[01:17] <ScottL> that's funny that you mention him persia, i thought about him yesterday or the day before and was thinking about asking him how things were going (not that i completely understand all of it)
[15:17] <falktx> hey quadrispro
[15:17] <falktx> quadrispro: thanks for all your work so far on ladish
[16:31] <scott-work> holstein: since you have testing the -lowlatency kernel can you respond to this email:  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2011-January/002931.html
[16:31] <scott-work> holstein: if you could, please describe the performance of the -generic kernel comapred with alessio's -lowlatency kernel
[16:32] <scott-work> i did so already at the bottom of the thread to help people understand how much improvement this kernel gives for audio work
[16:34] <scott-work> it would be appreciated if anyone else has experience with the performance improvement derived from abogani's -lowlatency kernel and would respond to the email thread linked above
[16:34] <scott-work> ailo__: ^^^^ ?
[16:34] <ailo__> Yeah, what's up scott-work?
[16:35] <ailo__> I've been reading a little about the discussions earlier, but haven't had the time to get fully informed.
[16:37] <ailo__> We can't compare with the -generic until it can do realtime
[16:37] <ailo__> Unless we compare with an older system, like Maverick
[16:50] <ailo__> I'm not clear on when the -generic will include the patch that gives us rtprio again
[17:01] <scott-work> ailo__: good point, i should append my email to mention that
[17:01] <scott-work> :(
[17:25] <holstein> scott-work: i saw that
[17:25] <holstein> the email
[17:34] <ailo__> holstein: did you ever test firewire without rt and no audio group?
[17:34] <holstein> ailo__: i thought we did
[17:34] <ailo__> I know tanders did
[17:34] <holstein> ailo__: i need to make better notes with these tests
[17:34] <holstein> ans we go
[17:34] <ailo__> But, just to be perfectly sure. 
[17:34] <holstein> as*
[17:34] <holstein> wont have time till maybe saturday 
[17:35] <ailo__> I guess we should have made a testing table
[17:35] <holstein> ailo__: we could just have a google doc
[17:35] <holstein> or something
[17:35] <holstein> so we dont forget what happened
[17:35] <ailo__> Sure. Maybe arrange that for next release, just to cover the basics when testing
[17:37] <holstein> somethine for the 2 of us at least next time we are testing
[17:37] <ailo__> I mean, of course we could do it before too, but then we don't need to think as much when we do the tests. Volunteers can just follow the table. I know there's a wiki page devoted to that, but we should form a definitive documentation for testers
[17:37] <ailo__> I think more people would join in if they got clear instructions
[17:38] <holstein> agreed
[17:41] <scott-work> i absolutely agree with that as well
[17:41] <holstein> scott-work: i was actually trying not to respond to that email
[17:42] <scott-work> oh, okay
[17:42] <holstein> i feel like all of that has been covered
[17:42] <holstein> several times
[17:42] <holstein> like you said 
[17:42] <scott-work> i agree, it is frustrating
[17:42] <holstein> i might just add how easy it is to test them
[17:42] <holstein> and what i have found performance wise
[17:42] <scott-work> that would be good :)
[17:44] <holstein> anyways... BBL
[18:27] <scott-work> holstein: awesome email :)