[07:50] <pitti> jdstrand_: e-d-s had a manual dependency on libgdata7, I fixed that over the weekend; CDs built again
[12:28] <lamont> rolling new natty tarballs, btw
[14:36] <jibel> cjwatson, is there a rebuild of xubuntu desktop amd64 scheduled today? X segfaults on amd64 with the current image.
[14:44] <cjwatson> dunno
[14:44] <cjwatson> is there a reason to believe that a rebuild would fare any better?
[14:53] <jibel> cjwatson, bug 709977 has been fixed yesterday. other images are fine now and I wanted to verify that xubuntu was ok too.
[14:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 709977 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in RemoveDevice() - segfault at 1010 error 4 in evdev_drv.so (affects: 37) (dups: 15) (heat: 214)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709977
[14:55] <cjwatson> jibel: well, xubuntu desktop amd64 was already built this morning
[14:55] <cjwatson> and it contains that version
[14:55] <cjwatson> so I'm not sure why a rebuild would help, again :)
[15:06] <jibel> cjwatson, the images are syncing now, I tried earlier and there was no xubuntu desktop iso for today. weird.
[15:09] <jdstrand_> pitti: re libgdata7. oh? I checked the build logs for e-d-s on all archs and it pulled in libgdata11. I am almost certain I did checkrdepends too, but it is possible I forgot the -b flag...
[15:09] <jdstrand_> pitti: sorry about that. btw, where do you see that CD images are failing to build?
[15:27] <pitti> jdstrand_: right, it linked against libgdata11 (through shlibs:Depens), but had an obsolete additional libgdata7 dependency
[15:28] <pitti> jdstrand_: the release team gets the failed logs emailed
[15:28] <pitti> jdstrand_: don't worry, it was easy to fix, and a real bug anyway
[15:28] <seb128> pitti, speaking of which there was a merge request with the fix waiting on launchpad
[15:29] <pitti> seb128: dropping the dependency?
[15:29] <seb128> yes
[15:29]  * pitti closes
[15:29] <jdstrand> pitti: ok. I'll take a look at the last package to see what it did so I can try to not make the same mistake in the future
[15:30] <pitti> seb128: updated, thanks
[15:30] <seb128> thanks
[15:31] <jdstrand> pitti: should I get those u-r emails? are they to a list or just an alias/exploder?
[15:32] <pitti> jdstrand: I'm not sure, cjwatson would know more
[15:34] <cjwatson> manually maintained list
[15:34] <cjwatson> I can add you if you like
[15:35] <cjwatson> preferred address?
[15:35] <jdstrand> cjwatson: I took this to be a long term responsibility. as such, it seems like it would make sense so I can at least be more proactive in me reacting :)
[15:36] <jdstrand> cjwatson: jamie@canonical.com would be great
[15:36] <jdstrand> s/me/my/
[15:37] <cjwatson> ok, thanks, done
[15:38] <jdstrand> cjwatson: thank you
[17:11] <ara> pitti, cjwatson: sorry about being that picky about testing from -proposed before eglibc and d-i go into -updates. We want to find regressions if there are any, but it is a very expensive testing, so we wouldn't like to start testing, then validation failures are found on those packages, and we have to start all over again
[17:12] <pitti> ara: that's fine; that's why we have these meetings, to figure out what will work for everyone :)
[17:12]  * skaet nods
[17:13]  * pitti -> dinner
[17:13] <ara> good night all
[17:52] <charlie-tca> do we have any daily/daily-live images of Xubuntu lucid 10.04.2?
[17:54] <cjwatson> probably not at the moment, I can do some if they're going to be tested
[18:03] <ScottK> Looks like Kubuntu live i386 on Lucid managed to get oversized.
[18:03] <ScottK> Riddell: ^^^ thoughts on this?
[18:05] <Riddell> remove a language pack I guess
[18:06] <pitti> there are none left on Kubuntu live :/
[18:06] <pitti> except -en
[18:06] <pitti> you could drop language-support-en
[18:06] <pitti> Riddell: so the gvfs removal didn't help enough?
[18:08] <Riddell> pitti: "lucid"
[18:08] <Riddell> natty is fine
[18:08] <pitti> ah
[18:10] <ScottK> Riddell: Did you kick off the powerpc rebuild in Natty?  Curious how it's going.
[18:10] <Riddell> still ongoing..
[18:14] <ScottK> Thanks.
[18:23] <charlie-tca> cjwatson: I can wait for the iso testing, if you prefer
[18:23] <charlie-tca> I asked because I couldn't find them, but if they are not there, it is okay today
[21:42] <stgraber> just FYI, I'm currently fixing LTSP in Ubuntu. I'll be uploading a new ldm now which should fix the biggest issue (non-working gnome).
[21:43] <stgraber> I haven't tested installing LTSP from alternate yet but if it's broken, it'll likely be in ltsp itself and not ldm. Will test it tomorrow morning.