[01:51] how do I remove a build from the queue [01:51] for the builders on launchpad [01:52] I messed up and now it's going to build a package that it doesn't need to. [01:52] job # 2226193 [01:52] vex: Usually, you don't remove a build [01:52] Is it going to harm anything if it builds? [01:52] no [01:52] just.. wastes resources :) [01:53] It's harder to remove it, so don't worry about it. :-) [01:54] okay :D [04:43] hi.. [04:45] I have a suggestion: do anyone think that we should have a launchpad group on facebook, in order for better interaction. [04:59] c2tarun: http://www.facebook.com/launchpad.net ? [07:17] hi, PPA downloads are slow today, is that expected? [07:17] (way slower than they used to be) [07:21] http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/slow-ppa-dl.png [07:22] the server in question is being hammered atm. that would account for much, alas. [07:23] oh, ok. thanks [08:57] hello! [08:58] I have a minor launchpad problem [08:58] if i go here https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/natty/+pots/ddtp-ubuntu-main/sl/+translate?show=new_suggestions [08:58] and try to confirm the new suggestions [08:58] i always get an oops with (Error ID: OOPS-1853EA326) [08:58] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1853EA326 [08:58] This has been happening for a week or so now [11:28] Hi launchpad developers [11:29] Translation export from launchpad doesn't work last 5 days, do you know about this? [11:30] @matiena: it's a known bug [11:30] i think it's been fixed [11:32] oh, it's here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/707741 [11:32] andrejz: thanks [11:32] so it's being fixed but not fixed yet [11:32] welcome === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 [11:42] I do a search on launchpad and found that the mozilla package are here. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+search?text=mozilla . [11:42] How a I can download it? [11:43] My OS is Ubuntu Maverick 64 bits LTS . [11:46] Better. How do i to download any package from launchpad? [11:48] dicas3d, if you found a package in a ppa, you can add it to your system and install it using apt-get [11:48] there are instructions to do that in the ppa page [11:50] But i don't found the ppa page. === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [11:52] * persia idly comments that Maverick isn't LTS === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ [12:04] Bur how i found a ppa with the package mozilla from this page https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/amd64/mozilla/2:1.7.12-1.1ubuntu2 . [12:05] I have to go out. === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:34] i have a very basic question, but i couldn't answer it with 15min of googling around: what's the correct syntax to assign a bug to someone? i always either get "invalid value" or "constraint not satisfied" when trying full urls or just the nicks (meaning the name after the ~) === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [12:36] (using the full real name or ~nick also didn't work) === yofel_ is now known as yofel === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ [13:27] ochosi: Are you talking about the web UI or email interface? [13:27] Or, indeed, the web API [13:29] maxb: the web UI [13:30] but i think now that it could also be due to restrictions === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [13:30] guess i'm not a member of the team i would i have to be [13:32] Unless you're in some team related (I forget precisely how) to a project, you can only assign to yourself or teams you are in === kostja_osipov1 is now known as kostja_osipoiv [13:32] mkay, thanks, that it explains it === kostja_osipoiv is now known as kostja_osipov [14:29] hi, need to file a few private bug reports, but doing this within the Ubuntu project, these are create publically. how should I create these? do I need a separate project to keep them private? [14:55] argh === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === mnepton is now known as mneptok [15:25] what does this mean: "Attempt to upload binaries specifying build 2203335, where they don't fit."? [15:28] eeek, that's not good, where did you see that? [15:32] bigjools: from soyuz somewhere [15:32] can forward it to you if you like [15:33] please [15:33] @ubuntu.com? [15:33] julian@ [15:34] whosh [15:35] it's likely that the build (would have) failed, fwiw [15:36] ok [15:36] hmmm never seen this in production before [15:36] got it twice [15:36] had you already uploaded the source ok, it built and then you got this? [15:37] no, I think it was when it attempted to build [15:37] visit the build page [15:37] this message is generated only when uploading build results [15:37] actually, it had [15:37] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-sha/1.4.1.1-1build1/+buildjob/2224549 [15:38] eh, ok, this is the other one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-curl/1.3.5-4ubuntu2/+buildjob/2224459 — check that build log [15:38] wooo, bizarro [15:39] 2203335 is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haxml/1:1.13.3-4build1/+buildjob/2224589 [15:39] I'll file a bug and you can subscribe, one sec [15:39] haven't had that reject mail yet [15:40] did get a failed to upload one though, which I hadn't opened [15:40] * apw notes he is getting "Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server." on every other launchpad link right now; never seen that one before [15:42] Laney: that other one is a different bug it seems [15:43] looks like something left over from a previous build [15:43] yeah [16:05] bigjools, Laney : looks like an other case of bug 705342 [16:05] Launchpad bug 705342 in Launchpad itself "buildlog contains a mix of two different builds" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/705342 [16:06] geser: I don't think it's the same as that [16:06] but I expect it's related [16:08] bigjools: when I look at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62954932/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-armel.haskell-sha_1.4.1.1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz it looks like an apt-get of the build-depends for haskell-curl and a fresh start of a build (RUN: ...) [16:08] geser: right [16:09] bigjools: and in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62955459/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-armel.haxml_1%3A1.13.3-4build1_BUILDING.txt.gz you see the start of a fresh build and the output of building haskell-sha [16:09] well spotted, thanks [16:09] ah jeez.... [16:09] geser: do you get the same rejected mail I saw? [16:11] Laney: no, the first time I saw this was when looking at some "upload failed" on the FTBFS page [16:11] hmm ok [16:11] it sounds like it probably is part of the same bug though [16:13] * bigjools investigates [16:15] bigjools: 3rd one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-curl/1.3.5-4ubuntu2/+buildjob/2224459 The build logs shows a mix with an openjdk build [16:15] yeah [16:15] they are all arm builds right? [16:16] yes, all three on satinash (armel) [16:16] the last time it was on 'adoxaceae' also armel [16:17] yeah [16:17] ok, I'm trawling some logs, thanks for helping [16:23] mass uploads are good for something after all :0 [16:28] this problem only affects nonvirtual builders [16:28] I think it's trying to abort the build on a slow arm builder when it gets no response for a few minutes [16:28] the abort code fails horribly === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:37] hello, all! Is there any way of seeing how many people are using a PPA of mine/a package? Or even just seeing how many people have branched from bzr or downloaded a .tar.gz? Thanks! === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [19:13] I am getting "Unable to find expected entry" errors on apt-get update for my PPAs since a while. See http://pastebin.com/4aX6awvT [19:16] blueyed: interesting [19:20] What's broken there? [19:20] lifeless: Thanks for the CSS fix, codebrowsing looks great now. [19:22] Meths: Cool! [19:23] Meths: did you file the bug ? [19:23] Yep === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [19:23] thanks for doing that [19:23] np [19:23] we have a separate server doing the static frontend stuff [19:23] but it also runs the bzr+ssh server [19:24] we can't (yet) upgrade that when we upgrade other things, without causing downtime [19:24] so there was a version skew :( [19:24] easy fix is to drop a separate launchpad tree on that frontend server, which we can upgrade to match the codebrowse middle tier machines - they are the ones that hand out the css [19:39] lifeless: should I file a bug about the ppa issue above? [19:40] bigjools: are you around? [19:40] blueyed: let me just consult a colleague :) === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha [19:46] lifeless: yo [19:47] whenver I've seen stuff like that it's nearly always a transparent proxy screwing things up [19:47] bigjools: how would I debug blueyed's issue above? [19:47] but [19:48] it's his fault for trying to download "restricted" when PPAs only have "main" [19:48] "Unable to find expected entry restricted/source/Sources " being the pertinent error [19:49] so s/entry/file/ [19:49] righto [19:49] blueyed: ^ [19:49] bigjools: thank you, i feel embarrassed :) [19:50] lifeless: :) [19:52] oh, thanks bigjools and lifeless. Has this behavior changed? Was it ignored before? (I would say I have not changed it recently) [19:55] I think so yes [19:55] blueyed: we stopped publishing empty indices for non-PPA components recently [19:55] makes sense then. Thanks again. === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk