| Pici | ... | 00:41 |
|---|---|---|
| gpc | » » » | 00:41 |
| rww | dear lord richthegeek is not good at the concept of "stop" | 00:42 |
| rww | (and yes, that appears to have been a significant factor last time around too) | 00:42 |
| Pici | (I had a feeling) | 00:43 |
| maco | Pici: do i banforward avenge now? | 01:24 |
| Pici | maco: I don't know what that was | 01:24 |
| rww | it was unamerican activities. | 01:49 |
| gpc | wish the loco channels were all +F | 01:54 |
| bazhang | naming debian after soap products? | 01:55 |
| gpc | Debian Snuggles | 01:55 |
| gpc | Debian Tide w/Bleach | 01:56 |
| bazhang | debain wretch | 01:56 |
| Jordan_U | Did anyone else just see kolo able to talk after being quieted in #ubuntu? | 01:57 |
| bazhang | nope | 01:57 |
| gpc | nope | 01:57 |
| bazhang | preceded it by a few nanoseconds | 01:57 |
| Jordan_U | I wonder why it appeared so in my client. | 01:57 |
| bazhang | laaaaag | 01:57 |
| Jordan_U | Lag in my connection would explain why my +q happened so late after I actually /aq'd, but doesn't quite explain why messages from kolo came after the message that he'd been quieted. | 02:01 |
| bazhang | I saw none, just one letter somewhat nearby | 02:01 |
| gpc | best to not dwell on such things | 02:01 |
| gpc | will only drive you crazy | 02:02 |
| rww | lag between servers, not lag between your client and the server | 02:02 |
| gpc | see what it has done to rww | 02:02 |
| gpc | he actually knows the reason | 02:02 |
| Jordan_U | "If it wasn't for my horse I never would have made it through that year in college" | 02:03 |
| maco | how long do you boil udon? | 02:03 |
| gpc | udon boil it | 02:03 |
| gpc | what is udon? /me googles | 02:03 |
| rww | @lart gpc | 02:03 |
| * gpc forces me to use /me on me | 02:03 | |
| maco | gpc: noodles | 02:04 |
| gpc | oh | 02:04 |
| gpc | till they are done, I would assume much like pasta | 02:04 |
| maco | looking for a ballpark though... | 02:05 |
| rww | udone ** | 02:05 |
| gpc | if they are fresh (not frozen or dry) not for very long 1-2 minutes | 02:05 |
| rww | you cook pasta for 2 minutes?! | 02:05 |
| bazhang | if that | 02:05 |
| gpc | fresh pasta yes | 02:05 |
| rww | what | 02:05 |
| gpc | if the water is at a rolling boil | 02:05 |
| bazhang | roiling | 02:05 |
| gpc | roiling lol | 02:05 |
| maco | these are dry | 02:06 |
| bazhang | 'gan mien' | 02:06 |
| gpc | maco 5-7 minutes ball park | 02:06 |
| maco | stopped at the korean market on "get stuff to stock brand new apartment" the day i moved in | 02:06 |
| maco | gpc: ok thanks | 02:06 |
| maco | its been like...6mo since i last made udon | 02:06 |
| rww | oh, not dry. huh. | 02:06 |
| gpc | but soon as they look done, try one and you will know | 02:06 |
| maco | i know soba is 5 minutes | 02:06 |
| * persia tends to soak it in boiled (not boiling) water for 3 minutes | 02:07 | |
| maco | apparently putting the bullion cube in after the water boils makes it sputter | 02:09 |
| maco | i wont be doing that again... | 02:09 |
| rww | This conversation is confusing me. I'm going back to my harry potter fanfiction. | 02:09 |
| gpc | hehe | 02:09 |
| maco | huh. why have i never bought miso paste? this doesnt make sense. | 02:09 |
| gpc | well look at that, roiling. | 02:10 |
| * gpc learned me something new today. | 02:10 | |
| bazhang | you doubted? | 02:10 |
| gpc | I didn't | 02:11 |
| gpc | I needed explaining | 02:11 |
| rww | I keep trying to read gpc as "General Protection F... meh". | 02:11 |
| * persia idly wonders if it makes sense to have a special channel to discuss debian naming conventions, japanese cooking, and people's nicknames | 02:12 | |
| rww | if only there were an offtopic channel for the Ubuntu namespace... >.> | 02:13 |
| Jordan_U | #ubuntu-optopic? | 02:13 |
| maco | but the person who lives in japan *looks at persia* isnt in the offtopic channel | 02:13 |
| maco | (i think) | 02:13 |
| persia | There's a reason for that :p | 02:14 |
| * maco tries to tab him | 02:14 | |
| maco | right yeah, not there | 02:14 |
| rww | gpc: anyways. I kinda wished they were too, except that then I realized that that would be yet another rule being pushed on LoCo channels, and also easily-abusable. | 02:14 |
| rww | although, was the old freenode behavior essentially all channels being +F? I forget. | 02:14 |
| marienz | I think so, yes | 02:15 |
| gpc | rww: yeah, but there has to be some way of making it so a Parent Channel can forward to Child Channel. something like a namespace forward I guess | 02:15 |
| persia | I'm really not sure that's ideal. | 02:15 |
| persia | There's many times when we want to send someone to a LoCo channel, but forcing them there seems less freindly. | 02:16 |
| gpc | there would be less abuse I would hope | 02:16 |
| gpc | there are many times that no matter how much we try to explain how to get to the LoCo channel the user just does not get it | 02:16 |
| rww | persia: more friendly than +qing them because they don't understand the concept of "no $lang in #ubuntu" after 10 minutes of trying :( | 02:16 |
| persia | rww, I don't think so. I think the /query has a personal flavour which folk appreciate. | 02:17 |
| persia | I also think the wealth of !cc factoids help direct folk | 02:17 |
| gpc | I forced forward will be "unfriendly" at first but then the user will realize where they are and I hope understand. | 02:17 |
| bazhang | unless its usuario | 02:17 |
| gpc | s/I/A/ | 02:18 |
| persia | Consider that the user may be using IRC for the first time, and Ubuntu for the first time, and have no idea what happened: force-forwarding them may cause them to expect that to happen again, which ends up for more work for #ubuntu ops. | 02:18 |
| gpc | so us being forced to +q the user where all they see is a message in English telling them They can't send to channel is better? | 02:19 |
| rww | persia: good point | 02:19 |
| gpc | a gentle kick in the butt to the correct channel is less annoying then not understanding why they aren't getting any help at all | 02:19 |
| rww | reminds me of the people that think the way to get to their channel is to /join #ubuntu, type #ubuntu-cc, and then click it. | 02:20 |
| persia | gpc, Well, if we've done the l10n work correctly in the clients, the message isn't in English. | 02:20 |
| persia | rww, Some of those folk are autojoining #ubuntu because of default client config | 02:20 |
| persia | Might be worth trying to define some master list of #ubuntu-cc channels, and configuring all the clients to reference this list to send people to appropriate local channels rather than #ubuntu by default. Of course, this presupposes the channels are staffed, etc. | 02:21 |
| rww | persia: either way, typing channels and clicking the typed name is suboptimal. is why I'm glad that an increasing number of !cc factoids have "type /join #ubuntu-cc to join" | 02:21 |
| gpc | why can't the client config be set to join the proper -country channel? | 02:21 |
| persia | gpc, Staffing, reliability, coverage, etc. | 02:21 |
| rww | also, I believe that LP bug on #ubuntu being too big had part of this discussion | 02:22 |
| persia | Some LoCo channels only get traffic a couple hours a week. | 02:22 |
| gpc | or join both #ubuntu and -loco | 02:22 |
| persia | Might be confusing for new folk for some clients, especially folk who are connecting the first time, and may not understand there are two channels. | 02:23 |
| gpc | So we are back to a new user being forced to an English channel where they get hit with !cc and don't understand what to do with it. | 02:24 |
| maco | i keep reading !cc as being a factoid about the Community Council | 02:24 |
| bazhang | hah | 02:24 |
| maco | oh good the power came back on | 02:25 |
| persia | Fine. Is "!${CC}" better? | 02:25 |
| persia | gpc, Unfortunately, there's no good solution, really. The best I've ever heard involves 1) creating some staffing requirements catalog to be on a whitelist of LoCo channels, 2) refactoring the code of every IRC client to use a shared whitelist for first login, and 3) maintaining and monitoring this mess in a way that keeps everyone motivated. | 02:27 |
| persia | Even that only covers a subset | 02:27 |
| gpc | there is a good solution. add a feature to the ircd where all ops of channels in namespace can forward to any other channel in namespace | 02:29 |
| gpc | the ops can be trusted to not abuse this feature right? | 02:29 |
| persia | Not all ops for all channels, sadly. | 02:30 |
| persia | And further, it doesn't help the users to learn how not to require operator time | 02:30 |
| rww | I'm an op in #trollpit. I /join #ubuntu-rginoigfno, register it, +f it to #ubuntu, op up, and +f #trollpit to #ubuntu-rginoigfno | 02:30 |
| rww | assuming +f is transitive. I've never checked | 02:30 |
| gpc | group contact of namespace has to approve creation of #ubuntu-trollpit | 02:31 |
| persia | No it doesn't. | 02:31 |
| gpc | to prevent abuse | 02:31 |
| persia | group contact of namespace may request uncreation of #ubuntu-trollpit | 02:31 |
| gpc | yes it should | 02:31 |
| bazhang | that's a channel rww ? | 02:31 |
| rww | bazhang: probably not. I pressed random keys. | 02:31 |
| * persia has created 5 or 6 #ubuntu-foo channels, and never had to go through any approval procedures (although they were all justified, and I informed the IRCC, etc.) | 02:32 | |
| gpc | to avoid problems you stop it at the source, you don't wait for it to become an issue and then fix it. | 02:32 |
| gpc | persia: I am saying if there were such a feature as I described above | 02:32 |
| persia | Having to go through namespace contacts would so hugely get in my way for some things. | 02:32 |
| rww | and also be yet another hoop/rule for LoCo channels to have to deal with. we're trying to encourage them, not scare them off with orders. | 02:33 |
| persia | The last channel I created, I created to stop an argument: any delay would have been bad. It now usually has a population of 30-50, and is relatively calm. | 02:33 |
| gpc | ok so #channel-foo can be created but can't forward until approved | 02:34 |
| persia | I still don't think forwarding most users really helps them. | 02:34 |
| gpc | you don't issue !cc 60 times a day | 02:35 |
| gpc | perhaps | 02:35 |
| bazhang | there are only a tiny number of users that refuse knowingly to join their respective channels | 02:35 |
| persia | Indeed (and no, I only issue !cc 3-5 times a week) | 02:36 |
| bazhang | so imo, /msg the ordinary ones , as the channel scrolls by so fast for many to read | 02:36 |
| gpc | correct, but for that tiny few who don't "get it" it would be useful | 02:36 |
| bazhang | the really hardcore abusers usually get killed by idoru anyway | 02:37 |
| bazhang | kolo never did join #ubuntu-pl from what I can see | 02:38 |
| bazhang | he seems to be /msg'ing floodbot1 though | 02:39 |
| gpc | DaGeek247: How can we help you? | 04:35 |
| DaGeek247 | oh, i dont need help | 04:35 |
| gpc | ok, then | 04:36 |
| gpc | ... | 04:36 |
| Hobbsee | knome: as for why i'ts allowed in our repos, it's | 06:46 |
| Hobbsee | "because no one has complained loud enough in debian for it to be removed" | 06:46 |
| persia | Erm, that's not the only reason. | 06:47 |
| persia | There's oodles of stuff in the repos that was never in Debian. | 06:47 |
| Hobbsee | true that, but it's an autosync from debian | 06:48 |
| persia | Yeah, well. | 06:50 |
| elky | it's pretty much a guarantee that the complaints after its removal will be much greater. | 06:53 |
| persia | The trivial solution is some string changes to avoid worrisome words. | 06:58 |
| persia | Much like the hotbabe applet ended up being renamed and getting skinnable graphics, and then being acceptable. | 06:59 |
| topyli | there are probably numerous packages to change/remove if we go that route. what about jack the ripper for example? | 07:19 |
| topyli | very useful, and can be misused | 07:19 |
| topyli | where does it end? emacs? | 07:20 |
| bazhang | hehe | 07:20 |
| persia | topyli, You mean the "jack" package? The description there seems perfectly reasonable. | 07:20 |
| Tm_T | emacs is evil | 07:20 |
| topyli | grr i typed !jack in my shell. i irc too much | 07:21 |
| elky | lol | 07:21 |
| topyli | persia: apparently i don't mean jack | 07:22 |
| persia | What is "jack the ripper" then? | 07:23 |
| * persia thought it was the old name of the "jack" package, before it was cleaned up | 07:23 | |
| topyli | john :) | 07:23 |
| Jordan_U | persia: Jack the Ripper: nothing appropriate. | 07:23 |
| topyli | !info john | 07:23 |
| ubottu | john (source: john): active password cracking tool. In component main, is optional. Version 1.7.3.1-1 (maverick), package size 283 kB, installed size 800 kB | 07:23 |
| bazhang | john the ripper | 07:24 |
| persia | topyli, That clearly states "... a tool designed to help systems administrators to find weak ... passwords ...", which is key to ensuring your systems are secure. | 07:24 |
| topyli | it does say admin yes | 07:24 |
| persia | The key is phrasing and presentation. The same code can be a 1337 7001 or a systems management essential. | 07:25 |
| elky | You can't approach things differently to black hat and think you're going to succeed as a white hat | 07:25 |
| persia | Yes you can. The PR team for white hats describe things clearly. The PR team for black hats provide obfuscation and deniability. | 07:26 |
| persia | Mind you, the code and engineering practices are the same. | 07:26 |
| elky | that's not approach... | 07:26 |
| * topyli goes through packages mentioning 'crack' :) | 07:26 | |
| topyli | the description of fcrackzip is neutral. 'able to crack password protected zip files with brute force...' ophcrack is similar, just tells you what it does. sipcrack is similar | 07:31 |
| topyli | aircrack-ng actually has the most whitehatted description :) | 07:32 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, hi | 08:02 |
| Garzooka | hello | 08:03 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, thanks for joining; you are currently +q in #ubuntu after being repeatedly asked to stay on topic, and not doing so. | 08:03 |
| * Garzooka is only 14 years old | 08:03 | |
| * rww sighs | 08:03 | |
| Garzooka | I have established that | 08:03 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, and you know that #ubuntu is support only, correct? | 08:04 |
| Garzooka | correct | 08:04 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, so why continue on with the offtopic chat when repeatedly asked to stop | 08:04 |
| Garzooka | I was going to stop after that last off topic line that I said | 08:06 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, you stated clearly in the channel that you don't even use Ubuntu. | 08:06 |
| Garzooka | yeah but I like to help or attempt to help | 08:06 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, and as you don't use Ubuntu, and are only offtopic in #ubuntu , was a reason you needed to join there? | 08:06 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, being offtopic constantly is not a help, nor even an attempt to help. it's a busy channel and that just creates more noise. | 08:07 |
| Garzooka | to be able to use #ubuntu freely, because sometimes I do actually solve peoples issues | 08:08 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, I have yet to see an instance of you solving anyone's issues. | 08:08 |
| * Garzooka is autistic and is 14 | 08:08 | |
| rww | neither of which in any way excuse your behavior | 08:09 |
| Garzooka | well a few days ago in #freenode I helped someone, and in #windows I have helped people | 08:10 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, thats fine. | 08:10 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, as you no longer use Ubuntu, and cannot credibly stay on topic in #ubuntu , then is there a real reason for you to join there? | 08:11 |
| bazhang | gah | 08:11 |
| rww | popey: If I remember correctly, the above conversation is relevant to #ubuntu-uk's ops. | 08:11 |
| Tm_T | yup | 08:12 |
| bazhang | well I tried; first PM then asked him to come here. | 08:12 |
| Tm_T | also, I fail to see anything "autistic" on his behaviour | 08:12 |
| bazhang | his response to why he was offtopic constantly: "I wanted to see what would happen" | 08:12 |
| Garzooka | sorry I lost signal | 08:13 |
| hypatia | Garzooka: you're plenty old enough at 14 to understand that when someone asks you to stop something because it's outside the rules for a channel, that you should stop it | 08:14 |
| Garzooka | its what I do, I help people and sometimes forget what channel I am in | 08:14 |
| Garzooka | I know you see sometimes I just want to send one more off topic line then I stop | 08:15 |
| hypatia | Garzooka: so slow down, check what channel you're in | 08:15 |
| Garzooka | thats what I did right after I got +q | 08:16 |
| Garzooka | and now I feel realy annoyed | 08:18 |
| Garzooka | and need to come to a solution | 08:19 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, thats fine. | 08:20 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, as you have trouble knowing what channel you're in, now would be a good time to take a break from #ubuntu | 08:20 |
| * Garzooka has a bad feeling that his #ubuntu-uk ban may take longer then he wants it to | 08:20 | |
| Garzooka | I have I am not even in the channel | 08:21 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, okay that's fine. | 08:21 |
| Garzooka | I am starting to get fed up | 08:22 |
| Garzooka | with all this +q you banned stuff | 08:22 |
| bazhang | Garzooka, then best learn to follow channel rules. | 08:22 |
| Garzooka | its annoying, | 08:22 |
| hypatia | Garzooka: you might want to consider modifying the behavior which got you banned, then | 08:22 |
| rww | this ^ | 08:22 |
| bazhang | okay, I'm stepping back, thanks. | 08:23 |
| Garzooka | you see I want to be able to use irc freely and come to a solution todat | 08:23 |
| Garzooka | taday | 08:24 |
| Garzooka | today | 08:24 |
| rww | At some point, instead of dodging responsibility for your actions by ban-evading or mentioning your demographics or claiming you have a vast array of scripts that mimic problematic user behavior, etc., you should consider actually changing your behavior. | 08:24 |
| Garzooka | be sides I am aproching school now | 08:24 |
| Garzooka | I HAVE changed | 08:24 |
| Garzooka | you just dont know that | 08:24 |
| rww | The scrollback in #ubuntu does not agree with this claim. | 08:25 |
| Garzooka | anyway at school now seeya this afternoon | 08:25 |
| rww | Anyway, it's my bed time. 'night. | 08:25 |
| * popey sighs | 09:00 | |
| Tm_T | somehow I feel happy that I didn't used IRC in my early years (: | 09:02 |
| jussi | As per my -irc ML post of about 30 seconds ago.... | 09:06 |
| jussi | !+ubuntu+1 | 09:06 |
| ubottu | <reply> $curDevelLong is the codename for Ubuntu $curDevelNum - $curDevel is NOT released and is NOT stable - Discussion and support only in #ubuntu+1 | 09:06 |
| jussi | New bot features FTW :) | 09:06 |
| * popey chuckles at jussis mail | 09:12 | |
| popey | every time someone uses the phrase "went ahead" or "go ahead" it just makes me think of Office Space | 09:12 |
| popey | personal issue, sorry :) | 09:12 |
| Tm_T | popey: we love other's personal issues (:) | 09:20 |
| popey | \o/ | 09:20 |
| jussi | :D | 09:25 |
| popey | Further to the recent discussions about askubuntu and its "officialness" for mentioning in topics / factoids. I just noticed whilst filing a bug on launchpad that in the dialog where you put a description it suggests that if it's not a bug but a question then use answers.lp.net or askubuntu.com | 09:57 |
| tsimpson | for me "official" (generally) means it's listed on http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community | 09:59 |
| * popey files a bug to get that done | 10:02 | |
| Tm_T | jolly good | 10:05 |
| popey | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/708540 | 10:05 |
| popey | done | 10:05 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 708540 in ubuntu-website-content "askubuntu not listed as a support option" [Undecided,New] | 10:05 |
| ikonia | where is the change control and discussion about implimenting new features in ubottu | 10:39 |
| Tm_T | #ubuntu-bots-devel I would suppose | 10:40 |
| Tm_T | or -team | 10:40 |
| ikonia | unacceptable | 10:40 |
| ikonia | unacceptable | 10:40 |
| ikonia | it should be discussed on the mailing list and at council meetings before being put live into the ubuntu name space | 10:40 |
| ikonia | I disagree with the feature add, I am fed up of the double standards | 10:41 |
| ikonia | I "don't" disagree with the feature add I should say | 10:41 |
| topyli | ikonia: how does this feature make your life harder? | 11:15 |
| topyli | all developers are required to contact you if they add features their software. if you're interested in bot development, you're free to pay attention to what the developers do | 11:17 |
| * persia prefers separation of oversight of tool users and tool developers, to create implicit tension and incentives to meet targets. | 11:17 | |
| topyli | if a change fundamentally affects our work, i'm sure it'll be discussed | 11:18 |
| persia | Indeed, and the fear of that makes the bot devs more likely to choose implementations of new features so that we don't notice any regressions. | 11:23 |
| BajK_ | eh, what's this again -.- | 11:28 |
| topyli | apparently bajk is forwarded here from #ubuntu by maco, for an inappropriate quit message | 11:35 |
| Tm_T | yup | 11:41 |
| ikonia | topyli: sorry was away from keyboard, it doesn't make my life harder at all, I fully support it, I just don't agree with the implimentation to live without consultation, everything else has to go through the council, through the mailing lists, why is the bot features different | 11:41 |
| ikonia | topyli: it was agreed that bot features would not go live without agreement again after the ubottu messaging the channel feature that got put in and then removed | 11:41 |
| jrib | but I just saw bajk in #ubuntu | 11:42 |
| jrib | actually, he's there now | 11:42 |
| ikonia | BajK_: be with you in just a moment | 11:43 |
| topyli | jrib: #kubuntu, sorry | 11:43 |
| jrib | topyli: ah | 11:43 |
| BajK_ | okay | 11:43 |
| ikonia | topyli: won't hurt to explain either | 11:43 |
| ikonia | BajK_: just wanted to ask you to change your quit/part message, you got ban forwarded from the #kubuntu channel as it's a bit offensive | 11:43 |
| ikonia | hence why you ended up here and then had to join #ubuntu instead of #kubuntu | 11:44 |
| BajK_ | ikonia: my quit message? doesn't this revert to default? | 11:44 |
| BajK_ | when I use the uttons to part/quit? | 11:44 |
| ikonia | 15:56 -!- BajK_ [~quassel@HSI-KBW-078-042-050-068.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has quit [Quit: Stupid IRC and fucking Bots.] | 11:44 |
| ikonia | that one | 11:44 |
| ikonia | if you could remove that from your setup / not use that sort of language/content again, it would be appreciated | 11:44 |
| BajK_ | I did that manually using /quit since those stupid floodbots are so damn annoying and I couldnt do anything about it since this stone-age IRC protocol splits long messages up into other ones which triggers the spambot and, yeah. | 11:45 |
| BajK_ | but it should be "Quassel - chat comfortably, anywhere" since this is the default setup then | 11:45 |
| ikonia | ok - so could you please not use that sort of language or content in any form in the Ubuntu IRC name space please. | 11:45 |
| BajK_ | sure | 11:46 |
| BajK_ | sorry for boterhing | 11:46 |
| ikonia | ok, I'll remove the ban forward from #kubuntu for you | 11:46 |
| BajK_ | thx | 11:46 |
| ikonia | you're welcome to re-join #kubuntu now, but please try to keep your language and content in mind | 11:46 |
| ikonia | BajK_: you're also welcome to leave this channel now, but thank you for joining and resolving this | 11:49 |
| BajK_ | yep, was just busy writing a bug report, bye | 11:50 |
| bazhang | ugh my chanserv py chokes on death^ | 12:13 |
| bazhang | if someone else wants to take a look, feel free | 12:15 |
| bazhang | death^> bazhang, sorry what is the topic again ? yesterday i smoked some kind of heavy buds, it was like rm -rf | 12:16 |
| bazhang | may want to keep an eye on -ot as its moved there | 12:21 |
| Tm_T | ...that didn't go well | 12:40 |
| ikonia | topyli: if you want him back in the channel, you can remove the ban at your lesure | 12:40 |
| gp5st | why was i banned from #ubuntu? | 12:47 |
| gp5st | last i as there i asked a question, then realized i was told wrong and i had a debian vm not an ubuntu one and moved over to the right irc channel | 12:47 |
| ikonia | I thought I'd removed that, apologies | 12:58 |
| ikonia | fixed now | 12:59 |
| bazhang | ugh | 14:37 |
| h00k | bazhang: I concur | 15:01 |
| === mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
| ikonia | can we please look at closing #ubuntu-uds ? | 16:29 |
| Pici | ikonia: Is it active? | 16:31 |
| ikonia | it's open to join with people in, but no activity | 16:31 |
| * jpds files under 'Mostly Harmless'. | 16:32 | |
| ikonia | it's not the end of the world | 16:32 |
| ikonia | totally harmless, just seems right to close it until use | 16:32 |
| ubottu | In ubottu, biiter said: thanks.. thx is rude? | 16:43 |
| * Pici talks to biiter | 16:44 | |
| charlie-tca | just got to open #ubuntu-uds again in a couple of months ;-) | 16:46 |
| === administ1ator is now known as Rannger | ||
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (kunwon2 appears to be abusive - 4.5) | 19:50 |
| ubottu | natt called the ops in #ubuntu () | 21:28 |
| ubottu | natt called the ops in #ubuntu () | 21:28 |
| bazhang | trolling multiple channels | 21:28 |
| Pici | bazhang: then I won't waste my time with him. Thanks. | 21:30 |
| bazhang | Pici, -v in #defocus then went on a rampage | 21:30 |
| guntbert | just for your info: natt got himself quieted in #freenode and devoiced in #defocus.... | 21:31 |
| bazhang | guntbert, yep thanks! :) | 21:31 |
| guntbert | you're welcome :-) | 21:32 |
| bazhang | * natt has quit (K-Lined) | 21:33 |
| bazhang | windows releases in iso? | 21:43 |
| Jordan_U | bazhang: MSDN network (legally) | 21:46 |
| bazhang | Jordan_U, yep. wonder if thats where philip_ got his | 21:46 |
| Jordan_U | Doubt it ;) | 21:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!