[00:00] hello, I have just been in the #ubuntu-classroom and I asked about a case [00:00] charlie-tca, ? [00:01] a particular bug? [00:01] yes , this [00:01] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/485067ç [00:01] ups [00:01] Launchpad bug 485067 in linux "wireless card malfunction" [Undecided,Confirmed] [00:01] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/485067 [00:01] he told me it was incomplete... but i dont know why [00:02] * penguin42 looks [00:03] txomon: OK, it was marked incomplete because he asked you to confirm it was still happening and to run that command, that I see you've run [00:04] yes [00:06] made it [00:07] txomon: I will subscribe to your bug, so I can follow it up [00:07] ok [00:07] I just submited a curious bug, [00:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/709955 [00:07] Launchpad bug 709955 in linux "03f0:241d Gobi wireless modem only works when rebooting from windows" [Undecided,New] [00:07] Yes, but jeromy asked to have the mainline kernel tested [00:07] is there anything missing there¿ [00:08] txomon: also, the kernel bug triager is overwhelmed by sheer numbers of bugs he gets. I can apologize that the ball got dropped on that bug. [00:09] txomon: you still have the system for bug 485067? [00:09] Launchpad bug 485067 in linux "wireless card malfunction" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485067 [00:10] oh, I just submited it with your instructions while u explained, so, I don't blame [00:10] charlie-tca, yes, I would have to take it from my sister ;) but yes [00:11] that new bug looks good to me. [00:12] im now in the computer (just 4 u to know) [00:12] new or old? [00:12] new [00:12] so I can submit more info [00:13] (the old one has a lot) [00:14] I don't want no more on it today. I think it has everything the kernel team needs, unless we have you test it in natty [00:14] and, I will leave that up to them... [00:18] ok, I think you have my mail there in launchpad, so dont hesitate in contacting me [00:19] (i'm spa and dont know if I spell correctly everything) [00:20] it's okay. Most of the time, we can read what you mean instead of how it got spelled :-) [00:20] I added a comment on the old bug. [00:21] and, since I only have a few bugs to follow, I will see it again in 3-4 weeks [00:25] txomon: thanks for your patience. [00:25] ok, I will install newly ubuntu [00:25] which one would u prefer? [00:25] an LTS or the latest? [00:25] on a separate partition, or for that 3G modem bug? [00:26] (it is just going to be for the bug) [00:26] the old one [00:26] You don't need to reinstall unless ubuntu is not there now. [00:26] for the modem one, I have the the latest [00:26] We just want to try a new kernel on it [00:27] charlie-tca, there isnt, so that is my question... ¿is it completely indiferent the ubuntu version? [00:27] then you should put maverick on, Ubuntu 10.10 [00:28] that gives you a better chance of things working right. [00:28] Or, you can just comment on the bug report that you no longer have that computer and save you a lot of work... [00:42] np I want to make posible for other people to use ubuntu easier [00:45] Thank you for doing that. [01:27] jibel: you around? [01:28] jibel: I'll catch up to you Monday then. questions about an old bug [01:35] Hey charlie-tca, I'm still there. What's the bug ? [01:35] bug 658900 [01:35] Launchpad bug 658900 in espeak "package espeak 1.43.03-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/658900 [01:35] * jibel looking [01:36] VarLogDistupgradTermlog.gz shows many errors starting about line 5556 [01:37] I never seen one that failed so much [01:39] hi, can you tell me if this is the correct way to express new features requierement? [01:39] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/709978 [01:39] Launchpad bug 709978 in empathy "empathy is not enought good in IRC chat" [Undecided,New] [01:40] Looks good to me, but let's see what someone else thinks, too. [01:42] charlie-tca, iirc update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin. was caused by a previous version of flash which broke the alternatives system. [01:42] * jibel now looking for the master bug [01:42] and that broke everything, then? [01:42] yep, duplicates are good for my karma :-) [01:42] yes, they are [01:42] charlie-tca, here is the master bug 429841 [01:43] Launchpad bug 429841 in flashplugin-nonfree "broken packaging: package flashplugin-nonfree failed to install/upgrade: (breaks upgrade)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/429841 [01:43] I sure appreciate you looking into it. [01:44] charlie-tca, especially at this time of the night, I should go to bed. [01:44] I don't know how you find this stuff, sometimes. but I sure am glad you are able to! [01:45] Thank you very much for doing that tonight [01:47] charlie-tca, memory training, I learn 500 bugs a day, and in 4 years of contribution to Ubuntu, I've been able to learn them all ;-) [01:48] whew! I wish I could say that. [01:48] I can say that, but I wish I could do that. [01:49] charlie-tca, okay, it's close to 0300AM, time to get some sleep. See you soon. [01:49] good night, jibel. And, thanks again [05:07] I want to know what else I can do about this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/654272 [05:07] Launchpad bug 654272 in gnome-games "Gnibbles cannot start new game. game score is initialized but the game splash (worm with green background) does not disappear" [Undecided,Confirmed] [05:08] How can it still be undecided? It renders the whole game unplayable :( [05:09] syntr, what do you mean by undecided? [05:10] hggdh» The level of importance [05:10] syntr, the way I see it, it is low. I will mark it so [05:10] hggdh» how is it low? When you install the game via apt you can't even use it [05:10] That would confuse anyone [05:11] It used to be included in the default distribution [05:12] hum. I agree. Medium is more correct [05:14] syntr, you might now go to http://bugzilla.gnome.org, and try to find a bug matching this [05:15] hggdh» It's ubuntu-specific. works fine on non-ubuntu distributions. It's probably just a packaging mistake [05:16] syntr, same version, same modification level? [05:16] modification level? [05:16] fix level. Patches applied. [05:20] syntr, additionally, this package is in Universe -- not in the default (main) repository. It might have been demoted, IDK, but it is *not* in main [05:22] hggdh» yes, it was demoted. Ubuntu has removed a lot of gnome-games with each iteration of the OS [05:23] but just because it's in the universe repository doesn't mean no one will ever find it lol [05:24] I did not say that. [05:26] *YOU* can help. Try to find out what is wrong. I know for a fact it works on Natty (current devel). You state it does not work in Maverick [05:26] So something changed from before Maverick to Maverick, and something changed again from Maverick to Natty. [05:27] these are good points to start your search [05:27] but just caming in here and complaining is really not going to help [05:28] I did try a while ago when I still had ubuntu on my main machine...but not being a developer I had no clue what to do other than reinstall [05:28] actually, in any big project things are overlooked so it helps to a point :) [05:29] indeed. But, even better than just point is to actually go and try to find the issues, and work out a fix [05:29] syntr: it was demoted after karmic [05:30] micahg» yeah. Ubuntu has been becoming more of a "serious" distro :) [05:31] syntr: that's not it, as space is needed on the CD I think games were the first thing to do [05:31] s/do/go [05:31] oh, maybe that as well. it is nice to be able to use a CD, as some distros require a dvd [05:32] syntr: I think Ubuntu is trying hard to make sure the final releases still fit on a CD [05:32] micahg, this is indeed correct [05:33] * hggdh considers it sort of a waste of time. CDs are already obsolete [05:33] it's more of an arbitary line [05:33] keeps the os nice and tight [05:33] and lean [05:33] syntr: If I backport the version from natty to my PPA, would you be able to test and see if anything has been fixed? [05:33] hggdh» I did try to make it work for about an hour. I tried deleting the title-screen SVG among other things....I had no clue how to compile from source or even read the source...I eventually gave up but the e-mail notifications brought it back to my attention [05:34] micahg» absolutely :D [05:34] * hggdh goes hit the bed. Tempus fugit [05:38] micahg» what's a PPA? [05:38] syntr: personal package archive [05:38] err, a straight backport won't work :-/ [05:39] :( [05:39] syntr: it's ok, I found a way to do it [05:46] syntr: I assume you're on maverick? [05:47] micahg» Not at the moment...I'm installing it in a VM on another machine right now. [05:47] syntr: ah, which release are you on? [05:48] * micahg is uploading for maverick ATM to a PPA [05:48] lol not sure if Windows counts as a release. I'm on my laptop...but I'll be ready in like 15 minutes on the other computer [05:48] ok, np will probably take longer than that to build [05:49] alright. I have all night :D thanks for trying to help :) [05:52] syntr: should be ready in about an hour ppa:micahg/ppa [06:03] micahg» sudo add-apt-repository ppa:micahg/ppa , right? [06:03] syntr: yes [06:52] micahg» how will I know when it's ready? [06:52] syntr: i386 is ready [06:54] micahg» I'm sorry...never used ppa...don't really know how to tell it to install yours [06:54] syntr: my version is higher than the archive version, so it'll be chosen [06:55] oh, ok [06:58] Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/universe gnibbles i386 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 [358kB] ... displays a white screen going in. Does not continue past New Game [06:58] syntr-vb: you need to update your apt-cache to see my version [06:59] via sudo apt-get update? [06:59] done so :| [06:59] syntr-vb: can you pastebin apt-cache policy gnibbles [07:01] micahg: http://pastebin.com/v7DK8gpU [07:01] syntr-vb: try to update again, it's not showing up yet for you [07:02] micahg: did sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade [07:02] no updates available [07:03] syntr-vb: hmm, not published yet, give it another 30 minutes or so [07:03] is there a way to be notified? [07:04] syntr-vb: not that I know of [07:04] ok [07:05] syntr-vb: you could run: watch -n600 'sudo apt-get update && apt-cache policy gnibbles' [07:05] update and show you what packages are available every 10 minutes [07:06] cool :D [07:06] yeah, I definitely added you right because I have "Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release.gpg" [07:29] micahg» can't I just download the .deb files on the site? [07:30] syntr: it's not updated yet? [07:30] weird [07:40] micahg: Installed gnome-games-common.deb and gnibbles.deb, no change [07:40] I'm off to bed, I don't know why it still doesn't work :/ [07:41] syntr-vb: I don't know then, maybe get a backtrace where it fails? [07:42] I don't know what that means [07:42] I'll be back tomorrow :D === fenris- is now known as ejat [09:39] can someone check: https://bugs.launchpad.net/totem/+bug/705361 [09:39] Launchpad bug 705361 in totem "movie player "take screenshot" not working" [Undecided,Incomplete] [09:39] and set to triaged if everything looks right =) === yofel_ is now known as yofel === AbhiJit is now known as AbhijiT [18:37] I am trying to debug a possible crash in evince but running 'sudo gdb evince' '(gdb) run' outputs Starting program: /usr/bin/evince [18:37] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [18:37] No protocol specified [18:37] Cannot parse arguments: Cannot open display: [18:37] Program exited with code 01. [18:37] any ideas? [18:40] bbordwell: Can you run evince as root anyway? e.g. just do sudo evince? [18:41] penguin42, ah that does not work....thats the problem, but gdb requires root privileges now... [18:41] bbordwell: Why not just use 'gdb evince'? There is no need to be root to debug something. [18:41] bbordwell: are you sure it needs root? [18:42] bbordwell: I know it stops you attaching to a separate process - but it should let you run something directly? [18:43] penguin42, ah yes sorry i have not had internet for some time so i am rusty....gdb only needs root to attach to a process. [18:43] thanks [18:43] bbordwell: It's fairly easy to reenable attach as well [18:51] hmm i looked at my backtrace to make sure i have all the -dbgsym packages and I found something strange, has anyone ever seen something like this? #38 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () [18:55] that looks like an invalid 64bit address? [18:58] yofel, does that make the backtrace unusable? [18:59] no idea, I don't look at that many backtraces, depends where it is I guess [19:04] alright i will just attach i to the bug report and see what the devs t hink [19:27] GUI in natty is not starting after an update, how do I report a bug? [19:28] (In virtualbox BTW) [19:44] How should I report data-corruption bug related to cryptswap? As in against which package? [19:46] failsafe X is also failing to start [19:55] Which package generates /etc/crypttab during installation? It fails to account for device names changing between initial installation and next boot, thus creating a dataloss situation. [19:55] akshatj, already known afaik [19:55] ikt: ok [19:56] akshatj, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10410999#post10410999 [19:56] bi [19:56] nonix4: It's a bit silly for it to use device names rather than uuid's [19:56] wops, wrong thread [19:59] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1677834&page=2 [20:02] ikt: thanks [20:03] :)) [20:06] penguin42: debian-installer? [20:07] nonix4: If it's the normal installer on ubuntu it's ubiquity unless you used the alternate cd in which case I think it probably is debian-installer [20:08] penguin42: alternate cd it was, yup [20:09] nonix4: Yeh so I think but am not sure it's debian-installer [20:11] debian-installer package description says it only contains docs, hmm... well, guess I file against that for now and fix later :) [20:11] although it being dataloss... should it also be in releasenotes? [20:17] the panel and sidebar are gone :( [21:50] would it be wise to move this bug to the moonlight plugin? [21:50] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/703609 [21:50] Launchpad bug 703609 in totem "Cant playback a live stream video" [Undecided,Incomplete] [21:51] given that now it reports: The silverlight application is using DRM-protected content, which Moonlight does not support. [21:53] ikt: yeah, you can change it to moon, and ask the user to try moonlight-plugin-mozilla [22:08] I think bug 584067 should be marked as high importance because of the potential for severe data loss. [22:08] Launchpad bug 584067 in debian-installer "setting up swap encryption from alternate CD uses unstable device nodes" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/584067 [22:15] cheers micahg