[00:00] gjs? [00:00] Other applications like Songbird that use the XUL libs? [00:00] we're not making those libraries public, this has been discussed to death already [00:00] So remove the pkg-config files then [00:00] I'm curious why you would deliberately break those applications though [00:00] other applications using xulrunner have a supported way of loading the libraries which doesn't involve linking against them ;) [00:00] called the standalone XPCOM glue ;) [00:01] chrisccoulson, what about something like gjs that uses libmozjs directly? [00:01] wait [00:01] magcius: gjs isn't in natty ;) [00:01] why is the standard dynamic linker bad? [00:01] micahg, does it matter? [00:01] for that, it needs to do LD_LIBRARY_PATH and accept the risk that ABI might break [00:02] magcius, it's not ABI stable or versioned. libmozjs is shipped as part of the toolkit, not as a public library [00:02] chrisccoulson, that's quite possibly the dumbest decision I've heard [00:03] chrisccoulson, it is ABI stable, and it versioned. [00:03] magcius: when mozilla 506890 or mozilla 618381 is fixed, we'll revisit it [00:03] Mozilla bug 506890 in Build Config "Make it possible for Ubuntu to provide libmozjs.so as a system library" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506890 [00:03] Mozilla bug 618381 in JavaScript Engine "Add a version number to spidermonkey suitable for distributions and embeddings" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618381 [00:04] magcius, it isn't ABI stable and it isn't versioned. not sure where you got that idea from [00:04] in fact, it broke ABI just a couple of days ago, screwing up couchdb etc [00:06] chrisccoulson, with compartment stuff? [00:06] huh? [00:06] Was the breakage the introduction of the compartment stuff? [00:07] no [00:09] ok. [01:06] oh, talking about compartments, that has now broken couchdb again [01:06] so, 2 breaks in as many uploads [01:06] couchjs crashes on start, again === asac_ is now known as asac [06:47] chrisccoulson, simplest fix is to replace JS_NewGlobalObject(...) with JS_NewCompartmentAndGlobalObject(NULL, ...); [06:47] chrisccoulson, of course that doesn't get you any of the benefits of compartments [11:29] awww the daily failed to build again.. [12:02] DeeVee, oh, that's not good. and i only fixed them yesterday ;) [12:03] yeah :-P [12:03] went to update today, since it was said to be fixed.. and was like.. "oohhh damn..." [12:40] chrisccoulson, indeed, lot of red: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/ubuntu-mozilla-daily--ppa.html :( [12:56] fta - yeah, i only sorted those out yesterday. i'll fix them again in a bit [12:59] chrisccoulson, no pressure from me ;) [17:55] chrisccoulson, micahg: fyi, when you commit a +buildX version in a branch used for the dailies, the bot won't update it the reason is that get-orig-source is not able to produce a version >= to it until upstream bumps it [18:02] fta: usually those builds come once trunk has been bumped to the next minor revision, this time was unusual in that regard, but thanks for the warning [18:15] b'ah, tbird didn't build in the archive [18:15] missing build-dep [18:15] i really should test my uploads in a clean environment [18:15] it worked fine on my laptop ;) [18:16] chrisccoulson: you probably had curl installed [18:18] micahg - yeah, that's the problem. i seem to have pretty much everything installed on this machine! [18:18] * chrisccoulson fixes [20:44] chrisccoulson, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=49743 last comment [20:46] fta - yeah, i saw that. he posted the same on the mozilla bug too [20:46] oh [20:46] thanks [20:48] chrisccoulson, you pointed me to the moz bug, i pointed evan to it, he pointed me back to the chbug, then i did the same to you ;) [20:48] call me proxy [20:51] heh :-) [21:08] hello, everyone [21:09] what is wrong with ff-4.0 builds? [22:53] grrr, couchdb is driving me crazy [22:53] chrisccoulson, the mono guys found the problem [22:53] fta - oh? [22:55] oh, nice catch! [23:21] grrr, when will they fix the indicators?? they keep growing [23:21] yeah, that's really annoying