[04:55] <JackyAlcine> Is it okay to report Nautlius lacking multiple threads for each window/GUI as a bug? Because I consider it to be one.
[04:55] <JackyAlcine> Not being use your desktop or other windows while one window is "frozen" is quite cumbersome.
[05:01] <micahg> JackyAlcine: feature request :)
[05:01] <persia> JackyAlcine, I'd recommend filing that upstream: it's unlikely to be something we would want to carry as a distribution-specific patch.
[05:02] <JackyAlcine> Hm. I mean, I've been working on trying to implement it. And it works okayish.
[05:02] <JackyAlcine> It's like a daemon that manages each running copy of nautilus.
[05:02] <JackyAlcine> But okay, thanks micahg and persia.
[05:03] <persia> It's a great idea, and I think it would improve nautilus.  That said, the Ubuntu Desktop team tends to try to get as much upstream as possible, and I suspect every install of GNOME (for every distribution that ships GNOME) could benefit from such a fix.
[05:07] <JackyAlcine> Well, lol, it's not stable at all. I lost a good amount of configuration settings because of it, but I'll submit the idea.
[05:08] <paultag> JackyAlcine: still dude, bugs.gnome
[05:08] <paultag> JackyAlcine: p.s. howdy
[05:08] <paultag> persia: I just got your devel mail, thanks for that :)
[05:10] <JackyAlcine> I don't know, most GNOME applications aren't that thread-centric, and I think threads implement that async feeling that most people feel for. Like it'd be easier to implement a statusbar at the bottom of the window with progress with some kind of background implementations.
[05:13] <JackyAlcine> How is this bug going to be fixed?
[05:13] <JackyAlcine> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
[05:14] <ubot2> JackyAlcine: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1)
[05:14] <lifeless> with great care
[05:14] <paultag> .away not here
[05:14] <paultag> Oh shoot. sorry.
[05:25] <persia> paultag, I'm glad you found it useful.
[05:51] <RedSingularity> micahg:  bug 703267  Am I missing any dups?  Maybe for lack of a better keyword search....?
[05:51] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 703267 in firefox "Google images search, image size dropdown resets" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/703267
[05:53]  * micahg would like to say that's a broken site, but hold on
[05:53] <micahg> RedSingularity: wfm in ff4.0b10
[05:55] <micahg> RedSingularity: confirmed in 3,6,14, but fixed in 4.0b10
[05:56] <RedSingularity> micahg: Have a dup # for me?  I will mark it.
[05:59] <micahg> RedSingularity: not offhand, I can get it to work in 3.6.x if I try enough
[06:00] <RedSingularity> micahg: Invalid then or leave it confirmed?
[06:01] <micahg> RedSingularity: not invalid, just not sure if it's worth an SRU task
[06:01] <RedSingularity> micahg: ah
[06:02] <micahg> it would be fix released
[06:09] <micahg> RedSingularity: well, upstream will just mark works for me, so unless you find an upstream bug, nothing will happen with it
[06:14] <RedSingularity> micahg:  Can i mark fix released an tell the user its upstream?  I hate to leave it confirmed if its not supposed to be.
[06:14] <micahg> RedSingularity: you can mark it Fix Released and note it's fixed upstream in Firefox 4.0
[06:16] <RedSingularity> micahg: Will do then.  Thx.
[06:18] <micahg> RedSingularity: actually, fixed in Natty :)
[06:19] <RedSingularity> micahg: Is that 4.0 or still 3.x.x?
[06:19] <micahg> RedSingularity: 4.0b10
[06:20] <ddecator> i would hope mozilla has the 4.0 final out before natty, haha
[06:20] <micahg> ddecator: supposedly end of Feb
[06:21] <ddecator> micahg: sounds about right, but at this point i don't even listen to their timelines since it changes so often
[06:21] <RedSingularity> micahg: Good.  Mentioned 4.0 in the report ;)
[16:44] <charlie-tca> w00t! Ubuntu
[16:44] <charlie-tca> UbuntuBugDay today is totem! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110127
[16:47] <ari-tczew> what does it mean? you will fix all bugs in totem?
[16:49] <AbhiJit> yes
[16:50] <micahg> ari-tczew: no, it's meant to triage open bugs
[16:56] <ari-tczew> :P
[16:57] <AbhiJit> :(
[17:00] <charlie-tca> AbhiJit: bugsquad does not fix bugs, we only triage them
[17:01] <AbhiJit> ohhh
[17:01] <AbhiJit> i missed the word 'fix'
[17:01] <AbhiJit> yeah yah we triage them right. sorry my bad.
[17:01] <charlie-tca> but, the more we get triaged, the better chances of them getting fixed! :-)
[17:03] <AbhiJit> :)
[17:08] <ari-tczew> charlie-tca, AbhiJit: we as developers don't mind if you can prepare a patch as well :P
[17:08] <micahg> ari-tczew: his point is that's not the focus of this channel not that people are limited in what they can do
[17:08] <AbhiJit> ari-tczew, :D sure!
[17:09] <ari-tczew> micahg: ... relax man, I'm talking flexible, with joke
[17:10] <ari-tczew> ( emot ":P" at the end can means that )
[17:15] <charlie-tca> ari-tczew: I don't really think you want me to try that. It could double the workload for you ;-)
[17:17] <ari-tczew> :(
[22:23] <bdmurray> could somebody triage bug 708914 for me?
[22:23] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 708914 in yelp "apport package hook shouldn't ask questions for crashes" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708914
[22:48] <charlie-tca> bdmurray: done, and no, I didn't reproduce it :-)
[22:51] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: okay thanks!
[23:43] <hggdh> charlie-tca: congrats on officially being the leader on Xubuntu!
[23:44] <charlie-tca> Thanks. It took long enough to get that done
[23:44] <hggdh> :-)
[23:44] <Pici> charlie-tca: hey, congrats from me as well :)
[23:45] <charlie-tca> thanks
[23:45] <hggdh> charlie-tca: I gotta say I am proud I know you :-)
[23:45] <charlie-tca> Now, that means a lot, you know!
[23:46]  * hggdh blushes
[23:46]  * ikt questions about asking if xubuntu will chase after lubuntu in terms of memory usage etc :3
[23:46] <charlie-tca> no
[23:47] <ikt> ah ok
[23:47] <charlie-tca> xubuntu is not interested in how little memory it can possibly be run in. It is very interested in being usable by the average person after installation
[23:48] <charlie-tca> Lubuntu found a place for themselves, I wish them luck in keeping it going
[23:49] <ikt> hrmm how odd, when I search for xubuntu it says this on google: An official version of Ubuntu Linux that uses the XFCE desktop environment. Designed for low-specification computers <- but when I click on the link it doesn't actually say that anywhere on the page :/
[23:50] <charlie-tca> not odd, it was originally designed for low-specs, but sometimes things change. It is still designed for lower specs then Ubuntu
[23:51] <charlie-tca> In 5 years, low spec has changed somewhat
[23:51] <ScottK> There's also lubuntu and LXDE these days too.
[23:51] <charlie-tca> All my systems are now considered low spec, including the 2.2GHz Athlon
[23:53] <charlie-tca> OTOH, try getting google to update anything!