| === Richie is now known as WelshDragon | ||
| JackyAlcine | Is it okay to report Nautlius lacking multiple threads for each window/GUI as a bug? Because I consider it to be one. | 04:55 |
|---|---|---|
| JackyAlcine | Not being use your desktop or other windows while one window is "frozen" is quite cumbersome. | 04:55 |
| micahg | JackyAlcine: feature request :) | 05:01 |
| persia | JackyAlcine, I'd recommend filing that upstream: it's unlikely to be something we would want to carry as a distribution-specific patch. | 05:01 |
| JackyAlcine | Hm. I mean, I've been working on trying to implement it. And it works okayish. | 05:02 |
| JackyAlcine | It's like a daemon that manages each running copy of nautilus. | 05:02 |
| JackyAlcine | But okay, thanks micahg and persia. | 05:02 |
| persia | It's a great idea, and I think it would improve nautilus. That said, the Ubuntu Desktop team tends to try to get as much upstream as possible, and I suspect every install of GNOME (for every distribution that ships GNOME) could benefit from such a fix. | 05:03 |
| JackyAlcine | Well, lol, it's not stable at all. I lost a good amount of configuration settings because of it, but I'll submit the idea. | 05:07 |
| paultag | JackyAlcine: still dude, bugs.gnome | 05:08 |
| paultag | JackyAlcine: p.s. howdy | 05:08 |
| paultag | persia: I just got your devel mail, thanks for that :) | 05:08 |
| JackyAlcine | I don't know, most GNOME applications aren't that thread-centric, and I think threads implement that async feeling that most people feel for. Like it'd be easier to implement a statusbar at the bottom of the window with progress with some kind of background implementations. | 05:10 |
| JackyAlcine | How is this bug going to be fixed? | 05:13 |
| JackyAlcine | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 | 05:13 |
| ubot2 | JackyAlcine: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1) | 05:14 |
| lifeless | with great care | 05:14 |
| paultag | .away not here | 05:14 |
| paultag | Oh shoot. sorry. | 05:14 |
| persia | paultag, I'm glad you found it useful. | 05:25 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: bug 703267 Am I missing any dups? Maybe for lack of a better keyword search....? | 05:51 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 703267 in firefox "Google images search, image size dropdown resets" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/703267 | 05:51 |
| * micahg would like to say that's a broken site, but hold on | 05:53 | |
| micahg | RedSingularity: wfm in ff4.0b10 | 05:53 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: confirmed in 3,6,14, but fixed in 4.0b10 | 05:55 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Have a dup # for me? I will mark it. | 05:56 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: not offhand, I can get it to work in 3.6.x if I try enough | 05:59 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Invalid then or leave it confirmed? | 06:00 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: not invalid, just not sure if it's worth an SRU task | 06:01 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: ah | 06:01 |
| micahg | it would be fix released | 06:02 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: well, upstream will just mark works for me, so unless you find an upstream bug, nothing will happen with it | 06:09 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Can i mark fix released an tell the user its upstream? I hate to leave it confirmed if its not supposed to be. | 06:14 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: you can mark it Fix Released and note it's fixed upstream in Firefox 4.0 | 06:14 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Will do then. Thx. | 06:16 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: actually, fixed in Natty :) | 06:18 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Is that 4.0 or still 3.x.x? | 06:19 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: 4.0b10 | 06:19 |
| ddecator | i would hope mozilla has the 4.0 final out before natty, haha | 06:20 |
| micahg | ddecator: supposedly end of Feb | 06:20 |
| ddecator | micahg: sounds about right, but at this point i don't even listen to their timelines since it changes so often | 06:21 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: Good. Mentioned 4.0 in the report ;) | 06:21 |
| === kklimonda1 is now known as kklimonda | ||
| === JackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine-AFK | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | ||
| charlie-tca | w00t! Ubuntu | 16:44 |
| charlie-tca | UbuntuBugDay today is totem! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110127 | 16:44 |
| ari-tczew | what does it mean? you will fix all bugs in totem? | 16:47 |
| AbhiJit | yes | 16:49 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: no, it's meant to triage open bugs | 16:50 |
| ari-tczew | :P | 16:56 |
| AbhiJit | :( | 16:57 |
| charlie-tca | AbhiJit: bugsquad does not fix bugs, we only triage them | 17:00 |
| AbhiJit | ohhh | 17:01 |
| AbhiJit | i missed the word 'fix' | 17:01 |
| AbhiJit | yeah yah we triage them right. sorry my bad. | 17:01 |
| charlie-tca | but, the more we get triaged, the better chances of them getting fixed! :-) | 17:01 |
| AbhiJit | :) | 17:03 |
| ari-tczew | charlie-tca, AbhiJit: we as developers don't mind if you can prepare a patch as well :P | 17:08 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: his point is that's not the focus of this channel not that people are limited in what they can do | 17:08 |
| AbhiJit | ari-tczew, :D sure! | 17:08 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: ... relax man, I'm talking flexible, with joke | 17:09 |
| ari-tczew | ( emot ":P" at the end can means that ) | 17:10 |
| charlie-tca | ari-tczew: I don't really think you want me to try that. It could double the workload for you ;-) | 17:15 |
| ari-tczew | :( | 17:17 |
| bdmurray | could somebody triage bug 708914 for me? | 22:23 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 708914 in yelp "apport package hook shouldn't ask questions for crashes" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708914 | 22:23 |
| charlie-tca | bdmurray: done, and no, I didn't reproduce it :-) | 22:48 |
| bdmurray | charlie-tca: okay thanks! | 22:51 |
| hggdh | charlie-tca: congrats on officially being the leader on Xubuntu! | 23:43 |
| charlie-tca | Thanks. It took long enough to get that done | 23:44 |
| hggdh | :-) | 23:44 |
| Pici | charlie-tca: hey, congrats from me as well :) | 23:44 |
| charlie-tca | thanks | 23:45 |
| hggdh | charlie-tca: I gotta say I am proud I know you :-) | 23:45 |
| charlie-tca | Now, that means a lot, you know! | 23:45 |
| * hggdh blushes | 23:46 | |
| * ikt questions about asking if xubuntu will chase after lubuntu in terms of memory usage etc :3 | 23:46 | |
| charlie-tca | no | 23:46 |
| ikt | ah ok | 23:47 |
| charlie-tca | xubuntu is not interested in how little memory it can possibly be run in. It is very interested in being usable by the average person after installation | 23:47 |
| charlie-tca | Lubuntu found a place for themselves, I wish them luck in keeping it going | 23:48 |
| ikt | hrmm how odd, when I search for xubuntu it says this on google: An official version of Ubuntu Linux that uses the XFCE desktop environment. Designed for low-specification computers <- but when I click on the link it doesn't actually say that anywhere on the page :/ | 23:49 |
| charlie-tca | not odd, it was originally designed for low-specs, but sometimes things change. It is still designed for lower specs then Ubuntu | 23:50 |
| charlie-tca | In 5 years, low spec has changed somewhat | 23:51 |
| ScottK | There's also lubuntu and LXDE these days too. | 23:51 |
| charlie-tca | All my systems are now considered low spec, including the 2.2GHz Athlon | 23:51 |
| charlie-tca | OTOH, try getting google to update anything! | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!