=== Richie is now known as WelshDragon [04:55] Is it okay to report Nautlius lacking multiple threads for each window/GUI as a bug? Because I consider it to be one. [04:55] Not being use your desktop or other windows while one window is "frozen" is quite cumbersome. [05:01] JackyAlcine: feature request :) [05:01] JackyAlcine, I'd recommend filing that upstream: it's unlikely to be something we would want to carry as a distribution-specific patch. [05:02] Hm. I mean, I've been working on trying to implement it. And it works okayish. [05:02] It's like a daemon that manages each running copy of nautilus. [05:02] But okay, thanks micahg and persia. [05:03] It's a great idea, and I think it would improve nautilus. That said, the Ubuntu Desktop team tends to try to get as much upstream as possible, and I suspect every install of GNOME (for every distribution that ships GNOME) could benefit from such a fix. [05:07] Well, lol, it's not stable at all. I lost a good amount of configuration settings because of it, but I'll submit the idea. [05:08] JackyAlcine: still dude, bugs.gnome [05:08] JackyAlcine: p.s. howdy [05:08] persia: I just got your devel mail, thanks for that :) [05:10] I don't know, most GNOME applications aren't that thread-centric, and I think threads implement that async feeling that most people feel for. Like it'd be easier to implement a statusbar at the bottom of the window with progress with some kind of background implementations. [05:13] How is this bug going to be fixed? [05:13] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 [05:14] JackyAlcine: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1) [05:14] with great care [05:14] .away not here [05:14] Oh shoot. sorry. [05:25] paultag, I'm glad you found it useful. [05:51] micahg: bug 703267 Am I missing any dups? Maybe for lack of a better keyword search....? [05:51] Launchpad bug 703267 in firefox "Google images search, image size dropdown resets" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/703267 [05:53] * micahg would like to say that's a broken site, but hold on [05:53] RedSingularity: wfm in ff4.0b10 [05:55] RedSingularity: confirmed in 3,6,14, but fixed in 4.0b10 [05:56] micahg: Have a dup # for me? I will mark it. [05:59] RedSingularity: not offhand, I can get it to work in 3.6.x if I try enough [06:00] micahg: Invalid then or leave it confirmed? [06:01] RedSingularity: not invalid, just not sure if it's worth an SRU task [06:01] micahg: ah [06:02] it would be fix released [06:09] RedSingularity: well, upstream will just mark works for me, so unless you find an upstream bug, nothing will happen with it [06:14] micahg: Can i mark fix released an tell the user its upstream? I hate to leave it confirmed if its not supposed to be. [06:14] RedSingularity: you can mark it Fix Released and note it's fixed upstream in Firefox 4.0 [06:16] micahg: Will do then. Thx. [06:18] RedSingularity: actually, fixed in Natty :) [06:19] micahg: Is that 4.0 or still 3.x.x? [06:19] RedSingularity: 4.0b10 [06:20] i would hope mozilla has the 4.0 final out before natty, haha [06:20] ddecator: supposedly end of Feb [06:21] micahg: sounds about right, but at this point i don't even listen to their timelines since it changes so often [06:21] micahg: Good. Mentioned 4.0 in the report ;) === kklimonda1 is now known as kklimonda === JackyAlcine is now known as JackyAlcine-AFK === yofel_ is now known as yofel === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti [16:44] w00t! Ubuntu [16:44] UbuntuBugDay today is totem! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110127 [16:47] what does it mean? you will fix all bugs in totem? [16:49] yes [16:50] ari-tczew: no, it's meant to triage open bugs [16:56] :P [16:57] :( [17:00] AbhiJit: bugsquad does not fix bugs, we only triage them [17:01] ohhh [17:01] i missed the word 'fix' [17:01] yeah yah we triage them right. sorry my bad. [17:01] but, the more we get triaged, the better chances of them getting fixed! :-) [17:03] :) [17:08] charlie-tca, AbhiJit: we as developers don't mind if you can prepare a patch as well :P [17:08] ari-tczew: his point is that's not the focus of this channel not that people are limited in what they can do [17:08] ari-tczew, :D sure! [17:09] micahg: ... relax man, I'm talking flexible, with joke [17:10] ( emot ":P" at the end can means that ) [17:15] ari-tczew: I don't really think you want me to try that. It could double the workload for you ;-) [17:17] :( [22:23] could somebody triage bug 708914 for me? [22:23] Launchpad bug 708914 in yelp "apport package hook shouldn't ask questions for crashes" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708914 [22:48] bdmurray: done, and no, I didn't reproduce it :-) [22:51] charlie-tca: okay thanks! [23:43] charlie-tca: congrats on officially being the leader on Xubuntu! [23:44] Thanks. It took long enough to get that done [23:44] :-) [23:44] charlie-tca: hey, congrats from me as well :) [23:45] thanks [23:45] charlie-tca: I gotta say I am proud I know you :-) [23:45] Now, that means a lot, you know! [23:46] * hggdh blushes [23:46] * ikt questions about asking if xubuntu will chase after lubuntu in terms of memory usage etc :3 [23:46] no [23:47] ah ok [23:47] xubuntu is not interested in how little memory it can possibly be run in. It is very interested in being usable by the average person after installation [23:48] Lubuntu found a place for themselves, I wish them luck in keeping it going [23:49] hrmm how odd, when I search for xubuntu it says this on google: An official version of Ubuntu Linux that uses the XFCE desktop environment. Designed for low-specification computers <- but when I click on the link it doesn't actually say that anywhere on the page :/ [23:50] not odd, it was originally designed for low-specs, but sometimes things change. It is still designed for lower specs then Ubuntu [23:51] In 5 years, low spec has changed somewhat [23:51] There's also lubuntu and LXDE these days too. [23:51] All my systems are now considered low spec, including the 2.2GHz Athlon [23:53] OTOH, try getting google to update anything!