[01:51] <vex> how do I remove a build from the queue
[01:51] <vex> for the builders on launchpad
[01:52] <vex> I messed up and now it's going to build a package that it doesn't need to.
[01:52] <vex> job # 2226193
[01:52] <StevenK> vex: Usually, you don't remove a build
[01:52] <StevenK> Is it going to harm anything if it builds?
[01:52] <vex> no
[01:52] <vex> just.. wastes resources :)
[01:53] <StevenK> It's harder to remove it, so don't worry about it. :-)
[01:54] <vex> okay :D
[04:43] <c2tarun> hi..
[04:45] <c2tarun> I have a suggestion: do anyone think that we should have a launchpad group on facebook, in order for better interaction.
[04:59] <lifeless> c2tarun: http://www.facebook.com/launchpad.net ?
[07:17] <fta2> hi, PPA downloads are slow today, is that expected?
[07:17] <fta2> (way slower than they used to be)
[07:21] <fta2> http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/slow-ppa-dl.png
[07:22] <spm> the server in question is being hammered atm. that would account for much, alas.
[07:23] <fta2> oh, ok. thanks
[08:57] <andrejz> hello!
[08:58] <andrejz> I have a minor launchpad problem
[08:58] <andrejz> if i go here https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/natty/+pots/ddtp-ubuntu-main/sl/+translate?show=new_suggestions
[08:58] <andrejz> and try to confirm the new suggestions
[08:58] <andrejz> i always get an oops with (Error ID: OOPS-1853EA326)
[08:58] <andrejz> This has been happening for a week or so now
[11:28] <mantiena> Hi launchpad developers
[11:29] <mantiena> Translation export from launchpad doesn't work last 5 days, do you know about this?
[11:30] <andrejz> @matiena: it's a known bug
[11:30] <andrejz> i think it's been fixed
[11:32] <andrejz> oh, it's here - https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/707741
[11:32] <mantiena> andrejz: thanks
[11:32] <andrejz> so it's being fixed but not fixed yet
[11:32] <andrejz> welcome
[11:42] <dicas3d> I do a search on launchpad and found that the mozilla package are here. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+search?text=mozilla .
[11:42] <dicas3d> How a I can download it?
[11:43] <dicas3d> My OS is Ubuntu Maverick 64 bits LTS .
[11:46] <dicas3d> Better. How do i to download any package from launchpad?
[11:48] <Ursinha> dicas3d, if you found a package in a ppa, you can add it to your system and install it using apt-get
[11:48] <Ursinha> there are instructions to do that in the ppa page
[11:50] <dicas3d> But i don't found the ppa page.
[11:52]  * persia idly comments that Maverick isn't LTS
[12:04] <dicas3d> Bur how i found a ppa with the package mozilla from this page https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/amd64/mozilla/2:1.7.12-1.1ubuntu2 .
[12:05] <dicas3d> I have to go out.
[12:34] <ochosi> i have a very basic question, but i couldn't answer it with 15min of googling around: what's the correct syntax to assign a bug to someone? i always either get "invalid value" or "constraint not satisfied" when trying full urls or just the nicks (meaning the name after the ~)
[12:36] <ochosi> (using the full real name or ~nick also didn't work)
[13:27] <maxb> ochosi: Are you talking about the web UI or email interface?
[13:27] <maxb> Or, indeed, the web API
[13:29] <ochosi> maxb: the web UI
[13:30] <ochosi> but i think now that it could also be due to restrictions
[13:30] <ochosi> guess i'm not a member of the team i would i have to be
[13:32] <maxb> Unless you're in some team related (I forget precisely how) to a project, you can only assign to  yourself or teams you are in
[13:32] <ochosi> mkay, thanks, that it explains it
[14:29] <doko_> hi, need to file a few private bug reports, but doing this within the Ubuntu project, these are create publically. how should I create these? do I need a separate project to keep them private?
[14:55] <Ursinha> argh
[15:25] <Laney> what does this mean: "Attempt to upload binaries specifying build 2203335, where they don't fit."?
[15:28] <bigjools> eeek, that's not good, where did you see that?
[15:32] <Laney> bigjools: from soyuz somewhere
[15:32] <Laney> can forward it to you if you like
[15:33] <bigjools> please
[15:33] <Laney> @ubuntu.com?
[15:33] <bigjools> julian@
[15:34] <Laney> whosh
[15:35] <Laney> it's likely that the build (would have) failed, fwiw
[15:36] <bigjools> ok
[15:36] <bigjools> hmmm never seen this in production before
[15:36] <Laney> got it twice
[15:36] <bigjools> had you already uploaded the source ok, it built and then you got this?
[15:37] <Laney> no, I think it was when it attempted to build
[15:37] <Laney> visit the build page
[15:37] <bigjools> this message is generated only when uploading build results
[15:37] <Laney> actually, it had
[15:37] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-sha/1.4.1.1-1build1/+buildjob/2224549
[15:38] <Laney> eh, ok, this is the other one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-curl/1.3.5-4ubuntu2/+buildjob/2224459 — check that build log
[15:38] <bigjools> wooo,  bizarro
[15:39] <bigjools> 2203335 is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haxml/1:1.13.3-4build1/+buildjob/2224589
[15:39] <bigjools> I'll file a bug and you can subscribe, one sec
[15:39] <Laney> haven't had that reject mail yet
[15:40] <Laney> did get a failed to upload one though, which I hadn't opened
[15:40]  * apw notes he is getting "Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server." on every other launchpad link right now; never seen that one before
[15:42] <bigjools> Laney: that other one is a different bug it seems
[15:43] <Laney> looks like something left over from a previous build
[15:43] <bigjools> yeah
[16:05] <geser> bigjools, Laney : looks like an other case of bug 705342
[16:06] <bigjools> geser: I don't think it's the same as that
[16:06] <bigjools> but I expect it's related
[16:08] <geser> bigjools: when I look at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62954932/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-armel.haskell-sha_1.4.1.1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz it looks like an apt-get  of the build-depends for haskell-curl and a fresh start of a build (RUN: ...)
[16:08] <bigjools> geser: right
[16:09] <geser> bigjools: and in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62955459/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-armel.haxml_1%3A1.13.3-4build1_BUILDING.txt.gz you see the start of a fresh build and the output of building haskell-sha
[16:09] <bigjools> well spotted, thanks
[16:09] <bigjools> ah jeez....
[16:09] <Laney> geser: do you get the same rejected mail I saw?
[16:11] <geser> Laney: no, the first time I saw this was when looking at some "upload failed" on the FTBFS page
[16:11] <Laney> hmm ok
[16:11] <Laney> it sounds like it probably is part of the same bug though
[16:13]  * bigjools investigates
[16:15] <geser> bigjools: 3rd one: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-curl/1.3.5-4ubuntu2/+buildjob/2224459 The build logs shows a mix with an openjdk build
[16:15] <bigjools> yeah
[16:15] <bigjools> they are all arm builds right?
[16:16] <geser> yes, all three on satinash (armel)
[16:16] <geser> the last time it was on 'adoxaceae' also armel
[16:17] <bigjools> yeah
[16:17] <bigjools> ok, I'm trawling some logs, thanks for helping
[16:23] <Laney> mass uploads are good for something after all :0
[16:28] <bigjools> this problem only affects nonvirtual builders
[16:28] <bigjools> I think it's trying to abort the build on a slow arm builder when it gets no response for a few minutes
[16:28] <bigjools> the abort code fails horribly
[18:37] <aroman> hello, all! Is there any way of seeing how many people are using a PPA of mine/a package? Or even just seeing how many people have branched from bzr or downloaded a .tar.gz? Thanks!
[19:13] <blueyed> I am getting "Unable to find expected entry" errors on apt-get update for my PPAs since a while. See http://pastebin.com/4aX6awvT
[19:16] <lifeless> blueyed: interesting
[19:20] <blueyed> What's broken there?
[19:20] <Meths> lifeless: Thanks for the CSS fix, codebrowsing looks great now.
[19:22] <lifeless> Meths: Cool!
[19:23] <lifeless> Meths: did you file the bug ?
[19:23] <Meths> Yep
[19:23] <lifeless> thanks for doing that
[19:23] <Meths> np
[19:23] <lifeless> we have a separate server doing the static frontend stuff
[19:23] <lifeless> but it also runs the bzr+ssh server
[19:24] <lifeless> we can't (yet) upgrade that when we upgrade other things, without causing downtime
[19:24] <lifeless> so there was a version skew :(
[19:24] <lifeless> easy fix is to drop a separate launchpad tree on that frontend server, which we can upgrade to match the codebrowse middle tier machines - they are the ones that hand out the css
[19:39] <blueyed> lifeless: should I file a bug about the ppa issue above?
[19:40] <lifeless> bigjools: are you around?
[19:40] <lifeless> blueyed: let me just consult a colleague :)
[19:46] <bigjools> lifeless: yo
[19:47] <bigjools> whenver I've seen stuff like that it's nearly always a transparent proxy screwing things up
[19:47] <lifeless> bigjools: how would I debug blueyed's issue above?
[19:47] <bigjools> but
[19:48] <bigjools> it's his fault for trying to download "restricted" when PPAs only have "main"
[19:48] <bigjools> "Unable to find expected entry  restricted/source/Sources " being the pertinent error
[19:49] <lifeless> so s/entry/file/
[19:49] <lifeless> righto
[19:49] <lifeless> blueyed: ^
[19:49] <lifeless> bigjools: thank you, i feel embarrassed :)
[19:50] <bigjools> lifeless: :)
[19:52] <blueyed> oh, thanks bigjools and lifeless. Has this behavior changed? Was it ignored before? (I would say I have not changed it recently)
[19:55] <lifeless> I think so yes
[19:55] <bigjools> blueyed: we stopped publishing empty indices for non-PPA components recently
[19:55] <blueyed> makes sense then. Thanks again.