[05:03] <Viper550> hello?
[16:45] <cjohnston> mornin
[16:46] <mhall119> just barely
[17:54] <cjohnston> newz2000: Bug 707009
[17:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 707009 in ubuntu-website "ubuntu.com does not support HTTP Secure (affects: 1) (heat: 258)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/707009
[18:41] <newz2000> :-/
[18:46] <cjohnston> is that confirmed then?
[19:11] <AlanBell> looks invalid to me
[19:12] <AlanBell> the brochureware site does not need https
[19:12] <AlanBell> the downloads are mirrored everywhere and https is not a part of what secures them
[19:13] <AlanBell> I suppose arguably the MD5SUM files might benefit from being authenticated with an HTTPS certificate
[19:34] <mhall119> AlanBell: I think it's more along the lines of "All websites should allow HTTPS connections" that Google is pussing
[19:34] <mhall119> pushing
[19:35] <AlanBell> there is no harm in that
[19:36] <AlanBell> apart from a little additional CPU load on the server
[19:36] <AlanBell> all websites that allow users to authenticate should do https
[19:36] <AlanBell> brochureware stuff is harder to justify
[19:37] <AlanBell> worth noting that https limits you to a single website per IP address (or a single one using https per IP address)
[19:56] <mhall119> true
[20:37] <newz2000> I agree, https is not needed for that site, and it would only hurt performance
[20:39] <cjohnston> newz2000: done.. ty
[20:39] <newz2000> thanks cjohnston
[21:14] <Viper550> hello