=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk] [09:51] pitti, hallo! [09:52] hey ara, wie gehts? [09:52] pitti, gut, danke :) [09:52] pitti, one question about 10.04.2 images [09:52] pitti, are they already building from -updates? [09:53] ara: no, still -proposed; it would be good to get some testing with those, to be able to verify eglibc [09:54] ara: I poked hard at -proposed to get as much verified as possible [09:54] * pitti looks at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html [09:54] casper, consolekit, dovecot, eglibc, grub2, samba, upstart [09:55] those are the ones that we need to verify still [09:55] pitti, :( [09:55] doing some testing on the current images would allow us to move casper, eglibc, grub2, and upstart to -update [09:55] pitti, we need to start testing full cert for 10.04.2 as soon as possible [09:55] s [09:55] ara: I thought you could do that with the current ones? [09:56] above 4 packages affect new installs as well, so if they work for them, they would be safe [09:57] pitti, we would prefer to do cert against -updates, as we need to make sure that we are not testing stuff that won't be in the final CDs [09:57] chicken-egg problem hten [09:57] yes [09:57] ara: well, we don't need a full cert run for those [09:57] just some test installs on any hardware [09:57] these aren't very hardware specific [09:58] pitti, yes, but we agreed with skaet that we would run full cert against 10.04.2 on all the hw that was certified for 10.04 [09:58] right [09:58] and we should [09:58] pitti, I will try to find people to verify those 4 [09:59] ara: that'd be great [10:03] pitti, would it be possible to build the CDs from -updates once debian-installer is verified? [10:04] we would run out of time if we can't start today [10:04] yes, definitively; once we know that the current CDs with -proposed work, we'll move base-files and d-i to -updates [10:04] ara: as for certification, the kernel is in -updates and is frozen now [10:04] ara: so with the current set of proposed packages I don't think that it'd hurt too much to do cert on those [10:05] I already killed all packages which won't make it to -updates in the next days [10:05] pitti, OK, good, so if we try a installation of the current CDs, would that work? [10:05] they are meant to work, yes [10:06] so you are not building from -updates until all those 6 are verified? [10:06] pitti: d-i has an explicit bug to verify as well as the regular updates [10:07] (DVDs should support installation using the maverick kernel) [10:07] so that does need actual testing [10:07] right, but that must be done using the -proposed builds [10:07] otherwise, chicken/egg [10:07] yes [10:08] I just mean it needs to be added to your list of packages from pending-sru that need verification [10:13] ara: I think we can switch over earlier, but I'd like to at least get d-i and eglibc into -updates (former requires testing proposed CDs, latter might affect certification) [10:13] ara: the rest can follow later, I think [10:14] I'd rather not switch until everything on the CDs has been verified [10:15] then we should do cert on the -proposed ones [10:16] I need to run out for ~ 2 hours for some errands [10:17] pitti, see you later!, thanks! [13:39] cjwatson, presumably a2 freeze is tuesday as normal ? [13:40] yeah, afaik === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf [21:16] fyi, all main NBS should now either have a bug, is actively being worked on or is waiting on powerpc [21:16] s# or # and/or # [21:49] re NBS> excepting the kernel of course (previously discussed) [22:34] aha [22:35] libgdata7 can be removed... for some reason the report said e-d-s needs it, but e-d-s built with libgdata11 on all archs [22:35] (removed now)