |
| bjf | apw, are you looking for: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~arsenal-devel/arsenal/python-launchpadlib-toolkit/ | 17:35 |
| bjf | apw, or: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/arsenal/kernel/ | 17:36 |
| bjf | apw, or: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~arsenal-devel/arsenal/master/ | 17:36 |
| bjf | apw, that's all i know about | 17:36 |
| apw | bjf, i thin the first one was the one i wanted, ta | 17:37 |
| JFo | ah yes, the first one | 17:37 |
| JFo | sorry I was no help there apw :) | 17:37 |
| bjf | tgardner, can you accept my nominations on bug 706149 ? | 17:55 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 706149 in linux "CVE-2010-4074" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/706149 | 17:55 |
| tgardner | bjf, done | 17:58 |
| JFo | <-lunch | 18:07 |
| === sforshee is now known as sforshee-lunch | ||
| apw | Bisecting: 5 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps) | 18:15 |
| apw | GAH | 18:15 |
| apw | https://www.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux | 18:24 |
| hyperair | kernel bisects are painful | 18:25 |
| === sforshee-lunch is now known as sforshee | ||
| * tgardner --> lunch | 19:07 | |
| apw | Bisecting: 2 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps) | 19:09 |
| === sconklin is now known as sconklin-lunch | ||
| poelzi | pah. 6.37 is the worst kernel ever | 19:45 |
| * jjohansen -> lunch | 20:02 | |
| === sconklin-lunch is now known as sconklin | ||
| apw | poelzi, false, .38 is much worse | 20:19 |
| poelzi | apw: hihi. but .38 is not a real release | 20:20 |
| apw | .37 has been one of the better ones on my kit | 20:21 |
| poelzi | i'm so unsure whats broken. kms, radeon, cachefiles,... i got so many tracebacks | 20:21 |
| poelzi | kms is slow like hell here at least | 20:21 |
| poelzi | but without it, x server makes even more trouble | 20:22 |
| apw | poelzi, if you have backtraces get them into bugs and to us, as we are not seeing them | 20:24 |
| bryceh | apw, hum didn't you tell me .37 was crackful and that all goodness was going into .38? | 20:24 |
| apw | bryceh, i think i said that all of the crack was going into .38-rc1 | 20:25 |
| bryceh | apw, ah that's right... you said it didn't even boot | 20:25 |
| apw | .37 has been pretty stable on everythiong i ahve but as noone lets me have nvidia or radeon h/w | 20:25 |
| JFo | because you break things :P | 20:26 |
| poelzi | apw: yes, i' m working on get them backtraced | 20:29 |
| poelzi | apw: can you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/706394 | 20:30 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 706394 in linux "kernel should have CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED" [Undecided,New] | 20:30 |
| poelzi | without it, the the cgroups io subsystem is useless and it's enabled | 20:30 |
| bryceh | apw, if you have a desktop/server type box, then I'm sure $$ could be scared up to send you a few ati/nvidia cards | 20:31 |
| bryceh | however frankly >80% of the gfx bugs we hear about are on -intel anyway ;-/ | 20:32 |
| apw | bryceh, cause most people buy intel sadly | 20:36 |
| bryceh | apw, likely so. Also I think Intel does a bit more experimental gfx dev work in releases than the other guys. | 20:36 |
| apw | yeah a bit of both in all likelyhood, cursed both ways arn't we | 20:37 |
| manjo | tgardner, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Testing/UbuntuUEFI | 20:39 |
| sforshee | patches for bug 659143 are in Linus's tree for 2.6.38 | 20:42 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 659143 in linux "64bit-only: regression: kernels >=2.6.34: rt2800pci: load firmware Error with ralink [1814:0781]" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/659143 | 20:42 |
| sforshee | am I right in thinking this is something we'd want to fix in maverick SRU? | 20:42 |
| tgardner | sforshee, seems reasonable if folks are actually encountering the bug | 20:43 |
| sforshee | tgardner, well, 10 people have marked the bug as affecting them | 20:46 |
| sforshee | the guy who reported the bug actually wrote the patches that fix it | 20:47 |
| tgardner | sforshee, we really like SRUs to go through upstream first. dunno if this one has yet... | 20:49 |
| sforshee | tgarnder, both patches are in 2.6.38-rc1 | 20:50 |
| sforshee | tgardner, ^^ | 20:51 |
| sforshee | typo | 20:51 |
| tgardner | sforshee, cool, that makes it a lot easier | 21:00 |
| manjo | bjf, not sure if this helps... git.alsa-project.org | 21:08 |
| bjf | manjo, thanks but no, takashi does a daily snapshot of his git repo in a form that can be wrapped in debian packaging and uploaded for a daily build | 21:09 |
| sforshee | tgardner, can you accept my nomination on bug bug 659143 ? | 21:30 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 659143 in linux "64bit-only: regression: kernels >=2.6.34: rt2800pci: load firmware Error with ralink [1814:0781]" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/659143 | 21:30 |
| JFo | I got it sforshee | 21:34 |
| sforshee | JFo, thanks | 21:34 |
| JFo | np | 21:34 |
| smoser | i need some help. there is a linux-image-2.6.32-312-ec2 in lucid-proposed | 21:56 |
| smoser | but there is no linux-ec2 (built by linux-meta-ec2) there | 21:57 |
| smoser | how would that normally be uploaded ? | 21:57 |
| smoser | smb, ^ | 21:57 |
| bjf | smoser, sconklin and i are discussing it | 22:13 |
| bjf | smoser, it looks like we uploaded the package to our ppa and it got built but it didn't get copied to -proposed | 22:18 |
| smoser | so... a copy is coming soon ? | 22:18 |
| bjf | smoser, we are going to reach out to an archive admin | 22:19 |
| sconklin | smoser: no answer from any archive admin, we'll keep trying and/or send email | 22:31 |
| === sconklin is now known as sconklin-away | ||
| smoser | sconklin-away, bjf kirkland will address if you can paste in #ubuntu-devel what you need | 23:29 |
| bjf | smoser, StevenK took care of it for us, thanks | 23:34 |
| kees | smb`: I think the RO/NX+Xen issues have found a solution upstream. have you been following that thread? | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!