| doctormo | lfaraone: hey, you want me on linked-in? | 01:14 |
|---|---|---|
| lfaraone | doctormo: yessir. | 01:19 |
| doctormo | lfaraone: Done sir, how are you? | 01:27 |
| lfaraone | doctormo: quite fine, thank you. | 01:27 |
| lfaraone | doctormo: yourself? | 01:27 |
| doctormo | lfaraone: Seemingly busy all the time, but not much to show for it. Must be background work. | 01:28 |
| lfaraone | fair enough. | 01:28 |
| doctormo | lfaraone: Any fine projects? | 01:29 |
| lfaraone | doctormo: nothing "fine", per se. wrote a replacement for purity, ugly ugly code. wrote a tiny application for multifactor authentication via cellphones, but didn't yet have time to dos o securely. | 01:30 |
| doctormo | lfaraone: Sounds fancy, for Debian? | 01:32 |
| lfaraone | doctormo: for Science, actually. But I'll put it in Debian when I'm done with the project | 01:35 |
| doctormo | lfaraone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgR3N8y4boQ | 01:35 |
| === mdomsch_ is now known as mdomsch | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:01 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| bdrung | dholbach: you could put the harvest script in a separate branch (and add the license header). then everyone can improve it until it can go into ubuntu-dev-tools. | 09:19 |
| bdrung | dholbach: 2) i made some changes to the sponsors-overview. | 09:20 |
| geser | good morning | 09:22 |
| bdrung | good morning | 09:24 |
| dholbach | hi bdrung, hi geser | 09:26 |
| dholbach | bdrung, maybe later - this week I'm pretty slammed with other stuff | 09:26 |
| === sebner_ is now known as sebner | ||
| Laney | ScottK: If you have 2 minutes today, could you look at haskell-utf8-string in natty/binary NEW? Thanks. | 10:11 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| kklimonda | is it just me or is the test rebuild being done on ppa builders | 10:40 |
| kklimonda | : | 10:40 |
| Laney | what's wrong with that? That seems like a reasonable thing to do. | 10:41 |
| kklimonda | are they being done with a lower score, or will I have to wait 4 days to build my stuff? :) | 10:41 |
| kklimonda | Laney: sure, but I was surprised when I saw 16k jobs in the builders queue | 10:42 |
| Laney | i would hope they are scored down | 10:42 |
| kklimonda | yeah, they have to have lower score | 10:44 |
| sebrock | can someone help me create a backport? | 10:47 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: sure, just ask | 10:51 |
| kklimonda | (the questions :)) | 10:51 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: its the package openswan. The current lucid package has a bug which makes it useless with L2TP. So basically my VPN service which utilizes IPSec/L2TP does not work. Err.. it works for one login thereafter it has to be restarted. version 2.6.26 in Maverick solves this. Oh and I have a AMD64 arch. | 10:52 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: so the question is if someone can build openswan 2.6.26 for 10.04 amd64? | 10:53 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: did that cover it? | 10:55 |
| * persia idly wonders what was wrong with the answer in #ubuntu-packaging | 10:56 | |
| kklimonda | sebrock: sure | 10:56 |
| * kklimonda wonders why there are no binaries for openswan 1:2.6.28+dfsg-1 | 10:57 | |
| kklimonda | for maverick* | 10:57 |
| persia | !backports | 10:57 |
| ubottu | If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | 10:57 |
| sebrock | sorry persia, I was suggested to post in both these channels on #ubuntu | 10:58 |
| persia | sebrock, Quick overview: read the wiki page, file a bug, do a test (prevu tends to be good for this), and report your results to the bug. | 10:58 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: would you be able to do it for me? | 10:58 |
| persia | Doesn't suprise me. The distinction between them isn't always clear. This one is dedicated to work *on* Ubuntu, and the other is about Packaging with Ubuntu, Ubuntu derivatives, etc. | 10:58 |
| sebrock | ok | 10:59 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: I can see if package builds without changes, and if so upload it to ppa:kklimonda/backports | 10:59 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: that would be great | 10:59 |
| persia | Ought still work towards proper backports so people don't have to find arbitrary PPAs :) | 10:59 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: 2.6.26 is the version I'm looking for | 10:59 |
| sebrock | I've tried to contact the maintainer but he does not answer me | 11:00 |
| kklimonda | persia: sebrock can request an official backport, but I can't upload to the backporters ppa anyway, and he has to test it somehow. | 11:00 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: can it be 1:2.6.28+dfsg-1? | 11:00 |
| persia | Makes sense :) | 11:00 |
| sebrock | dunno, possibly there are more new dependencies on that one | 11:01 |
| sebrock | but I can always try it | 11:01 |
| sebrock | kklimonda I would suggest 2.6.26 | 11:01 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: 2.6.28 builds fine, but I can't do a one magic command trick for 2.6.26 :) | 11:03 |
| sebrock | kklimonda you mean 2.6.26 does not build? | 11:03 |
| kklimonda | there seems to be a problem with openswan in maverick | 11:03 |
| sebrock | oh | 11:03 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: well, it should build but I'd have to dig out source from LP | 11:03 |
| sebrock | there is no source for it? | 11:04 |
| kklimonda | persia: also, when backporting is there a rule to backport the newest version available in concurrent releases, or can we backport any version we choose? | 11:04 |
| sebrock | 2.6.26 is the version in maverick right now no? | 11:04 |
| sebrock | or am I missing somethig | 11:05 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: yes - but there has been 2.6.28 upload, which didn't build for some reason | 11:05 |
| sebrock | hmm.. I'm confused. You have built .26 or .28? | 11:05 |
| persia | kklimonda, My understanding is that we're supposed to backport something current in the archives, but I'm not sure that blocks maverick->lucid backports during natty development. That said, I'm not a backporter: if the backport policy on the wiki page posted above doesn't say, you'll want to ask someone on the backporters team. | 11:06 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: which package did you manage to build? | 11:08 |
| kklimonda | 2.6.28+dfsg-5 from natty | 11:09 |
| sebrock | oh | 11:09 |
| kklimonda | I think I can also build 2.6.28+dfsg-1 from maverick | 11:09 |
| sebrock | but 2.6.26 from Maverick is a no go? | 11:09 |
| kklimonda | well, it can be done, but it would have to wait a while. Plus, I'm not sure if we can backport it. | 11:10 |
| persia | sebrock, The 2.6.26 in maverick doesn't have accompanying source, sadly. | 11:10 |
| kklimonda | persia: well, it can be fetched from LP | 11:10 |
| persia | kklimonda, Oh, good. I was very worried for a bit there. | 11:10 |
| sebrock | persia: ok | 11:11 |
| kklimonda | it's actually an interesting problem | 11:11 |
| sebrock | kklimonda so how shouls we proceed? In "wait for a while", is that weeks? | 11:11 |
| kklimonda | I wonder what did happen with 2.6.28 for maverick | 11:11 |
| kklimonda | ScottK: can we backport a package from maverick that got superseeded by a never version that was never published in maverick? the package is openswan | 11:12 |
| sebrock | if you managed to backport 2.6.28 to 10.04 amd64 I can try it out | 11:12 |
| sebrock | you got a link? | 11:12 |
| sebrock | brb, telephone | 11:13 |
| sebrock | there | 11:13 |
| sebrock | kklimonda I can try out 2.6.28 | 11:13 |
| kklimonda | it has 3 dependencies, so they should also be checked if we are actually backporting it | 11:14 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: can you make an official backport request for openswan from natty to lucid? | 11:15 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: I've uploaded it to https://launchpad.net/~kklimonda/+archive/backports, it should build in an hour or so (depending on how busy builders are) | 11:15 |
| kklimonda | (when you report it we can actually track testing somewhere - it should help a little) | 11:17 |
| sebrock | kklimonda I can do that. LP handles that right? | 11:17 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: yes - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How%20to%20request%20new%20packages outlines the process | 11:18 |
| sebrock | ok great | 11:18 |
| sebrock | in order to get your package I add it to my sources or is it possible to manually get the deb? | 11:19 |
| sebrock | ah right I see now | 11:19 |
| sebrock | I'll report back | 11:19 |
| === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
| sebrock | kklimonda: are you able to also build 1.2.6 of xl2tpd for 10.04? Seems the current version does not cooperate with openswan 2.6.28 very well | 11:54 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: I'll see | 12:01 |
| === kklimonda1 is now known as kklimonda | ||
| kklimonda | sebrock: it built fine, I've uploaded it to the same location | 12:07 |
| sebrock | thanks will check it out | 12:07 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: do I have to do something special to get it into my sources, apt-get update does not do anything | 12:16 |
| sebrock | ie, I already have your PPA in there | 12:16 |
| sebrock | yeah its ignoring your repo | 12:17 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: it shouldn't | 12:19 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: what do you mean by ignoring? | 12:20 |
| sebrock | it is, I guess the diff is null | 12:20 |
| sebrock | [Ign] | 12:20 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: xl2tpd hasn't yet built, so nothing has been published yet | 12:20 |
| sebrock | oh I thought it had | 12:20 |
| kklimonda | it may not yet have been published | 12:21 |
| sebrock | no indication when it has? | 12:21 |
| kklimonda | see the result of apt-cache policy openswan | 12:21 |
| kklimonda | it should show that there are two versions available - one of them from ppa | 12:21 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| sebrock | kklimonda: got it. However I'm sad to say that it still has the same bugs | 13:36 |
| sebrock | I should file a bug for that first :( | 13:36 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: there is a newer version in natty, you can test it | 13:36 |
| sebrock | Yeah, but I'm certain the actual bug is in openswan | 13:37 |
| kklimonda | ah, I see | 13:37 |
| sebrock | Thank you very much for your help | 13:38 |
| kklimonda | no problem | 13:38 |
| * kklimonda hugs backportpackage | 13:38 | |
| sebrock | Its people like you who makes this so great :D | 13:38 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| ari-tczew | bdrung, tumbleweed: could you have a look on http://paste.ubuntu.com/559009/ | 14:13 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: so did you install debian-keyring? | 14:14 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: not yet | 14:14 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: but error message is ugly :) | 14:14 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: that's true :) | 14:14 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: report bug for it? | 14:16 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: sure | 14:17 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: with debian-keyring works fine. is it in depends or something? | 14:20 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: suggests, IIRC | 14:22 |
| * ari-tczew is off to doctor. | 14:22 | |
| sebrock | so how do I remove a PPA from lucid? | 14:46 |
| al-maisan | sebrock: remove ppa? look in /etc/apt/sources.list.d | 14:47 |
| sebrock | yes I saw that, but will removing the file remove the PPA completely? | 14:47 |
| kklimonda | there is also ppa-purge in lucid-backports | 14:47 |
| sebrock | seems ppa-purge is not available on lucid | 14:48 |
| sebrock | kklimonda: I could not find it | 14:48 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: you still have to remove all packages (or downgrade them) manually | 14:48 |
| al-maisan | sebrock: do a "apt-get upgrade" afterwards? | 14:48 |
| sebrock | I've removed them | 14:48 |
| kklimonda | sebrock: then you are all set | 14:48 |
| sebrock | I mean I want to remove the source | 14:48 |
| kklimonda | just delete the file, and do apt-get update | 14:48 |
| kklimonda | source of what? | 14:48 |
| al-maisan | sebrock: oh sorry yes s/upgrade/update/ | 14:49 |
| sebrock | I figured that out myself :P | 14:49 |
| sebrock | alright it seems to have worked... | 14:49 |
| sebrock | strange there is a command to do that small task | 14:49 |
| kklimonda | well, there is a ppa-purge :) | 14:50 |
| kklimonda | (you have to install it by hand in lucid though, or enable backports) | 14:50 |
| sebrock | ok Im trying to build a package here. it says I should set: --disable-md5 --disable-sha1 --disable-sha2 | 14:51 |
| sebrock | where do I set that? | 14:51 |
| sebrock | debian rules or whatever... | 14:52 |
| Laney | what's 'it'? | 14:52 |
| Rhonda | In the configure switches in debian/rules | 14:52 |
| sebrock | so I invoke configure with them switches? | 14:52 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| Rhonda | Most probably, but that still depends on what "it" is and the likes. It's just a guess based on the minimum information that you offered us. | 14:53 |
| Rhonda | You see, the more information, the mor accurate the answers could be. :) | 14:53 |
| sebrock | it is a blog post | 14:53 |
| sebrock | http://blog.coombabah.net/wiki/strongswan | 14:53 |
| Rhonda | It is pretty explicit on what to change. | 14:54 |
| Rhonda | "Now edit debian/rules and change … to …" | 14:54 |
| sebrock | explicit would be the name of the file to edit | 14:54 |
| sebrock | this assumes knowledge of editing debian rules | 14:54 |
| Rhonda | But it carrys the name of the file to change. | 14:55 |
| Rhonda | No, it doesn't. | 14:55 |
| sebrock | am I blind? | 14:55 |
| sebrock | :D | 14:55 |
| Rhonda | debian/rules is a filename. | 14:55 |
| sebrock | ah I see | 14:55 |
| sebrock | I thought it was a name | 14:55 |
| AnAnt | Hello | 15:23 |
| === hanska is now known as dapal | ||
| RainCT | bdrung: http://paste.debian.net/105852/ | 16:06 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| udienz | ari-tczew, alive? | 16:31 |
| udienz | about merge firestarter. i found that a desktop file contained errors | 16:32 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: nope | 16:32 |
| udienz | i'have checked with desktop-file-validate | 16:32 |
| udienz | can i patching it? | 16:32 |
| udienz | http://paste.ubuntu.com/559084/ | 16:34 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: if you have right fix, please patch and note in d/changelog in separate star * | 16:38 |
| ari-tczew | under information about merge | 16:39 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| udienz | ari-tczew, bug 694413 ready to review | 18:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 694413 in firestarter (Ubuntu) "Merge firestarter 1.0.3-9 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/694413 | 18:02 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: News accepted. | 18:04 |
| ari-tczew | will take a look when have a time | 18:04 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, okay. i will wait | 18:04 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: do you know how fix that FTBFS? [LD_ERROR] misc.c:229: undefined reference to `log10' | 18:15 |
| ScottK | kklimonda: You want to backport 1:2.6.26+dfsg? | 18:16 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, that must be a libs not placing after object | 18:16 |
| udienz | or a needed libs placed to end | 18:16 |
| ScottK | kklimonda: If nothing else it can be done as a direct upload. | 18:16 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: I got similiar error during build erlang (main) | 18:17 |
| ari-tczew | you can try to merge it from unstable and fix ftbfs | 18:17 |
| udienz | ok, i'll loking | 18:17 |
| kklimonda | ScottK: not anymore as it doesn't work as it should but the question remains - can I backport from any newer release, or should I backport from the most recent release/development one? | 18:18 |
| kklimonda | ScottK: If I can backport from any more recent release what happens in situation when (for example) I want to backport to lucid package from maverick that enables feature A, and then someone else wants a release from natty that enables feature B, and disables a feature A? ;) | 18:19 |
| cjwatson | undefined reference to `log10'> as the log10(3) man page explains, "Link with -lm" | 18:24 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: ^^ | 18:24 |
| shadeslayer | hi | 18:40 |
| shadeslayer | im a bit confused about : " usr/lib/mono/* debian/tmp/opt/project-neon/usr/lib/mono/* " | 18:41 |
| shadeslayer | is that the right way to move files from usr/lib/mono to other dirs? | 18:41 |
| ScottK | kklimonda: You can backport from any newer release. | 18:41 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: if you like, try to link -lm as cjwatson suggested on package tstools | 18:56 |
| udienz | ari-tczew, okay. still downloading :( | 18:57 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: ah, right, king size | 18:57 |
| udienz | and my connections is very bad tonight | 18:57 |
| broder | ScottK: if you have a moment, could you glance at bug #708757? i think this should be an easy one | 19:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 708757 in maverick-backports "Please backport libpipeline (1.1.0-1) from natty to lucid, maverick" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708757 | 19:46 |
| ScottK | Sure | 19:46 |
| ScottK | broder: Approved. | 19:48 |
| broder | thanks | 19:48 |
| === hanska is now known as dapal | ||
| bdrung | RainCT: please pull the latest version of lp:ubuntu-dev-tools and test again. | 20:28 |
| ari-tczew | udienz: new comment added on firestarter | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | needs fixing | 20:29 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: please file a bug requesting a nicer looking error message. | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: ah yea, I forgot | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: for this time while I'm reporting bug, you could take a quick work on bug 708695 :> | 20:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 708695 in avogadro (Ubuntu) "rebuild with python-numpy 1.5.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708695 | 20:34 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: in a few minutes after sqeezing the last performing bits out of my buddy implementation | 20:35 |
| ari-tczew | :> | 20:35 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: bug 708862 | 20:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 708862 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "[pull-debian-source] Ugly error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708862 | 20:36 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: I guess that there are more bad looking errors in scripts. | 20:37 |
| bdrung | probably | 20:37 |
| bcurtiswx | doctormo, what would you think of allowing ground control to work when you have nautilus open with another server.. i.e. I connect-to-server to my desktop which is where i store all the bzr gets, groundcontrol still works since i've got nautilus up... or would it if i have ground control on the desktop? | 22:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!