[01:17] that's funny that you mention him persia, i thought about him yesterday or the day before and was thinking about asking him how things were going (not that i completely understand all of it) [15:17] hey quadrispro [15:17] quadrispro: thanks for all your work so far on ladish [16:31] holstein: since you have testing the -lowlatency kernel can you respond to this email: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2011-January/002931.html [16:31] holstein: if you could, please describe the performance of the -generic kernel comapred with alessio's -lowlatency kernel [16:32] i did so already at the bottom of the thread to help people understand how much improvement this kernel gives for audio work [16:34] it would be appreciated if anyone else has experience with the performance improvement derived from abogani's -lowlatency kernel and would respond to the email thread linked above [16:34] ailo__: ^^^^ ? [16:34] Yeah, what's up scott-work? [16:35] I've been reading a little about the discussions earlier, but haven't had the time to get fully informed. [16:37] We can't compare with the -generic until it can do realtime [16:37] Unless we compare with an older system, like Maverick [16:50] I'm not clear on when the -generic will include the patch that gives us rtprio again [17:01] ailo__: good point, i should append my email to mention that [17:01] :( [17:25] scott-work: i saw that [17:25] the email [17:34] holstein: did you ever test firewire without rt and no audio group? [17:34] ailo__: i thought we did [17:34] I know tanders did [17:34] ailo__: i need to make better notes with these tests [17:34] ans we go [17:34] But, just to be perfectly sure. [17:34] as* [17:34] wont have time till maybe saturday [17:35] I guess we should have made a testing table [17:35] ailo__: we could just have a google doc [17:35] or something [17:35] so we dont forget what happened [17:35] Sure. Maybe arrange that for next release, just to cover the basics when testing [17:37] somethine for the 2 of us at least next time we are testing [17:37] I mean, of course we could do it before too, but then we don't need to think as much when we do the tests. Volunteers can just follow the table. I know there's a wiki page devoted to that, but we should form a definitive documentation for testers [17:37] I think more people would join in if they got clear instructions [17:38] agreed [17:41] i absolutely agree with that as well [17:41] scott-work: i was actually trying not to respond to that email [17:42] oh, okay [17:42] i feel like all of that has been covered [17:42] several times [17:42] like you said [17:42] i agree, it is frustrating [17:42] i might just add how easy it is to test them [17:42] and what i have found performance wise [17:42] that would be good :) [17:44] anyways... BBL [18:27] holstein: awesome email :)