[07:50] jdstrand_: e-d-s had a manual dependency on libgdata7, I fixed that over the weekend; CDs built again === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti [12:28] rolling new natty tarballs, btw [14:36] cjwatson, is there a rebuild of xubuntu desktop amd64 scheduled today? X segfaults on amd64 with the current image. [14:44] dunno [14:44] is there a reason to believe that a rebuild would fare any better? [14:53] cjwatson, bug 709977 has been fixed yesterday. other images are fine now and I wanted to verify that xubuntu was ok too. [14:54] Launchpad bug 709977 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in RemoveDevice() - segfault at 1010 error 4 in evdev_drv.so (affects: 37) (dups: 15) (heat: 214)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709977 [14:55] jibel: well, xubuntu desktop amd64 was already built this morning [14:55] and it contains that version [14:55] so I'm not sure why a rebuild would help, again :) [15:06] cjwatson, the images are syncing now, I tried earlier and there was no xubuntu desktop iso for today. weird. [15:09] pitti: re libgdata7. oh? I checked the build logs for e-d-s on all archs and it pulled in libgdata11. I am almost certain I did checkrdepends too, but it is possible I forgot the -b flag... [15:09] pitti: sorry about that. btw, where do you see that CD images are failing to build? [15:27] jdstrand_: right, it linked against libgdata11 (through shlibs:Depens), but had an obsolete additional libgdata7 dependency [15:28] jdstrand_: the release team gets the failed logs emailed [15:28] jdstrand_: don't worry, it was easy to fix, and a real bug anyway === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [15:28] pitti, speaking of which there was a merge request with the fix waiting on launchpad [15:29] seb128: dropping the dependency? [15:29] yes [15:29] * pitti closes [15:29] pitti: ok. I'll take a look at the last package to see what it did so I can try to not make the same mistake in the future [15:30] seb128: updated, thanks [15:30] thanks [15:31] pitti: should I get those u-r emails? are they to a list or just an alias/exploder? [15:32] jdstrand: I'm not sure, cjwatson would know more [15:34] manually maintained list [15:34] I can add you if you like [15:35] preferred address? [15:35] cjwatson: I took this to be a long term responsibility. as such, it seems like it would make sense so I can at least be more proactive in me reacting :) [15:36] cjwatson: jamie@canonical.com would be great [15:36] s/me/my/ [15:37] ok, thanks, done [15:38] cjwatson: thank you [17:11] pitti, cjwatson: sorry about being that picky about testing from -proposed before eglibc and d-i go into -updates. We want to find regressions if there are any, but it is a very expensive testing, so we wouldn't like to start testing, then validation failures are found on those packages, and we have to start all over again [17:12] ara: that's fine; that's why we have these meetings, to figure out what will work for everyone :) [17:12] * skaet nods [17:13] * pitti -> dinner [17:13] good night all [17:52] do we have any daily/daily-live images of Xubuntu lucid 10.04.2? [17:54] probably not at the moment, I can do some if they're going to be tested [18:03] Looks like Kubuntu live i386 on Lucid managed to get oversized. [18:03] Riddell: ^^^ thoughts on this? [18:05] remove a language pack I guess [18:06] there are none left on Kubuntu live :/ [18:06] except -en [18:06] you could drop language-support-en [18:06] Riddell: so the gvfs removal didn't help enough? [18:08] pitti: "lucid" [18:08] natty is fine [18:08] ah [18:10] Riddell: Did you kick off the powerpc rebuild in Natty? Curious how it's going. [18:10] still ongoing.. [18:14] Thanks. [18:23] cjwatson: I can wait for the iso testing, if you prefer [18:23] I asked because I couldn't find them, but if they are not there, it is okay today === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf [21:42] just FYI, I'm currently fixing LTSP in Ubuntu. I'll be uploading a new ldm now which should fix the biggest issue (non-working gnome). [21:43] I haven't tested installing LTSP from alternate yet but if it's broken, it'll likely be in ltsp itself and not ldm. Will test it tomorrow morning. === bjf is now known as bjf[afk]