[00:07] <micahg> chrisccoulson: fennec failed to build because of a build-dep, would you like me to take a look later?
[00:07] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i saw that.
[00:07] <chrisccoulson> feel free to look at it if i've not done it before i go to bed
[00:07] <chrisccoulson> i guess it needs --disable-notify rather than the build-depend adding
[00:08] <micahg> chrisccoulson: does fennec not have notifications?
[00:09] <chrisccoulson> it doesn't matter really, the libnotify stuff is only part of the toolkit, so that check is bogus :)
[00:09] <chrisccoulson> and xulrunner is already built with libnotfiy support
[00:09] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ah, ok, I'll add a note then if I do it
[00:09] <chrisccoulson> i had to do the same for lightning too. it might be worth just copying the extra build flags i added there :)
[00:10] <micahg> ok, we should probably upstream at some point the checks that should be disabled with --with-system-libxul
[12:44] <magcius> Is there any chance the Firefox daily builds can work again soon?
[12:45] <DeeVee> 2nd that :-P
[12:45] <DeeVee> the one from 20th has some weird repainting problem on some sites
[13:01] <magcius> As said before, I'd offer to fix it.
[13:02] <magcius> But I can't, because I can't fix the broken patch, because the patch won't apply
[13:02] <magcius> So I can't make a new patch.
[13:57] <micahg> magcius: DeeVee: yes, I'll fix it tonight if chrisccoulson doesn't get to it first
[13:58] <DeeVee> cool
[16:06] <dupondje> Firefox upgrade removes cache ?
[16:19] <chrisccoulson> dupondje, "removes cache"?
[16:20] <chrisccoulson> dupondje, if you're referring to the lack of confirmation on close, that's deliberate i'm afraid
[17:00] <dupondje> chrisccoulson: it moved places.sqlite to places.sqlite.corrupted
[17:00] <dupondje> :s
[21:20] <chrisccoulson> wow, abrowser has been broken in natty since before christmas, and not a single bug report so far
[21:20] <chrisccoulson> needs to die :)
[21:20] <chrisccoulson> clearly, nobody uses it
[21:22] <micahg> heh
[21:22]  * micahg still thinks it should be built from xulrunner like Debian
[21:23] <chrisccoulson> i think we should just kill it entirely
[21:23] <chrisccoulson> :)
[21:23] <micahg> well, the only benefit is testing FF-on-XR, but I guess there's no point anyway
[21:23] <chrisccoulson> i need to talk to the people that i know still do use it first though
[21:24] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: hey, curious if anything has happened with bug #677551?
[21:24] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 677551 in firefox "pressing Enter in a large textarea is very CPU intensive with Firefox 4.0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/677551
[21:24] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, no, not yet ;)
[21:24] <jdstrand> today's firefox is no better
[21:25] <chrisccoulson> i'll take another look next week though, i've been playing catch up this week after spending all my time on globalmenu work
[21:25] <jdstrand> cool, thanks
[21:25] <chrisccoulson> right, nightlies should work again now :)
[21:25] <chrisccoulson> time to do tbird 3.1.8 for natty and get the crashreporter on
[21:27] <micahg> cool
[21:27] <micahg> I need to finish with the locales this weekend
[21:39] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, actually, would you mind sending bug 677551 upstream? i'll still look at it next week, but perhaps somebody else already has an idea ;)
[21:39] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 677551 in firefox "pressing Enter in a large textarea is very CPU intensive with Firefox 4.0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/677551
[21:51] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: is there a wiki page for properly forwarding mozilla bugs?
[21:51] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: like there is for gnome?
[21:55] <micahg> jdstrand: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/Mozilla, probably a little out of date
[21:58] <chrisccoulson> heh, i wasn't aware of that ;)
[21:58] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, if you forward it upstream, Core - Layout is probably an appropriate place to report it
[21:58]  * micahg has roots in the bugsquad ;)
[22:00] <jdstrand> micahg, chrisccoulson: thanks
[22:00] <jdstrand> micahg: and hi! :)
[22:00] <micahg> hi jdstrand :)
[22:00] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, also, please subscribe me :)
[22:00] <chrisccoulson> i'm not subscribed to all upstream bugs ;)
[22:01]  * micahg is following chrisccoulson upstream and will be implicitly subscribed
[22:01] <chrisccoulson> lol
[22:02] <micahg> chrisccoulson: it's the only way I can keep track of the GNOME3/global menu stuff without subscribing to everything :)
[22:03] <chrisccoulson> heh :)
[22:03] <chrisccoulson> oh no, updated indicator stack now
[22:04] <chrisccoulson> i wonder if everything will break again ;)
[22:04] <chrisccoulson> it did on the friday afternoon of the sprint!
[22:04] <chrisccoulson> perhaps i'll upgrade in the morning
[22:05] <micahg> Well, I'll probably be on natty in a couple weeks
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> you're not on it already?
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> tut tut, you'll need to be more hardcore than that ;)
[22:05] <micahg> chrisccoulson: nope
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> i'm on natty+3 already!
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> :)
[22:05]  * micahg still needs a guaranteed working system ATM :)
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> lol
[22:06] <chrisccoulson> i could do with that sometimes too
[22:06] <micahg> when I get my new laptop, I'll upgrade it to natty
[22:06] <chrisccoulson> cool!
[22:07] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597627
[22:07] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 597627 in Layout: Text "Adding and removing lines in big textareas is really slow" [Normal,New]
[22:07] <chrisccoulson> thanks :)
[22:07] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: added that to the LP bug
[22:08] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: looks like they are really keen on fixing it
[22:08] <jdstrand> [hardblocker]
[22:08] <micahg> yeah, but that still could be 3 weeks out
[22:08] <jdstrand> that is fine by me
[22:10] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: would you mind subscribing yourself to the upstream bug if you want? not sure what address you want
[22:47] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: wow, I don't think I realzed how cool the LP <-> mozilla bugzilla integration was
[22:47] <jdstrand> s/was/is/
[22:47] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, oh, what has it done?
[22:47] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: it imported 109 comments and allows me to respond to the mozilla bug
[22:47] <jdstrand> cia LP
[22:47] <jdstrand> via
[22:48] <chrisccoulson> ah, i haven't noticed that yet. does that mean i have 109 e-mails? ;)
[22:48] <jdstrand> I wonder how it does that, since I need to be logged in over there...
[22:48] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: heh, no-- just one saying it happened
[22:48] <jdstrand> I am logged in over there... hmm
[23:52] <magcius> Wait, why aren't you running FF on xulrunner currently?
[23:52] <chrisccoulson> fta - mozilla bug 629544
[23:52] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 629544 in Blocklisting "Blocklist moonlight plugin on linux." [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629544
[23:52] <chrisccoulson> magcius, we haven't done for ages, why you ask?
[23:52] <magcius> chrisccoulson, it makes more sense to do that for me
[23:52] <magcius> however mozilla-central is indeed a mess
[23:53] <chrisccoulson> why? you're free to build it on XR if you like, but we're not going to do that any more ;)
[23:53] <magcius> I hope some day they'll split out into the main gecko stuff, and have app/browser and all of that into a simple broject project
[23:53] <magcius> chrisccoulson, I'm curious why not
[23:53] <chrisccoulson> firstly, that configuration is totally unsupported
[23:54] <chrisccoulson> our builds are also pretty close to upstream builds now as well
[23:54] <chrisccoulson> which means we can do things like - send our crash reports to mozilla ;)
[23:54] <magcius> Ah.
[23:54] <magcius> I swore that upstream built it separately.
[23:55] <magcius> Not doing it that way seems stupid, but I have to ask upstream them.
[23:55] <magcius> then
[23:55] <chrisccoulson> also, certain features in ffox 4.0 don't work with ff-on-xr
[23:55] <chrisccoulson> eg, omni.jar
[23:55] <chrisccoulson> (unless that has been changed recently)
[23:56] <chrisccoulson> our source package supports building ff-on-xr btw
[23:56] <magcius> Right, I was under the impression that XULRunner contained the platform (gecko layout, libmozjs), and that FF was purely an application on top
[23:56] <chrisccoulson> just by flipping a bit in debian/rules
[23:57] <chrisccoulson> not sure if it still works though ;)
[23:58] <magcius> I'm sure you know by now that your pkg-config files are completely useless because /usr/lib/xulrunner-V/ isn't in ld.so.conf
[23:59] <magcius> But can you add another tally to that bug for me?
[23:59] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, no, that's deliberate
[23:59] <magcius> Why?
[23:59] <chrisccoulson> why should that directory be in ld.so.conf? applications shouldn't be directly linking against them
[23:59] <magcius> It makes gjs completely impossible to run, outside of LD_LIBRARY_PATH hacks